Skip to content

Big Ben sets new record

The Browns Board
81 17 1.5k 1
  • He is the only qb to start 9-0 and get away with rape.

  • I posted something on here earlier, not sure where to find it,   but the last  like 13 teams that were the last to suffer a loss in a season have NOT won the Super Bowl.   You have to go back to 2006 and the Colts to find one that did. 

  • They crying all over pukeberg sports radio that raplisberger isnt in the discussion for mvp

  • They crying all over pukeberg sports radio that raplisberger isnt in the discussion for mvp

    @kvoethe said:

    They crying all over pukeberg sports radio that raplisberger isnt in the discussion for mvp

    There is a good reason....all he is doing is dinking and dunking.  I did a play by play search of one game wherein of over 30 passes he threw, only like 3 of them went over maybe 15 yards downfield in the air.  MVP means that he is the most instrumental person on a team for that team's success.  BR is not that. Not this year. 

  • They crying all over pukeberg sports radio that raplisberger isnt in the discussion for mvp

    @kvoethe said:

    They crying all over pukeberg sports radio that raplisberger isnt in the discussion for mvp

     I'm stuck in a delivery truck 6 hours a day listening to these steel-fag fans.. I know what your hearing ?...They all have their coattails hanging on Ben.. Without Ben? They'd still want Tomlin fired...stay tuned & f'em 

  • Fuck the rapist... Fuck their fans and Fuck their team... That is all!!

  • @kvoethe said:

    They crying all over pukeberg sports radio that raplisberger isnt in the discussion for mvp

    There is a good reason....all he is doing is dinking and dunking.  I did a play by play search of one game wherein of over 30 passes he threw, only like 3 of them went over maybe 15 yards downfield in the air.  MVP means that he is the most instrumental person on a team for that team's success.  BR is not that. Not this year. 

    @the-gipper said:

    There is a good reason....all he is doing is dinking and dunking.  

    I was curious so I looked up what his yards per attempt is this season, and it is a rather pedestrian 6.8 yards/attempt - a full yard below his career average.

    It's also the same as Baker Mayfield, who is a dinker and a dunker too. 

  • The week isn’t over yet

  • @kvoethe said:

    They crying all over pukeberg sports radio that raplisberger isnt in the discussion for mvp

    There is a good reason....all he is doing is dinking and dunking.  I did a play by play search of one game wherein of over 30 passes he threw, only like 3 of them went over maybe 15 yards downfield in the air.  MVP means that he is the most instrumental person on a team for that team's success.  BR is not that. Not this year. 

    @the-gipper said:

      MVP means that he is the most instrumental person on a team for that team's success.  BR is not that. Not this year. 

    They're not 9-0 without BR. They're not that great of a team.

    How many come from behind wins did he have this year, 3? 4? They didn't do it by running the ball.

    Drawing up plays in the dirt, like Bernie, except that didn't get him fired.

  • @the-gipper said:

      MVP means that he is the most instrumental person on a team for that team's success.  BR is not that. Not this year. 

    They're not 9-0 without BR. They're not that great of a team.

    How many come from behind wins did he have this year, 3? 4? They didn't do it by running the ball.

    Drawing up plays in the dirt, like Bernie, except that didn't get him fired.

    @gorka said:

    They're not 9-0 without BR. They're not that great of a team.

    How many come from behind wins did he have this year, 3? 4? They didn't do it by running the ball.

    Drawing up plays in the dirt, like Bernie, except that didn't get him fired.

    Sure they are not 9-0 without BR....but you can say that about every team playing decently......"they aren't yada yada without  Joe Blow, their starting QB". 

    But, the fact is, BR is Nowhere near as instrumental to that team winning as  say  Patrick Mahomes is to the Chiefs, Aaron Rodgers to the Packers,  Derek Carr to the Raiders,  Russell Wilson to the Seahawks,  Kyler Murray to the Cardinals,  Tom Brady to the Bucs,  Lamar Jackson to the Ravens, Josh Allen to the Bills...or even  Baker Mayfield to the Browns.   In fact....I will say this.....if Mayfield were the QB of the Squibs right they....they would just as easily have the same record as they do now. 

    ....we shall see about Drew Brees and the Saints, given that he is going to miss a lot of games.

  • I can't agree more with Gipper on this one. Steelers' defense is scary, they have a good running back, a good Oline and a very talented WR corps. 

    Sure Ben isn't a liability, but he doesn't make up for the rest of the team, either.  He has had better years. 

  • I can't agree more with Gipper on this one. Steelers' defense is scary, they have a good running back, a good Oline and a very talented WR corps. 

    Sure Ben isn't a liability, but he doesn't make up for the rest of the team, either.  He has had better years. 

