If you want to put Lum on ignore
-
@jadbf said:
I'm the one who quoted freedom of speech.and no your not stopping him from writing, but you are campaining for people to ignore him.
You're not "helping" people. If they needed help they could ask.
I actually don't find many of his posts interesting at all. But I don't need the ingore feature either. I can very easily use my mouse scroll button to go right past his posts.
and again, I have no issue if people want to put him (or me or anyone else) on ignore. But the people campaining and telling others they should ignore him too, and acting like they know the best way to deal with lums (whos says he need "dealt with" at all) are being just as childish as he is.
Lums a good guy, BQ fags
-
@jadbf said:
I'm the one who quoted freedom of speech.and no your not stopping him from writing, but you are campaining for people to ignore him.
You're not "helping" people. If they needed help they could ask.
I actually don't find many of his posts interesting at all. But I don't need the ingore feature either. I can very easily use my mouse scroll button to go right past his posts.
and again, I have no issue if people want to put him (or me or anyone else) on ignore. But the people campaining and telling others they should ignore him too, and acting like they know the best way to deal with lums (whos says he need "dealt with" at all) are being just as childish as he is.
Lums a good guy, BQ fags
Lums a good guy, BQ fags
And there we have it - Lumbergh with his new identity.
-
@inspecta said:
Did you de-throne yourself or something?But seriously, that was way cool, makes it very interesting to put him on ignore. Hell if stan won't do anything, I say we sticky this to the top of the board.
Maybe put it on the front page of the site.
Inspecta, you don't need to call out Stan because you can't handle Lums. Who gives a rat if you have him on ignore or you have thick enough skin to be selective in what you read by him? You're better than this.
If people are going to attack Atenear's character because somebody doesn't share their opinion about 1 or 2 players - TOUGHEN UP, get a backbone and get this CRAP off the message board! Don't tell me you're ignoring the guy when he's all you talk about.
IMO, we're LUCKY Atenears runs this board. The last time I was on a message board runned by someone else - she handed out cyber time outs to adults. I'm disappointed in this thread and the people that don't appreciate Atenears. Think about that the next time you show up to a tailgate in Cleveland.
- Tom F. (Message boards are supposed to be about expressing differences of opinion)
-
@inspecta said:
Did you de-throne yourself or something?But seriously, that was way cool, makes it very interesting to put him on ignore. Hell if stan won't do anything, I say we sticky this to the top of the board.
Maybe put it on the front page of the site.
Inspecta, you don't need to call out Stan because you can't handle Lums. Who gives a rat if you have him on ignore or you have thick enough skin to be selective in what you read by him? You're better than this.
If people are going to attack Atenear's character because somebody doesn't share their opinion about 1 or 2 players - TOUGHEN UP, get a backbone and get this CRAP off the message board! Don't tell me you're ignoring the guy when he's all you talk about.
IMO, we're LUCKY Atenears runs this board. The last time I was on a message board runned by someone else - she handed out cyber time outs to adults. I'm disappointed in this thread and the people that don't appreciate Atenears. Think about that the next time you show up to a tailgate in Cleveland.
- Tom F. (Message boards are supposed to be about expressing differences of opinion)
Inspecta, you don't need to call out Stan because you can't handle Lums. Who gives a rat if you have him on ignore or you have thick enough skin to be selective in what you read by him? You're better than this.
If people are going to attack Atenear's character because somebody doesn't share their opinion about 1 or 2 players - TOUGHEN UP, get a backbone and get this CRAP off the message board! Don't tell me you're ignoring the guy when he's all you talk about.
IMO, we're LUCKY Atenears runs this board. The last time I was on a message board runned by someone else - she handed out cyber time outs to adults. I'm disappointed in this thread and the people that don't appreciate Atenears. Think about that the next time you show up to a tailgate in Cleveland.
- Tom F. (Message boards are supposed to be about expressing differences of opinion)
Yeah Inspecta, quit being a little cheese-hole ... Springer sells baby!
