Skip to content

JJ Watt to Cardinals

The Browns Board
262 40 10.0k 1
  • While an edge has much more to their game then straight stat stuffing, it's worth pointing out how god awful the Texans were this year.

    Hard to get pass rushing opportunities in the 2nd half when teams are running the ball on you to bleed clock with a 3 TD lead.

  • True that this past season was his first in 5?7? where he played all 16, he remains pretty good.  Not greatly better than Olivier Vernon.

    New site linked for this forum.. sports injury predictor for JJ watt suggests he's expected to miss 5 games to injury next year. Also lists his entire injury history.

  • Play against his brothers? lol...

    Yeah he'd be opposite Derek for about 4 plays twice a season... what an inducement.

    Hey, Gip...

    Double or nothing for that $100 you owe me? I'll take PTG and you can have the other 31 teams.

  • I'm interested in the Watt wants to win where watch...

    Going home to Green Bay with Rogers is his best landing spot imo.. a mere minus -28M over the cap

    I'd really hate the Steelers... a mere minus -30M over the cap 

    stay tuned & Why not us ?

  • I'm interested in the Watt wants to win where watch...

    Going home to Green Bay with Rogers is his best landing spot imo.. a mere minus -28M over the cap

    I'd really hate the Steelers... a mere minus -30M over the cap 

    stay tuned & Why not us ?

    @gumby73 said:

    Going home to Green Bay with Rogers is his best landing spot imo.. a mere minus -28M over the cap

    Good possibility be sure...

  • When I watched JJ play this last season, he looked like an average to slightly above average DL. Those injuries have taken a toll on him and he isn't the same player anymore. No way would I trade for him. I rather pay OV to come back for one year then take Watt.

    @runyon27 said:

    When I watched JJ play this last season, he looked like an average to slightly above average DL. Those injuries have taken a toll on him and he isn't the same player anymore. No way would I trade for him. I rather pay OV to come back for one year then take Watt.

    He was 8th in qb pressures. He wasn’t average. 

  • Play against his brothers? lol...

    Yeah he'd be opposite Derek for about 4 plays twice a season... what an inducement.

    Hey, Gip...

    Double or nothing for that $100 you owe me? I'll take PTG and you can have the other 31 teams.

    @tour2ma said:

    Play against his brothers? lol...

    Yeah he'd be opposite Derek for about 4 plays twice a season... what an inducement.

    Hey, Gip...

    Double or nothing for that $100 you owe me? I'll take PTG and you can have the other 31 teams.

      Your expertis at cullionocity is on display. 

    But  if it is a wager that you actually want to make an agreement on:   I will do it  for my usual wager:    a hot fudge sundae. 

    Now...you see this is  how this works, and to quote Denzel, I will explain it to you like you are a 4th grader, which may be apt: 

      You have invited me to make a   wager on a particular matter. (you wanna bet?)  Now, I have proposed to accept your invitation  to make a wager (OK, I will bet) .... but I have rejected your terms (that were never in place in the first place)  .....and I have proposed the alternate  terms of that wager:   a hot fudge sundae being the stakes. 

    Now, it is up to you to accept and agree to those terms.    If JJ Watt signs with the Steelers, you win the hot fudge sundae.  If he signs with any other team, I win it.   If you do not accept (as I did not on that other thing) there is no wager, no contract. No one gets anything. 

    See, now, this is a pretty simple legal construct that maybe even you can comprehend.  (maybe 60/40). 

    The ball is in your court

  • Gipper you are on ignore. I feel like you think we are communicating via smoke signals or something. It’s just a pile of your bs burning. I didn’t send up the plume. You should just put me on ignore too, spare yourself the constant heartache. 

  • Gipper you are on ignore. I feel like you think we are communicating via smoke signals or something. It’s just a pile of your bs burning. I didn’t send up the plume. You should just put me on ignore too, spare yourself the constant heartache. 

    @vagitron said:

    Gipper you are on ignore. I feel like you think we are communicating via smoke signals or something. It’s just a pile of your bs burning. I didn’t send up the plume. You should just put me on ignore too, spare yourself the constant heartache. 

    This guy is an ignoramous that just doesn't get it.    Again, I make commentary on sports here for the entire group's edification, not his.  He  occasionally may  bring up a subject that bears specific subject commentary upon...like, say, Steeler's cap issues  , but that commentary is  not specifically directed at him.  He, personally,   is irrelevant. 

    And, if he were not such a Fucktard, he would have noted that there was that specific invitation to me to make a wager.  So I responded to that direct question.   I don't have either of them on ignore, because I am not craven.

    And...another thing:

    If they have me on "Ignore", then why can't they ignore me?   As you all can tell, I certainly have no need to engage in repartee with them.....except, as I said, to comment on the substance of a post they make that may warrant commentary.    Yet every other post they make is about the fact that they have me on ignore. Curiouser and Curiouser.   I guess they can't really exist here without me. 

  • @gumby73 said:

    Going home to Green Bay with Rogers is his best landing spot imo.. a mere minus -28M over the cap

    Good possibility be sure...

    Touchdown Packers GIF - Touchdown Packers Aaron rodgers GIFs     ya win some       Image  

    @tour2ma said:

    Good possibility be sure...

