The Browns Draft Slot Getting Better
-
Carolina won, Miami won, Seatlle won, Washington won, KC won, The Browns won't catch Indy, Stl, or Minn, but if we lose out we will be picking 4th, 5th, or 6. But then again they will probably win against the Cards and screw it up anyway.
"And they don't really know even what they're talkin' about And I can't imagine what empty heads can achieve." -
There ya go boys! Start winning games now when they don't mean squat and hurt your draft position come April!
-
What good is it to improve your draft position, when your front office has a penchant for trading it away?
-
I highly doubt we will trade it away this year. We need offensive firepower. We will get an offensive weapon this year. This loss hurts, but it almost assures us the fourth pick.
-
Yes that is the only positive from todays game....RG3 to Cleveland i think we will have the first shot at him HERE WE GO CLEVELAND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
Yes that is the only positive from todays game....RG3 to Cleveland i think we will have the first shot at him HERE WE GO CLEVELAND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yes that is the only positive from todays game....RG3 to Cleveland i think we will have the first shot at him HERE WE GO CLEVELAND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hopefully, but chances are Barkley will also still be there and Browns likely go with the more conservative pick if go QB, and knowing our luck it will be a big mistake and we will have chosen the wrong one, think if we pick at 4, could have too many choices and the backroom staff will just go into meltdown not knowing what to do
-
No to a QB. Sign a GREAT WR or OL... Joe Thomas was a first round pick and he's been to multiple probowls since he's been here, get another like him. Get a STUD LB or another DE, heck maybe a shutdown CB or Ed Reed type Safety. Screw the damn QB position, it's a wasted pick with all that this team needs. Let's put some more pieces in place an see if Colt can do it, unless we can snatch Luck I vote NO on the QB in this Draft.
-
We need a qb. All the best teams have a great qb... We don't. McCoys intangibles are good but he is small and his arm strength is not that great. We need a qb, if it costs a ton to get one it is worth it to become relevant. It comes down to to is indy willing to make a trade oe do they want Luck?
-
I think this game sealed McCoy's fate. We're moving on. Seneca came in and did very well.
-
People say since we're getting a high draft pick, lets get a QB. I just dont understand how people are willing to give up on Colt already? Guy gets a new coach and theres a lockout so he almost has 0 time to practice and learn this new style of offense. The guy sure is good at getting up off the ground seeing as how he doesnt have an Oline to protect him. Who cares that he doesnt have ANY talent to throw to? Who cares if none of the receivers can get open? Starting running back out for a good stretch of the season? that means no run game or run block so all the defenses are going to blitz as much as possible. I mean when we played some equally bad teams with bad defenses and colt had A LITTLE time to throw he looked very good and accurate. Im not sure where people come up with the no arm strength BS either, is arm strength important in a west coast offense? Im done ranting lets just do like everyones says and draft another QB and put him in colts place. When next seasons over and the new rookie QB hasnt won a superbowl we can repeat the process. With so many impatient fans out there not willing to give anyone a chance they're always going to suck so its helpless. Why not give colt and a coach 4,5, or 6 years playing together with a team? maybe some of our receivers (little) will have learned how to not drop 5 passes in one game by then who knows? Why not with high draft picks, draft good receivers and some beefy offensive line men? Like I said it doesnt matter either way the fans are too impatient and wont give anyone a legit chance so they're always going to suck
-
People say since we're getting a high draft pick, lets get a QB. I just dont understand how people are willing to give up on Colt already? Guy gets a new coach and theres a lockout so he almost has 0 time to practice and learn this new style of offense. The guy sure is good at getting up off the ground seeing as how he doesnt have an Oline to protect him. Who cares that he doesnt have ANY talent to throw to? Who cares if none of the receivers can get open? Starting running back out for a good stretch of the season? that means no run game or run block so all the defenses are going to blitz as much as possible. I mean when we played some equally bad teams with bad defenses and colt had A LITTLE time to throw he looked very good and accurate. Im not sure where people come up with the no arm strength BS either, is arm strength important in a west coast offense? Im done ranting lets just do like everyones says and draft another QB and put him in colts place. When next seasons over and the new rookie QB hasnt won a superbowl we can repeat the process. With so many impatient fans out there not willing to give anyone a chance they're always going to suck so its helpless. Why not give colt and a coach 4,5, or 6 years playing together with a team? maybe some of our receivers (little) will have learned how to not drop 5 passes in one game by then who knows? Why not with high draft picks, draft good receivers and some beefy offensive line men? Like I said it doesnt matter either way the fans are too impatient and wont give anyone a legit chance so they're always going to suck
