***official Draft Day Thread***
-
1. Luck - Colts
2. Griffin - Redskins
3. Richardson - Jets
4. Kalil - Bills
5. Claiborne - Bucs
6. Cox - Rams
7. Blackmon - Jags
8. Tannehill - Dolphins
9. Floyd - Panthers
10. Kuechly - Browns
If this is the first ten picks I'm buying a lotto ticket.
1. Luck - Colts
2. Griffin - Redskins
3. Richardson - Jets
4. Kalil - Bills
5. Claiborne - Bucs
6. Cox - Rams
7. Blackmon - Jags
8. Tannehill - Dolphins
9. Floyd - Panthers
10. Kuechly - Browns
If this is the first ten picks I'm buying a lotto ticket.
This seems likely, although I expect it to be the Bucs at #3, not the Jets. Jets will balk at how much the Vikings want for that kind of move up, and the Bucs will have to offer a lot less and the Vikings still get Claiborne at #5.
Then at #4 with Kalil still on the board, I agree that the Bills trade up to the Browns for a #1 next year and a 2nd rounder this year. Maybe a swap of 7th rounders.
At #10, however, the Browns will take Floyd if the Panthers don't, or at CB take the 2nd best in Gilmore or Barron, the best rated DB (albeit safety) in the draft.
-
Trent BAMF Richardson at #4 or I'll light the RIVER on FIRE again!!!!
THIS^!!!
-
Talk about the draft and post your own mock draft here for the next three days. Lets pray that we finally help our offense out.
Jesus, Joseph and Mary. What do you think we have been doing here for the last 3 months?
Jesus, Joseph and Mary. What do you think we have been doing here for the last 3 months?
Excellent...
-
am i stoopid or am i the only sane one here?
if we are looking to go rb and and wr in our first 2 picks.......
why wouldn't we take the #1 receiver in blackmon @4 and take the #2 running back in martin @22?
rather than take the #1 rb in richardson and take the #4 wr @22?
can someone explain that rational to me?
guess i'm the only sane one, either that or i'm drunk already.
-
am i stoopid or am i the only sane one here?
if we are looking to go rb and and wr in our first 2 picks.......
why wouldn't we take the #1 receiver in blackmon @4 and take the #2 running back in martin @22?
rather than take the #1 rb in richardson and take the #4 wr @22?
can someone explain that rational to me?
guess i'm the only sane one, either that or i'm drunk already.
am i stoopid or am i the only sane one here?
if we are looking to go rb and and wr in our first 2 picks.......
why wouldn't we take the #1 receiver in blackmon @4 and take the #2 running back in martin @22?
rather than take the #1 rb in richardson and take the #4 wr @22?
can someone explain that rationaliztion to me?
guess i'm the only sane one, either that or i'm drunk already.
Because the difference between Richardson and Martin is approximately 18 spots
The difference between Blackmon, Floyd, Hill and Wright is about 4 spots
In other words, the drop off from Hill/Wright from Blackmon/Floyd is not that huge.
The drop off from Richardson and Martin is much bigger.
-
TR is the consensus #1 RB.....martin isn't even close. in contrast, floyd is supposedly slightly behind blackmon.
i guess your real question should be....how much worse is the #4 WR than the #1 relative to the #2 RB to the #1?
its not so much insanity, as just another route. but there's many factors, all of which im not going into. the easy explanation: RB's touch the ball more. so there is a higher propensity for reward with TR than blackmon. the bit of diva in him starts to get impatient when he doesn't get the ball. his attitude will be his undoing in B&O
-
Toxic, it is not just measuring Richardson to Martin, or the other backs for that matter. It's upon measuring Richardson to ALL the backs in the Draft since 2007 and seeing that he is better than them all as a prospect. Whereas Blackmon is the "best in this class" but not by all that much and certainly not the best out of multiple draft classes.
Richardson "is" Calvin Johnson or A.J. Green, Blackmon "is" Reggie Bush... kinda.
The secret of getting ahead is getting started. The secret of getting started is breaking your complex overwhelming tasks into small manageable tasks, and then starting on the first one. -Mark Twain- "It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog." -Mark Twain- -
am i stoopid or am i the only sane one here?
if we are looking to go rb and and wr in our first 2 picks.......
why wouldn't we take the #1 receiver in blackmon @4 and take the #2 running back in martin @22?
rather than take the #1 rb in richardson and take the #4 wr @22?
can someone explain that rational to me?
guess i'm the only sane one, either that or i'm drunk already.
am i stoopid or am i the only sane one here?
if we are looking to go rb and and wr in our first 2 picks.......
why wouldn't we take the #1 receiver in blackmon @4 and take the #2 running back in martin @22?
rather than take the #1 rb in richardson and take the #4 wr @22?
can someone explain that rational to me?
guess i'm the only sane one, either that or i'm drunk already.
Point taken wisely.
Why are you still sitting at home?
You need to be in NY to be sure we draft the right personnel to insure a draft day success.
Head or Gut? -
i gotcha.
what 'route' will the browns go if tampa bay trades up and takes him?
