Stop with ND in the playoffs already
-
Well, it is very difficult for a clean program to compete with East Germany.
Goes to my point. These big football factories shouldn’t be playing academic schools like ND. They are not in the same league
Goes to my point. These big football factories shouldn’t be playing academic schools like ND. They are not in the same league
Like northwestern who is playing better ball but probably couldn't beat Ohio State, Alabama or other 5* and 4* football factory teams.
-
Parity is dead in college football and the CFP helped kill it
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
Parity is dead in college football and the CFP helped kill it
One of my old pet peeves of mine do a 16 team playoff like every other football division.
It can be done with the bowls and WAY more successful.
-
Well, it is very difficult for a clean program to compete with East Germany.
Goes to my point. These big football factories shouldn’t be playing academic schools like ND. They are not in the same league
Goes to my point. These big football factories shouldn’t be playing academic schools like ND. They are not in the same league
You are missing my point. I think.
-
Saban couldn’t care less about winning the Rose Bowl. The only schools that care about that game are the lesser teams in the BIG TEN and PAC 12
Saban couldn’t care less about winning the Rose Bowl. The only schools that care about that game are the lesser teams in the BIG TEN and PAC 12
Uhm...they cared about winning THIS Rose Bowl.....since they were in it.
-
Parity is dead in college football and the CFP helped kill it
I don't know....Is it? It just takes other schools to get a good coach and recruit good players. Other schools have made breakthroughs. Here is the list of CFP participants since it started:
Clemson 6 times
Alabama 6 times
Ohio St. 4 times
Oklahoma 4 times
Notre Dame 2 times
Oregon 1
Washington 1
Michigan St. 1
Florida St. 1
LSU 1
Georgia 1
-
Parity is dead in college football and the CFP helped kill it
I don't know....Is it? It just takes other schools to get a good coach and recruit good players. Other schools have made breakthroughs. Here is the list of CFP participants since it started:
Clemson 6 times
Alabama 6 times
Ohio St. 4 times
Oklahoma 4 times
Notre Dame 2 times
Oregon 1
Washington 1
Michigan St. 1
Florida St. 1
LSU 1
Georgia 1
I don't know....Is it?
yes
-
I don't know....Is it?
yes
-
yes
Why do you think?
Why do you think?
20 of the 28 possible slots have been 4 teams
Bama or Clemson have been in every final but the first, and they've played each other 4 times (3 in the finals)
The system allows the rich to get richer. There is a snowball effect with recruiting. Especially if the rich utilize bagmen.
The best chance to fix the system is NIL rights and/or paying the players. An expanded CFP wouldn't hurt though
-
Why do you think?
20 of the 28 possible slots have been 4 teams
Bama or Clemson have been in every final but the first, and they've played each other 4 times (3 in the finals)
The system allows the rich to get richer. There is a snowball effect with recruiting. Especially if the rich utilize bagmen.
The best chance to fix the system is NIL rights and/or paying the players. An expanded CFP wouldn't hurt though
20 of the 28 possible slots have been 4 teams
Bama or Clemson have been in every final but the first, and they've played each other 4 times (3 in the finals)
The system allows the rich to get richer. There is a snowball effect with recruiting. Especially if the rich utilize bagmen.
The best chance to fix the system is NIL rights and/or paying the players. An expanded CFP wouldn't hurt though
At a minimum it should be an 8 team playoff which means 7 of the bowls. The rest can go to all other teams as usual. The only thing that I think all conferences should do is exactly what the SEC does. All bowl monies above expenses to the team going are put in the SEC pot and split equally among all SEC teams so that even in a zero win year, that team gets it's equal share.
-
20 of the 28 possible slots have been 4 teams
Bama or Clemson have been in every final but the first, and they've played each other 4 times (3 in the finals)
The system allows the rich to get richer. There is a snowball effect with recruiting. Especially if the rich utilize bagmen.
The best chance to fix the system is NIL rights and/or paying the players. An expanded CFP wouldn't hurt though
At a minimum it should be an 8 team playoff which means 7 of the bowls. The rest can go to all other teams as usual. The only thing that I think all conferences should do is exactly what the SEC does. All bowl monies above expenses to the team going are put in the SEC pot and split equally among all SEC teams so that even in a zero win year, that team gets it's equal share.
