Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. Political Discussion
  3. Idaho first to sign law AGAINST health care reform

Idaho first to sign law AGAINST health care reform

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Political Discussion
9 Posts 4 Posters 781 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
    • 64k Posts
    • 8k Reputation
    C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by calfoxwc
    #1

    Idaho first to sign law against health care reform

    The Associated Press - 7 hours ago

    Idaho Gov. C.L. "Butch" Otter addresses the media during a news conference on Wednesday, March 17, 2010 inside his office at the Idaho statehouse in Boise, Idaho. On Wednesday Otter signed a piece of legislation that will require the state of Idaho to sue the federal government upon passage of health care reform which comes as Democrats in Congress hope to pass healthcare reform this weekend. (AP Photo/Charlie Litchfield)

    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
      • 64k Posts
      • 8k Reputation
      C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
      #2

      gosh, whatever happened to that "pres" who was going to bring us all together?

      sad. SO VERY SAD.

      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
        • 64k Posts
        • 8k Reputation
        C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
        #3

        And don't let Mr. Jellybean tell you that the public option is no more.

        It is most certainly still in the background, and they plan on implementing it later.

        But they will try now to get as much of the power as they can, to help them

        get that public option at another time.

        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • Mr. T Mr. TM
          • 7k Posts
          • 184 Reputation
          Mr. TM Mr. T wrote on last edited by
          #4
          Virginia is ready to sue also....read here.
          Head or Gut?
          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
            • 64k Posts
            • 8k Reputation
            C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
            #5

            And if that doesn't astound you, the stuff is going to hit the fan also,

            because EXPERTS at Constitutional law say this hc bill "slaughter solution"

            is UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

            Check this out, while you ask yourself, why is Obama pushing the Constitutional crisis?:

            *****************************************************

            Welcome to Landmark Legal Foundation Landmark Legal Foundation to File Suit to Stop President’s Health Plan if ‘Slaughter Rule’ is Used

            (LEESBURG, VA, MARCH 17, 2010)…Mark R. Levin, president of Landmark Legal Foundation, today issued a warning to the leadership of the U.S. House of Representatives about the possible use of the so-called “deem and pass,” “self-executing,” or “Slaughter Rule” to enact H.R. 3590, the legislative version of President Obama’s healthcare proposal that has been previously approved by the Senate. If this tactic is employed, Landmark will immediately sue the President, Attorney General Eric Holder and other relevant cabinet members to prevent them from instituting this unconstitutional contrivance.

            “Landmark has already prepared a lawsuit that will be filed in federal court the moment the House acts. Such a brazen violation of the core functions of Congress simply cannot be ignored. Article I, Section 7 of the Constitution is clear respecting the manner in which a bill becomes law. Members are required to vote on this bill, not claim they did when they didn’t. The Speaker of the House and her lieutenants are temporary custodians of congressional authority. They are not empowered to do permanent violence to our Constitution.”

            (A draft of the complaint Landmark will file is available at:

            Landmark's Draft "Slaughter Rule" Complaint

            Founded in 1976, Landmark Legal Foundation is a nonprofit, public interest law firm with offices in Kansas City, Missouri and Leesburg, Virginia. (END)

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • Pumpkin Eater P
              • 4k Posts
              • 297 Reputation
              P Pumpkin Eater wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Kinda pointless when federal law trumps state law.

              :neutral_face:
              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                • 64k Posts
                • 8k Reputation
                C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Only to a point. It's more complicated than that.

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • heckofajobbrownie H
                  • 6k Posts
                  • 47 Reputation
                  H heckofajobbrownie wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Yeah, it's going to be difficult to claim that this is somehow a states rights issue when these states already enjoy Medicare and Medicaid, both federal single-payer health care programs funded by federal taxes, while this program is a mandate to buy private insurance. These suits are political, not legally viable.

                  But you guys love the idea of it, which is why they do it.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                    • 64k Posts
                    • 8k Reputation
                    C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Do you notice there isn't any takeover of current PRIVATE insurance?

                    Come on, Heck, you can do better.

                    The current bill IS a takeover of all PRIVATE insurance co's.

                    When the DEM finance director of Mass. says this hc bill, if passed,

                    will bankrupt our nation in four years. how the hell do you paint THAT

                    as partisan politics?

                    Seriously, this bill and the other bill, are bad bills. That's why there has been

                    so much problem in DEMOCRATS supporting it.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply

                    Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                    Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                    With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                    Register Login
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    Theme
                    • System
                    • Light
                    • Dark
                    The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                    The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Forums
                    • Recent
                    • Popular
                    • Users
                    • Donate