People say since we're getting a high draft pick, lets get a QB. I just dont understand how people are willing to give up on Colt already? Guy gets a new coach and theres a lockout so he almost has 0 time to practice and learn this new style of offense. The guy sure is good at getting up off the ground seeing as how he doesnt have an Oline to protect him. Who cares that he doesnt have ANY talent to throw to? Who cares if none of the receivers can get open? Starting running back out for a good stretch of the season? that means no run game or run block so all the defenses are going to blitz as much as possible. I mean when we played some equally bad teams with bad defenses and colt had A LITTLE time to throw he looked very good and accurate. Im not sure where people come up with the no arm strength BS either, is arm strength important in a west coast offense? Im done ranting lets just do like everyones says and draft another QB and put him in colts place. When next seasons over and the new rookie QB hasnt won a superbowl we can repeat the process. With so many impatient fans out there not willing to give anyone a chance they're always going to suck so its helpless. Why not give colt and a coach 4,5, or 6 years playing together with a team? maybe some of our receivers (little) will have learned how to not drop 5 passes in one game by then who knows? Why not with high draft picks, draft good receivers and some beefy offensive line men? Like I said it doesnt matter either way the fans are too impatient and wont give anyone a legit chance so they're always going to suck
I gotta say i completely agree with you about giving McCoy more time but as far as a draft goes i would always go BPA over Needs thats just the way i think good teams are made..Now if Blackmon were to somehow fall i would defentily take him if hes not there at say pick #4 or 5 i would consider getting RG3 and still starting McCoy and building the team with more peices for ethier one...If McCoy does alot better you trade RG3 or you keep who ever you feel Comfortable with reminds me of Kevin Kolb situation in Philly or the Matt Casell situation in New England i still take best player on the board..
-
People say since we're getting a high draft pick, lets get a QB. I just dont understand how people are willing to give up on Colt already? Guy gets a new coach and theres a lockout so he almost has 0 time to practice and learn this new style of offense. The guy sure is good at getting up off the ground seeing as how he doesnt have an Oline to protect him. Who cares that he doesnt have ANY talent to throw to? Who cares if none of the receivers can get open? Starting running back out for a good stretch of the season? that means no run game or run block so all the defenses are going to blitz as much as possible. I mean when we played some equally bad teams with bad defenses and colt had A LITTLE time to throw he looked very good and accurate. Im not sure where people come up with the no arm strength BS either, is arm strength important in a west coast offense? Im done ranting lets just do like everyones says and draft another QB and put him in colts place. When next seasons over and the new rookie QB hasnt won a superbowl we can repeat the process. With so many impatient fans out there not willing to give anyone a chance they're always going to suck so its helpless. Why not give colt and a coach 4,5, or 6 years playing together with a team? maybe some of our receivers (little) will have learned how to not drop 5 passes in one game by then who knows? Why not with high draft picks, draft good receivers and some beefy offensive line men? Like I said it doesnt matter either way the fans are too impatient and wont give anyone a legit chance so they're always going to suck
I gotta say i completely agree with you about giving McCoy more time but as far as a draft goes i would always go BPA over Needs thats just the way i think good teams are made..Now if Blackmon were to somehow fall i would defentily take him if hes not there at say pick #4 or 5 i would consider getting RG3 and still starting McCoy and building the team with more peices for ethier one...If McCoy does alot better you trade RG3 or you keep who ever you feel Comfortable with reminds me of Kevin Kolb situation in Philly or the Matt Casell situation in New England i still take best player on the board..
I gotta say i completely agree with you about giving McCoy more time but as far as a draft goes i would always go BPA over Needs thats just the way i think good teams are made..Now if Blackmon were to somehow fall i would defentily take him if hes not there at say pick #4 or 5 i would consider getting RG3 and still starting McCoy and building the team with more peices for ethier one...If McCoy does alot better you trade RG3 or you keep who ever you feel Comfortable with reminds me of Kevin Kolb situation in Philly or the Matt Casell situation in New England i still take best player on the board..
RG3, McCoy and Seneca ? Nah ! we gotta cut one.
-
Yes that is the only positive from todays game....RG3 to Cleveland i think we will have the first shot at him HERE WE GO CLEVELAND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hopefully, but chances are Barkley will also still be there and Browns likely go with the more conservative pick if go QB, and knowing our luck it will be a big mistake and we will have chosen the wrong one, think if we pick at 4, could have too many choices and the backroom staff will just go into meltdown not knowing what to do
Hopefully, but chances are Barkley will also still be there and Browns likely go with the more conservative pick if go QB, and knowing our luck it will be a big mistake and we will have chosen the wrong one, think if we pick at 4, could have too many choices and the backroom staff will just go into meltdown not knowing what to do
There is truth in that.
They will overthink the process and get all gummed up.
-
I just dont understand how people are willing to give up on Colt already?
Some wines require time to bring out the potential. Some wines don't.
Colt is like Boones Farm. It's as good as it is going to get, and not very good.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login