Ultimatum Time

? TheJokersWILD

@danamal said:
mz the pussy,
I like you and all but if you cant ignore one Retard you should take a break,I understand your point but he's a Retard why let him get under your skin?

I agree mz the pussy, take a break...browse though the Rock-N-Roll thread. I just posted a new topic in it Whether we have a winning or losing record, this year is going to be exciting, I can't wait to see the new defense in action in the regular season. I just love the way Mangini is running this team right now, I want to see how this season plays out.

? mz.

Thanks for the responses, guys.

We all have our distinct views on what's happened/what's going on.

I just urge the mods to think about how much better, win OR lose, reflecting/discussing/analyzing/preparing for the game would be without the aforementioned distraction. If this behavior happened in a bar, I think it's sage to say he'd be up shit's creek. Since I'm sure no real discussion is possible unless EVERYONE ignores it, I'm going to opt for enjoyng the football season insteadof having to argue with some troll who is not only NOT a fan of the team but gets inbetween us fans and our discussions.

I am on a couple of other message boards, and there is nothing that approximates Lumbergh. Not even close.

It frankly saddens me that Stan et al don't see it this way. It's shocking; it's a mystery to me. How much better of a place this is (the best), how much better the discussion and debate is and, call me a fag if you like, the comroderie/togetherness is without just ONE solitary asshat who isn't even a Browns fan. This isn't even a question in my mind. But I'm not the owner here, I'm merely a visitor, so I guess the owner wins out. Which is fine. The idea of keeping someone here who is detrimental to the quality of this place (this is not debatable) is a decision I'll never understand but will nevertheless abide by.

samoth

you guys are taking the internet WAY too seriously

Mark O

All great points everyone....There are some of us who have been together since before '99, when there wasn't even a Browns team to watch on Sundays yet here we all were talking and arguing about college players who wouldn't be drafted for 2 years.

That's the reason why I'm struggling to stay away from the opening game. I really shouldn't spend the money, but I can't stay away from the 10 year anniversary of the group getting together.

As others have said....when Lums and the other trolls get to be too much...stay away for a couple days or ignore what he says. The key thing to remember is that he's not a Browns fan. He's a Derek Anderson fan and if Quinn starts and plays well, there won't be much for lumpdick to say.

Sez.EJ

So basically what I hear a lot of you guys saying is that since Lums will not debate you on YOUR terms.. he should be banned. Because Lums will not see things YOUR way...he should be banned. Because lums is absolutely blind to the deficiencies DA has..he should be banned... because Lums will not answer your questions the way YOU want him to... he should be banned...

What kind of fascist attitude is this.. America is strong because we allow people to be different and have differing views and opinions. I realize all to well this board is not a democracy.. But you guys act like Lums is sneaking into your house and molesting your daughter.. Good grief.. Quitcher whining.. This post is unbelievable. Your Browns fans.. You should be used to a little adversity in your life by now. Grow a pair and get over it.

? AdaM

Anyone know who's starting tonight?

steel88

I heard that itll be brady, but they are splitting the first half.

roach

Larry, i wouldn't start deleting Lum's work. A well placed reminder that Quinn got punched in the face by a teammate can be pretty funny every once in a while. Some can't keep up with his wit, others are just disgusted with his existence. i think he provides a health element to the Board.

Besides, he doesn't normally pollute all the threads- just the QB ones.

PlaygroundLegend

As much as I dislike Lumburg and his blind love for DA, I dont think he should be banned. He has the right to his opinion, and yes, I know he relentlessly calls everyone BQ fags, and yes I know that he is troll like and hijacks threads, even I am guilty for feeding him and dissing him, but the fact of the matter is that he has the right to post here since he is a fan of a Browns player. If he calls you a Quinn fag, just ignore it, and dont recognize it, when we create threads like this and respond to his insults were just fueling the fire, most of the time his arguments arent logical, but from time to time he brings up good points.

Remember, every place we go, theres an asshole, Lumburg is our asshole, but we cant ban him, we need him here to keep things level, it gives us something to do, he causes more people to post.

Plus, I want to see what he says when Quinn is named the starter...

My vote is to keep Lumburg here

WPB Dawg Fan

as a moderator, I have in fact done some deleting of posts when they are out of context of the thread...and that is not just Lumbergh. So, in that arena, because Lumbergh is not the only one that gets deleted when out of context (hi-jacking a thread) I don't have any problems with doing so to him as well.

Honesty, for some reason or another I think Lumbergh has actually been given more rope than most to hang himself. I think it is exactly the reason that many of us like trotting out our supposed 'wealth of knowledge' as to why Lumbergh is wrong. Many actually enjoy thinking we are 'owning' the Lumbergh.

With that said, any talk of banning is ridiculous. He is obnoxious at times, but isn't threatening, does normally keep his posts limited to the threads about QB's...and actually does at times add information that many don't know about DA.

So, I guess my point is this....Lumbergh is more than welcome in my mind on this board. He can and does add something (even if it is only comic relief at times). However, he does need to try and curtail the name calling thing. Not everyone who expresses a difference in opinion needs to be lumped in as a BQ f** or whatever.