           Gtg9.gif         ya lose some ?

  • Sign him for two or three years and draft a young buck in the first round to give him breathers on the sideline in between plays.

  • 9417FC3F-8606-4B84-B5E7-8BD1E4E18A44.png

  • @canton-dawg said:

    9417FC3F-8606-4B84-B5E7-8BD1E4E18A44.png

    Well, again, someone needs to explain the whole cap situation.   Unsymp says the Browns have no room. And even with the retirements of  McDonald, Pouncey, and if BR takes a vast pay cut, that still does not get the Steelers to the cap break even point.   I don't know about the other teams above here. 

    So...how is that all going to work for someone that has no cap space? 

  • @canton-dawg said:

    9417FC3F-8606-4B84-B5E7-8BD1E4E18A44.png

    Well, again, someone needs to explain the whole cap situation.   Unsymp says the Browns have no room. And even with the retirements of  McDonald, Pouncey, and if BR takes a vast pay cut, that still does not get the Steelers to the cap break even point.   I don't know about the other teams above here. 

    So...how is that all going to work for someone that has no cap space? 

    @the-gipper said:

    Well, again, someone needs to explain the whole cap situation.   Unsymp says the Browns have no room. And even with the retirements of  McDonald, Pouncey, and if BR takes a vast pay cut, that still does not get the Steelers to the cap break even point.   I don't know about the other teams above here. 

    So...how is that all going to work for someone that has no cap space? 

    At this point how many teams will be willing to give Watt a long term deal? My guess is none.  One year rent a player deal with a lot of incentives. 

  • I'm interested in the Watt wants to win where watch...

    Going home to Green Bay with Rogers is his best landing spot imo.. a mere minus -28M over the cap

    I'd really hate the Steelers... a mere minus -30M over the cap 

    stay tuned & Why not us ?

    @gumby73 said:

    I'm interested in the Watt wants to win where watch...

    Going home to Green Bay with Rogers is his best landing spot imo.. a mere minus -28M over the cap

    I'd really hate the Steelers... a mere minus -30M over the cap 

    stay tuned & Why not us ?

    Pass. 

  • Okkkkk him getting released definitely shaking this up.

    Salary cap 

    https://overthecap.com/salary-cap-space/

    It comes down to 3 serious teams assuming he would only go to a playoff contender?

    Us

    Rats

    9ers

    We can NOT let him become a rat

  • @gumby73 said:

    I'm interested in the Watt wants to win where watch...

    Going home to Green Bay with Rogers is his best landing spot imo.. a mere minus -28M over the cap

    I'd really hate the Steelers... a mere minus -30M over the cap 

    stay tuned & Why not us ?

    Pass. 

    @icecube said:

    Pass. 

    GIF jj, watt, best animated GIFs free download             6RTG.gif     passing is not asking.. were in the mix, as we should be     

  • @canton-dawg said:

    9417FC3F-8606-4B84-B5E7-8BD1E4E18A44.png

    Well, again, someone needs to explain the whole cap situation.   Unsymp says the Browns have no room. And even with the retirements of  McDonald, Pouncey, and if BR takes a vast pay cut, that still does not get the Steelers to the cap break even point.   I don't know about the other teams above here. 

    So...how is that all going to work for someone that has no cap space? 

    @the-gipper said:

    Well, again, someone needs to explain the whole cap situation.   Unsymp says the Browns have no room. And even with the retirements of  McDonald, Pouncey, and if BR takes a vast pay cut, that still does not get the Steelers to the cap break even point.   I don't know about the other teams above here. 

    So...how is that all going to work for someone that has no cap space? 

     1. The Browns MAY spend unused cap from the previous year.  We have a lot.  

    2. They don’t have to extend any player of Major significance in the 2021 offseason.

    3. They don’t have to extend any player of major significance but they have to be mindful of the players they sign in 2021 and how their cap numbers (if we sign anyone beyond a one year deal) may play out in 2022, 2023 and down the road when we need to sign our own and Garrett’s cap number is more of a burden.  
     

    Watt on a one year deal mentoring the 6-7 rookies we draft is not a bad situation. 

     

  • @the-gipper said:

    Well, again, someone needs to explain the whole cap situation.   Unsymp says the Browns have no room. And even with the retirements of  McDonald, Pouncey, and if BR takes a vast pay cut, that still does not get the Steelers to the cap break even point.   I don't know about the other teams above here. 

    So...how is that all going to work for someone that has no cap space? 

     1. The Browns MAY spend unused cap from the previous year.  We have a lot.  

    2. They don’t have to extend any player of Major significance in the 2021 offseason.

    3. They don’t have to extend any player of major significance but they have to be mindful of the players they sign in 2021 and how their cap numbers (if we sign anyone beyond a one year deal) may play out in 2022, 2023 and down the road when we need to sign our own and Garrett’s cap number is more of a burden.  
     

    Watt on a one year deal mentoring the 6-7 rookies we draft is not a bad situation. 

     

    @sdbacker80 said:

    Watt on a one year deal mentoring the 6-7 rookies we draft is not a bad situation.

    Well there's the kicker. He will only sign with someone who offers a multi-year deal IMO.