your favorite teams
-
Besides the Browns,
KC always like them.
Hate- Steelers (because of their arrogant fans)
Cowboys (arrogant owner)
Ratbirds- Schmodell.
Bungles- biggest bunch of wimp fans in the NFL. Goona be a good one at work tomorrow. One Bungle booster was predicting 10 wins in a row this year before the season started. Have to ask him how 10 losses in a row feels. Go crawl back under your rocks. wimps.
-
Fav Team:
Steelers
Alternate Team (really there's only one fav)
Green Bay
Teams I hate:
Ravens
Eagles
Patriots
Cowboys
Browns can't make my list of hated teams for several reasons. First, I don't like the fact that your franchise was ripped from your city by Art Modell which makes it's kinda hard for me to hate someone who had that happen to them. Second you just ain't good enough to hate.
-
Fav Team:
Steelers
Alternate Team (really there's only one fav)
Green Bay
Teams I hate:
Ravens
Eagles
Patriots
Cowboys
Browns can't make my list of hated teams for several reasons. First, I don't like the fact that your franchise was ripped from your city by Art Modell which makes it's kinda hard for me to hate someone who had that happen to them. Second you just ain't good enough to hate.
Endymion said:
you just ain't good enough to hate.give us another year and you'll be hating us plenty.
and if not i'll stop by you trailer, knock on your tin screen door .to call out your wife yolanda. she's really good.
-
Favorite NFL teams:
A.The Browns, obviously.
B. Beyond that, it would be the Packers solely for the fact that they are the only community owned team in the NFL. (and maybe in all pro sports.
C. Any team that has gone many, many years without winning a title, or who has never won one. ( I was glad to see the Saints win one) That actually includes fully 1/2 of the entire NFL. There are 16 NFL teams, including the Browns, who have either not won an NFL/AFL title since 1970 or have never won one in there existance: Chargers, Cardinals, Chiefs, Vikings, Lions, Browns, Bengals, Titans, Falcons, Panthers, Jaguars, Texans, Eagles, Bills, Jets, Seahawks.
Least favorite:
A. Obviously you dislike your division rivals the most, that is purely natural: Ravens, Steelers, and Bengals. The fact that two of those teams are the bastard children of the Cleveland Browns (Bengals and Ravens) makes these rivalries somewhat unprecedented in the league.
B. Beyond that there are the Broncos. Sure, losing 3 AFC title games to them in the manner in which a couple were lost still grates.
C. Also, I too take delight in the failures of the Cowboys simply because of the fellatio the national media performs upon them constantly.
Favorite MLB teams:
A. The Indians obviously.
B. The Cubs, because that is my wife's favorite team.
C. Just like with football, any team that has gone many, many years without winning a title. It just so happens that the two teams that have gone the longest happen to be the two teams my family supports. Ain't that a bitch.
Least favorite:
A. The Yankees
B. Now, the Red Sox
C. Actually, it isn't even so much the Yankees and Red Sox that I despise, but it is the system in place in MLB that bestows upon them the built in advantage of money over all the other teams. These f**kers don't have to use any skill or competence to always be good. They simply have to throw more money around, and they can and do because the system gives them more money to throw around. At least in the NFL and maybe other sports, the winning franchises like the Pats and Steelers etc. do it through competent management and coaching. I don't believe for one second that the guys running the Yankees and Red Sox are more competent than those running any other teams. They can just afford to buy the best talent. A moron could run a successful team that way....and I am not so sure those teams aren't run by morons.
NBA:
Favorites:
A. The Cavaliers, obviously
B. Again, any team that has gone a long, long time since winning
Least favorites:
A. Lakers
B. Celtics
C. Heat, for obvious reasons
D. Hear again, I am under the firm belief that the NBA does thing to cater to the Lakers and Celtics. I believe that league thinks that if the Celtics and Lakers are not the best teams in the league that the league will suffer. That is preposterous of course, but the NBA wants its big market teams to do well. All these great players just miraculously end up on the rosters of the Lakers and Celtics. Let's put it this way: count me among those who say that the way the NBA does its business smells fishy.
-
This will seem very strange to most on here:
Favorite: Steelers
Ones I like: Browns (the rivalry between the teams made me sad when Baltimore took the team and am so glad Cleveland has a team again) Cowboys (because my son works for them), Dolphins, Bills
Dislike: Broncos, Patriots, Jets
Hate: Raiders: This goes back a long way
Indifferent: everyone else[/color]
-
Favorite NFL teams:
A.The Browns, obviously.
B. Beyond that, it would be the Packers solely for the fact that they are the only community owned team in the NFL. (and maybe in all pro sports.
C. Any team that has gone many, many years without winning a title, or who has never won one. ( I was glad to see the Saints win one) That actually includes fully 1/2 of the entire NFL. There are 16 NFL teams, including the Browns, who have either not won an NFL/AFL title since 1970 or have never won one in there existance: Chargers, Cardinals, Chiefs, Vikings, Lions, Browns, Bengals, Titans, Falcons, Panthers, Jaguars, Texans, Eagles, Bills, Jets, Seahawks.
Least favorite:
A. Obviously you dislike your division rivals the most, that is purely natural: Ravens, Steelers, and Bengals. The fact that two of those teams are the bastard children of the Cleveland Browns (Bengals and Ravens) makes these rivalries somewhat unprecedented in the league.
B. Beyond that there are the Broncos. Sure, losing 3 AFC title games to them in the manner in which a couple were lost still grates.
C. Also, I too take delight in the failures of the Cowboys simply because of the fellatio the national media performs upon them constantly.
Favorite MLB teams:
A. The Indians obviously.
B. The Cubs, because that is my wife's favorite team.
C. Just like with football, any team that has gone many, many years without winning a title. It just so happens that the two teams that have gone the longest happen to be the two teams my family supports. Ain't that a bitch.
Least favorite:
A. The Yankees
B. Now, the Red Sox
C. Actually, it isn't even so much the Yankees and Red Sox that I despise, but it is the system in place in MLB that bestows upon them the built in advantage of money over all the other teams. These f**kers don't have to use any skill or competence to always be good. They simply have to throw more money around, and they can and do because the system gives them more money to throw around. At least in the NFL and maybe other sports, the winning franchises like the Pats and Steelers etc. do it through competent management and coaching. I don't believe for one second that the guys running the Yankees and Red Sox are more competent than those running any other teams. They can just afford to buy the best talent. A moron could run a successful team that way....and I am not so sure those teams aren't run by morons.
NBA:
Favorites:
A. The Cavaliers, obviously
B. Again, any team that has gone a long, long time since winning
Least favorites:
A. Lakers
B. Celtics
C. Heat, for obvious reasons
D. Hear again, I am under the firm belief that the NBA does thing to cater to the Lakers and Celtics. I believe that league thinks that if the Celtics and Lakers are not the best teams in the league that the league will suffer. That is preposterous of course, but the NBA wants its big market teams to do well. All these great players just miraculously end up on the rosters of the Lakers and Celtics. Let's put it this way: count me among those who say that the way the NBA does its business smells fishy.
A. The Yankees
B. Now, the Red Sox
C. Actually, it isn't even so much the Yankees and Red Sox that I despise, but it is the system in place in MLB that bestows upon them the built in advantage of money over all the other teams. These f**kers don't have to use any skill or competence to always be good. They simply have to throw more money around, and they can and do because the system gives them more money to throw around. At least in the NFL and maybe other sports, the winning franchises like the Pats and Steelers etc. do it through competent management and coaching. I don't believe for one second that the guys running the Yankees and Red Sox are more competent than those running any other teams. They can just afford to buy the best talent. A moron could run a successful team that way....and I am not so sure those teams aren't run by morons.
It's why I don't bother to watch baseball anymore. The big market teams have a very unfair advantage in buying up all the best talent. That may not buy you a pennant every year, but it certainly buys you a competitive team. The Yankees haven't had a losing season since 1992, and in their 108 years in New York, they've only been on the minus side of the win column 21 times.
-
talking about mount union of course i have a buddy down there i went to school with and played football with hes on the team
i've had the pleasure to meet Coach Kehres and he is a total class guy. According to today's PD, Coach has a record of 303-22-3 in his 25 years at the helm. i believe that includes playoff games as well. His run has got to be the most successful in NCAA football history. i think he as 10 national championships.
Yesterday, his starting QB went down in the first quarter. The backup, Matt Pilotto, threw for over 300 yards, 4 TD's and 0 ints. Cecil Shorts, a Collinwood grad, may get drafted in the NFL this spring.
i've had the pleasure to meet Coach Kehres and he is a total class guy. According to today's PD, Coach has a record of 303-22-3 in his 25 years at the helm. i believe that includes playoff games as well. His run has got to be the most successful in NCAA football history. i think he as 10 national championships.
Yesterday, his starting QB went down in the first quarter. The backup, Matt Pilotto, threw for over 300 yards, 4 TD's and 0 ints. Cecil Shorts, a Collinwood grad, may get drafted in the NFL this spring.
YOU GOTTA LOVE THE PURPLE RAIDERS.............I do.........what a dynasty..........the should be rated higher than TCU and BOISE
-
i've had the pleasure to meet Coach Kehres and he is a total class guy. According to today's PD, Coach has a record of 303-22-3 in his 25 years at the helm. i believe that includes playoff games as well. His run has got to be the most successful in NCAA football history. i think he as 10 national championships.
Yesterday, his starting QB went down in the first quarter. The backup, Matt Pilotto, threw for over 300 yards, 4 TD's and 0 ints. Cecil Shorts, a Collinwood grad, may get drafted in the NFL this spring.
YOU GOTTA LOVE THE PURPLE RAIDERS.............I do.........what a dynasty..........the should be rated higher than TCU and BOISE
YOU GOTTA LOVE THE PURPLE RAIDERS.............I do.........what a dynasty..........the should be rated higher than TCU and BOISE
Well, they very well may be rated higher than those teams.....in their own division. Mt. Union is a Division III school. That is the 4th rung division, behind FBS, FCS, Division II.
As great as they are, let's face the truth: if Mt. Union came up against Boise or TCU, they would probably get whipped pretty bad.
What might be interesting though would be to see them play against say, Kent St. or Akron U. I am not so sure they couldn't hold their own pretty well against them.
-
Well the BCS is crap.............the Purple Raiders play their way to championships every year..............and the BCS is really Bullshit Crock oh Sheet
-
Well the BCS is crap.............the Purple Raiders play their way to championships every year..............and the BCS is really Bullshit Crock oh Sheet
Well the BCS is crap.............the Purple Raiders play their way to championships every year..............and the BCS is really Bullshit Crock oh Sheet
Yes, it would be nice to have a real playoff, wouldn't it. Now, instead, the teams in the title game have a 6 week layoff. I am convinced that hurt OSU in their two most recent title game losses. I don't know if they would have won, but I don't believe it would have been so bad.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login