REFS BLOW CALL - RECEPTION AND TD DISALLOWED
-
@inspecta said:
I was completely dumbfounded by that call. He wasn't even touched. Give Berger the Academy award, that was some good acting.YeahDA, you were saying about bad calls? Luckily those shitty shitty stoolers didn't get points off of it.
That was one bad call to how many? How many points did we get off that bad call?
-Ravens O-line hasn't been for holding once
-Made up pass inerference call on McFadden
-The Ravens long punt return was sparked by a huge block in the back
Use you counting skills to see watch team got screwed more. Then admitt that the one bad call didn't get the Steelers a single point!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@yeahdaisafuturehofer... said:
That was one bad call to how many? How many points did we get off that bad call?-Ravens O-line hasn't been for holding one
-Made up pass inerference call on McFadden
-The Ravens long punt return was sparked by a huge block in the back
Use you counting skills to see watch team got screwed more. Then admitt that the one bad call didn't get the Steelers a single point!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
yuhDUHuh,great insight,your like magic with a keyboard,so eloquent
please hurry use you typing sklills me wait for more guud bad call report!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
@yeahdaisafuturehofer... said:
That was one bad call to how many? How many points did we get off that bad call?-Ravens O-line hasn't been for holding one
-Made up pass inerference call on McFadden
-The Ravens long punt return was sparked by a huge block in the back
Use you counting skills to see watch team got screwed more. Then admitt that the one bad call didn't get the Steelers a single point!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
yuhDUHuh,great insight,your like magic with a keyboard,so eloquent
please hurry use you typing sklills me wait for more guud bad call report!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
yuhDUHuh,great insight,your like magic with a keyboard,so eloquent
please hurry use you typing sklills me wait for more guud bad call report!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I rather you spew stupidity then make a logical response. Thanks for making my job and proving we are getting screwed much easy. Thanks so much.
-
@inspecta said:
I was completely dumbfounded by that call. He wasn't even touched. Give Berger the Academy award, that was some good acting.YeahDA, you were saying about bad calls? Luckily those shitty shitty stoolers didn't get points off of it.
That was one bad call to how many? How many points did we get off that bad call?
-Ravens O-line hasn't been for holding once
-Made up pass inerference call on McFadden
-The Ravens long punt return was sparked by a huge block in the back
Use you counting skills to see watch team got screwed more. Then admitt that the one bad call didn't get the Steelers a single point!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
yeahImADumbassYinzer... said:
-Made up pass inerference call on McFaddenWe already knew you were dumb, but apparently you're blind as well. McFathead was ALL OVER Mason on that play WELL before the ball got there. Do you wanna go for "deaf" next so you can acheive the Helen Keller trifecta?
Doug
-
I want to make sure Inspector answers so I will bump this!
-
yeahImADumbassYinzer... said:
-Made up pass inerference call on McFaddenWe already knew you were dumb, but apparently you're blind as well. McFathead was ALL OVER Mason on that play WELL before the ball got there. Do you wanna go for "deaf" next so you can acheive the Helen Keller trifecta?
Doug
We already knew you were dumb, but apparently you're blind as well. McFathead was ALL OVER Mason on that play WELL before the ball got there. Do you wanna go for "deaf" next so you can acheive the Helen Keller trifecta?
Doug
No he wasn't. Did he push him forward or clamp on his arm? If you want to we can take that bad call away and still see we are getting screwed!!!!!!!!
-
@inspecta said:
Ok, raise your hand if you are officially of the opinion that "yeahDA" is asian...."all your base are belong to us"
"please wash hands for maximum satisfaction efficiency"
Shit....
And ghoolie, of course we would like to have steelers success, no shit we are envious are rivals are in this game and we aren't, and wallowing in shit yet again, but we'd be talking shit like this with these yokels even if I was watching the browns play now and the steelers were sitting at home.
We hate the steelers win or lose, we are going to kick the shit out of stooler inbred trolls win or lose. It's life dude, if your somehow insinuating that we should all tuck our tail between are legs and start sucking off these trolls then you're outta your f*cking mind dude. Beyond gone, checked out all brain cells have expired please insert .25 for more minutes.