-
This entire board needs group therapy. What an odd thread.
And I am still not sure why Stan is agitated with this thread. If he is all for supporting freedom of speech, why is he electing to have this post removed? Selective approach I gather.
-
This entire board needs group therapy. What an odd thread.
And I am still not sure why Stan is agitated with this thread. If he is all for supporting freedom of speech, why is he electing to have this post removed? Selective approach I gather.
This entire board needs group therapy. What an odd thread.
And I am still not sure why Stan is agitated with this thread. If he is all for supporting freedom of speech, why is he electing to have this post removed? Selective approach I gather.
He didn't. He was just venting. You know he PAYS for this site right? People can give him a little more respect than they do. People wanted smiley fces and people got smiley faces. People wanted a game day tavern and they got a game day tavern. People wanted fantasy football and they got 5 leagues and a Woof Woof Column that's second to none. People wanted a high school football section and they got one. People wanted a college football section and they got one. People wanted a Tribe section, Cavs section, fantasy baseball and fantasy basketball sections and got them. People wanted a political moshpit and got one. People wanted a pro pick em and college pick em and got them. People wanted a tail gate opportunity to meet those they post with and Stan's boards have provided the opportunity. There's even a freakin store on this forum.
What everyone is suddenly griping about is the fact that Atenears does NOT remove posts or people. That's what made THIS board so damn refreshing. PLEASE don't ruin that folks. Sometimes people need to THANK the moderators and Atenears instead of bellyaching about every little thing.
If the purpose of a message board was to show up and say "damn straight" or "high 5" to every single statement - we'd be bored. There's other sites that do that but people are HERE so guess what? Some of the funniest threads and most entertaining threads are the ones where you see BIG time disagreement and philosophies colliding. The ones that ENCOURAGE emotion are the ones that get the readers. Skippy (that's Atenears to you newbies) knows that Springer sells but he also knows Springer needs bouncers willing for Roadhouse when/if necessary. These Mods have a thankless job so let's not over state our FREEDOMS to not read subjects or people we can't tolerate. Just do it if need be.
In the number of years I've been on Stan's boards - I've only seen maybe 2 or 3 guys booted tops. They've all been allowed to return except maybe Steelers4Tim and Chubbychucker. When I see newbies like Masters, JADBF, Fooleeze gelling with regulars like yourself and others I feel pretty good about WHO we have in here.
All this "don't talk about or with Lums" stuff only to slap up countless subject headings with his name seems rather hypocritical. In other words, if he doesn't like the SAME players as the majority in here - he shouldn't be allowed to stay. We ALL had fun busting his chops about DA and calling him Loverboy and slapping up Air Supply lyrics when his hometown hero was starting so WHY wouldn't we expect a litle return fire and karma from him when we have OUR favorite QB? He's harmless UNLESS we allow otherwise. I rarely agree with the guy but I don't think he's here to ruin the board. He's just doing what we did to him because he thinks we didn't appreciate his version of a good thing. He's in love so every backbreaking INT became an extra mulligan. He knows DA's play had him gagging and spitting up right next to his baby on game day. That's a smart kid not dis-illusioned by a mancrush yet.
I think Riffer has a little Stevie Nicks lyrics to hook us up with for what Quinn is doing to Loverboy. "Stop Dragging My Heart Around" That's a hot mess!
- Tom F. (Every time Lums protests, it means Quinn just did something else DA was incapable of like winning ANY of his first 3 starts and refraining from backbreaking INTs in tight ball games)
I welcome the only Defensive Coordinator to earn a Superbowl Ring in New Orleans while understanding Revenge of the Nerds is a sequel. "Come get some!" -
Please note: At the time of this release Nicks was still a prime piece of ass and had yet to go RAC 'n ROLLS/Crennelephant on her fans.
