Where We Are

[calfoxwc]

Supreme Court Refuses To Hear Post-Election Fraud Cases ...

www.christianitydaily.com/articles/10485/20210112/...

Jan 12, 2021 · The Supreme Court refused to hear the post-election fraud cases filed by President Donald Trump's legal team including those cases filed by the GOP and Trump Lawyer Sidney Powell, a report says. As per Forbes on Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected the motion of the Trump Team to

[Westside Steve]

Again I don't suppose any of you Trump haters would bet anything of value that there was absolutely no fraud. And the fact 60 compromised judges decided not to even look into it proves nothing.

WSS

[calfoxwc]

so the courts REFUSED TO HEAR THE CASES. that means THEY REFUSED TO HEAR the CASES.

They never got to HEAR any evidence because they were terrified their families would be targeted

by the left, and they would be slimed all over the media.

"lack of standing" BY THE PRESIDENT?

I wish we could have INTELLIGENT conversations from the left, instead of tired old slimey parroting of fake news antagonistic talking points. But, it won't happen. Just got worse.

[DieHardBrownsFan]

[The Cysko Kid]

You guys prove what I said true, precisely, in your attempts to refute it. Right now you have an enemy. 

It doesn't matter if I say I agree or disagree or that the national guard should have mowed the capital protestors down...you don't hear. You're incapable of hearing. That is why the left will begin eating itself in earnest very soon. You scoff now but you'll see. Sooner than you'd like to believe. I hope we all survive long enough for me to rub your noses in your sins like a bad dog. 

[The Cysko Kid]

You refuse to acknowledge the capital protestors are exactly the same as the blm/antifa/left protestors by the way but...they are. Exactly the same. And I have the exact same esteem for them. None. 

[cccjwh]

@westside-steve said:

Again I don't suppose any of you Trump haters would bet anything of value that there was absolutely no fraud. And the fact 60 compromised judges decided not to even look into it proves nothing.

WSS

1. You have to show fraud that would effect the outcome of an election. A cult member voting for Cheetos with his dead mom's ballot does not show massive voter fraud.

2. Compromised" judges? I guess Cheetos shouldn't have appointed "compromised" judges. 

I guess Cheetos's Attorney General is also compromised. ?

Cysko is watching a guy play chess with a pigeon. The pigeon knocks down all the pieces and shits on the board and Cysko response is "Hey, you have to meet the pigeon half way."

[Vambo]

@cccjwh said:

1. You have to show fraud that would effect the outcome of an election. A cult member voting for Cheetos with his dead mom's ballot does not show massive voter fraud.

2. Compromised" judges? I guess Cheetos shouldn't have appointed "compromised" judges. 

I guess Cheetos's Attorney General is also compromised. ?

Cysko is watching a guy play chess with a pigeon. The pigeon knocks down all the pieces and shits on the board and Cysko response is "Hey, you have to meet the pigeon half way."

So you admit there was fraud...

How can we know to what level if they won't investigate it queenie?

[cccjwh]

@vambo said:

So you admit there was fraud...

How can we know to what level if they won't investigate it queenie?

They did investigate dick holster.

Secretary Raffensperger Leads Fullscale Investigation To Combat Illegal Voting | Elections

Justice Dept. ends Pennsylvania election investigation, finding 'insufficient evidence' to prove bad intent - The Washington Post

You cult members don't accept those results either. Cause your lord and savior says something different.

[Axe]

Gee, I didn't realize it was a mods place to change other's quotes..

"Food for thought! Written by a Democrat! Ron Thomson

Just a short note prior to you reading this article. Of all of the hundreds of articles written about Donald J. Trump this one is by far the most authentic. No matter your politics you will have a better understanding of our President and our politics after reading this.

 Very interesting theory on Trump's success. The mayor of Livermore California explains Trump’s popularity and success. This is perhaps the best explanation for Trump's popularity. Marshall Kamena is a registered Democrat and was elected mayor of Livermore, CA.. He ran on the democratic ticket as he knew a Bay Area city would never vote for a Republican. He is as conservative as they come. He wrote the following: Trump’s 'Lack of Decorum, Dignity, and Statesmanship' By Marshall Kamena, Mayor of Livermore, CA.

