Cleveland +10 on 1/16 and the other division playoff games.....one more step.
-
-
-
Nope not really. He says he doesn't remember it. In fact he said, " I am not trying to welch...I honestly do not remember any such thing."
Tell him (feel like your back in grade school passing notes?) I laid it out there twice.
First I referred to my willingness to bet a "Franklin".
The other time I straight out offered up $100... because I wasn't sure he knew what "a Franklin" was.
-
Let me guess.... he's welshing...
And so I did...
That was speculation conversation. Show us where you proposed a $100 bet and show where I accepted. By what you posted here, if I owned anyone it would be jiggins.
-
Nope not really. He says he doesn't remember it. In fact he said, " I am not trying to welch...I honestly do not remember any such thing."
Tell him (feel like your back in grade school passing notes?) I laid it out there twice.
First I referred to my willingness to bet a "Franklin".
The other time I straight out offered up $100... because I wasn't sure he knew what "a Franklin" was.
Tell him (feel like your back in grade school passing notes?) I laid it out there twice.
First I referred to my willingness to bet a "Franklin".
The other time I straight out offered up $100... because I wasn't sure he knew what "a Franklin" was.
Show it. Prove it. Link it. And show where I accepted.
Beyond that....tell me yourself You Gutless pile of smegma.
(Furthermore....among the first is not yet determined)
-
Let me guess.... he's welshing...
And so I did...
That was speculation conversation. Show us where you proposed a $100 bet and show where I accepted. By what you posted here, if I owned anyone it would be jiggins.
That was speculation conversation. Show us where you proposed a $100 bet and show where I accepted. By what you posted here, if I owned anyone it would be jiggins.
Ah, the old quote trick they use on the polyboard to force a reading of an ignored post.?
Tell him (feel like your back in grade school passing notes?) I laid it out there twice.
And another quote to pull the reader in.?
-
That was speculation conversation. Show us where you proposed a $100 bet and show where I accepted. By what you posted here, if I owned anyone it would be jiggins.
Ah, the old quote trick they use on the polyboard to force a reading of an ignored post.?
Tell him (feel like your back in grade school passing notes?) I laid it out there twice.
And another quote to pull the reader in.?
Ah, the old quote trick they use on the polyboard to force a reading of an ignored post.?
And another quote to pull the reader in.?
Tell him to put up with the proof that I accepted any such bet......or shut the fuck up.
-
So...
- If the open question is put forth by person one, "Anyone want to wager that 'A' does not happen?"
- And person two responds, "Yes. I have $X that says that 'A' does not happen."
- And it's in writing...
- And witnesses are present...
That's not a bet?
So...
- If the open question is put forth by person one, "Anyone want to wager that 'A' does not happen?"
- And person two responds, "Yes. I have $X that says that 'A' does not happen."
- And it's in writing...
- And witnesses are present...
That's not a bet?
No...it isn't.
Do you really want to get into a Contract Law dispute with me?
-
LOLOLOLOL!?
-
-
LOLOLOLOL!?
LOLOLOLOL!?
So.... I guess he disagreed? Shocker...
Tell him I will settle for a simple post stating he was wrong.
Of course the street value of the that would be way over "a Franklin"...
-
So...
- If the open question is put forth by person one, "Anyone want to wager that 'A' does not happen?"
- And person two responds, "Yes. I have $X that says that 'A' does not happen."
- And it's in writing...
- And witnesses are present...
That's not a bet?
No...it isn't.
Do you really want to get into a Contract Law dispute with me?
No...it isn't.
Do you really want to get into a Contract Law dispute with me?
Yes go over the age old four reguirements for a legal contact (and witnesses isn't one).
And nobody in their right mind wants to dispute the Gipper.

-
No...it isn't.
Do you really want to get into a Contract Law dispute with me?
Yes go over the age old four reguirements for a legal contact (and witnesses isn't one).
And nobody in their right mind wants to dispute the Gipper.

-
No...it isn't.
Do you really want to get into a Contract Law dispute with me?
Yes go over the age old four reguirements for a legal contact (and witnesses isn't one).
And nobody in their right mind wants to dispute the Gipper.

Yes go over the age old four reguirements for a legal contact (and witnesses isn't one).
And nobody in their right mind wants to dispute the Gipper.

You can dispute me all you want.....but then all I gotta do is point to the facts and the law.
Like I said any number of times , almost all of my so called arguments are me simply pointing out facts. Which seem to be things that some people can't deal with. And you are right about the witnesses claim....Witnesses are not required to a contract: to a Will and to notarized documents, yes, not to a contract. Not to mention mutual consent to the terms thereof which clearly didn't exist. My normal offer on a bet here is for a hot fudge Sundae.....except when I make a wine bet with Larry. Like Cal usually proposes a root beer.
-
-
-
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login

how could you be so certain Mrs Vito ?