Stop Draggin' My Heart Around was the first single from Stevie Nicks' debut solo album Bella Donna. It was written by Tom Petty and Mike Campbell, and Petty sang with Nicks in the chorus and bridge, whilst his entire band played on the song.
from the music video
The song reached #3 on Billboard and in reaching #7 in Australia remains the only Top 10 hit which Petty has played on or written. It was not a success in Europe, however: reaching only #50 in the UK. The lyrics are about a man who feels weighed down by relationships and wants to part despite a strong sentimental attachment to his lover. The melody is described by All Music as "dark and sinister"[1], probably because of the dense drumming of Stan Lynch which is the most prominent feature of the song's rhythm. Apart from the intro before the first verse and a solo following the second verse (where there is some fairly heavy riffing), however, the guitar sound is laid-back in typical Heartbreakers style.
The two singers performed another duet on Petty's 1981 album Hard Promises, "Insider".
The song was parodied by "Weird Al" Yankovic as "Stop Draggin My Car Around" on his first album.
Tom Petty Stop Draggin' My Heart Around Lyrics
Songwriters: Petty, Tom; Campbell, Michael W; With Stevie Nicks
Baby you'll come knocking on
My front door
Same old line you used to use before
I said ya...well...
What am I supposed to do
I didn't know what I was getting into
So you've had a little trouble in town
Now you're keeping some demon down
Stop draggin' my...
Stop draggin' my...
Stop draggin' my heart around
It's hard to think about
What you've wanted
It's hard to think about what you've lost
This doesn't have to be the big get even
This doesn't have to be anything at all
I know you really want to
Tell me good-bye
I know you really want to
Be your own guy
Baby you could never look me in the eye
Yeah you buckle with the weight
Of the words
Stop draggin' my...
Stop draggin' my...
Stop draggin' my heart around
There's people running 'round loose
In the world
Ain't got nothing better to do
Than make a meal of some
Bright eyed kid
You need someone looking after you
I know you really want to
Tell me good-bye
I know you really want to
Be your own guy
Baby you could never look me in the eye
Yeah you buckle with the weight
Of the words
Stop draggin' my...
Stop draggin' my...
Stop draggin' my heart around
NOTE: If you really pay attention to these thought provoking lyrics, it almost makes you tear up a little bit for Lumsford. He has feelings too, you know.
-
This entire board needs group therapy. What an odd thread.
And I am still not sure why Stan is agitated with this thread. If he is all for supporting freedom of speech, why is he electing to have this post removed? Selective approach I gather.
He didn't. He was just venting. You know he PAYS for this site right? People can give him a little more respect than they do. People wanted smiley fces and people got smiley faces. People wanted a game day tavern and they got a game day tavern. People wanted fantasy football and they got 5 leagues and a Woof Woof Column that's second to none. People wanted a high school football section and they got one. People wanted a college football section and they got one. People wanted a Tribe section, Cavs section, fantasy baseball and fantasy basketball sections and got them. People wanted a political moshpit and got one. People wanted a pro pick em and college pick em and got them. People wanted a tail gate opportunity to meet those they post with and Stan's boards have provided the opportunity. There's even a freakin store on this forum.
What everyone is suddenly griping about is the fact that Atenears does NOT remove posts or people. That's what made THIS board so damn refreshing. PLEASE don't ruin that folks. Sometimes people need to THANK the moderators and Atenears instead of bellyaching about every little thing.
If the purpose of a message board was to show up and say "damn straight" or "high 5" to every single statement - we'd be bored. There's other sites that do that but people are HERE so guess what? Some of the funniest threads and most entertaining threads are the ones where you see BIG time disagreement and philosophies colliding. The ones that ENCOURAGE emotion are the ones that get the readers. Skippy (that's Atenears to you newbies) knows that Springer sells but he also knows Springer needs bouncers willing for Roadhouse when/if necessary. These Mods have a thankless job so let's not over state our FREEDOMS to not read subjects or people we can't tolerate. Just do it if need be.
