Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Hollywood returns!

Hollywood returns!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
58 Posts 20 Posters 1.4k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • gumby73 gumby73G Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
    • 11k Posts
    • 4k Reputation
    gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by
    #18

    ugh?... Jarvis is 28 & will retire as a brown.. book it! 

    #80     Bless'em !! 

    Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends Team Brotherhood-"It's not about You,Me or I. It's about building We"..Hue Jackson
    1 Reply Last reply
    👍 ❤
    Quote Reply
    • S Silver slayer

      My take is this is the last year higgy, obj and landry

      Next off-season higgins gets extended and the LSU  guys will be surprised to be told to go elsewhere 

      hoorta hoortaH Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
      • 20k Posts
      • 5k Reputation
      hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
      #19

      @silver-slayer said:

      My take is this is the last year higgy, obj and landry

      Next off-season higgins gets extended and the LSU  guys will be surprised to be told to go elsewhere 

      You really must think Pro-Bowl WRs just grow on trees.  Sure the Browns are way up there- 3rd in the NFL- on WR positional spending. It's not like we can't afford to. OBJ's future in 2022 will be dependent on whether he can stay healthy or not. 

      ATOMA 1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • U Unsympathetic

        Deal is 2.38M for 2021.

        Betcha next offseason we look to make WR younger & more explosive. VS Baltimore in playoffs we couldn't beat their press man.

        ballpeen ballpeenB Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
        • 9k Posts
        • 2k Reputation
        ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by
        #20

        @unsympathetic said:

        Deal is 2.38M for 2021.

        Betcha next offseason we look to make WR younger & more explosive. VS Baltimore in playoffs we couldn't beat their press man.

        Don't be surprised if it is this year.  The draft is loaded with excellent receivers.  Maybe the best receiver class in decades.  I don't think we will use our 1st rounder on a receiver, but we could if the receiver is clearly the BPA.  I fully expect we will draft a receiver in rounds 2 or 3.  We may not, but I wouldn't be anywhere near shocked.  

        I don't think both of OBJ and Landry are here next year.  Maybe both will be gone.  Now, not next year is the time to plan for that.

        If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
        1 Reply Last reply
        👍
        Quote Reply
        • tiamat63 tiamat63T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Week One Done One Month Later One Year In Very Popular
          • 13k Posts
          • 5k Reputation
          tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by tiamat63
          #21

          You don't necessarily have to be "explosive" to beat press. (But it sure helps)    nobody is going to call Fitz,  Boldin or Michael Thomas that explosive, but they tend to annihilate more physical db's with their size, strength and footwork.  If I can't beat you vertical, then I'm just going to out muscle and out position you on 50/50 throws.

          1 Reply Last reply
          👍
          Quote Reply
          • Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
            • 30k Posts
            • 6k Reputation
            Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
            #22

            I still think a waterbug is on our shopping list this draft. A smaller, more quick than fast WR who puts fear in Ds whenever he has the ball and who is also comfortable returning punts.

            There are a couple really good prospects in that vein that'll be there Day 2.

            "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
            L ballpeenB 2 Replies Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • Tour2maT Tour2ma

              I still think a waterbug is on our shopping list this draft. A smaller, more quick than fast WR who puts fear in Ds whenever he has the ball and who is also comfortable returning punts.

              There are a couple really good prospects in that vein that'll be there Day 2.

              LondonBrown L Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
              • 4k Posts
              • 918 Reputation
              L LondonBrown wrote on last edited by
              #23

              @tour2ma said:

              I still think a waterbug is on our shopping list this draft. A smaller, more quick than fast WR who puts fear in Ds whenever he has the ball and who is also comfortable returning punts.

              There are a couple really good prospects in that vein that'll be there Day 2.

              Any names please Tour, I’ve got some time to look at a few today ?

              Tour2maT 1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • Tour2maT Tour2ma

                I still think a waterbug is on our shopping list this draft. A smaller, more quick than fast WR who puts fear in Ds whenever he has the ball and who is also comfortable returning punts.