The only thing that I think all conferences should do is exactly what the SEC does. All bowl monies above expenses to the team going are put in the SEC pot and split equally among all SEC teams so that even in a zero win year, that team gets it's equal share.
The Big 10 has been doing this for decades. I'm pretty sure all the way back to Woody & Bo.
-
20 of the 28 possible slots have been 4 teams
Bama or Clemson have been in every final but the first, and they've played each other 4 times (3 in the finals)
The system allows the rich to get richer. There is a snowball effect with recruiting. Especially if the rich utilize bagmen.
The best chance to fix the system is NIL rights and/or paying the players. An expanded CFP wouldn't hurt though
At a minimum it should be an 8 team playoff which means 7 of the bowls. The rest can go to all other teams as usual. The only thing that I think all conferences should do is exactly what the SEC does. All bowl monies above expenses to the team going are put in the SEC pot and split equally among all SEC teams so that even in a zero win year, that team gets it's equal share.
At a minimum it should be an 8 team playoff which means 7 of the bowls. The rest can go to all other teams as usual. The only thing that I think all conferences should do is exactly what the SEC does. All bowl monies above expenses to the team going are put in the SEC pot and split equally among all SEC teams so that even in a zero win year, that team gets it's equal share.
The big ten already shared revenue. In fact the big ten has the highest per team revenue.
Expanded playoffs will help. NIL would be big too.
-
At a minimum it should be an 8 team playoff which means 7 of the bowls. The rest can go to all other teams as usual. The only thing that I think all conferences should do is exactly what the SEC does. All bowl monies above expenses to the team going are put in the SEC pot and split equally among all SEC teams so that even in a zero win year, that team gets it's equal share.
The big ten already shared revenue. In fact the big ten has the highest per team revenue.
Expanded playoffs will help. NIL would be big too.
The big ten already shared revenue. In fact the big ten has the highest per team revenue.
Expanded playoffs will help. NIL would be big too.
I think it's a tough slippery slope regarding revenue sharing and paying players.
Much of the revenue generated from football & basketball (at not only Big 10 schools) funds the other sports programs at the schools. I'm not sure it helps fund say, the science departments or english departments, etc.
The NCAA would have to change amateur rules, no? It would also effect athlete's who have Olympic dreams if they get paid (basketball in particular).
I do know some guys who played college football, and hear their horror stories about how they have to be careful in receiving any kind of financial aid. Even if their Aunts & Uncles want to send them $50 for Christmas it could be deemed illegal by the NCAA. It's a mess.
Karlis Missed -
The big ten already shared revenue. In fact the big ten has the highest per team revenue.
Expanded playoffs will help. NIL would be big too.
I think it's a tough slippery slope regarding revenue sharing and paying players.
Much of the revenue generated from football & basketball (at not only Big 10 schools) funds the other sports programs at the schools. I'm not sure it helps fund say, the science departments or english departments, etc.
The NCAA would have to change amateur rules, no? It would also effect athlete's who have Olympic dreams if they get paid (basketball in particular).
I do know some guys who played college football, and hear their horror stories about how they have to be careful in receiving any kind of financial aid. Even if their Aunts & Uncles want to send them $50 for Christmas it could be deemed illegal by the NCAA. It's a mess.
I think it's a tough slippery slope regarding revenue sharing and paying players.
Much of the revenue generated from football & basketball (at not only Big 10 schools) funds the other sports programs at the schools. I'm not sure it helps fund say, the science departments or english departments, etc.
The NCAA would have to change amateur rules, no? It would also effect athlete's who have Olympic dreams if they get paid (basketball in particular).
I do know some guys who played college football, and hear their horror stories about how they have to be careful in receiving any kind of financial aid. Even if their Aunts & Uncles want to send them $50 for Christmas it could be deemed illegal by the NCAA. It's a mess.
The NCAA would have to change their rules or schools would have to agree to leave the NCAA
Schools are eating $20M+ buyouts while also cancelling non revenue sports. The illusion of football and basketball being amateur sports is dead.
-
I think it's a tough slippery slope regarding revenue sharing and paying players.
Much of the revenue generated from football & basketball (at not only Big 10 schools) funds the other sports programs at the schools. I'm not sure it helps fund say, the science departments or english departments, etc.