In the number of years I've been on Stan's boards - I've only seen maybe 2 or 3 guys booted tops. They've all been allowed to return except maybe Steelers4Tim and Chubbychucker. When I see newbies like Masters, JADBF, Fooleeze gelling with regulars like yourself and others I feel pretty good about WHO we have in here.
All this "don't talk about or with Lums" stuff only to slap up countless subject headings with his name seems rather hypocritical. In other words, if he doesn't like the SAME players as the majority in here - he shouldn't be allowed to stay. We ALL had fun busting his chops about DA and calling him Loverboy and slapping up Air Supply lyrics when his hometown hero was starting so WHY wouldn't we expect a litle return fire and karma from him when we have OUR favorite QB? He's harmless UNLESS we allow otherwise. I rarely agree with the guy but I don't think he's here to ruin the board. He's just doing what we did to him because he thinks we didn't appreciate his version of a good thing. He's in love so every backbreaking INT became an extra mulligan. He knows DA's play had him gagging and spitting up right next to his baby on game day. That's a smart kid not dis-illusioned by a mancrush yet.
I think Riffer has a little Stevie Nicks lyrics to hook us up with for what Quinn is doing to Loverboy. "Stop Dragging My Heart Around" That's a hot mess!
- Tom F. (Every time Lums protests, it means Quinn just did something else DA was incapable of like winning ANY of his first 3 starts and refraining from backbreaking INTs in tight ball games)
And I am still not sure why Stan is agitated with this thread. If he is all for supporting freedom of speech, why is he electing to have this post removed? Selective approach I gather.
He didn't. He was just venting.
That's because he deleted his own post calling for a Mod to remove the thread. I've come to the defense of Stan on plenty of occassion and told people that this is his board and he can do what he wants. Just a little odd that he would want this particular thread closed down when he is the first to support non-censorship.
-
And I am still not sure why Stan is agitated with this thread. If he is all for supporting freedom of speech, why is he electing to have this post removed? Selective approach I gather.
He didn't. He was just venting.
That's because he deleted his own post calling for a Mod to remove the thread. I've come to the defense of Stan on plenty of occassion and told people that this is his board and he can do what he wants. Just a little odd that he would want this particular thread closed down when he is the first to support non-censorship.
That's because he deleted his own post calling for a Mod to remove the thread. I've come to the defense of Stan on plenty of occassion and told people that this is his board and he can do what he wants. Just a little odd that he would want this particular thread closed down when he is the first to support non-censorship.
Hey, who pulled my post? That's it, I'm going to Dawgbones ...
Hey Vegasdoggie, I didn't request that this thread be removed because of some censorship issue, I requested it be removed because it was fawking gay.
Putting someone on ignore is like pinning a sign on your bedroom door that reads, "No girls allowed". Grow the fawk-up.
-
Thanks you made a good analogy, lum is a bitch.
-
This entire board needs group therapy. What an odd thread.
And I am still not sure why Stan is agitated with this thread. If he is all for supporting freedom of speech, why is he electing to have this post removed? Selective approach I gather.
He didn't. He was just venting. You know he PAYS for this site right? People can give him a little more respect than they do. People wanted smiley fces and people got smiley faces. People wanted a game day tavern and they got a game day tavern. People wanted fantasy football and they got 5 leagues and a Woof Woof Column that's second to none. People wanted a high school football section and they got one. People wanted a college football section and they got one. People wanted a Tribe section, Cavs section, fantasy baseball and fantasy basketball sections and got them. People wanted a political moshpit and got one. People wanted a pro pick em and college pick em and got them. People wanted a tail gate opportunity to meet those they post with and Stan's boards have provided the opportunity. There's even a freakin store on this forum.
What everyone is suddenly griping about is the fact that Atenears does NOT remove posts or people. That's what made THIS board so damn refreshing. PLEASE don't ruin that folks. Sometimes people need to THANK the moderators and Atenears instead of bellyaching about every little thing.