    @nero said:

    I can't agree more with Gipper on this one. Steelers' defense is scary, they have a good running back, a good Oline and a very talented WR corps. 

    Sure Ben isn't a liability, but he doesn't make up for the rest of the team, either.  He has had better years. 

    He also said that Roethlisberger isn't as important to the Steelers as Baker is to the Browns.

    That is patently false. The list of QBs who could have done a similar job as Baker is a long one. 

  • I can't agree more with Gipper on this one. Steelers' defense is scary, they have a good running back, a good Oline and a very talented WR corps. 

    Sure Ben isn't a liability, but he doesn't make up for the rest of the team, either.  He has had better years. 

    @nero said:

    I can't agree more with Gipper on this one. Steelers' defense is scary, they have a good running back, a good Oline and a very talented WR corps. 

    Sure Ben isn't a liability, but he doesn't make up for the rest of the team, either.  He has had better years. 

    Well said!  When you have a defense like Pittsburgh has - the margin of error for the QB gets very user friendly.  We've seen Trent Dilfer be the QB of a Superbowl Champion where his margin of error gave him the green light to be average at best.  That team had an elite defense that not only limited points against; but scored points.  They had 1 RB that rushed for over 2000 yards, a good OL and their TE (Sharpe) was their biggest weapon.  Dilfer started 8 games throwing for 12 TD and 11 INT w/ a 59.8 cmp% for a passer rating of 76.6.  In the SB, he went 12 of 25 for 153 yards, had 1 fumble his tam recovered and had a pick 6 nullified by a penalty.

    The very next year, he was signed by Seattle.

  • @nero said:

    I can't agree more with Gipper on this one. Steelers' defense is scary, they have a good running back, a good Oline and a very talented WR corps. 

    Sure Ben isn't a liability, but he doesn't make up for the rest of the team, either.  He has had better years. 

    He also said that Roethlisberger isn't as important to the Steelers as Baker is to the Browns.

    That is patently false. The list of QBs who could have done a similar job as Baker is a long one. 

    @dutch-oven said:

    He also said that Roethlisberger isn't as important to the Steelers as Baker is to the Browns.

    That is patently false. The list of QBs who could have done a similar job as Baker is a long one. 

    Sometimes you have to swallow your words. Most of the times I read diagonally, so I didn't see that. Yeah. I don't agree on Baker, but I agree on 90% of what Gipper said. 

  • @nero said:

    I can't agree more with Gipper on this one. Steelers' defense is scary, they have a good running back, a good Oline and a very talented WR corps. 

    Sure Ben isn't a liability, but he doesn't make up for the rest of the team, either.  He has had better years. 

    He also said that Roethlisberger isn't as important to the Steelers as Baker is to the Browns.

    That is patently false. The list of QBs who could have done a similar job as Baker is a long one. 

    @dutch-oven said:

    He also said that Roethlisberger isn't as important to the Steelers as Baker is to the Browns.

    That is patently false. The list of QBs who could have done a similar job as Baker is a long one. 

    It may be a long one....but that goes both ways.  The list of QBs who could have done a similar job as BR for the Steelers is a long one,   plus what I am saying is that if you switched the QBs on the two teams....I don't see where the teams would have any difference in their records.  Baker could just as easily have the Steelers at  9-0 and with BR this team would not likely be any better than 6-3. 

    Bottom line:  BR ain't an MVP candidate because BR is by no means the primary reason that team is as good as they are right now. 

  • @dutch-oven said:

    He also said that Roethlisberger isn't as important to the Steelers as Baker is to the Browns.

    That is patently false. The list of QBs who could have done a similar job as Baker is a long one. 

    Sometimes you have to swallow your words. Most of the times I read diagonally, so I didn't see that. Yeah. I don't agree on Baker, but I agree on 90% of what Gipper said. 

    @nero said:

    Sometimes you have to swallow your words. Most of the times I read diagonally, so I didn't see that. Yeah. I don't agree on Baker, but I agree on 90% of what Gipper said. 

    Probably 100% because Dutch misinterpreted what I meant. 

    But, let's say he didn't.  Let's look at this:

    Why are the Steelers  9-0?   As Flugel said:   a defense that is playing at a superb level right now....NOT because their offense is all that. The offense is playing well enough to support their defense to get them to 9-0.

    But why are the Browns 6-3?   It sure as hell is not because of our defense,  which has given up  38, 30, 38, 38, 34, 23, 20, 16, 7...points in each game.  Baker and this offense has HAD to produce at a very high level to have won some of these games. The brown numbers above are the games the Browns won. Three of those games are where the Browns gave up  30 or more points.  BR never had to win a single game where his defense gave up 30 or more points because in NO game this year has their defense given up  30 or more points.......though I will give that there was one game....their 38-29 win over the Eagles where that offense had to bail out their defense.  