The NCAA would have to change amateur rules, no? It would also effect athlete's who have Olympic dreams if they get paid (basketball in particular).
I do know some guys who played college football, and hear their horror stories about how they have to be careful in receiving any kind of financial aid. Even if their Aunts & Uncles want to send them $50 for Christmas it could be deemed illegal by the NCAA. It's a mess.
The NCAA would have to change their rules or schools would have to agree to leave the NCAA
Schools are eating $20M+ buyouts while also cancelling non revenue sports. The illusion of football and basketball being amateur sports is dead.
The NCAA would have to change their rules or schools would have to agree to leave the NCAA
Schools are eating $20M+ buyouts while also cancelling non revenue sports. The illusion of football and basketball being amateur sports is dead.
It's all about the $$. Colleges typically raise tuition 5-6% every year, while many families never realize that in pay raises over a two or 3 year period.
I'm not here to argue about illusions or not illusions about amateur sports. In my mind they are amateur sports, but the revenue generated sure isn't amateur, that's for sure.
Karlis Missed -
The big ten already shared revenue. In fact the big ten has the highest per team revenue.
Expanded playoffs will help. NIL would be big too.
I think it's a tough slippery slope regarding revenue sharing and paying players.
Much of the revenue generated from football & basketball (at not only Big 10 schools) funds the other sports programs at the schools. I'm not sure it helps fund say, the science departments or english departments, etc.
The NCAA would have to change amateur rules, no? It would also effect athlete's who have Olympic dreams if they get paid (basketball in particular).
I do know some guys who played college football, and hear their horror stories about how they have to be careful in receiving any kind of financial aid. Even if their Aunts & Uncles want to send them $50 for Christmas it could be deemed illegal by the NCAA. It's a mess.
I think it's a tough slippery slope regarding revenue sharing and paying players.
Much of the revenue generated from football & basketball (at not only Big 10 schools) funds the other sports programs at the schools. I'm not sure it helps fund say, the science departments or english departments, etc.
The NCAA would have to change amateur rules, no? It would also effect athlete's who have Olympic dreams if they get paid (basketball in particular).
I do know some guys who played college football, and hear their horror stories about how they have to be careful in receiving any kind of financial aid. Even if their Aunts & Uncles want to send them $50 for Christmas it could be deemed illegal by the NCAA. It's a mess.
Amateur rules for the Olympics have been thrown out long ago. Where have you been on this?
-
The NCAA would have to change their rules or schools would have to agree to leave the NCAA
Schools are eating $20M+ buyouts while also cancelling non revenue sports. The illusion of football and basketball being amateur sports is dead.
It's all about the $$. Colleges typically raise tuition 5-6% every year, while many families never realize that in pay raises over a two or 3 year period.
I'm not here to argue about illusions or not illusions about amateur sports. In my mind they are amateur sports, but the revenue generated sure isn't amateur, that's for sure.
It's all about the $$. Colleges typically raise tuition 5-6% every year, while many families never realize that in pay raises over a two or 3 year period.
Some have not realized that over 10-20 year period.
I'm not here to argue about illusions or not illusions about amateur sports. In my mind they are amateur sports, but the revenue generated sure isn't amateur, that's for sure.
-
The NCAA would have to change their rules or schools would have to agree to leave the NCAA
Schools are eating $20M+ buyouts while also cancelling non revenue sports. The illusion of football and basketball being amateur sports is dead.
It's all about the $$. Colleges typically raise tuition 5-6% every year, while many families never realize that in pay raises over a two or 3 year period.
I'm not here to argue about illusions or not illusions about amateur sports. In my mind they are amateur sports, but the revenue generated sure isn't amateur, that's for sure.
It's all about the $$. Colleges typically raise tuition 5-6% every year, while many families never realize that in pay raises over a two or 3 year period.
I'm not here to argue about illusions or not illusions about amateur sports. In my mind they are amateur sports, but the revenue generated sure isn't amateur, that's for sure.
Exactly. So continuing to allow the schools and the NCAA to play this guy is foolish. The players should be paid, and at worst they should get NIL rights.
The schools fighting this now are the ones benefiting from the current broken system that they're succeeding in by bending the rules are just completely cheating
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login