If the purpose of a message board was to show up and say "damn straight" or "high 5" to every single statement - we'd be bored. There's other sites that do that but people are HERE so guess what? Some of the funniest threads and most entertaining threads are the ones where you see BIG time disagreement and philosophies colliding. The ones that ENCOURAGE emotion are the ones that get the readers. Skippy (that's Atenears to you newbies) knows that Springer sells but he also knows Springer needs bouncers willing for Roadhouse when/if necessary. These Mods have a thankless job so let's not over state our FREEDOMS to not read subjects or people we can't tolerate. Just do it if need be.
In the number of years I've been on Stan's boards - I've only seen maybe 2 or 3 guys booted tops. They've all been allowed to return except maybe Steelers4Tim and Chubbychucker. When I see newbies like Masters, JADBF, Fooleeze gelling with regulars like yourself and others I feel pretty good about WHO we have in here.
All this "don't talk about or with Lums" stuff only to slap up countless subject headings with his name seems rather hypocritical. In other words, if he doesn't like the SAME players as the majority in here - he shouldn't be allowed to stay. We ALL had fun busting his chops about DA and calling him Loverboy and slapping up Air Supply lyrics when his hometown hero was starting so WHY wouldn't we expect a litle return fire and karma from him when we have OUR favorite QB? He's harmless UNLESS we allow otherwise. I rarely agree with the guy but I don't think he's here to ruin the board. He's just doing what we did to him because he thinks we didn't appreciate his version of a good thing. He's in love so every backbreaking INT became an extra mulligan. He knows DA's play had him gagging and spitting up right next to his baby on game day. That's a smart kid not dis-illusioned by a mancrush yet.
I think Riffer has a little Stevie Nicks lyrics to hook us up with for what Quinn is doing to Loverboy. "Stop Dragging My Heart Around" That's a hot mess!
- Tom F. (Every time Lums protests, it means Quinn just did something else DA was incapable of like winning ANY of his first 3 starts and refraining from backbreaking INTs in tight ball games)
He didn't. He was just venting. You know he PAYS for this site right? People can give him a little more respect than they do. People wanted smiley fces and people got smiley faces. People wanted a game day tavern and they got a game day tavern. People wanted fantasy football and they got 5 leagues and a Woof Woof Column that's second to none. People wanted a high school football section and they got one. People wanted a college football section and they got one. People wanted a Tribe section, Cavs section, fantasy baseball and fantasy basketball sections and got them. People wanted a political moshpit and got one. People wanted a pro pick em and college pick em and got them. People wanted a tail gate opportunity to meet those they post with and Stan's boards have provided the opportunity. There's even a freakin store on this forum.
What everyone is suddenly griping about is the fact that Atenears does NOT remove posts or people. That's what made THIS board so damn refreshing. PLEASE don't ruin that folks. Sometimes people need to THANK the moderators and Atenears instead of bellyaching about every little thing.
If the purpose of a message board was to show up and say "damn straight" or "high 5" to every single statement - we'd be bored. There's other sites that do that but people are HERE so guess what? Some of the funniest threads and most entertaining threads are the ones where you see BIG time disagreement and philosophies colliding. The ones that ENCOURAGE emotion are the ones that get the readers. Skippy (that's Atenears to you newbies) knows that Springer sells but he also knows Springer needs bouncers willing for Roadhouse when/if necessary. These Mods have a thankless job so let's not over state our FREEDOMS to not read subjects or people we can't tolerate. Just do it if need be.
In the number of years I've been on Stan's boards - I've only seen maybe 2 or 3 guys booted tops. They've all been allowed to return except maybe Steelers4Tim and Chubbychucker. When I see newbies like Masters, JADBF, Fooleeze gelling with regulars like yourself and others I feel pretty good about WHO we have in here.
