Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. No Browns Today, So.... Whoyawatchin?

No Browns Today, So.... Whoyawatchin?

The Browns Board
74 19 1.4k
  • TypicalBrowns50T TypicalBrowns50

    Steelers looked like garbage against a team that is garbage. Good sighting 

    VagitronV Vagitron wrote on
    #50

    @typicalbrowns50 said:

    Steelers looked like garbage against a team that is garbage. Good sighting 

    Yep, terrible game. However good teams find a way to win. We are 8-0. What's your record again? 

    AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month)
    GorkaG 1 Reply
    👍
  • Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on
    #51

    The roughing call was "by the book".

    ***sigh**

    Such is the state of our game.

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
    👍
  • Tour2maT Tour2ma

    The roughing call was "by the book".

    ***sigh**

    Such is the state of our game.

    VagitronV Vagitron wrote on
    #52

    @tour2ma said:

    The roughing call was "by the book".

    ***sigh**

    Such is the state of our game.

    Yep, it was pretty weak but that's a flag everytime. The NFL needs full time refs and certain things should be determined via their discretion. 

    AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month)
    I Tour2maT 2 Replies
    👍
  • CLEVELANDwantsPLAYOFFSC CLEVELANDwantsPLAYOFFS wrote on
    #53

    Dolphins and Raiders are both good. And then there is the Colts. It will be an interesting wildcard race.

    I 1 Reply
  • U Unsympathetic

    I love Scotch.  Scotchy scotch scotch.  Here it goes down, down into my belly.

    20201108_170330.jpg

    Don't act like you're not impressed!

    Broiling a few pounds of steak tips for the week's lunches.. nothing like getting a buzz on while flipping steak.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #54

    @unsympathetic said:

    I love Scotch.  Scotchy scotch scotch.  Here it goes down, down into my belly.

    20201108_170330.jpg

    Don't act like you're not impressed!

    Broiling a few pounds of steak tips for the week's lunches.. nothing like getting a buzz on while flipping steak.

    I'm impressed.

  • Canton MikeC Canton Mike

    I went fishin' with a buddy on 2 ponds he recently got permission to fish. I got the only fish...5 undersized bluegill. I shoulda stayed home drinking beer & watching football! Oh well, at least I didn't miss a Browns' game & I DID get outside on a beautiful day.

    Mike

    I Icecube wrote on
    #55

    @canton-mike said:

    I went fishin' with a buddy on 2 ponds he recently got permission to fish. I got the only fish...5 undersized bluegill. I shoulda stayed home drinking beer & watching football! Oh well, at least I didn't miss a Browns' game & I DID get outside on a beautiful day.

    Mike

    Bluegill? LOL. I remember those. The pond down my street was full of them. 

  • CLEVELANDwantsPLAYOFFSC CLEVELANDwantsPLAYOFFS

    Dolphins and Raiders are both good. And then there is the Colts. It will be an interesting wildcard race.

    I Icecube wrote on
    #56

    @clevelandwantsplayoffs said:

    Dolphins and Raiders are both good. And then there is the Colts. It will be an interesting wildcard race.

    Boy, Pitt was getting the piss beat out of them. Ben took a hellacious shot. Raiders ain't no joke. They aren't rock solid but they can beat anyone. 

  • VagitronV Vagitron

    @tour2ma said:

    The roughing call was "by the book".

    ***sigh**

    Such is the state of our game.

    Yep, it was pretty weak but that's a flag everytime. The NFL needs full time refs and certain things should be determined via their discretion. 

    I Icecube wrote on
    #57

    @vagitron said:

    Yep, it was pretty weak but that's a flag everytime. The NFL needs full time refs and certain things should be determined via their discretion. 

    The hand hit the head, didn't cause any impact. It's just how it is now, you touch QB's face mask, flag. 

  • VagitronV Vagitron

    @tour2ma said:

    The roughing call was "by the book".

    ***sigh**

    Such is the state of our game.

    Yep, it was pretty weak but that's a flag everytime. The NFL needs full time refs and certain things should be determined via their discretion. 