Please respond to my other post. Totally ignoring a point I am making is a sign I am right and you don't want to bother with it for that reason.
-
@inspecta said:
1. This is one of those "they always hold and don't get called for it" bitch rants that can be applied to 95% of games played. Same can be said for Ben about his rolls to the right sitting there with all day while your Oline grapples the balt D line. Next....2. Dude he was all over him, your blind. Next...
3. More phantom calls, didn't see it and neither anouncer said a word about it, yet even the half time crew went off about the roughing the kicker call. So did Simms. Everybody saw it. Again, your owned.
1. Are you seriously sering Harrsion being thrown down by a horse collar is okay?
2. I Would like to see it again but at first galnce seen nothing
3. You didn't see our guy drilled in the back? Dude, c'mon! Watch the game!
How many point did we did we get off the bad roughing call? You didn't answer that one. I purposely said "point" becuase I know for a fact they didn't get mutliple points! Do you really believe there was just one bad call the whole game?
For the record I asked four questions that need answering.
-
@inspecta said:
Look again shit for brains. Learn some patience f*cktard, unlike you, I'm actually watching the gameYou responded to the post but you ignored my questions and points. Thats when I called you out on that.
-
Oh My God! The refs are 1 for 17 on actually calling holding! Although the very next play Woodley is held. O well. Thats the first holding call this have of the season. Its a start...
-
-
Oh My God! The refs are 1 for 17 on actually calling holding! Although the very next play Woodley is held. O well. Thats the first holding call this have of the season. Its a start...
Thats the first holding call this have of the season.
Damn you, 'spec. This is all I can hear when this douche talks...
-
-
Thats the first holding call this have of the season.
Damn you, 'spec. This is all I can hear when this douche talks...
mz. said:
Damn you, 'spec. This is all I can hear when this douche talks...Go Steelers?
-
Masters said:
I thought it was a catch. But the rule is if the dude has contact and falling (which he was during the two steps), you have to hang on to the ball through contact w/ the ground. It is what it is.NO THE RULES DO NOT SAY THAT.....................
THE RULE SAYS THAT IN LIEU OF THE RECIVER MAKING CONTACT WITH HIS FEET< IF HIS ONLY CONTACT IS THE GROUND.................... THEN HE HAS TO HAVE POSESSION.
IF HE WOULD HAVE RUN 3 STEPS INSTEAD OF 2, OR 10 STEPS................. WHAT WOULD THE CALL BE?
TWO STEPS IN TEH NFL CONSTITUTES A RECEPTION.
THEY BLEW THE CALL.
NO THE RULES DO NOT SAY THAT.....................
THE RULE SAYS THAT IN LIEU OF THE RECIVER MAKING CONTACT WITH HIS FEET< IF HIS ONLY CONTACT IS THE GROUND.................... THEN HE HAS TO HAVE POSESSION.
IF HE WOULD HAVE RUN 3 STEPS INSTEAD OF 2, OR 10 STEPS................. WHAT WOULD THE CALL BE?
TWO STEPS IN TEH NFL CONSTITUTES A RECEPTION.
THEY BLEW THE CALL.
"A forward pass is complete when a receiver clearly possesses the pass and touches the ground with both feet inbounds while in possession of the ball." If the ball comes loose on contact with the ground it is INC. If you watched a game more than once a year, you'd know this. Guys get get two feet in hit the ground and lose the ball on ground contact each week and it is INC.
-
Masters said:
I thought it was a catch. But the rule is if the dude has contact and falling (which he was during the two steps), you have to hang on to the ball through contact w/ the ground. It is what it is.NO THE RULES DO NOT SAY THAT.....................
THE RULE SAYS THAT IN LIEU OF THE RECIVER MAKING CONTACT WITH HIS FEET< IF HIS ONLY CONTACT IS THE GROUND.................... THEN HE HAS TO HAVE POSESSION.
IF HE WOULD HAVE RUN 3 STEPS INSTEAD OF 2, OR 10 STEPS................. WHAT WOULD THE CALL BE?