My Leftist friends (as well as many ardent #NeverTrumpers) constantly ask me if I’m not bothered by Donald Trump’s lack of decorum. They ask if I don’t think his tweets are “beneath the dignity of the office.” Here’s my answer: We Right-thinking people have tried dignity. There could not have been a man of more quiet dignity than George W. Bush as he suffered the outrageous lies and politically motivated hatreds that undermined his presidency. We tried statesmanship. Could there be another human being on this earth who so desperately prized “collegiality” as John McCain? We tried propriety – has there been a nicer human being ever than Mitt Romney? And the results were always the same. This is because, while we were playing by the rules of dignity, collegiality and propriety, the Left has been, for the past 60 years, engaged in a knife fight where the only rules are those of Saul Alinsky and the Chicago mob.

 I don’t find anything “dignified,” “collegial” or “proper” about Barack Obama’s lying about what went down on the streets of Ferguson in order to ramp up racial hatreds because racial hatreds serve the Democratic Party. I don’t see anything “dignified” in lying about the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi and imprisoning an innocent filmmaker to cover your tracks. I don’t see anything “statesman-like” in weaponizing the IRS to be used to destroy your political opponents and any dissent. Yes, Obama was “articulate” and “polished” but in no way was he in the least bit “dignified,” “collegial” or “proper.” The Left has been engaged in a war against America since the rise of the Children of the ‘60s. To them, it has been an all-out war where nothing is held sacred and nothing is seen as beyond the pale.. It has been a war they’ve fought with violence, the threat of violence, demagoguery and lies from day one – the violent take-over of the universities – 'till today.

 The problem is that, through these years, the Left has been the only side fighting this war. While the Left has been taking a knife to anyone who stands in their way, the Right has continued to act with dignity, collegiality and propriety. With Donald Trump, this all has come to an end. Donald Trump is America ’s first wartime president in the Culture War. During wartime, things like “dignity” and “collegiality” simply aren’t the most essential qualities one looks for in their warriors. Ulysses Grant was a drunk whose behavior in peacetime might well have seen him drummed out of the Army for conduct unbecoming. Had Abraham Lincoln applied the peacetime rules of propriety and booted Grant, the Democrats might well still be holding their slaves today. Lincoln rightly recognized that, “I cannot spare this man. He fights.” General George Patton was a vulgar-talking.. In peacetime, this might have seen him stripped of rank. But, had Franklin Roosevelt applied the normal rules of decorum then, Hitler and the Socialists would barely be five decades into their thousand-year Reich.

 Trump is fighting. And what’s particularly delicious is that, like Patton standing over the battlefield as his tanks obliterated Rommel’s, he’s shouting, “You magnificent bastards, I read your book!” That is just the icing on the cake, but it’s wonderful to see that not only is Trump fighting, he’s defeating the Left using their own tactics. That book is Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals – a book so essential to the Liberals’ war against America that it is and was the playbook for the entire Obama administration and the subject of Hillary Clinton’s senior thesis. It is a book of such pure evil, that, just as the rest of us would dedicate our book to those we most love or those to whom we are most indebted, Alinsky dedicated his book to Lucifer.

 Trump’s tweets may seem rash and unconsidered but, in reality, he is doing exactly what Alinsky suggested his followers do. First, instead of going after “the fake media” — and they are so fake that they have literally gotten every single significant story of the past 60 years not just wrong, but diametrically opposed to the truth, from the Tet Offensive to Benghazi, to what really happened on the streets of Ferguson, Missouri — Trump isolated CNN.. He made it personal. Then, just as Alinsky suggests, he employs ridicule which Alinsky described as “the most powerful weapon of all.”... Most importantly, Trump’s tweets have put CNN in an untenable and unwinnable position. They need to respond. This leaves them with only two choices. They can either “go high” (as Hillary would disingenuously declare of herself and the fake news would disingenuously report as the truth) and begin to honestly and accurately report the news or they can double-down on their usual tactics and hope to defeat Trump with twice their usual hysteria and demagoguery.

