Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. We need a "safe" pick

We need a "safe" pick

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
6 Posts 5 Posters 999 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ballpeen ballpeenB Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
    • 9k Posts
    • 2k Reputation
    ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by
    #1

    One of the faults I had with Savage is I think he tended to get too wrapped up in his scouting reports and sometimes found things in guys that weren't there...trying to pluck a diamond in the rough so to speak when there were other diamonds in plain view.

    That is fine in the later rounds, and actually worked in his favor with some of the later round picks, but I think reached for guys like Wimbly, Rucker, Bell, and maybe a few others.

    My hope is whoever we select, we look for a "safer" route, and go by what our eyes tell us rather than read something in to a scouting report.

    We should have good solid picks galore when we select in rounds 1 and 2, even in to rounds 3 and 4, and hope we don't get a guy who starts throwing the dice, looking for more than is available.

    Get some guys who you know are going to be at least good, solid players rather than seek out that guy who might be great....or might not.

    We need some players we can count on out of the gate.

    JMO

    If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
    E 1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • ballpeenB ballpeen

      One of the faults I had with Savage is I think he tended to get too wrapped up in his scouting reports and sometimes found things in guys that weren't there...trying to pluck a diamond in the rough so to speak when there were other diamonds in plain view.

      That is fine in the later rounds, and actually worked in his favor with some of the later round picks, but I think reached for guys like Wimbly, Rucker, Bell, and maybe a few others.

      My hope is whoever we select, we look for a "safer" route, and go by what our eyes tell us rather than read something in to a scouting report.

      We should have good solid picks galore when we select in rounds 1 and 2, even in to rounds 3 and 4, and hope we don't get a guy who starts throwing the dice, looking for more than is available.

      Get some guys who you know are going to be at least good, solid players rather than seek out that guy who might be great....or might not.

      We need some players we can count on out of the gate.

      JMO

      Earl34 E
      • 1k Posts
      • 11 Reputation
      E Earl34 wrote on last edited by
      #2

      @ballpeen said:

      One of the faults I had with Savage is I think he tended to get too wrapped up in his scouting reports and sometimes found things in guys that weren't there...trying to pluck a diamond in the rough so to speak when there were other diamonds in plain view.

      That is fine in the later rounds, and actually worked in his favor with some of the later round picks, but I think reached for guys like Wimbly, Rucker, Bell, and maybe a few others.

      My hope is whoever we select, we look for a "safer" route, and go by what our eyes tell us rather than read something in to a scouting report.

      We should have good solid picks galore when we select in rounds 1 and 2, even in to rounds 3 and 4, and hope we don't get a guy who starts throwing the dice, looking for more than is available.

      Get some guys who you know are going to be at least good, solid players rather than seek out that guy who might be great....or might not.

      We need some players we can count on out of the gate.

      JMO

      I agree. Need another day one pick though. With the number five are you in favor of a DB or a pass rusher?

      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • ballpeen ballpeenB Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
        • 9k Posts
        • 2k Reputation
        ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by ballpeen
        #3

        In tune with what I said before....DBs are safer picks. It is pretty easy to see if they have the hip movement, ball skills, and speed that will translate to the NFL. Pass rushers are much harder to assess.

        At this point, I think Jenkins would be my pick...shoot....maybe even the safety Mays, though that is a reach...for a backer if we went that direction, I would go Curry...I think he is less boom or bust potential than does Malagula.

        A few of those OTs are can't miss types..and we are kidding ourself if we don't think we couldn't use a stud linemen on that side of the ball.

        If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • JewDago J
          • 837 Posts
          • 0 Reputation
          J JewDago wrote on last edited by
          #4

          how is jenkins less of a reach than mays? they're both outstanding college players who have room to grow as they learn the nuances of playing their positions in the NFL. if anything, jenkins is more of a reach because he has less potential. mays has the potential to be one of the best ever but, at worst, will be a solid safety who's good in the run game and punishes receivers.

          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • mz. ?
            • Posts
            • 0 Reputation
            ? mz. wrote on last edited by
            #5

            I'm not sure how a pick gets safer than Mays or Curry, really.

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • DestinFunk DestinFunkD
              • 291 Posts
              • 0 Reputation
              DestinFunkD DestinFunk wrote on last edited by
              #6

              I have flip flopped a bit as the browns need a stud LB (Curry)in the worst way..and Shonn Greene in rd 2 ..but the more i watch mays as a game changing safety...then i watch ed reed and the long hair polo from pissburgh dominate the game...i am hoping mays could be that guy for the browns D...huge hitter..players scared to go over the middle...i dont know that anyone is the ball hawk Reed is..but he is EVERYWHERE...and the browns NEED that a huge playmaker that plays his ass off..its infectious...

              ~Silence is boring!
              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply

              Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

              Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

              With your input, this post could be even better 💗

              Register Login
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              Theme
              • System
              • Light
              • Dark
              The Browns Board Terms Privacy

              The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Forums
              • Recent
              • Popular
              • Users
              • Donate