TWO STEPS IN TEH NFL CONSTITUTES A RECEPTION.
THEY BLEW THE CALL.
NO THE RULES DO NOT SAY THAT.....................
THE RULE SAYS THAT IN LIEU OF THE RECIVER MAKING CONTACT WITH HIS FEET< IF HIS ONLY CONTACT IS THE GROUND.................... THEN HE HAS TO HAVE POSESSION.
IF HE WOULD HAVE RUN 3 STEPS INSTEAD OF 2, OR 10 STEPS................. WHAT WOULD THE CALL BE?
TWO STEPS IN TEH NFL CONSTITUTES A RECEPTION.
THEY BLEW THE CALL.
Ghoulie: That's what I thought also.. he took 2steps and went down and the ground caused the ball to come out.. the real question should have been TD or ball on the 1/2 yard line. It did not effect the outcome fortunately.. However the steelers still and will always..... suck! Go Cards
-
NO THE RULES DO NOT SAY THAT.....................
THE RULE SAYS THAT IN LIEU OF THE RECIVER MAKING CONTACT WITH HIS FEET< IF HIS ONLY CONTACT IS THE GROUND.................... THEN HE HAS TO HAVE POSESSION.
IF HE WOULD HAVE RUN 3 STEPS INSTEAD OF 2, OR 10 STEPS................. WHAT WOULD THE CALL BE?
TWO STEPS IN TEH NFL CONSTITUTES A RECEPTION.
THEY BLEW THE CALL.
"A forward pass is complete when a receiver clearly possesses the pass and touches the ground with both feet inbounds while in possession of the ball." If the ball comes loose on contact with the ground it is INC. If you watched a game more than once a year, you'd know this. Guys get get two feet in hit the ground and lose the ball on ground contact each week and it is INC.
Masters said:
"A forward pass is complete when a receiver clearly possesses the pass and touches the ground with both feet inbounds while in possession of the ball." If the ball comes loose on contact with the ground it is INC. If you watched a game more than once a year, you'd know this. Guys get get two feet in hit the ground and lose the ball on ground contact each week and it is INC.They are already talking on ESPN radio, the refs blew the call. TWO feet on the ground and it is a posession. IF it comes out on the ground it is a dead ball.
By your asshole interpretation a guy could catch a pass, run 55 yards, get tackled and then when the ball bounces off the ground have the pass called an interception.
The pass was complete, the refs blew it and have already admitted so.
At the end of the day it doesn't matter because the Steelers punked the Ravens and punched the shit out of them.
-
NO THE RULES DO NOT SAY THAT.....................
THE RULE SAYS THAT IN LIEU OF THE RECIVER MAKING CONTACT WITH HIS FEET< IF HIS ONLY CONTACT IS THE GROUND.................... THEN HE HAS TO HAVE POSESSION.
IF HE WOULD HAVE RUN 3 STEPS INSTEAD OF 2, OR 10 STEPS................. WHAT WOULD THE CALL BE?
TWO STEPS IN TEH NFL CONSTITUTES A RECEPTION.
THEY BLEW THE CALL.
Ghoulie: That's what I thought also.. he took 2steps and went down and the ground caused the ball to come out.. the real question should have been TD or ball on the 1/2 yard line. It did not effect the outcome fortunately.. However the steelers still and will always..... suck! Go Cards
Ghoulie: That's what I thought also.. he took 2steps and went down and the ground caused the ball to come out.. the real question should have been TD or ball on the 1/2 yard line. It did not effect the outcome fortunately.. However the steelers still and will always..... suck! Go Cards
SEZ, you're okay with me. You are reasonable and it is only normal for you to hate the Steelers.
To be honest with you, I have lsot interest in the NFL to where I can call myself a fan of any team. This mess in Cleveland is not the Browns. Deep down, eveyone here knows it. You guys can try to force it all you want, and for the 30 and under crowd, (since they don't know any better) Lerner's team IS the real thing, but dude, Baltimore has the connection to Cleveland, not the pseudo Browns.