I have expressed this opinion to Lumbergh, and I hope that he respects that and we can go forward with our core of great posters AND Lumbergh for as long as he wishes to be here and contribute.

? mz.

@shepwrite said:
Sounds cool enough. We'll see how it goes. I'm putting him back on ignore.

I truly hope it improves for the sake of everyone here.

That being said, go Browns, and I'll be popping my head in the tavern sporadically on gamedays just to see what's what.

Thanks, y'all.

Erie Dawg

@danamal said:
Shep aint goin anywhere.
Look at his post count,this board is his life.

I think that’s the problem with some of these guys, they spend so much time on here that it’s making them crazy.

Shut the computer off for a minute and go get some ass!

You are making this place look like a whine ass steeler forum.

ndneighbor

Anyone who is still feeling "in the dark" about the Limbergher character, it's because you didn't really read Flugel's post in this thread. Try reading it again. This time actually read it.

Limbergher isn't the only puppet to stop by this thread:

@herman-m said:
you are who you hang out with. i wouldnt tell anybody if i was you. like the apple didnt fall to far from the tree thing.

Steeler SChuck said:
The Browns Board is thick with drama, I see.
Truth is, mz the pussy wants to back out of our bet. He's wising up and realizes the stains are a 4-win team this year.

Smart man.

Regards

..... an'at

.

Wow. Look at the page views.

Don't be suckers.

Learn how to use "Ignore." Ignore is a verb, by the way.

Don't be afraid to punch the punching bag from time to time. (If you're not using ignore.)

The next puppet we'll see will probably be Zohan.

Perhaps some of you should post some links to schizophrenia support groups for the puppet master.

ndneighbor

88fingerslewy said:
Hoorta,
when you put it that way....what the hell. Lums will disappear one day, if he doesn't so what. Did I mention I heart boobs....?

Stop it. You're just changing the subject.

Legacy Fan

@sez.ej said:
So basically what I hear a lot of you guys saying is that since Lums will not debate you on YOUR terms.. he should be banned. Because Lums will not see things YOUR way...he should be banned. Because lums is absolutely blind to the deficiencies DA has..he should be banned... because Lums will not answer your questions the way YOU want him to... he should be banned...
What kind of fascist attitude is this.. America is strong because we allow people to be different and have differing views and opinions. I realize all to well this board is not a democracy.. But you guys act like Lums is sneaking into your house and molesting your daughter.. Good grief.. Quitcher whining.. This post is unbelievable. Your Browns fans.. You should be used to a little adversity in your life by now. Grow a pair and get over it.

I completely disagree with this assessment of the Lumberg situation. If he was only defending DA, or only bashing Quinn it might be possible to ignore, or even tolerable to an extent. What he does is hijack the content of the thread and pollutes the board with whatever insult he just learned from an email forward.

To give a non QB example so as to illustrate my (and many's) point.

Say we were discussing Jarron Gilbert jumping out of the pool on youtube. There would be talk of explosion and strength, and as normal discussion progresses, most members could visualize how that kind of "stunt" could translate to explosiveness on the football field. Or could argue that it might provide forward burst only & his lateral movement could be compromised. You know, adult stuff.

Lumberg has entered the room:

"Yeah, well how many TD's does jumping out of a pool score? Zero!! Hahaha!!1"

and scene.

What in the fcuk does that bring to the table other than to disrupt?

And I'll leave you and anyone else that feels that he brings some sort of balance to the QB debate, or some entertainment value, with my last thoughts on the matter:

When a poster like Jason J (the only member on the board with more "thanks" than posts) has to waste one of his valuable, few and far between posts addressing the ridiculousness of the situation, you have a problem.

choco

he tries to hijack the thread. the idiots replying to his every comment are those that let him succeed.

exercise some control people.....or at least make a spearate thread to post all your whiny bullshit.

roach

If he was a smartass about the defense then you might cry more.

Do you mean saying things like our defense has the talent to compete, D'Qwell is a good LB, stuff like that? Yeah, i'd be crying.

Lollygagger

Been lurking a long time on this board, Lums is definitely one of the most annoying characters on any board I visit.

Instead of an outright ban, another possibility is just treating him as the juvenile he is, give him a time out for a few weeks (revoke posting privileges). The board will be much more readable.

Farang

@lollygagger said:
Been lurking a long time on this board, Lums is definitely one of the most annoying characters on any board I visit.
Instead of an outright ban, another possibility is just treating him as the juvenile he is, give him a time out for a few weeks (revoke posting privileges). The board will be much more readable.

I agree, Lumbergh adds nothing positive to this board. Suspend him whenever he acts like an ass.

Flugel

@ndneighbor said:
Anyone who is still feeling "in the dark" about the Limbergher character, it's because you didn't really read Flugel's post in this thread. Try reading it again. This time actually read it.

Thanks ND & Damajuki for your acknowledgments.

This board can be as FUN or miserable as we want it to be. Choco pretty much nails it when he says don't respond to Lummy's every opinion if you have a hard time with his style.

Damajuki also nailed it when he said this board is alot like Cheers. There's all kinds of opportunities for fun on this board.

Let's get the game faces on - kick off is in less than 2 hours.

- Tom F.