REFS BLOW CALL - RECEPTION AND TD DISALLOWED
-
Oh My God! The refs are 1 for 17 on actually calling holding! Although the very next play Woodley is held. O well. Thats the first holding call this have of the season. Its a start...
-
-
Oh My God! The refs are 1 for 17 on actually calling holding! Although the very next play Woodley is held. O well. Thats the first holding call this have of the season. Its a start...
Thats the first holding call this have of the season.
Damn you, 'spec. This is all I can hear when this douche talks...
-
-
Thats the first holding call this have of the season.
Damn you, 'spec. This is all I can hear when this douche talks...
mz. said:
Damn you, 'spec. This is all I can hear when this douche talks...Go Steelers?
-
Masters said:
I thought it was a catch. But the rule is if the dude has contact and falling (which he was during the two steps), you have to hang on to the ball through contact w/ the ground. It is what it is.NO THE RULES DO NOT SAY THAT.....................
THE RULE SAYS THAT IN LIEU OF THE RECIVER MAKING CONTACT WITH HIS FEET< IF HIS ONLY CONTACT IS THE GROUND.................... THEN HE HAS TO HAVE POSESSION.
IF HE WOULD HAVE RUN 3 STEPS INSTEAD OF 2, OR 10 STEPS................. WHAT WOULD THE CALL BE?
TWO STEPS IN TEH NFL CONSTITUTES A RECEPTION.
THEY BLEW THE CALL.
NO THE RULES DO NOT SAY THAT.....................
THE RULE SAYS THAT IN LIEU OF THE RECIVER MAKING CONTACT WITH HIS FEET< IF HIS ONLY CONTACT IS THE GROUND.................... THEN HE HAS TO HAVE POSESSION.
IF HE WOULD HAVE RUN 3 STEPS INSTEAD OF 2, OR 10 STEPS................. WHAT WOULD THE CALL BE?
TWO STEPS IN TEH NFL CONSTITUTES A RECEPTION.
THEY BLEW THE CALL.
"A forward pass is complete when a receiver clearly possesses the pass and touches the ground with both feet inbounds while in possession of the ball." If the ball comes loose on contact with the ground it is INC. If you watched a game more than once a year, you'd know this. Guys get get two feet in hit the ground and lose the ball on ground contact each week and it is INC.
-
Masters said:
I thought it was a catch. But the rule is if the dude has contact and falling (which he was during the two steps), you have to hang on to the ball through contact w/ the ground. It is what it is.NO THE RULES DO NOT SAY THAT.....................
THE RULE SAYS THAT IN LIEU OF THE RECIVER MAKING CONTACT WITH HIS FEET< IF HIS ONLY CONTACT IS THE GROUND.................... THEN HE HAS TO HAVE POSESSION.
IF HE WOULD HAVE RUN 3 STEPS INSTEAD OF 2, OR 10 STEPS................. WHAT WOULD THE CALL BE?
TWO STEPS IN TEH NFL CONSTITUTES A RECEPTION.
THEY BLEW THE CALL.
NO THE RULES DO NOT SAY THAT.....................
THE RULE SAYS THAT IN LIEU OF THE RECIVER MAKING CONTACT WITH HIS FEET< IF HIS ONLY CONTACT IS THE GROUND.................... THEN HE HAS TO HAVE POSESSION.
IF HE WOULD HAVE RUN 3 STEPS INSTEAD OF 2, OR 10 STEPS................. WHAT WOULD THE CALL BE?
TWO STEPS IN TEH NFL CONSTITUTES A RECEPTION.
THEY BLEW THE CALL.
Ghoulie: That's what I thought also.. he took 2steps and went down and the ground caused the ball to come out.. the real question should have been TD or ball on the 1/2 yard line. It did not effect the outcome fortunately.. However the steelers still and will always..... suck! Go Cards
-
NO THE RULES DO NOT SAY THAT.....................
THE RULE SAYS THAT IN LIEU OF THE RECIVER MAKING CONTACT WITH HIS FEET< IF HIS ONLY CONTACT IS THE GROUND.................... THEN HE HAS TO HAVE POSESSION.
IF HE WOULD HAVE RUN 3 STEPS INSTEAD OF 2, OR 10 STEPS................. WHAT WOULD THE CALL BE?