-
Masters said:
"A forward pass is complete when a receiver clearly possesses the pass and touches the ground with both feet inbounds while in possession of the ball." If the ball comes loose on contact with the ground it is INC. If you watched a game more than once a year, you'd know this. Guys get get two feet in hit the ground and lose the ball on ground contact each week and it is INC.They are already talking on ESPN radio, the refs blew the call. TWO feet on the ground and it is a posession. IF it comes out on the ground it is a dead ball.
By your asshole interpretation a guy could catch a pass, run 55 yards, get tackled and then when the ball bounces off the ground have the pass called an interception.
The pass was complete, the refs blew it and have already admitted so.
At the end of the day it doesn't matter because the Steelers punked the Ravens and punched the shit out of them.
They are already talking on ESPN radio, the refs blew the call. TWO feet on the ground and it is a posession. IF it comes out on the ground it is a dead ball.
By your asshole interpretation a guy could catch a pass, run 55 yards, get tackled and then when the ball bounces off the ground have the pass called an interception.
The pass was complete, the refs blew it and have already admitted so.
At the end of the day it doesn't matter because the Steelers punked the Ravens and punched the shit out of them.
Yawn. By my interpretation what you just said doesn't make since. I previously said two feet while falling forward and fall to the ground.
By your interpretation, you should be bitching about PITs first drive where Washington had two feet down, control of the ball above his head, and Reed knocking it loose should have been called a fumble instead of INC.
I don't agree with the rule, but it is what it is.
If you watched games, you'd be up on this stuff. But you never do.
-
@inspecta said:
What dude? are you even watching? he made 0 steps extended for the ball and laid out for it. NO CATCHGreat call by the refs and even better challenge by Harbaugh.
Ghoolie is exactly correct Holmes caught the ball possessed it completely and then made two steps while having possession and then put a hand down while maintaining possession. By rule that is a catch. They blew it but that is common for NFL officiatiing, it SUCKS. You are so blinded by your self described "hate" you cannot even see what is obvious being total irrational and hate blinded. Sad I expected more from you.
The also blew a call huge in the first game and blew the call on the first pass interference against Pittsburgh. And others. They had a bad day. As Usual.
SezEJ I am glad at least you are objective this was clearly a catch rule. Masters is wrong and doesn't know the rules. Two steps after getting possession is a catch. Accoding to his interpretation if the ball is caught and the guy drags the defender ten yards and loses the ball then it is not a catch. Blown call and bad understanding of the rules by Masters
-
@inspecta said:
What dude? are you even watching? he made 0 steps extended for the ball and laid out for it. NO CATCHGreat call by the refs and even better challenge by Harbaugh.
Ghoolie is exactly correct Holmes caught the ball possessed it completely and then made two steps while having possession and then put a hand down while maintaining possession. By rule that is a catch. They blew it but that is common for NFL officiatiing, it SUCKS. You are so blinded by your self described "hate" you cannot even see what is obvious being total irrational and hate blinded. Sad I expected more from you.
The also blew a call huge in the first game and blew the call on the first pass interference against Pittsburgh. And others. They had a bad day. As Usual.
SezEJ I am glad at least you are objective this was clearly a catch rule. Masters is wrong and doesn't know the rules. Two steps after getting possession is a catch. Accoding to his interpretation if the ball is caught and the guy drags the defender ten yards and loses the ball then it is not a catch. Blown call and bad understanding of the rules by Masters
Masters is wrong and doesn't know the rules. Two steps after getting possession is a catch. Accoding to his interpretation if the ball is caught and the guy drags the defender ten yards and loses the ball then it is not a catch. Blown call and bad understanding of the rules by Masters
Read much? That's retorical
I specifically said in my first while falling see ("and falling (which he was during the two steps), you have to hang on to the ball through contact w/ the ground.") If a guy is falling while hit, he must maintain control to the ground. Like I said to Ghools, by your backwards twisted logic back, how was Washington's play on the first drive not a fumble? Two feet, control, hit, then ball comes loose.
I don't make the rules, nor do I agree with it. But since you and Ghoolie haven't paid attention to a game since 1965, I get why you aren't up on what is called.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login