Lum HAS to be a puppet
-
Now that right there is funny, I don't care how much of a patsy white boy you think Inspecta is, that was good.
-
I am in Oregon every month - I'd settle for a telephone call from a 503 or 541 area code.
Oregon also has a 971 area code.
-
@jadbf said:
Brave Brave silly man....You're lucky goolie and jack aren't around......
It's an office phone with no phone, so it goes right into voice mail but I have caller ID. It's a Vonage deal. You think I gave him my cell? LOL.
-
@jadbf said:
There are (I believe) 3 people on this site that even know my real 1st name. This is an internet message board, where trolls and wacos come to play. Who KNOWS what some moron will do with any information they get about you if you ever upset them.....I know I plan to flood his voicemail now.....lol
Just kidding.
-
Lums give me a call.
1-800-LUMNUTS
-
Now that right there is funny, I don't care how much of a patsy white boy you think Inspecta is, that was good.
-
The entire point of this thread on my part was to point out the hypocrisy of board moderators not moderating Lum.
Pretty simple logic: Stan appears to hate the sillier aspects of the QB debate and Lum does little more than perpetuate the sillier aspects of it.
So, either he's a puppet or Stan (the mods) really don't care about the sillier QB debates and believe that it "adds" to the community.
While I'm dumb enough to do my part in perpetuating, I can't help but think that Vegas' rather elegant post in this thread is spot on: has the "Lum" element eroded the quailty football talk on these boards?
I'm sticking around regardless so this wasn't some emotional rant. Just a discussion I thought I'd start (5 pages later).
-
The entire point of this thread on my part was to point out the hypocrisy of board moderators not moderating Lum.
Pretty simple logic: Stan appears to hate the sillier aspects of the QB debate and Lum does little more than perpetuate the sillier aspects of it.
So, either he's a puppet or Stan (the mods) really don't care about the sillier QB debates and believe that it "adds" to the community.
While I'm dumb enough to do my part in perpetuating, I can't help but think that Vegas' rather elegant post in this thread is spot on: has the "Lum" element eroded the quailty football talk on these boards?
I'm sticking around regardless so this wasn't some emotional rant. Just a discussion I thought I'd start (5 pages later).
The entire point of this thread on my part was to point out the hypocrisy of board moderators not moderating Lum.
Pretty simple logic: Stan appears to hate the sillier aspects of the QB debate and Lum does little more than perpetuate the sillier aspects of it.
So, either he's a puppet or Stan (the mods) really don't care about the sillier QB debates and believe that it "adds" to the community.
While I'm dumb enough to do my part in perpetuating, I can't help but think that Vegas' rather elegant post in this thread is spot on: has the "Lum" element eroded the quailty football talk on these boards?
I'm sticking around regardless so this wasn't some emotional rant. Just a discussion I thought I'd start (5 pages later).
No, we're just running out of topics until the starting lineups are introduced.
We've prolly pounded out every different angle, arguement, strength and weakness of both QBs.
We've had some GOOD oline conversations.
There will be more to talk about soon and the diversity of topics should get some giddyup..
- Tom F.
-
The entire point of this thread on my part was to point out the hypocrisy of board moderators not moderating Lum.
Pretty simple logic: Stan appears to hate the sillier aspects of the QB debate and Lum does little more than perpetuate the sillier aspects of it.
So, either he's a puppet or Stan (the mods) really don't care about the sillier QB debates and believe that it "adds" to the community.
While I'm dumb enough to do my part in perpetuating, I can't help but think that Vegas' rather elegant post in this thread is spot on: has the "Lum" element eroded the quailty football talk on these boards?
I'm sticking around regardless so this wasn't some emotional rant. Just a discussion I thought I'd start (5 pages later).
The entire point of this thread on my part was to point out the hypocrisy of board moderators not moderating Lum.
Pretty simple logic: Stan appears to hate the sillier aspects of the QB debate and Lum does little more than perpetuate the sillier aspects of it.
So, either he's a puppet or Stan (the mods) really don't care about the sillier QB debates and believe that it "adds" to the community.
While I'm dumb enough to do my part in perpetuating, I can't help but think that Vegas' rather elegant post in this thread is spot on: has the "Lum" element eroded the quailty football talk on these boards?
I'm sticking around regardless so this wasn't some emotional rant. Just a discussion I thought I'd start (5 pages later).
Don't you think Mods should pull threads about moderating the sillier aspects of the QB debate, before an actual QB debate that's gone silly?
I vote for Greythan to be banned and sentenced to 30-days on Dawgbones.com
-
The entire point of this thread on my part was to point out the hypocrisy of board moderators not moderating Lum.
Pretty simple logic: Stan appears to hate the sillier aspects of the QB debate and Lum does little more than perpetuate the sillier aspects of it.
So, either he's a puppet or Stan (the mods) really don't care about the sillier QB debates and believe that it "adds" to the community.
While I'm dumb enough to do my part in perpetuating, I can't help but think that Vegas' rather elegant post in this thread is spot on: has the "Lum" element eroded the quailty football talk on these boards?
I'm sticking around regardless so this wasn't some emotional rant. Just a discussion I thought I'd start (5 pages later).
Don't you think Mods should pull threads about moderating the sillier aspects of the QB debate, before an actual QB debate that's gone silly?
I vote for Greythan to be banned and sentenced to 30-days on Dawgbones.com
Don't you think Mods should pull threads about moderating the sillier aspects of the QB debate, before an actual QB debate that's gone silly?
I vote for Greythan to be banned and sentenced to 30-days on Dawgbones.com
At times I have complained about the mod's but I just keep my mouth shut from now on. This is a great site to come on when you want to talk Browns football or your just bored and want to irritate the fuk out of someone you don't like. All in all, the mod's are fair and even complete tools like SteelersSChuck and Lumburgh get to voice their opinions, they give us ammo to bully them
-
@jadbf said:
Nah just wait till someone you don't like gets out of hand, I'm sure you can handle that one maturely and correctly.Right Tom V.?
Always keep'em guessing ... oh, and stay thirsty.
-
Slightly off topic, but I just saw a user with the certain name of "horse balls" thanking lumnuts on his posts....
Slightly off topic, but I just saw a user with the certain name of "horse balls" thanking lumnuts on his posts....
That might be the funniest comment made in this entire thread.
.jpg.a1a2b9a0c33008fdaf4097d8fe2cfd64.jpg "Riffer X"){kind=avatar}
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login