    So, yes, in a very real sense, Baker as the trigger man of this offense has HAD to perform at a higher level....and has been More Valuable to the success of the Browns so far than BR has been to the Steelers success. 

  • I think that Browns' running corps has a lot to do with how much the Browns offense has produced, so I'm still not giving it to you 100% Gipper. But yeah, none of them have had incredible stats/performances. 

  • I think that Browns' running corps has a lot to do with how much the Browns offense has produced, so I'm still not giving it to you 100% Gipper. But yeah, none of them have had incredible stats/performances. 

    @nero said:

    I think that Browns' running corps has a lot to do with how much the Browns offense has produced, so I'm still not giving it to you 100% Gipper. But yeah, none of them have had incredible stats/performances. 

    Certainly they have, but I am just saying that BR does NOT have to overcome a piss poor defense......Baker does, and even though they both certainly have help on their offenses,  they are still the trigger men.  And BR has not had to overcome the loss of one of the premier WRs in this league, like Baker. 

    Baker, plain and simple has had far rougher hurdles to overcome....and has been more critical to the team's success.   

  • @nero said:

    I think that Browns' running corps has a lot to do with how much the Browns offense has produced, so I'm still not giving it to you 100% Gipper. But yeah, none of them have had incredible stats/performances. 

    Certainly they have, but I am just saying that BR does NOT have to overcome a piss poor defense......Baker does, and even though they both certainly have help on their offenses,  they are still the trigger men.  And BR has not had to overcome the loss of one of the premier WRs in this league, like Baker. 

    Baker, plain and simple has had far rougher hurdles to overcome....and has been more critical to the team's success.   

    @the-gipper said:

    Certainly they have, but I am just saying that BR does NOT have to overcome a piss poor defense......Baker does, and even though they both certainly have help on their offenses,  they are still the trigger men.  And BR has not had to overcome the loss of one of the premier WRs in this league, like Baker. 

    Baker, plain and simple has had far rougher hurdles to overcome....and has been more critical to the team's success.   

    Could be. But if it were a 1 year deal, I would trade Ben for Baker in a heartbeat. BR doesn't make as many mistakes as Baker does, and that's what we need at QB at the moment. 

  • @the-gipper said:

    Certainly they have, but I am just saying that BR does NOT have to overcome a piss poor defense......Baker does, and even though they both certainly have help on their offenses,  they are still the trigger men.  And BR has not had to overcome the loss of one of the premier WRs in this league, like Baker. 

    Baker, plain and simple has had far rougher hurdles to overcome....and has been more critical to the team's success.   

    Could be. But if it were a 1 year deal, I would trade Ben for Baker in a heartbeat. BR doesn't make as many mistakes as Baker does, and that's what we need at QB at the moment. 

    @nero said:

    Could be. But if it were a 1 year deal, I would trade Ben for Baker in a heartbeat. BR doesn't make as many mistakes as Baker does, and that's what we need at QB at the moment. 

    Well, a couple of things:  BR playing the dink/dunk game seems to give him some better stats;  Baker takes more chances than he does.  That and the fact that yes, the Browns are more reliant on their run game...because they have much better runners than Pitt. 

    Here are their stats;

    BR:  223/334 for  2267 yards;     Baker  149/243  for 1646 yards.

    BR:  66.8% comp. pct.      Baker  61.3%

    BR:  22 TDs   6.6 TD %;    Baker  15 TDs  6.2 TD%

    BR:  4 Int.    Baker  7 Ints

    BR: 6.6 ypa,  10.2 ypc;     Baker 7.3 ypa  11.9 ypc.

    BR  3  30 pt. games.    Baker  5 30 pt. games.

    And then there are these stats:

    Pittsburgh defense:   2863 yds allowed   171 pts. allowed.   19.0 pts per game

    Browns defense:  3214 yards allowed  244 pts. allowed  27.1  pts per game.....over a TD more per game, which of course is huge.

    The Browns are actually outgaining Pitt on offense ever so slightly:   3130 to 3105 yards.    But Pitt has scored more pts. 271 to 216. 

    Note this stat also:

    Browns are  3-0 in one score games.  (7 pt. margin or less)   Steelers are  5-0  in one score games. 

    So, the Steelers, despite their 9-0 record are NOT blowing people out as much as you would think, because despite the sterling play of their defense, their offense is not as dominant. 

    Browns rush offense ranks #4 with 1431 yds and 9 TDs....or #3 in YPG  (AZ has played 10 games now which puts them ahead of the Browns....Ravens and Pats are the other 2)

    Pitt is #25 with 916 yds and 9 TDs.