Skip to content

Referees....

The Browns Board
28 9 2.6k
  • Formerly Stone said:

    The hit on Cribbs was on a running back where helmet to helmet to helmet is legal, the hit on Massi the helmets never touched!

    lol no dawg. They made it a specific point this year to ban all helmet to helmet contact even if it's a runner. And I agree, the momass play was completely clean. That's just good hard football.

    @jrb12711 said:

    lol no dawg. They made it a specific point this year to ban all helmet to helmet contact even if it's a runner. And I agree, the momass play was completely clean. That's just good hard football.

    They made a point to stop helmet-to-helmet for qbs and defenseless receivers. Not for running backs.

  • Formerly Stone said:

    All ball busting aside....don't you guys ever get tired of whining and looking for reasons to feel sorry for yourself?

    That's like asking Steeler fans if they get tired of winning. Of course not.

  • @jrb12711 said:

    lol no dawg. They made it a specific point this year to ban all helmet to helmet contact even if it's a runner. And I agree, the momass play was completely clean. That's just good hard football.

    They made a point to stop helmet-to-helmet for qbs and defenseless receivers. Not for running backs.

    @spunkonmyback-dpoy said:

    They made a point to stop helmet-to-helmet for qbs and defenseless receivers. Not for running backs.

    well here's what i meant. By rule a helmet to helmet hit

    " using any part of a players helmet (including the top/crown and forehead/hairline parts) or facemask to butt, spear, or ram an opponent violently or unnecessarily; although such violent or unnecessary use of the helmet is impermissible against any opponent, game officials will give special attention in administering this rule to protect those players who are in virtually defenseless postures."

    although the biggest change was for defenseless QB's, they also made it a point to pretty much call it anytime someone "leads" with the helmet to make a hit. Honestly, I don't think he did. But, they've consistently been calling ANY helmet to helmet this year across the league. I'm just surprised based on the sequence of events they didn't call it. I'm not the type to whine about refs though, i just figured they'd call it. this is just a good game so far, glad to see us playing well.

  • Formerly Stone said:

    The hit on Cribbs was on a running back where helmet to helmet to helmet is legal, the hit on Massi the helmets never touched!

    Have your glasses checked.

  • @spunkonmyback-dpoy said:

    They made a point to stop helmet-to-helmet for qbs and defenseless receivers. Not for running backs.

    well here's what i meant. By rule a helmet to helmet hit

    " using any part of a players helmet (including the top/crown and forehead/hairline parts) or facemask to butt, spear, or ram an opponent violently or unnecessarily; although such violent or unnecessary use of the helmet is impermissible against any opponent, game officials will give special attention in administering this rule to protect those players who are in virtually defenseless postures."

    although the biggest change was for defenseless QB's, they also made it a point to pretty much call it anytime someone "leads" with the helmet to make a hit. Honestly, I don't think he did. But, they've consistently been calling ANY helmet to helmet this year across the league. I'm just surprised based on the sequence of events they didn't call it. I'm not the type to whine about refs though, i just figured they'd call it. this is just a good game so far, glad to see us playing well.

    @jrb12711 said:

    well here's what i meant. By rule a helmet to helmet hit

    " using any part of a players helmet (including the top/crown and forehead/hairline parts) or facemask to butt, spear, or ram an opponent violently or unnecessarily; although such violent or unnecessary use of the helmet is impermissible against any opponent, game officials will give special attention in administering this rule to protect those players who are in virtually defenseless postures."

    although the biggest change was for defenseless QB's, they also made it a point to pretty much call it anytime someone "leads" with the helmet to make a hit. Honestly, I don't think he did. But, they've consistently been calling ANY helmet to helmet this year across the league. I'm just surprised based on the sequence of events they didn't call it. I'm not the type to whine about refs though, i just figured they'd call it. this is just a good game so far, glad to see us playing well.

    Hits like Harrison's on Cribbs are never flagged.

    I'm glad you are enjoying this game. Too many of your Brownie fan buddies are ruining a good game for themselves by whining.

    McCoy is playing extremely well for his first ever start.

  • Formerly Stone said:

    The hit on Cribbs was on a running back where helmet to helmet to helmet is legal, the hit on Massi the helmets never touched!

    Have your glasses checked.

    @hoorta said:

    Have your glasses checked.

    The irony.

  • Formerly Stone said:

    The hit on Cribbs was on a running back where helmet to helmet to helmet is legal, the hit on Massi the helmets never touched!

    Have your glasses checked.

    @hoorta said:

    Have your glasses checked.

    Harrison led with his arms on the Mo-mass tackle trying to knock the ball loose. I can't believe you guys are on here crying. It's xxxxing FOOTBALL! in the NFL.

  • The Browns are playing good.

    McCoy is playing good.

    Your punter is making me sick! 😵

    Have fun and enjoy the game.

    Don't whine and make excuses for yourselves.

  • Are they not calling Holding anymore?

  • Are they not calling Holding anymore?

    @atenears said:

    Are they not calling Holding anymore?

    Holding on who lol. They've already flagged us once for Holding. Try watching Harrison. He's always getting held. Let's not talk about holding lol.

    Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaambulance.

  • Are they not calling Holding anymore?

    @atenears said:

    Are they not calling Holding anymore?

    Always whining. That's what you do best.

  • Spunkonmyback DPOY your a total asshat.

    I've read 3 times in this threat you calling Browns fans whiners, when your dumbass posts a thread about how the Browns paid off the refs... Are you 12?

  • Spunkonmyback DPOY your a total asshat.

    I've read 3 times in this threat you calling Browns fans whiners, when your dumbass posts a thread about how the Browns paid off the refs... Are you 12?

    @hx214 said:

    Spunkonmyback DPOY your a total asshat.