                There are a couple really good prospects in that vein that'll be there Day 2.

                ballpeen ballpeenB Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                • 9k Posts
                • 2k Reputation
                ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by
                #24

                @tour2ma said:

                I still think a waterbug is on our shopping list this draft. A smaller, more quick than fast WR who puts fear in Ds whenever he has the ball and who is also comfortable returning punts.

                There are a couple really good prospects in that vein that'll be there Day 2.

                The guy I want is Toney from Florida.  He won't be there, but I want him.

                If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • tiamat63 tiamat63T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Week One Done One Month Later One Year In Very Popular
                  • 13k Posts
                  • 5k Reputation
                  tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by tiamat63
                  #25

                  Technically Hollywood never left sir.  He's always offered the same high quality meals at competitive low prices.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • L LondonBrown

                    @tour2ma said:

                    I still think a waterbug is on our shopping list this draft. A smaller, more quick than fast WR who puts fear in Ds whenever he has the ball and who is also comfortable returning punts.

                    There are a couple really good prospects in that vein that'll be there Day 2.

                    Any names please Tour, I’ve got some time to look at a few today ?

                    Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                    • 30k Posts
                    • 6k Reputation
                    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
                    #26

                    @londonbrown said:

                    Any names please Tour, I’ve got some time to look at a few today ?

                    1st find was UL's Chatarius "Tutu" Atwell (5'9, 165)... once upon a time he was round 4-ish, but now is in the mix for Round 2. So enter....

                    Auburn's Anthony Schwartz (6'0, 179)... tad tall for waterbug status at 6'0, but still very quick.

                    And finally a pair of Day 3, small college kids...

                    • North Texas' Jaelon Darden (5'9, 170)... probably the buggiest of all.
                    • Western Michigan's D'Wayne Eskridge (5'9, 189).

                    image.png.02bd439d26887aaddb4ebb0dbf032eed.pngimage.png.f6a6632e1689da8f3cbf46318b93919f.png

                    image.png.cb73ada2565d8285c62362be7caf84ad.pngimage.png.29e6d507eb38e81cc367c4c34c522f17.png

                    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • LondonBrown L Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                      • 4k Posts
                      • 918 Reputation
                      L LondonBrown wrote on last edited by
                      #27

                      I like to listen to Greg Cosell's draft stuff, he is high on Daerden as well

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven

                        @sdbacker80 said:

                        I love me some prove it deals.

                        Although it Creates another question heading into 2022.  Where our WR room could look VERY different.  

                        I agree. 

                        I'd put a ton of money that 2 of the 3 - and maybe all three - of Landry, OBJ and Higgins are playing their last season with the Browns in 2021. 

                        jiggins7919 jiggins7919J Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                        • 5k Posts
                        • 1k Reputation
                        jiggins7919J jiggins7919 wrote on last edited by
                        #28

                        @dutch-oven said:

                        I agree. 

                        I'd put a ton of money that 2 of the 3 - and maybe all three - of Landry, OBJ and Higgins are playing their last season with the Browns in 2021. 

                        It all depends but you could be right. We could also run it back again if things work out and contracts get restructured after a substantial boost in cap next year. 

                        Dutch OvenD 1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • jiggins7919J jiggins7919

                          @dutch-oven said:

                          I agree. 

                          I'd put a ton of money that 2 of the 3 - and maybe all three - of Landry, OBJ and Higgins are playing their last season with the Browns in 2021. 

                          It all depends but you could be right. We could also run it back again if things work out and contracts get restructured after a substantial boost in cap next year. 

                          Dutch Oven Dutch OvenD Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                          • 15k Posts
                          • 8k Reputation
                          Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on last edited by
                          #29

                          @jiggins7919 said:

                          It all depends but you could be right. We could also run it back again if things work out and contracts get restructured after a substantial boost in cap next year. 

                          Possibly, or OBJ has another season where he misses games, and Higgins and Landry get another year older and another tick slower in their 40 times. 

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven

                            @sdbacker80 said:

                            I love me some prove it deals.

                            Although it Creates another question heading into 2022.  Where our WR room could look VERY different.  

                            I agree. 