-
am i stoopid or am i the only sane one here?
if we are looking to go rb and and wr in our first 2 picks.......
why wouldn't we take the #1 receiver in blackmon @4 and take the #2 running back in martin @22?
rather than take the #1 rb in richardson and take the #4 wr @22?
can someone explain that rational to me?
guess i'm the only sane one, either that or i'm drunk already.
am i stoopid or am i the only sane one here?
if we are looking to go rb and and wr in our first 2 picks.......
why wouldn't we take the #1 receiver in blackmon @4 and take the #2 running back in martin @22?
rather than take the #1 rb in richardson and take the #4 wr @22?
can someone explain that rational to me?
guess i'm the only sane one, either that or i'm drunk already.
Yes, you may be drunk: it is because the #1 RB is apparently considered a far better prospect than the #1 WR, and the #4 WR is rated a better prospect than the #2 RB.
E.g. The #6 "rated" QB in the 1983 draft was a guy named Dan Marino. The #1 rated QB in the 1984 draft was a guy named Boomer Esiason.
Not a bad player, but clearly #6 one year was better than #1 the following year.
Same with different positions. The #4 WR may be much better rated than the #2 RB.
-
am i stoopid or am i the only sane one here?
if we are looking to go rb and and wr in our first 2 picks.......
why wouldn't we take the #1 receiver in blackmon @4 and take the #2 running back in martin @22?
rather than take the #1 rb in richardson and take the #4 wr @22?
can someone explain that rational to me?
guess i'm the only sane one, either that or i'm drunk already.
Point taken wisely.
Why are you still sitting at home?
You need to be in NY to be sure we draft the right personnel to insure a draft day success.
Point taken wisely.
Why are you still sitting at home?
You need to be in NY to be sure we draft the right personnel to insure a draft day success.
man i hate going into the city anymore.
besides you can drink on the train you can drink at a bar all the way to radio city but once you get in...................
besides i wouldn't want to embarrass myself or this board wearing a 'i'm a brownsboard member' tshirt and the cameras zoom in (showing the group of rowdy browns fans when the browns are on the clock) and showing me vomit on a jets fan head when we pick tannehill @4.
-
It doesn't matter at this point... I'll be rooting for whoever they draft on Sundays this fall
Go Browns!!!!!!!!!
-
Point taken wisely.
Why are you still sitting at home?
You need to be in NY to be sure we draft the right personnel to insure a draft day success.
man i hate going into the city anymore.
besides you can drink on the train you can drink at a bar all the way to radio city but once you get in...................
besides i wouldn't want to embarrass myself or this board wearing a 'i'm a brownsboard member' tshirt and the cameras zoom in (showing the group of rowdy browns fans when the browns are on the clock) and showing me vomit on a jets fan head when we pick tannehill @4.
man i hate going into the city anymore.
besides you can drink on the train you can drink at a bar all the way to radio city but once you get in...................
besides i wouldn't want to embarrass myself or this board wearing a 'i'm a brownsboard member' tshirt and the cameras zoom in (showing the group of rowdy browns fans when the browns are on the clock) and showing me vomit on a jets fan head when we pick tannehill @4.
Give Colt some instant relief and pick TR (if he his available)!
BTW, wonder how big the Browns coalition will be in The Big Apple tonite?
-
at this point all i know is if we stay pat @4 we'll be getting a really good player, no matter who it is.
-
-
Talk about the draft and post your own mock draft here for the next three days. Lets pray that we finally help our offense out.
Jesus, Joseph and Mary. What do you think we have been doing here for the last 3 months?
Jesus, Joseph and Mary. What do you think we have been doing here for the last 3 months?
Stuff...
-
I have a bad feeling we will end up and they will all be a bust
Blackmon
Weeden
Adams
Pead
instead of a solid base
Richardson
Rieff
Jeffery
Mcnutt
-
I have a bad feeling we will end up and they will all be a bust
Blackmon
Weeden
Adams
Pead
instead of a solid base
Richardson
Rieff
Jeffery
Mcnutt
I have a bad feeling we will end up and they will all be a bust
Blackmon
Weeden
Adams
Pead
instead of a solid base
Richardson
Rieff
Jeffery
Mcnutt
It always irritates me when people poopoo other ideas, and throw out there much better idea… with what essentially is a crappy choice (hey, I’m hypocritical, I’m doing what I just said irritates me).
Alshon Jeffery is NOT a good choice. He will be a huge bust (ala Mike Williams)
And anyone who suggests we take a flier on Burfict in round 3 or 4 is stupid. He could be had with our last 7th rounder, but better yet, we could probably get him as an UDFA (and it still wouldn’t be worth the money).
-
Toxic, it is not just measuring Richardson to Martin, or the other backs for that matter. It's upon measuring Richardson to ALL the backs in the Draft since 2007 and seeing that he is better than them all as a prospect. Whereas Blackmon is the "best in this class" but not by all that much and certainly not the best out of multiple draft classes.
Richardson "is" Calvin Johnson or A.J. Green, Blackmon "is" Reggie Bush... kinda.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login