All this "don't talk about or with Lums" stuff only to slap up countless subject headings with his name seems rather hypocritical. In other words, if he doesn't like the SAME players as the majority in here - he shouldn't be allowed to stay. We ALL had fun busting his chops about DA and calling him Loverboy and slapping up Air Supply lyrics when his hometown hero was starting so WHY wouldn't we expect a litle return fire and karma from him when we have OUR favorite QB? He's harmless UNLESS we allow otherwise. I rarely agree with the guy but I don't think he's here to ruin the board. He's just doing what we did to him because he thinks we didn't appreciate his version of a good thing. He's in love so every backbreaking INT became an extra mulligan. He knows DA's play had him gagging and spitting up right next to his baby on game day. That's a smart kid not dis-illusioned by a mancrush yet.
I think Riffer has a little Stevie Nicks lyrics to hook us up with for what Quinn is doing to Loverboy. "Stop Dragging My Heart Around" That's a hot mess!
- Tom F. (Every time Lums protests, it means Quinn just did something else DA was incapable of like winning ANY of his first 3 starts and refraining from backbreaking INTs in tight ball games)
At the risk of sounding gay.......well said my friend.
-
That's because he deleted his own post calling for a Mod to remove the thread. I've come to the defense of Stan on plenty of occassion and told people that this is his board and he can do what he wants. Just a little odd that he would want this particular thread closed down when he is the first to support non-censorship.
Hey, who pulled my post? That's it, I'm going to Dawgbones ...
Hey Vegasdoggie, I didn't request that this thread be removed because of some censorship issue, I requested it be removed because it was fawking gay.
Putting someone on ignore is like pinning a sign on your bedroom door that reads, "No girls allowed". Grow the fawk-up.
I requested it be removed because it was fawking gay.
Putting someone on ignore is like pinning a sign on your bedroom door that reads, "No girls allowed". Grow the fawk-up.
I completely agree that putting people on ignore is a tad weak, and I don't do it.
But it doesn't matter if you think the post was gay or not, asking to have it pulled goes against everything you have stood for since I have been here.
So you're against censorship only when you agree with the post and the poster? Being the owner that is your right. But then you can't be the champion of freedom of speech that you pretend to be.
I have backed you up on more than one occassion when it comes to running the board as you see fit. I just think asking for a post to be pulled because you disagree with it is fooking gay.
-
Stan is there an age requirement on this forum? I've never seen a place full of more whinny ass bitches.
Did somebody spill some water on your cookies, because you sound like a bunch of children.
Lum must be doing something write if he is the center of attention in 85% of these threads.
Stan is there an age requirement on this forum? I've never seen a place full of more whinny ass bitches.
Did somebody spill some water on your cookies, because you sound like a bunch of children.
Lum must be doing something write if he is the center of attention in 85% of these threads.
+1.....must be some pansy asses to get their panties in such a bunch. never saw an entire forum get owned by one poster.
lums the man....even if i disagree with most of what he says. brady's ladys dont like dissent, ya know.
-
-
He didn't. He was just venting. You know he PAYS for this site right? People can give him a little more respect than they do. People wanted smiley fces and people got smiley faces. People wanted a game day tavern and they got a game day tavern. People wanted fantasy football and they got 5 leagues and a Woof Woof Column that's second to none. People wanted a high school football section and they got one. People wanted a college football section and they got one. People wanted a Tribe section, Cavs section, fantasy baseball and fantasy basketball sections and got them. People wanted a political moshpit and got one. People wanted a pro pick em and college pick em and got them. People wanted a tail gate opportunity to meet those they post with and Stan's boards have provided the opportunity. There's even a freakin store on this forum.
What everyone is suddenly griping about is the fact that Atenears does NOT remove posts or people. That's what made THIS board so damn refreshing. PLEASE don't ruin that folks. Sometimes people need to THANK the moderators and Atenears instead of bellyaching about every little thing.