                            I'd put a ton of money that 2 of the 3 - and maybe all three - of Landry, OBJ and Higgins are playing their last season with the Browns in 2021. 

                            ballpeen ballpeenB Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                            • 9k Posts
                            • 2k Reputation
                            ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by
                            #30

                            @dutch-oven said:

                            I agree. 

                            I'd put a ton of money that 2 of the 3 - and maybe all three - of Landry, OBJ and Higgins are playing their last season with the Browns in 2021. 

                            I agree with that. Higgins will always be a year to year guy.  OBJ and Jarvis make a ton of money.  It will get harder and harder to keep both.  This is a good draft for receivers.  If we select one fairly high, I think it is a clear signal that one of OBJ or Landry are gone at some point in the near future.  Near future meaning anytime before the trade deadline and the 2022 season.

                            If the plan is to trade one of them, drafting a receiver this year is the time to plan for that, not next draft. Again, it is a great year to draft a receiver, and I don't think we want to go in to next year counting on a freshly drafted rookie. It makes sense to give that player a year under the belt.

                            If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
                            Dutch OvenD The GipperT 2 Replies Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • ballpeenB ballpeen

                              @dutch-oven said:

                              I agree. 

                              I'd put a ton of money that 2 of the 3 - and maybe all three - of Landry, OBJ and Higgins are playing their last season with the Browns in 2021. 

                              I agree with that. Higgins will always be a year to year guy.  OBJ and Jarvis make a ton of money.  It will get harder and harder to keep both.  This is a good draft for receivers.  If we select one fairly high, I think it is a clear signal that one of OBJ or Landry are gone at some point in the near future.  Near future meaning anytime before the trade deadline and the 2022 season.

                              If the plan is to trade one of them, drafting a receiver this year is the time to plan for that, not next draft. Again, it is a great year to draft a receiver, and I don't think we want to go in to next year counting on a freshly drafted rookie. It makes sense to give that player a year under the belt.

                              Dutch Oven Dutch OvenD Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                              • 15k Posts
                              • 8k Reputation
                              Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on last edited by
                              #31

                              @ballpeen said:

                              I agree with that. Higgins will always be a year to year guy.  OBJ and Jarvis make a ton of money.  It will get harder and harder to keep both.  This is a good draft for receivers.  If we select one fairly high, I think it is a clear signal that one of OBJ or Landry are gone at some point in the near future.  Near future meaning anytime before the trade deadline and the 2022 season.

                              If the plan is to trade one of them, drafting a receiver this year is the time to plan for that, not next draft. Again, it is a great year to draft a receiver, and I don't think we want to go in to next year counting on a freshly drafted rookie. It makes sense to give that player a year under the belt.

                              The Browns have Mayfield, Ward, Chubb, and Teller coming up on free agency. 

                              You have Landry and OBJ making about $30 mill combined. One is a leader of the team, who is somewhat limited athletically who keeps getting older. The other is a more dynamic receiver who can take pressure off the other, but isn't consistently available. 

                              Finding cheaper, more explosive WRs would really help a Browns team that is going to have to dole out big contracts. 

                              tiamat63T 1 Reply Last reply
                              👍
                              Quote Reply
                              • ballpeen ballpeenB Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                • 9k Posts
                                • 2k Reputation
                                ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by
                                #32

                                You get it Dutch.  This has nothing to do with not liking the players.  It has to do with the realities the team faces.  When we sucked it was easy to release players to add or extend others.    As you get better, hard decisions sometimes have to be made.  It isn't as simple as it once was where we could cut some player to find the roster spot.

                                Now, not only do we have to find the roster spot, we also have to find the cap space.

                                If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
                                Dutch OvenD 1 Reply Last reply
                                ❤
                                Quote Reply
                                • ballpeenB ballpeen

                                  You get it Dutch.  This has nothing to do with not liking the players.  It has to do with the realities the team faces.  When we sucked it was easy to release players to add or extend others.    As you get better, hard decisions sometimes have to be made.  It isn't as simple as it once was where we could cut some player to find the roster spot.