TWO STEPS IN TEH NFL CONSTITUTES A RECEPTION.
THEY BLEW THE CALL.
"A forward pass is complete when a receiver clearly possesses the pass and touches the ground with both feet inbounds while in possession of the ball." If the ball comes loose on contact with the ground it is INC. If you watched a game more than once a year, you'd know this. Guys get get two feet in hit the ground and lose the ball on ground contact each week and it is INC.
Masters said:
"A forward pass is complete when a receiver clearly possesses the pass and touches the ground with both feet inbounds while in possession of the ball." If the ball comes loose on contact with the ground it is INC. If you watched a game more than once a year, you'd know this. Guys get get two feet in hit the ground and lose the ball on ground contact each week and it is INC.They are already talking on ESPN radio, the refs blew the call. TWO feet on the ground and it is a posession. IF it comes out on the ground it is a dead ball.
By your asshole interpretation a guy could catch a pass, run 55 yards, get tackled and then when the ball bounces off the ground have the pass called an interception.
The pass was complete, the refs blew it and have already admitted so.
At the end of the day it doesn't matter because the Steelers punked the Ravens and punched the shit out of them.
-
NO THE RULES DO NOT SAY THAT.....................
THE RULE SAYS THAT IN LIEU OF THE RECIVER MAKING CONTACT WITH HIS FEET< IF HIS ONLY CONTACT IS THE GROUND.................... THEN HE HAS TO HAVE POSESSION.
IF HE WOULD HAVE RUN 3 STEPS INSTEAD OF 2, OR 10 STEPS................. WHAT WOULD THE CALL BE?
TWO STEPS IN TEH NFL CONSTITUTES A RECEPTION.
THEY BLEW THE CALL.
Ghoulie: That's what I thought also.. he took 2steps and went down and the ground caused the ball to come out.. the real question should have been TD or ball on the 1/2 yard line. It did not effect the outcome fortunately.. However the steelers still and will always..... suck! Go Cards
Ghoulie: That's what I thought also.. he took 2steps and went down and the ground caused the ball to come out.. the real question should have been TD or ball on the 1/2 yard line. It did not effect the outcome fortunately.. However the steelers still and will always..... suck! Go Cards
SEZ, you're okay with me. You are reasonable and it is only normal for you to hate the Steelers.
To be honest with you, I have lsot interest in the NFL to where I can call myself a fan of any team. This mess in Cleveland is not the Browns. Deep down, eveyone here knows it. You guys can try to force it all you want, and for the 30 and under crowd, (since they don't know any better) Lerner's team IS the real thing, but dude, Baltimore has the connection to Cleveland, not the pseudo Browns.
-
Masters said:
"A forward pass is complete when a receiver clearly possesses the pass and touches the ground with both feet inbounds while in possession of the ball." If the ball comes loose on contact with the ground it is INC. If you watched a game more than once a year, you'd know this. Guys get get two feet in hit the ground and lose the ball on ground contact each week and it is INC.They are already talking on ESPN radio, the refs blew the call. TWO feet on the ground and it is a posession. IF it comes out on the ground it is a dead ball.
By your asshole interpretation a guy could catch a pass, run 55 yards, get tackled and then when the ball bounces off the ground have the pass called an interception.
The pass was complete, the refs blew it and have already admitted so.
At the end of the day it doesn't matter because the Steelers punked the Ravens and punched the shit out of them.
They are already talking on ESPN radio, the refs blew the call. TWO feet on the ground and it is a posession. IF it comes out on the ground it is a dead ball.
By your asshole interpretation a guy could catch a pass, run 55 yards, get tackled and then when the ball bounces off the ground have the pass called an interception.
The pass was complete, the refs blew it and have already admitted so.
At the end of the day it doesn't matter because the Steelers punked the Ravens and punched the shit out of them.
Yawn. By my interpretation what you just said doesn't make since. I previously said two feet while falling forward and fall to the ground.
By your interpretation, you should be bitching about PITs first drive where Washington had two feet down, control of the ball above his head, and Reed knocking it loose should have been called a fumble instead of INC.
I don't agree with the rule, but it is what it is.