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on
    #58

    @vagitron said:

    Yep, it was pretty weak but that's a flag everytime. The NFL needs full time refs and certain things should be determined via their discretion. 

    Cool we agree...

    Now let's talk about the Vander Esch "retaliation" that never landed and Smith's ticky-tac, illegal contact. 😉

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
    VagitronV 1 Reply
  • Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on
    #59

    As for SNF...

    Talk about a beat-down...

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
  • VagitronV Vagitron

    @typicalbrowns50 said:

    Steelers looked like garbage against a team that is garbage. Good sighting 

    Yep, terrible game. However good teams find a way to win. We are 8-0. What's your record again? 

    GorkaG Gorka wrote on
    #60

    @vagitron said:

    Yep, terrible game. However good teams find a way to win. We are 8-0. What's your record again? 

    Steelers manhandled up front two weeks in a row...couldn't run the ball, couldn't stop the run.

    👍
  • GorkaG Gorka

    @vagitron said:

    Yep, terrible game. However good teams find a way to win. We are 8-0. What's your record again? 

    Steelers manhandled up front two weeks in a row...couldn't run the ball, couldn't stop the run.

    jiggins7919J jiggins7919 wrote on
    #61

    @gorka said:

    Steelers manhandled up front two weeks in a row...couldn't run the ball, couldn't stop the run.

    I don't even see how that's possible. Steelers looked so completely dominant on both sides of the LoS....it was crazy. Of course, their defensive pressure essentially won the game for them, which is going to be the primary difference between our teams. They can rely on their defense to win them some games. If our defense HAS to make a stop...well...we tried. Lol. 

    The GipperT Tour2maT 2 Replies
  • jiggins7919J jiggins7919

    @gorka said:

    Steelers manhandled up front two weeks in a row...couldn't run the ball, couldn't stop the run.

    I don't even see how that's possible. Steelers looked so completely dominant on both sides of the LoS....it was crazy. Of course, their defensive pressure essentially won the game for them, which is going to be the primary difference between our teams. They can rely on their defense to win them some games. If our defense HAS to make a stop...well...we tried. Lol. 

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #62

    @jiggins7919 said:

    I don't even see how that's possible. Steelers looked so completely dominant on both sides of the LoS....it was crazy. Of course, their defensive pressure essentially won the game for them, which is going to be the primary difference between our teams. They can rely on their defense to win them some games. If our defense HAS to make a stop...well...we tried. Lol. 

    Well, I think it is fair to say that the Steelers invested heavily into LB corps.   At least 3  First round picks there.  The Browns? Quite the opposite. Takitaki taken in round 3 is their highest pick playing. (Wilson round 5).

    Only  first round picks on Browns defense are   Garrett and Ward.

    So, you say, we must have gone with offense with all our first rounders?   Well, no.  The only first round picks starting of offense are  Mayfield and Wills.   Njoku, round one backup.  (Beckham traded for  2 first rounders...including Peppers) 

    In addition to the OBJ trade,  this is the legacy of having so many busts chosen in round one.  

    👍
  • jiggins7919J jiggins7919

    @gorka said:

    Steelers manhandled up front two weeks in a row...couldn't run the ball, couldn't stop the run.

    I don't even see how that's possible. Steelers looked so completely dominant on both sides of the LoS....it was crazy. Of course, their defensive pressure essentially won the game for them, which is going to be the primary difference between our teams. They can rely on their defense to win them some games. If our defense HAS to make a stop...well...we tried. Lol. 

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on
    #63

    @jiggins7919 said:

    I don't even see how that's possible. Steelers looked so completely dominant on both sides of the LoS....it was crazy.

    And yet...

    image.png.2b77dfe8073eda80c239be46478db406.png

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
    jiggins7919J gumby73G VagitronV 3 Replies
    👍
  • Tour2maT Tour2ma

    @jiggins7919 said:

    I don't even see how that's possible. Steelers looked so completely dominant on both sides of the LoS....it was crazy.