    I've read 3 times in this threat you calling Browns fans whiners, when your dumbass posts a thread about how the Browns paid off the refs... Are you 12?

    He made that post in over the top sarcastic fashion. One would assume any individual with a brain could deduce that fact. 😵

  • @atenears said:

    Are they not calling Holding anymore?

    Holding on who lol. They've already flagged us once for Holding. Try watching Harrison. He's always getting held. Let's not talk about holding lol.

    Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaambulance.

    Homotron said:

    Holding on who lol. They've already flagged us once for Holding. Try watching Harrison. He's always getting held. Let's not talk about holding lol.

    Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaambulance.

    Hey asshole, I asked if they were calling holding anymore. Almost every big play and all TD passes except maybe that last garbage time TD there was blatant holding (Browns or Steelers). The Steelers were blocking by hugging all day. Even on runs, containment by holding onto the outside of the jersey and many times blocking from the side with one hand grasp on the front of the shirt collar and one on the back. Horrible officiating and yes I believe the Steelers were much more guilty than the Browns. On the Browns TD, our RT tackled your guy, I will admit that, but show me an endzone shot from behind big ben on any of the early TD's and many of Mendenhall's clear path runs and I'll shoiw you a hold.

  • Homotron said:

    Holding on who lol. They've already flagged us once for Holding. Try watching Harrison. He's always getting held. Let's not talk about holding lol.

    Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaambulance.

    Hey asshole, I asked if they were calling holding anymore. Almost every big play and all TD passes except maybe that last garbage time TD there was blatant holding (Browns or Steelers). The Steelers were blocking by hugging all day. Even on runs, containment by holding onto the outside of the jersey and many times blocking from the side with one hand grasp on the front of the shirt collar and one on the back. Horrible officiating and yes I believe the Steelers were much more guilty than the Browns. On the Browns TD, our RT tackled your guy, I will admit that, but show me an endzone shot from behind big ben on any of the early TD's and many of Mendenhall's clear path runs and I'll shoiw you a hold.

    @atenears said:

    Hey asshole, I asked if they were calling holding anymore. Almost every big play and all TD passes except maybe that last garbage time TD there was blatant holding (Browns or Steelers). The Steelers were blocking by hugging all day. Even on runs, containment by holding onto the outside of the jersey and many times blocking from the side with one hand grasp on the front of the shirt collar and one on the back. Horrible officiating and yes I believe the Steelers were much more guilty than the Browns. On the Browns TD, our RT tackled your guy, I will admit that, but show me an endzone shot from behind big ben on any of the early TD's and many of Mendenhall's clear path runs and I'll shoiw you a hold.

    I DVR all the games. I'll be sure to watch it again, I usually do. I didn't see the "blatant holds" because I don't believe they exist. Sure there is some grabbing and showing all the time but not enough to warrant a call. I also didn't think the officiating was anywhere close to horrible. The Steelers handled the game and now you're grasping at straws. Give it a rest.

  • @hx214 said:

    Spunkonmyback DPOY your a total asshat.

    I've read 3 times in this threat you calling Browns fans whiners, when your dumbass posts a thread about how the Browns paid off the refs... Are you 12?

    He made that post in over the top sarcastic fashion. One would assume any individual with a brain could deduce that fact. 😵

    Homotron said:

    He made that post in over the top sarcastic fashion. One would assume any individual with a brain could deduce that fact. 😵

    Ya ok Homo. 😵

  • Spunkonmyback DPOY your a total asshat.

    I've read 3 times in this threat you calling Browns fans whiners, when your dumbass posts a thread about how the Browns paid off the refs... Are you 12?

    @hx214 said:

    Spunkonmyback DPOY your a total asshat.

    I've read 3 times in this threat you calling Browns fans whiners, when your dumbass posts a thread about how the Browns paid off the refs... Are you 12?

    sarcasm-meter-sarcasm-meter-demotivational-poster-1223486438.jpg

  • @atenears said:

    Hey asshole, I asked if they were calling holding anymore. Almost every big play and all TD passes except maybe that last garbage time TD there was blatant holding (Browns or Steelers). The Steelers were blocking by hugging all day. Even on runs, containment by holding onto the outside of the jersey and many times blocking from the side with one hand grasp on the front of the shirt collar and one on the back. Horrible officiating and yes I believe the Steelers were much more guilty than the Browns. On the Browns TD, our RT tackled your guy, I will admit that, but show me an endzone shot from behind big ben on any of the early TD's and many of Mendenhall's clear path runs and I'll shoiw you a hold.

    I DVR all the games. I'll be sure to watch it again, I usually do. I didn't see the "blatant holds" because I don't believe they exist. Sure there is some grabbing and showing all the time but not enough to warrant a call. I also didn't think the officiating was anywhere close to horrible. The Steelers handled the game and now you're grasping at straws. Give it a rest.

    Homotron said:

    I DVR all the games. I'll be sure to watch it again, I usually do. I didn't see the "blatant holds" because I don't believe they exist. Sure there is some grabbing and showing all the time but not enough to warrant a call. I also didn't think the officiating was anywhere close to horrible. The Steelers handled the game and now you're grasping at straws. Give it a rest.

    Saw Roth get tackled from behind twice on Pittsburgh runs to his side, if you go back and look for holds watch for those too!

    Also, you obviously see everything through rose colored glasses, like almost every fan so don't bother checking back in with your findings.

  • Homotron said:

    He made that post in over the top sarcastic fashion. One would assume any individual with a brain could deduce that fact. 😵

    Ya ok Homo. 😵

    @hx214 said:

    Ya ok Homo. 😵

    What I'm a 😵 because you're a idiot and can't tell when someone is being over the top sarcastic?