  The problem for CNN (et al.) with the former is that, if they were to start honestly reporting the news, that would be the end of the Democratic Party they serve. It is nothing but the incessant use of fake news (read: propaganda) that keeps the Left alive. Imagine, for example, if CNN had honestly and accurately reported then-candidate Barack Obama’s close ties to foreign terrorists (Rashid Khalidi), domestic terrorists (William Ayers & Bernardine Dohrn), the mafia (Tony Rezko) or the true evils of his spiritual mentor, Jeremiah Wright’s church. Imagine if they had honestly and accurately conveyed the evils of the Obama administration’s weaponizing of the IRS to be used against their political opponents or his running of guns to the Mexican cartels or the truth about the murder of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and the Obama administration’s cover-up. So, to my friends on the Left — and the #NeverTrumpers as well — do I wish we lived in a time when our president could be “collegial” and “dignified” and “proper”? Of course I do. These aren’t those times. This is war. And it’s a war that the Left has been fighting without opposition for the past 50 years. So, say anything you want about this president - I get it - he can be vulgar, he can be crude, he can be undignified at times. I don’t care. I can’t spare this man. He fights for America!"

[Vambo]

@cccjwh said:

They did investigate dick holster.

Secretary Raffensperger Leads Fullscale Investigation To Combat Illegal Voting | Elections

Justice Dept. ends Pennsylvania election investigation, finding 'insufficient evidence' to prove bad intent - The Washington Post

You cult members don't accept those results either. Cause your lord and savior says something different.

What's your obsession with dicks? queenie

Did they investigate as they did with Mueller?  4 years of crying for nothing.

[cccjwh]

@vambo said:

What's your obsession with dicks? queenie

Did they investigate as they did with Mueller?  4 years of crying for nothing.

DH you seem to have moved on to the next talking point. Some many investigates are needed for you to admitted there wasn't any massive voter fraud? 

[Westside Steve]

@cccjwh said:

1. You have to show fraud that would effect the outcome of an election. A cult member voting for Cheetos with his dead mom's ballot does not show massive voter fraud.

No you do not. You need to investigate to see if the fraud affected the outcome or not. Even if it didn't those who perpetrated it should be punished. And if it did the election should be nullified

2. Compromised" judges? I guess Cheetos shouldn't have appointed "compromised" judges. 

I guess Cheetos's Attorney General is also compromised. ?

Cysko is watching a guy play chess with a pigeon. The pigeon knocks down all the pieces and shits on the board and Cysko response is "Hey, you have to meet the pigeon half way."

[FairHooker11]

@axe said:

Gee, I didn't realize it was a mods place to change other's quotes..

"Food for thought! Written by a Democrat! Ron Thomson

Just a short note prior to you reading this article. Of all of the hundreds of articles written about Donald J. Trump this one is by far the most authentic. No matter your politics you will have a better understanding of our President and our politics after reading this.

 Very interesting theory on Trump's success. The mayor of Livermore California explains Trump’s popularity and success. This is perhaps the best explanation for Trump's popularity. Marshall Kamena is a registered Democrat and was elected mayor of Livermore, CA.. He ran on the democratic ticket as he knew a Bay Area city would never vote for a Republican. He is as conservative as they come. He wrote the following: Trump’s 'Lack of Decorum, Dignity, and Statesmanship' By Marshall Kamena, Mayor of Livermore, CA.

My Leftist friends (as well as many ardent #NeverTrumpers) constantly ask me if I’m not bothered by Donald Trump’s lack of decorum. They ask if I don’t think his tweets are “beneath the dignity of the office.” Here’s my answer: We Right-thinking people have tried dignity. There could not have been a man of more quiet dignity than George W. Bush as he suffered the outrageous lies and politically motivated hatreds that undermined his presidency. We tried statesmanship. Could there be another human being on this earth who so desperately prized “collegiality” as John McCain? We tried propriety – has there been a nicer human being ever than Mitt Romney? And the results were always the same. This is because, while we were playing by the rules of dignity, collegiality and propriety, the Left has been, for the past 60 years, engaged in a knife fight where the only rules are those of Saul Alinsky and the Chicago mob.