If the purpose of a message board was to show up and say "damn straight" or "high 5" to every single statement - we'd be bored. There's other sites that do that but people are HERE so guess what? Some of the funniest threads and most entertaining threads are the ones where you see BIG time disagreement and philosophies colliding. The ones that ENCOURAGE emotion are the ones that get the readers. Skippy (that's Atenears to you newbies) knows that Springer sells but he also knows Springer needs bouncers willing for Roadhouse when/if necessary. These Mods have a thankless job so let's not over state our FREEDOMS to not read subjects or people we can't tolerate. Just do it if need be.
In the number of years I've been on Stan's boards - I've only seen maybe 2 or 3 guys booted tops. They've all been allowed to return except maybe Steelers4Tim and Chubbychucker. When I see newbies like Masters, JADBF, Fooleeze gelling with regulars like yourself and others I feel pretty good about WHO we have in here.
All this "don't talk about or with Lums" stuff only to slap up countless subject headings with his name seems rather hypocritical. In other words, if he doesn't like the SAME players as the majority in here - he shouldn't be allowed to stay. We ALL had fun busting his chops about DA and calling him Loverboy and slapping up Air Supply lyrics when his hometown hero was starting so WHY wouldn't we expect a litle return fire and karma from him when we have OUR favorite QB? He's harmless UNLESS we allow otherwise. I rarely agree with the guy but I don't think he's here to ruin the board. He's just doing what we did to him because he thinks we didn't appreciate his version of a good thing. He's in love so every backbreaking INT became an extra mulligan. He knows DA's play had him gagging and spitting up right next to his baby on game day. That's a smart kid not dis-illusioned by a mancrush yet.
I think Riffer has a little Stevie Nicks lyrics to hook us up with for what Quinn is doing to Loverboy. "Stop Dragging My Heart Around" That's a hot mess!
- Tom F. (Every time Lums protests, it means Quinn just did something else DA was incapable of like winning ANY of his first 3 starts and refraining from backbreaking INTs in tight ball games)
At the risk of sounding gay.......well said my friend.
-
I requested it be removed because it was fawking gay.
Putting someone on ignore is like pinning a sign on your bedroom door that reads, "No girls allowed". Grow the fawk-up.
I completely agree that putting people on ignore is a tad weak, and I don't do it.
But it doesn't matter if you think the post was gay or not, asking to have it pulled goes against everything you have stood for since I have been here.
So you're against censorship only when you agree with the post and the poster? Being the owner that is your right. But then you can't be the champion of freedom of speech that you pretend to be.
I have backed you up on more than one occassion when it comes to running the board as you see fit. I just think asking for a post to be pulled because you disagree with it is fooking gay.
I completely agree that putting people on ignore is a tad weak, and I don't do it.
But it doesn't matter if you think the post was gay or not, asking to have it pulled goes against everything you have stood for since I have been here.
So you're against censorship only when you agree with the post and the poster? Being the owner that is your right. But then you can't be the champion of freedom of speech that you pretend to be.
I have backed you up on more than one occassion when it comes to running the board as you see fit. I just think asking for a post to be pulled because you disagree with it is fooking gay.
I think the newbie, Derek Anderson, accidently posted using Stan's ID. He forgot to log off Stan's ID from Stan's computer and log onto his own ID... maybe?
-
you think i care for your respect? really? keep trying, you may be cool someday.
im no cyber tough guy, simply pointing out that your such a pussy that you cant even handle lums.....you get all butthurt cause he doesn't wanna blow your boyfriend.....
you own this place? no? ok then.
edit: maybe i qualified this a bit strongly, but every single thread i open has 4 or 5 posters that simply make a one-lined quip about lum. youre one of them. you aren't man enough to just move on, you need to try to tear him down. funny thing is, he's still here, and you still bitch. need a wambulance? its only a google search away....
-
-
-
DA is done; it is over
Fin
.jpg.a1a2b9a0c33008fdaf4097d8fe2cfd64.jpg "Riffer X"){kind=avatar}
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login