If you watched games, you'd be up on this stuff. But you never do.
-
@inspecta said:
What dude? are you even watching? he made 0 steps extended for the ball and laid out for it. NO CATCHGreat call by the refs and even better challenge by Harbaugh.
Ghoolie is exactly correct Holmes caught the ball possessed it completely and then made two steps while having possession and then put a hand down while maintaining possession. By rule that is a catch. They blew it but that is common for NFL officiatiing, it SUCKS. You are so blinded by your self described "hate" you cannot even see what is obvious being total irrational and hate blinded. Sad I expected more from you.
The also blew a call huge in the first game and blew the call on the first pass interference against Pittsburgh. And others. They had a bad day. As Usual.
SezEJ I am glad at least you are objective this was clearly a catch rule. Masters is wrong and doesn't know the rules. Two steps after getting possession is a catch. Accoding to his interpretation if the ball is caught and the guy drags the defender ten yards and loses the ball then it is not a catch. Blown call and bad understanding of the rules by Masters
-
@inspecta said:
What dude? are you even watching? he made 0 steps extended for the ball and laid out for it. NO CATCHGreat call by the refs and even better challenge by Harbaugh.
Ghoolie is exactly correct Holmes caught the ball possessed it completely and then made two steps while having possession and then put a hand down while maintaining possession. By rule that is a catch. They blew it but that is common for NFL officiatiing, it SUCKS. You are so blinded by your self described "hate" you cannot even see what is obvious being total irrational and hate blinded. Sad I expected more from you.
The also blew a call huge in the first game and blew the call on the first pass interference against Pittsburgh. And others. They had a bad day. As Usual.
SezEJ I am glad at least you are objective this was clearly a catch rule. Masters is wrong and doesn't know the rules. Two steps after getting possession is a catch. Accoding to his interpretation if the ball is caught and the guy drags the defender ten yards and loses the ball then it is not a catch. Blown call and bad understanding of the rules by Masters
Masters is wrong and doesn't know the rules. Two steps after getting possession is a catch. Accoding to his interpretation if the ball is caught and the guy drags the defender ten yards and loses the ball then it is not a catch. Blown call and bad understanding of the rules by Masters
Read much? That's retorical
I specifically said in my first while falling see ("and falling (which he was during the two steps), you have to hang on to the ball through contact w/ the ground.") If a guy is falling while hit, he must maintain control to the ground. Like I said to Ghools, by your backwards twisted logic back, how was Washington's play on the first drive not a fumble? Two feet, control, hit, then ball comes loose.
I don't make the rules, nor do I agree with it. But since you and Ghoolie haven't paid attention to a game since 1965, I get why you aren't up on what is called.
-
Rich and Ghoolie, even a legit PIT can see it
@yeahdaisafuturehofer... said:
The Holmes incompletion was a good call but the refs refuse to call holding on the B-more o-line and the made up PI call. -
Doesn't the whole 'football-related' move come into play here? In other words, it's more than just getting two feet down - you have to make a football-related move (I recall this cam up during and Indy game a few years ago).
It did look like a catch to me, though.
-
Rich and Ghoolie, even a legit PIT can see it
@yeahdaisafuturehofer... said:
The Holmes incompletion was a good call but the refs refuse to call holding on the B-more o-line and the made up PI call.Masters said:
Rich and Ghoolie, even a legit PIT can see itDon't quote me as an expert but I from what I saw its an incompletion.
-
Masters said:
Rich and Ghoolie, even a legit PIT can see itDon't quote me as an expert but I from what I saw its an incompletion.
Don't quote me as an expert but I from what I saw its an incompletion.
Just saying that a Steelers fan agreed with the call.
-
-
@inspecta said:
Eh. Ghoolie is just working a new angle, he can't really piss and moan about the management so he's gotta do something to rile up the monkeysLol im sure ghoolie will still whine about mangini,ryan,kokinis,daboll,lerner...especially once they kick the steelers ass next year...
-
I thought it was a catch. Holmes stretching his arm out towards the endzone while he cradled the ball was the football move that's needed, IMO.
-
@yeahdaisafuturehofer... said:
The Browns........No glory.
The Steelers.... 3 of them confirmed to live past the age of 60.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login