    And yet...

    image.png.2b77dfe8073eda80c239be46478db406.png

    jiggins7919J jiggins7919 wrote on
    #64

    @tour2ma said:

    And yet...

    image.png.2b77dfe8073eda80c239be46478db406.png

    I meant dominant all year, not that game obviously. Then again, when it mattered, the Steelers defense won the game. Their pass rush is no joke. 

    VagitronV 1 Reply
  • U Unsympathetic wrote on
    #65

    We are in a division with 2 teams who don't miss on 1st [and usually but not always 2nd] round picks.  There is no immediate solution -- you absolutely cannot solve this in one offseason unless you're trading with Bill O'Brien, who would have given us a first-rounder for Elliot.  Steelers are 9-0 because they just.don't.miss on high draft picks.. 9 times out of 10 go OL/DL, even if already a strength.  And look where we are yet again this offseason.. We need to go back to drafting D [I'd like LB in the first, we'll see if one falls] and only small-bore targeted FA because.. the Dorsey Experience showed us that signing [or trading for!] lots of FA is not the answer to any question other than "How would you like to waste cap space and be wildly unproductive"

    Last 3 steeler drafts and compare with depth chart -- All 2020 made the team, in 2019 one 6th one 7th rounders aren't on the team, in 2018 the 3rd [qb], 6th, and 7th aren't on the team.

    Similar stuff with ravens -- and note that they're finding multiple NFL-quality starters in rounds 5,6.  So it IS possible to find players there.. you just have to be actually good at evaluation and development of people and not just parroting conventional wisdom from Mel Faker.

    One thing that's often missed in discussions regarding why our drafting "isn't good" -- very few first-rounders [let alone further down] come into the league fully developed with zero coaching needed to improve traits/flexibility etc.  Our coaching staff has simply not been good at this for quite a long time.. so even if we drafted a "good" player, if you wonder why he didn't become even more better, that's 100% on the terrible coaching rather than purely on the player ! 

    This affects Browns lower-round draft results -- no coaching up 5th rounders to a productive swing OL, a productive spot LB starter, etc.

    "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." Paul Brown
  • Tour2maT Tour2ma

    @jiggins7919 said:

    I don't even see how that's possible. Steelers looked so completely dominant on both sides of the LoS....it was crazy.

    And yet...

    image.png.2b77dfe8073eda80c239be46478db406.png

    gumby73G gumby73 wrote on
    #66

    @tour2ma said:

    And yet...

    image.png.2b77dfe8073eda80c239be46478db406.png

    from what i'm hearing.. Ben has injuries to both knees on the same play..  Won't practice till Friday & still should get start with Bengals.. After Ben's injury.. The Steelers coaching staff protected Ben by only calling 1 running play in the 3Q.. And 1 running play in 4Q... Only until 1:37 seconds left in the 4th. J.Conner carried 3 times to run down some clock... "Living on the Edge" 

    Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends
    VagitronV 1 Reply
  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #67

    Well,  I have been peaking in on  the MNF game.

    Jets actually lead Pats by a TD with about 6 minutes left.

    I think they are playing Joe Flacco at QB. 

  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #68

    Jets blow it as you might’ve expected.

  • Tour2maT Tour2ma

    @vagitron said:

    Yep, it was pretty weak but that's a flag everytime. The NFL needs full time refs and certain things should be determined via their discretion. 

    Cool we agree...

    Now let's talk about the Vander Esch "retaliation" that never landed and Smith's ticky-tac, illegal contact. 😉

    VagitronV Vagitron wrote on
    #69

    @tour2ma said:

    Cool we agree...

    Now let's talk about the Vander Esch "retaliation" that never landed and Smith's ticky-tac, illegal contact. 😉

    Off the rip I thought he punched him in the helmet. He didn't which I was happy to see as I've always like Vander Esch. However that being said the guy that retaliates almost always gets the flag. It's no different than the "hit" on Ben. As I said before Ben had his nose broken once and no flag. Sooooo if the NFL officiating is anything it's inconsistent. Vander Esch needs to be smarter there, period. 

    AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month)
    Tour2maT 1 Reply
Log in to reply