                                  Now, not only do we have to find the roster spot, we also have to find the cap space.

                                  Dutch Oven Dutch OvenD Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                  • 15k Posts
                                  • 8k Reputation
                                  Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on last edited by
                                  #33

                                  @ballpeen said:

                                  You get it Dutch.  This has nothing to do with not liking the players.  It has to do with the realities the team faces.  When we sucked it was easy to release players to add or extend others.    As you get better, hard decisions sometimes have to be made.  It isn't as simple as it once was where we could cut some player to find the roster spot.

                                  Now, not only do we have to find the roster spot, we also have to find the cap space.

                                  Yep. 

                                  The Browns are going to find themselves in the weird and unique (for them) situation of having to actually pay their top draft picks past their rookie contracts. They will have to look at their roster and figure out where they can get younger and cheaper. Well, a possession WR in his late 20s making $14ish mill a year and an oft-injured WR making more are obvious spots to look.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  👍
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • ballpeenB ballpeen

                                    @dutch-oven said:

                                    I agree. 

                                    I'd put a ton of money that 2 of the 3 - and maybe all three - of Landry, OBJ and Higgins are playing their last season with the Browns in 2021. 

                                    I agree with that. Higgins will always be a year to year guy.  OBJ and Jarvis make a ton of money.  It will get harder and harder to keep both.  This is a good draft for receivers.  If we select one fairly high, I think it is a clear signal that one of OBJ or Landry are gone at some point in the near future.  Near future meaning anytime before the trade deadline and the 2022 season.

                                    If the plan is to trade one of them, drafting a receiver this year is the time to plan for that, not next draft. Again, it is a great year to draft a receiver, and I don't think we want to go in to next year counting on a freshly drafted rookie. It makes sense to give that player a year under the belt.

                                    The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                                    • 57k Posts
                                    • 4k Reputation
                                    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                                    #34

                                    @ballpeen said:

                                    I agree with that. Higgins will always be a year to year guy.  OBJ and Jarvis make a ton of money.  It will get harder and harder to keep both.  This is a good draft for receivers.  If we select one fairly high, I think it is a clear signal that one of OBJ or Landry are gone at some point in the near future.  Near future meaning anytime before the trade deadline and the 2022 season.

                                    If the plan is to trade one of them, drafting a receiver this year is the time to plan for that, not next draft. Again, it is a great year to draft a receiver, and I don't think we want to go in to next year counting on a freshly drafted rookie. It makes sense to give that player a year under the belt.

                                    Having done some stocking up in the DB, and at  LB some with Walker, it may make it more likely that a WR may be taken high  Maybe  2d round?  I still think defense, probably DL  will be the ticket in round one. 

                                    ballpeenB 1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • The GipperT The Gipper

                                      @ballpeen said:

                                      I agree with that. Higgins will always be a year to year guy.  OBJ and Jarvis make a ton of money.  It will get harder and harder to keep both.  This is a good draft for receivers.  If we select one fairly high, I think it is a clear signal that one of OBJ or Landry are gone at some point in the near future.  Near future meaning anytime before the trade deadline and the 2022 season.

                                      If the plan is to trade one of them, drafting a receiver this year is the time to plan for that, not next draft. Again, it is a great year to draft a receiver, and I don't think we want to go in to next year counting on a freshly drafted rookie. It makes sense to give that player a year under the belt.

                                      Having done some stocking up in the DB, and at  LB some with Walker, it may make it more likely that a WR may be taken high  Maybe  2d round?  I still think defense, probably DL  will be the ticket in round one. 

                                      ballpeen ballpeenB Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                      • 9k Posts
                                      • 2k Reputation
                                      ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by
                                      #35

                                      @the-gipper said:

                                      Having done some stocking up in the DB, and at  LB some with Walker, it may make it more likely that a WR may be taken high  Maybe  2d round?  I still think defense, probably DL  will be the ticket in round one. 

                                      That is probably the odds on favorite, and makes sense.  With FA having filled many of our needs, what might have been the odds on favorite a few weeks ago, more of a true BPA approach might be what we do, so while it might still be the odds favorite to go D, the odds might not be as good.  I also think the odds of trading out of round 1 have also increased.   

