Skip to content

If Rob Ryan Gets a HC Job......

The Browns Board
29 18 2.1k
  • R roach wrote on last edited by
    #1

    i want to play against this loser twice per year, and the Cincy job is the only one that likely will be open in our conference. Let's keep our fingers crossed. Honestly, if it wasn't for his pedigree, who would hire this guy? How do you get 6 turnovers in one game and still manage to give up nearly 400 yards? That's almost impossible to do.

    i'm a Mangini fan. But if they retain this blowhard, then the gloves come off. i want a DC that: (1) Doesn't rely on funny lines to maintain his popularity, and (2) Doesn't rely on turnovers to give the ball back to his offense.

    i wish we could fire him now, but that would be the wrong move to make. Waiting for Cincy (or unfortunately for some other team) after the season would be the right move.

  • i want to play against this loser twice per year, and the Cincy job is the only one that likely will be open in our conference. Let's keep our fingers crossed. Honestly, if it wasn't for his pedigree, who would hire this guy? How do you get 6 turnovers in one game and still manage to give up nearly 400 yards? That's almost impossible to do.

    i'm a Mangini fan. But if they retain this blowhard, then the gloves come off. i want a DC that: (1) Doesn't rely on funny lines to maintain his popularity, and (2) Doesn't rely on turnovers to give the ball back to his offense.

    i wish we could fire him now, but that would be the wrong move to make. Waiting for Cincy (or unfortunately for some other team) after the season would be the right move.

    CLEVELANDwantsPLAYOFFSC CLEVELANDwantsPLAYOFFS wrote on last edited by
    #2

    @roach said:

    i want to play against this loser twice per year, and the Cincy job is the only one that likely will be open in our conference. Let's keep our fingers crossed. Honestly, if it wasn't for his pedigree, who would hire this guy? How do you get 6 turnovers in one game and still manage to give up nearly 400 yards? That's almost impossible to do.

    i'm a Mangini fan. But if they retain this blowhard, then the gloves come off. i want a DC that: (1) Doesn't rely on funny lines to maintain his popularity, and (2) Doesn't rely on turnovers to give the ball back to his offense.

    i wish we could fire him now, but that would be the wrong move to make. Waiting for Cincy (or unfortunately for some other team) after the season would be the right move.

    its called being on the field the whole day, with a number of old players who are tired. go home.

  • RichiswhereR Richiswhere wrote on last edited by
    #3

    When you have little talent these things happen

  • i want to play against this loser twice per year, and the Cincy job is the only one that likely will be open in our conference. Let's keep our fingers crossed. Honestly, if it wasn't for his pedigree, who would hire this guy? How do you get 6 turnovers in one game and still manage to give up nearly 400 yards? That's almost impossible to do.

    i'm a Mangini fan. But if they retain this blowhard, then the gloves come off. i want a DC that: (1) Doesn't rely on funny lines to maintain his popularity, and (2) Doesn't rely on turnovers to give the ball back to his offense.

    i wish we could fire him now, but that would be the wrong move to make. Waiting for Cincy (or unfortunately for some other team) after the season would be the right move.

    Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by
    #4

    @roach said:

    i want to play against this loser twice per year, and the Cincy job is the only one that likely will be open in our conference. Let's keep our fingers crossed. Honestly, if it wasn't for his pedigree, who would hire this guy? How do you get 6 turnovers in one game and still manage to give up nearly 400 yards? That's almost impossible to do.

    i'm a Mangini fan. But if they retain this blowhard, then the gloves come off. i want a DC that: (1) Doesn't rely on funny lines to maintain his popularity, and (2) Doesn't rely on turnovers to give the ball back to his offense.

    i wish we could fire him now, but that would be the wrong move to make. Waiting for Cincy (or unfortunately for some other team) after the season would be the right move.

    You are a xxxxing moron.

  • T tshirtfan wrote on last edited by
    #5

    I have to say, pinning this one on the defense... much fail.

  • Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by
    #6
    20090727002827780196-0-epic-fail.jpg
  • C CLEVELandMILIDH wrote on last edited by CLEVELandMILIDH
    #7

    WHAT???!!!!!!!!!!!Its a bend but dont break defense, yards mean nothing. We've given up 14, 17, 20 and 24 points the last 4 games to some pretty darn good football teams. Rob Ryan is a hell of a coach, doubt he'll get a head coaching job after this year and I'm pretty excited about that.

  • i want to play against this loser twice per year, and the Cincy job is the only one that likely will be open in our conference. Let's keep our fingers crossed. Honestly, if it wasn't for his pedigree, who would hire this guy? How do you get 6 turnovers in one game and still manage to give up nearly 400 yards? That's almost impossible to do.

    i'm a Mangini fan. But if they retain this blowhard, then the gloves come off. i want a DC that: (1) Doesn't rely on funny lines to maintain his popularity, and (2) Doesn't rely on turnovers to give the ball back to his offense.

    i wish we could fire him now, but that would be the wrong move to make. Waiting for Cincy (or unfortunately for some other team) after the season would be the right move.

    RAWDAWGR RAWDAWG wrote on last edited by
    #8

    @roach said:

    i want to play against this loser twice per year, and the Cincy job is the only one that likely will be open in our conference. Let's keep our fingers crossed. Honestly, if it wasn't for his pedigree, who would hire this guy? How do you get 6 turnovers in one game and still manage to give up nearly 400 yards? That's almost impossible to do.

    i'm a Mangini fan. But if they retain this blowhard, then the gloves come off. i want a DC that: (1) Doesn't rely on funny lines to maintain his popularity, and (2) Doesn't rely on turnovers to give the ball back to his offense.

    i wish we could fire him now, but that would be the wrong move to make. Waiting for Cincy (or unfortunately for some other team) after the season would be the right move.

    You must be out of your mind. This could be the best d that we've had in years. We need a little help in the secondary and for the most part until today, our run defense has been good. We need an o coordinator that plays to win and not to lose. Holmgren will fix that problem during the off-season. Six turnovers and 400 yards is due to the fact that our offense never moved the ball in the second half. The defense did great and any defense that is left on the field that long will break down.

  • S SJ_Browns wrote on last edited by
    #9

    i can't believe the op is actually being serious. unbelievable! 😳😵😳

  • i want to play against this loser twice per year, and the Cincy job is the only one that likely will be open in our conference. Let's keep our fingers crossed. Honestly, if it wasn't for his pedigree, who would hire this guy? How do you get 6 turnovers in one game and still manage to give up nearly 400 yards? That's almost impossible to do.

    i'm a Mangini fan. But if they retain this blowhard, then the gloves come off. i want a DC that: (1) Doesn't rely on funny lines to maintain his popularity, and (2) Doesn't rely on turnovers to give the ball back to his offense.

    i wish we could fire him now, but that would be the wrong move to make. Waiting for Cincy (or unfortunately for some other team) after the season would be the right move.

    TheClevelandSoundT TheClevelandSound wrote on last edited by
    #10

    @roach said:

    i want to play against this loser twice per year, and the Cincy job is the only one that likely will be open in our conference. Let's keep our fingers crossed. Honestly, if it wasn't for his pedigree, who would hire this guy? How do you get 6 turnovers in one game and still manage to give up nearly 400 yards? That's almost impossible to do.

    i'm a Mangini fan. But if they retain this blowhard, then the gloves come off. i want a DC that: (1) Doesn't rely on funny lines to maintain his popularity, and (2) Doesn't rely on turnovers to give the ball back to his offense.

    i wish we could fire him now, but that would be the wrong move to make. Waiting for Cincy (or unfortunately for some other team) after the season would be the right move.

    Ass.

  • I have to say, pinning this one on the defense... much fail.

    RAWDAWGR RAWDAWG wrote on last edited by
    #11

    @tshirtfan said:

    I have to say, pinning this one on the defense... much fail.

    You're just a plain out moron. 6 takeaways is far from fail by anyones standards except yours. I'm surprised you can even spell fail after a post that stupid.

  • @tshirtfan said:

    I have to say, pinning this one on the defense... much fail.

    You're just a plain out moron. 6 takeaways is far from fail by anyones standards except yours. I'm surprised you can even spell fail after a post that stupid.

    T tshirtfan wrote on last edited by tshirtfan
    #12

    @rawdawg said:

    You're just a plain out moron. 6 takeaways is far from fail by anyones standards except yours. I'm surprised you can even spell fail after a post that stupid.

    Huh? To pin this loss on the defense is just plain stupid..

    EDIT: I get it now. Yeah, my sentence could have been read two different ways. I meant for the OP to pin this one on the defense, much fail. If you read it another way, it could have sounded like I said "I'm pinning this one on the defense."

  • medicinemanM medicineman wrote on last edited by
    #13

    DUMB ASS

  • @tshirtfan said:

    I have to say, pinning this one on the defense... much fail.

    You're just a plain out moron. 6 takeaways is far from fail by anyones standards except yours. I'm surprised you can even spell fail after a post that stupid.

    RichiswhereR Richiswhere wrote on last edited by
    #14

    @rawdawg said:

    You're just a plain out moron. 6 takeaways is far from fail by anyones standards except yours. I'm surprised you can even spell fail after a post that stupid.

    Hes saying pinning it on the defense was the failure

  • @rawdawg said:

    You're just a plain out moron. 6 takeaways is far from fail by anyones standards except yours. I'm surprised you can even spell fail after a post that stupid.

    Huh? To pin this loss on the defense is just plain stupid..

    EDIT: I get it now. Yeah, my sentence could have been read two different ways. I meant for the OP to pin this one on the defense, much fail. If you read it another way, it could have sounded like I said "I'm pinning this one on the defense."

    RAWDAWGR RAWDAWG wrote on last edited by
    #15

    @tshirtfan said:

    Huh? To pin this loss on the defense is just plain stupid..

    EDIT: I get it now. Yeah, my sentence could have been read two different ways. I meant for the OP to pin this one on the defense, much fail. If you read it another way, it could have sounded like I said "I'm pinning this one on the defense."

    Thats how I took it

  • @tshirtfan said:

    Huh? To pin this loss on the defense is just plain stupid..

    EDIT: I get it now. Yeah, my sentence could have been read two different ways. I meant for the OP to pin this one on the defense, much fail. If you read it another way, it could have sounded like I said "I'm pinning this one on the defense."

    Thats how I took it

    T tshirtfan wrote on last edited by
    #16

    @rawdawg said:

    Thats how I took it

    So I think we agree with one another, the OP made a stupid thread.

  • GipsG Gips wrote on last edited by Gips
    #17

    If ryan gets the HC job in cincy they would rape us twice annually, just like everything else in this rebuild we are not quite there with the components this defense needs to play at the highest level of man coverage and ultimate blitz packages yet...

    All the injuries and lack of quality depth isnt helping either..

  • If ryan gets the HC job in cincy they would rape us twice annually, just like everything else in this rebuild we are not quite there with the components this defense needs to play at the highest level of man coverage and ultimate blitz packages yet...

    All the injuries and lack of quality depth isnt helping either..

    S SJ_Browns wrote on last edited by SJ_Browns
    #18

    @gips said:

    If ryan gets the HC job in cincy they would rape us twice annually, just like everything else in this rebuild we are not quite there with the components this defense needs to play at the highest level of man coverage and ultimate blitz packages yet...

    All the injuries and lack of quality depth isnt helping either..

    the op must have forgotten that not only did the browns d get ints and fumbles, but they also scored on d. i guess that's not good enough for him, though. 😵

  • C Carolina Brownie wrote on last edited by
    #19

    Wtf? This guy is delusional.

  • C CLEVELandMILIDH wrote on last edited by
    #20

    Its not a very good idea to call the man preparing your food names. Have a little respect, its his opinion, it can be debated without personal attacks.