 I don’t find anything “dignified,” “collegial” or “proper” about Barack Obama’s lying about what went down on the streets of Ferguson in order to ramp up racial hatreds because racial hatreds serve the Democratic Party. I don’t see anything “dignified” in lying about the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi and imprisoning an innocent filmmaker to cover your tracks. I don’t see anything “statesman-like” in weaponizing the IRS to be used to destroy your political opponents and any dissent. Yes, Obama was “articulate” and “polished” but in no way was he in the least bit “dignified,” “collegial” or “proper.” The Left has been engaged in a war against America since the rise of the Children of the ‘60s. To them, it has been an all-out war where nothing is held sacred and nothing is seen as beyond the pale.. It has been a war they’ve fought with violence, the threat of violence, demagoguery and lies from day one – the violent take-over of the universities – 'till today.

 The problem is that, through these years, the Left has been the only side fighting this war. While the Left has been taking a knife to anyone who stands in their way, the Right has continued to act with dignity, collegiality and propriety. With Donald Trump, this all has come to an end. Donald Trump is America ’s first wartime president in the Culture War. During wartime, things like “dignity” and “collegiality” simply aren’t the most essential qualities one looks for in their warriors. Ulysses Grant was a drunk whose behavior in peacetime might well have seen him drummed out of the Army for conduct unbecoming. Had Abraham Lincoln applied the peacetime rules of propriety and booted Grant, the Democrats might well still be holding their slaves today. Lincoln rightly recognized that, “I cannot spare this man. He fights.” General George Patton was a vulgar-talking.. In peacetime, this might have seen him stripped of rank. But, had Franklin Roosevelt applied the normal rules of decorum then, Hitler and the Socialists would barely be five decades into their thousand-year Reich.

 Trump is fighting. And what’s particularly delicious is that, like Patton standing over the battlefield as his tanks obliterated Rommel’s, he’s shouting, “You magnificent bastards, I read your book!” That is just the icing on the cake, but it’s wonderful to see that not only is Trump fighting, he’s defeating the Left using their own tactics. That book is Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals – a book so essential to the Liberals’ war against America that it is and was the playbook for the entire Obama administration and the subject of Hillary Clinton’s senior thesis. It is a book of such pure evil, that, just as the rest of us would dedicate our book to those we most love or those to whom we are most indebted, Alinsky dedicated his book to Lucifer.

 Trump’s tweets may seem rash and unconsidered but, in reality, he is doing exactly what Alinsky suggested his followers do. First, instead of going after “the fake media” — and they are so fake that they have literally gotten every single significant story of the past 60 years not just wrong, but diametrically opposed to the truth, from the Tet Offensive to Benghazi, to what really happened on the streets of Ferguson, Missouri — Trump isolated CNN.. He made it personal. Then, just as Alinsky suggests, he employs ridicule which Alinsky described as “the most powerful weapon of all.”... Most importantly, Trump’s tweets have put CNN in an untenable and unwinnable position. They need to respond. This leaves them with only two choices. They can either “go high” (as Hillary would disingenuously declare of herself and the fake news would disingenuously report as the truth) and begin to honestly and accurately report the news or they can double-down on their usual tactics and hope to defeat Trump with twice their usual hysteria and demagoguery.