                                      If we know anything about Berry and Depo, they love future picks, and there is no better pick to gain picks and still have a good draft pick is to trade your 1st rounder.  We could trade that and move down only 5-6 slots and probably get a 3rd rounder for next year.  It might make sense depending on who is left on the board and how likely 1-2 of them will still be there after the trade down.

                                      If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
                                      Dutch OvenD 1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • ballpeenB ballpeen

                                        @the-gipper said:

                                        Having done some stocking up in the DB, and at  LB some with Walker, it may make it more likely that a WR may be taken high  Maybe  2d round?  I still think defense, probably DL  will be the ticket in round one. 

                                        That is probably the odds on favorite, and makes sense.  With FA having filled many of our needs, what might have been the odds on favorite a few weeks ago, more of a true BPA approach might be what we do, so while it might still be the odds favorite to go D, the odds might not be as good.  I also think the odds of trading out of round 1 have also increased.   

                                        If we know anything about Berry and Depo, they love future picks, and there is no better pick to gain picks and still have a good draft pick is to trade your 1st rounder.  We could trade that and move down only 5-6 slots and probably get a 3rd rounder for next year.  It might make sense depending on who is left on the board and how likely 1-2 of them will still be there after the trade down.

                                        Dutch Oven Dutch OvenD Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                        • 15k Posts
                                        • 8k Reputation
                                        Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on last edited by
                                        #36

                                        @ballpeen said:

                                        That is probably the odds on favorite, and makes sense.  With FA having filled many of our needs, what might have been the odds on favorite a few weeks ago, more of a true BPA approach might be what we do, so while it might still be the odds favorite to go D, the odds might not be as good.  I also think the odds of trading out of round 1 have also increased.   

                                        If we know anything about Berry and Depo, they love future picks, and there is no better pick to gain picks and still have a good draft pick is to trade your 1st rounder.  We could trade that and move down only 5-6 slots and probably get a 3rd rounder for next year.  It might make sense depending on who is left on the board and how likely 1-2 of them will still be there after the trade down.

                                        That makes sense in many ways, for the Browns to trade down because of the front office loves them some picks, but there is something to consider doing that...

                                        If you do, you lose control of your top drafted player in the 2021 draft by a year. 

                                        Something to consider.  

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        ❤
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven

                                          @ballpeen said:

                                          I agree with that. Higgins will always be a year to year guy.  OBJ and Jarvis make a ton of money.  It will get harder and harder to keep both.  This is a good draft for receivers.  If we select one fairly high, I think it is a clear signal that one of OBJ or Landry are gone at some point in the near future.  Near future meaning anytime before the trade deadline and the 2022 season.

                                          If the plan is to trade one of them, drafting a receiver this year is the time to plan for that, not next draft. Again, it is a great year to draft a receiver, and I don't think we want to go in to next year counting on a freshly drafted rookie. It makes sense to give that player a year under the belt.

                                          The Browns have Mayfield, Ward, Chubb, and Teller coming up on free agency. 

                                          You have Landry and OBJ making about $30 mill combined. One is a leader of the team, who is somewhat limited athletically who keeps getting older. The other is a more dynamic receiver who can take pressure off the other, but isn't consistently available. 

                                          Finding cheaper, more explosive WRs would really help a Browns team that is going to have to dole out big contracts. 

                                          tiamat63 tiamat63T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Week One Done One Month Later One Year In Very Popular
                                          • 13k Posts
                                          • 5k Reputation
                                          tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by tiamat63
                                          #37

                                          @dutch-oven said:

                                          The Browns have Mayfield, Ward, Chubb, and Teller coming up on free agency. 

                                          You have Landry and OBJ making about $30 mill combined. One is a leader of the team, who is somewhat limited athletically who keeps getting older.

                                          First off, we're all getting older.  Second of all, Juice is 28 there guy.  Hard to believe because it feels like he's been in the league since the Bush administration.  

                                          Dutch OvenD 1 Reply Last reply
                                          😂
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate