Skip to content

Bye Bye Mangini

Locked The Browns Board
583 96 35.7k
  • @falcon7 said:

    Oh F it all, so sick of this! They suck and always will.

    3 1/2 quarters left... if our oline shows up we will be ok...

    @bringbackbrownie2 said:

    3 1/2 quarters left... if our oline shows up we will be ok...

    And the Dline, Dbacks, Lbackers, QB, receivers, RB's, Kickers, Coaches ect. if they all show up we may only lose by 4 td's.

  • GO FOR IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • you're an idiot..

    @mark-o said:

    you're an idiot..

    I'm not the one who kicked a fg at the one! Gaylord

  • I love the guys on here who assume they can get off their couch, put down the Busch Light, and walk onto that field and do a better job. Face it most of you don't even know what your talking about when it comes to coaches, all you look at is the record and a 5-11 last year where we beat bottom dwellers (except for the Steelers) and 5-11 this year with the toughest schedule and great wins against two of some of the NFL elite and only losing games by a 1.6 point average is a huge improvement. But I digress. I'll refer to your drunken lazy boy sunday coach hiring advise.

  • GO FOR IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    @falcon7 said:

    GO FOR IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    You're talking about Mangenious, Mr. Field goal! Playing not to lose. Or to lose respectable. He needs to go!!

  • @falcon7 said:

    GO FOR IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    You're talking about Mangenious, Mr. Field goal! Playing not to lose. Or to lose respectable. He needs to go!!

    @dawg08 said:

    You're talking about Mangenious, Mr. Field goal! Playing not to lose. Or to lose respectable. He needs to go!!

    I agree that I would have gone for it here... but it was on the 3 yard line not the 1

  • @dawg08 said:

    You're talking about Mangenious, Mr. Field goal! Playing not to lose. Or to lose respectable. He needs to go!!

    I agree that I would have gone for it here... but it was on the 3 yard line not the 1

    @bringbackbrownie2 said:

    I agree that I would have gone for it here... but it was on the 3 yard line not the 1

    They just ran two plays from the same spot and couldn't do anything, what makes you think they would have even scored if they went for it. If he had gone for it and not gotten it you would have just bitched about that too. This is the number 1 defense in the country not the Bills (who we should have went for it against.)

  • Wow glad we kicked the fg now, so they can get a td.

    Some one get saun rodgers off the field.

    he gets like 500"000 a tackle

  • Did we throw in the towel?

    Hope not. But that 4th and goal... 😠

  • He challenges this int and doesn't go for it on 4th down?

    Please fire mangini at halftime

  • He challenges this int and doesn't go for it on 4th down?

    Please fire mangini at halftime

    @wrrebel said:

    He challenges this int and doesn't go for it on 4th down?

    Please fire mangini at halftime

    we don't need you to comment on EVERY PLAY just to disagree with Mangini.. Go cuddle with Gruden...

  • I don't know if Mangini should be fired.

    I only know I want Gruden in orange and brown pretty soon. 😡

  • This has nothing to do with any other coach..

    The browns said this game was for mangini, enough said!

  • hey Mangini don't let the Doors hit you in your ass on the way out.

  • I can't wait for the next coach to do just as bad with this roster and the same homos wanting the coaching staff gutted, yet again, will be on here crying for a new coach.

  • Sadly, this says more about the talent on the team than anything. Lombardi couldn't win with this group right now.

  • I can't wait for the next coach to do just as bad with this roster and the same homos wanting the coaching staff gutted, yet again, will be on here crying for a new coach.

    @next2nothing said:

    I can't wait for the next coach to do just as bad with this roster and the same homos wanting the coaching staff gutted, yet again, will be on here crying for a new coach.

    I disagree. Look at the season we've just played: so many games lost that we could have easily won. That's bad coaching to me.

    We've been in every game we played except the two against the Suckers. And we end up 5-11?

  • @next2nothing said:

    I can't wait for the next coach to do just as bad with this roster and the same homos wanting the coaching staff gutted, yet again, will be on here crying for a new coach.

    I disagree. Look at the season we've just played: so many games lost that we could have easily won. That's bad coaching to me.

    We've been in every game we played except the two against the Suckers. And we end up 5-11?

    @the-italian-dawgpound said:

    I disagree. Look at the season we've just played: so many games lost that we could have easily won. That's bad coaching to me.

    We've been in every game we played except the two against the Suckers. And we end up 5-11?

    It might be bad coaching on some parts but how do the coaches have any part in Hillis fumbling or INT's thrown by Delhomme? How about Wright deciding he didn't want to cover anyone in that first Baltimore game?

    How about the fact that our WR corp is horrendous and our leading receiver is our freaking TE? Or how we have 11 guys on injured reserve? 11! That's one side of the ball on the injury list! This was a roster who could ill-afford too many injuries and look what happens. We lose 11 guys for the year and have to fill these spots with anyone we can.