  The problem for CNN (et al.) with the former is that, if they were to start honestly reporting the news, that would be the end of the Democratic Party they serve. It is nothing but the incessant use of fake news (read: propaganda) that keeps the Left alive. Imagine, for example, if CNN had honestly and accurately reported then-candidate Barack Obama’s close ties to foreign terrorists (Rashid Khalidi), domestic terrorists (William Ayers & Bernardine Dohrn), the mafia (Tony Rezko) or the true evils of his spiritual mentor, Jeremiah Wright’s church. Imagine if they had honestly and accurately conveyed the evils of the Obama administration’s weaponizing of the IRS to be used against their political opponents or his running of guns to the Mexican cartels or the truth about the murder of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and the Obama administration’s cover-up. So, to my friends on the Left — and the #NeverTrumpers as well — do I wish we lived in a time when our president could be “collegial” and “dignified” and “proper”? Of course I do. These aren’t those times. This is war. And it’s a war that the Left has been fighting without opposition for the past 50 years. So, say anything you want about this president - I get it - he can be vulgar, he can be crude, he can be undignified at times. I don’t care. I can’t spare this man. He fights for America!"

I think we all remember voting trump in 2016 as a vote to keep out higgardly - we didnt know exactly who we were getting with trump (politically) 

showy, narcissistic, self-aggrandizing yes... but a POTUS?   It was so much fun seeing (reading) the leftys here screaming about the lack of decorum.... 

My vote for trump in 2020 was my middle finger to all the establishment dc politics and YEARS of playing nice 

Trump has changed the landscape forever - and while Im not on the civil war ending yet,  I do know that the 74 million of us that voted trump 

will be here watching waiting for biden harris to get caught perpetuating the very notion of war that cysko says IMO correctly as "eating thier own"   

and like Axe says and Im paraphrasing to my feelings -  thanks a lot for voting these asswipes in - you know who you are

[JAFBF]

@cccjwh said:

Justice Dept. ends Pennsylvania election investigation, finding 'insufficient evidence' to prove bad intent - The Washington Post

The top federal prosecutor in Harrisburg, Pa., announced Friday that his office has closed an investigation into nine discarded ballots found in the northeastern part of the state that President Trump had touted to support his unfounded claims of election rigging, saying in a statement that the probe had found “insufficient evidence to prove criminal intent on the part of the person who discarded the ballots.”

"But this blog says there was massive election fraud." - Nut Jobs

First off, that number is wrong, but who cares, leave it as is.

You do realize those cases were thrown out without them even looking at any evidence don't you ?

Same for the Supreme Court, they never looked at any of the the evidence.

There may be another (at least one) case post "Inauguration" that they may deem worthy of being looked at.

They'll presume once the "danger" has passed it will be safe too look into.

[JAFBF]

@cccjwh said:

1. You have to show fraud that would effect the outcome of an election. A cult member voting for Cheetos with his dead mom's ballot does not show massive voter fraud.

2. Compromised" judges? I guess Cheetos shouldn't have appointed "compromised" judges. 

I guess Cheetos's Attorney General is also compromised. ?

Cysko is watching a guy play chess with a pigeon. The pigeon knocks down all the pieces and shits on the board and Cysko response is "Hey, you have to meet the pigeon half way."

Once they see the evidence that they refuse to even look at, the Election is null and void.

This has all been an exercise too show to the American people that the Courts are corrupt.

The other Government agencies have already been exposed as corrupt.

It just boils down to whether people care to look into it and believe what has been going on for years and years.

This Board is a prime example that people prefer to believe the MSM propaganda instead of actually doing a little investigation - it's much easier and less stressful that way isn't it ?

[MLD Woody]

"My client lost because of fraud!"

Where is your evidence?

"I don't have any..."

Alright then we're throwing this case out and not wasting our time with it

"See! They won't even take our case! They know there's fraud and they're hiding it!"

....

[MLD Woody]

Maybe history will look back at this and we can study how Trump and social media were used to fool so many people. I mean it's happened many times before, from religion to politics, but this is a great modern example. From people like Steve that have slowly bought into the lie, to people like JAFBF that destroyed their life buying into a conspiracy. I imagine most of you will be dead or in homes by then, but it'll be interesting history to look back on and to learn to avoid in the future. 

[DieHardBrownsFan]

@mld-woody said:

I imagine most of you will be dead or in homes by then

Typical Woody........

[calfoxwc]

@diehardbrownsfan said:

@mld-woody said:

I imagine most of you will be dead or in homes by then

Typical Woody........

terrorist threat or what, woodpecker?