    That's exactly my point. We've been in every game, we just don't have the weapons on both sides of the ball to get past those games like the contending teams do. Yet fans still want to gut the coaching staff because they claim there's been no improvement. We went from one year where we were destroyed almost the entire year to a year where we competed and were close with every team on our schedule but the Steelers and fans are calling for the coaches head.

    So let me ask you this... how long do you give the next coaching staff if this team isn't winning 9 or 10 games a year? Do you give them the same 2 years and out? How long do you give the next guy to rebuild this team before you want to axe him? The Browns will never get back to contention if they constantly change coaches every 2 years. That's a fact.

  • @the-italian-dawgpound said:

    I disagree. Look at the season we've just played: so many games lost that we could have easily won. That's bad coaching to me.

    We've been in every game we played except the two against the Suckers. And we end up 5-11?

    It might be bad coaching on some parts but how do the coaches have any part in Hillis fumbling or INT's thrown by Delhomme? How about Wright deciding he didn't want to cover anyone in that first Baltimore game?

    How about the fact that our WR corp is horrendous and our leading receiver is our freaking TE? Or how we have 11 guys on injured reserve? 11! That's one side of the ball on the injury list! This was a roster who could ill-afford too many injuries and look what happens. We lose 11 guys for the year and have to fill these spots with anyone we can.

    That's exactly my point. We've been in every game, we just don't have the weapons on both sides of the ball to get past those games like the contending teams do. Yet fans still want to gut the coaching staff because they claim there's been no improvement. We went from one year where we were destroyed almost the entire year to a year where we competed and were close with every team on our schedule but the Steelers and fans are calling for the coaches head.

    So let me ask you this... how long do you give the next coaching staff if this team isn't winning 9 or 10 games a year? Do you give them the same 2 years and out? How long do you give the next guy to rebuild this team before you want to axe him? The Browns will never get back to contention if they constantly change coaches every 2 years. That's a fact.

    @next2nothing said:

    It might be bad coaching on some parts but how do the coaches have any part in Hillis fumbling or INT's thrown by Delhomme? How about Wright deciding he didn't want to cover anyone in that first Baltimore game?

    How about the fact that our WR corp is horrendous and our leading receiver is our freaking TE? Or how we have 11 guys on injured reserve? 11! That's one side of the ball on the injury list! This was a roster who could ill-afford too many injuries and look what happens. We lose 11 guys for the year and have to fill these spots with anyone we can.

    That's exactly my point. We've been in every game, we just don't have the weapons on both sides of the ball to get past those games like the contending teams do. Yet fans still want to gut the coaching staff because they claim there's been no improvement. We went from one year where we were destroyed almost the entire year to a year where we competed and were close with every team on our schedule but the Steelers and fans are calling for the coaches head.

    So let me ask you this... how long do you give the next coaching staff if this team isn't winning 9 or 10 games a year? Do you give them the same 2 years and out? How long do you give the next guy to rebuild this team before you want to axe him? The Browns will never get back to contention if they constantly change coaches every 2 years. That's a fact.

    I'm not saying you're wrong. But bad coaching should not add up to players mistakes. Coaching should help reduce their impact.

  • @next2nothing said:

    It might be bad coaching on some parts but how do the coaches have any part in Hillis fumbling or INT's thrown by Delhomme? How about Wright deciding he didn't want to cover anyone in that first Baltimore game?

    How about the fact that our WR corp is horrendous and our leading receiver is our freaking TE? Or how we have 11 guys on injured reserve? 11! That's one side of the ball on the injury list! This was a roster who could ill-afford too many injuries and look what happens. We lose 11 guys for the year and have to fill these spots with anyone we can.

    That's exactly my point. We've been in every game, we just don't have the weapons on both sides of the ball to get past those games like the contending teams do. Yet fans still want to gut the coaching staff because they claim there's been no improvement. We went from one year where we were destroyed almost the entire year to a year where we competed and were close with every team on our schedule but the Steelers and fans are calling for the coaches head.

    So let me ask you this... how long do you give the next coaching staff if this team isn't winning 9 or 10 games a year? Do you give them the same 2 years and out? How long do you give the next guy to rebuild this team before you want to axe him? The Browns will never get back to contention if they constantly change coaches every 2 years. That's a fact.

    I'm not saying you're wrong. But bad coaching should not add up to players mistakes. Coaching should help reduce their impact.

    @the-italian-dawgpound said:

    I'm not saying you're wrong. But bad coaching should not add up to players mistakes. Coaching should help reduce their impact.

    I totally get what you're saying and I do agree. I think Mangini has made some bad decisions this year and failed to make any decision when he needed to. I don't think Dabol is a great OC but he hasn't much to work with so I guess he could get some pass there but still good OC's find a way to utilize what they have. I don't think Ryan has done that great of a job but again he also does not have much to work with. I think our D has improved but our O is terrible and if not for Hillis we probably win 2 games this year.

    I'm just saying that some fans, not you, who are blaming all this on the coaches really need to look at the whole picture.