TRICH traded to colts
-
3 carries 1 yard, 2 yard longest carry. what a bum. So now that the colts are out of the playoffs, what's our draft slot?
3 carries 1 yard, 2 yard longest carry. what a bum. So now that the colts are out of the playoffs, what's our draft slot?
4
"We are Americans. We don't quit doing something because it's wrong. We just keep doing the wrong thing till it turns out right." Browns maybe the most American Football team ever. -
-
-
3 carries 1 yard, 2 yard longest carry. what a bum. So now that the colts are out of the playoffs, what's our draft slot?
3 carries 1 yard, 2 yard longest carry. what a bum. So now that the colts are out of the playoffs, what's our draft slot?
26 ? That being said..........Does it really matter? This FO will pick some loser
"And they don't really know even what they're talkin' about And I can't imagine what empty heads can achieve." -
Where is PoeticG? I need an explanation on why TR still sucks donkey balls and we should have never traded him.
-
26 ? That being said..........Does it really matter? This FO will pick some loser
Yea we should give it back to them. ...... For their 2nd round and next yrs 1st
"We are Americans. We don't quit doing something because it's wrong. We just keep doing the wrong thing till it turns out right." Browns maybe the most American Football team ever. -
26 ? That being said..........Does it really matter? This FO will pick some loser
Yea we should give it back to them. ...... For their 2nd round and next yrs 1st
-
-
-
@mike-h said:
Remember when you all told me I was crazy for not wanting him?
you weren't the only one. i was carrying the claiborne torch as well.
-
3 carries 1 yard, 2 yard longest carry. what a bum. So now that the colts are out of the playoffs, what's our draft slot?
-
26 ? That being said..........Does it really matter? This FO will pick some loser
Yea we should give it back to them. ...... For their 2nd round and next yrs 1st
-
@mike-h said:
Remember when you all told me I was crazy for not wanting him?
you weren't the only one. i was carrying the claiborne torch as well.
@mike-h said:
Remember when you all told me I was crazy for not wanting him?
you weren't the only one. i was carrying the claiborne torch as well.
Mike, there were many, many so not on the Richardson bandwagon. Even Dumbtardi said it was stupid. Richadson may go down as the highest non-injury bust since Ryan Leaf.
-
@mike-h said:
Before the draft? Don't think many is a good word. A few maybe.
For the most part everyone bought into TRich, while some realized two things: drafting a RB that high is ludicrous, and he isn't that special
Hoorta- March 24, 2012
That's right PG. In today's NFL RBs don't mean very much. I've offered you proof- but you're still drinking the Richardson Kool-aid. Best since Peterson- yawn. The Vikes won fewer games than the Browns- got it?
Every top 10 rusher in the F**king NFL last year wasn't drafted as high as you're proposing to waste the #4 pick on. This guy ISN'T Jim Brown, he ISN'T Walter Payton, and if you think he is, you can put your crack pipe down right now. The only way we take Richardson is in a trade down.
Like I've said many times- not hating on Richardson- hating on drafting a RB way high. Recent NFL history says he won't have the immediate impact some people think he will.
The question I would pose is why draft a RB @ #4, when the top rushing list is currently populated by guys drafted far lower than that? If you think the guy is Jim Brown good- OK then. I'm not seeing it though.
MLD Woody- March 24, 2012
Cost analysis of what you would be getting from Richardson makes me think taking him at #4 is way to much to spend on him
Nickers- March 24, 2012
Put the crack pipe down dude...TR's are A DIME A DOZEN!! wait...Are you RGIII to CLE's lil brother...or worse yet...offspring?
Tim Couch Pulls Out- March 14, 2012
He won't be a Brown. He won't be in the league 10 years and he won't have one Pro Bowl, much less 10.
His on the field play isn't anything stellar. Most of his big hits are on defensive backs. He's not going to be half as effective in the NFL as he was in college, and most of his effectiveness in college was due to the fact he was playing for Alabama. He was outshone by his backup a couple times, just as he outshone Mark Ingram. Alabama has a very run-friendly system, RB's are flourishing there.
This is just ridiculous.
Miktoxic- March 14, 2012
you got to be insane to pick a running back at #4. big Fing deal he did this and that. how has peterson led the vikes to the SB?
That took two seconds to look up. I'm sure there were plenty of others.
There were many more TR detractors than there were TR fans pre-draft.
Finding the bright-side in a bad situation after the fact is a lot different than buying into the hype pre-draft.
-
and it doesn't show much class by patting yourself on the back thinking that you were the first and only person to have the same thoughts on a subject as 60% of a city's pro football franchise's fan base.
anyhoo, i'm standing pat on my assesment of these QBs in THIS upcoming draft. in most years maybe one or 2 would get picked top ten, but with so many teams in need of a QB everyone of these guy's #'s all of a sudden look so great and hey we need a QB so.............
if the FO is in it for the long haul they should do well to prognosticate and look into the future and look who will be coming out next year. if you take a look at that list you might do some rethinking as to what we do with our first overall pick (hell a lot of mock drafts i've seen on these so-called draftnik sites have us taking carr with our first pick because manziel is already gone and clowney lasting all the way to #7, which goes to show me how much they know about this.....about as much as me or you) and maybe go for the monster DE or the play-making WR.
i'm an advocate of having a huge strong OL. i would prob go after OL with 2nd or 3rd pick and throw a RB in there. you know there are a lot of shortcomings on this team that need to be upgraded or at least given some help with depth.
if manziel or bortles falls to us a 4 or 5 or wherever we are picking at fine, get the guy. i just don't understand all the hoopla when we got a guy returning from injury that everybody loved last year and now i guess he's just a piece of garbage that we toss into the streets.
stay classy cleveland.
-
and it doesn't show much class by patting yourself on the back thinking that you were the first and only person to have the same thoughts on a subject as 60% of a city's pro football franchise's fan base.
anyhoo, i'm standing pat on my assesment of these QBs in THIS upcoming draft. in most years maybe one or 2 would get picked top ten, but with so many teams in need of a QB everyone of these guy's #'s all of a sudden look so great and hey we need a QB so.............
if the FO is in it for the long haul they should do well to prognosticate and look into the future and look who will be coming out next year. if you take a look at that list you might do some rethinking as to what we do with our first overall pick (hell a lot of mock drafts i've seen on these so-called draftnik sites have us taking carr with our first pick because manziel is already gone and clowney lasting all the way to #7, which goes to show me how much they know about this.....about as much as me or you) and maybe go for the monster DE or the play-making WR.
i'm an advocate of having a huge strong OL. i would prob go after OL with 2nd or 3rd pick and throw a RB in there. you know there are a lot of shortcomings on this team that need to be upgraded or at least given some help with depth.
if manziel or bortles falls to us a 4 or 5 or wherever we are picking at fine, get the guy. i just don't understand all the hoopla when we got a guy returning from injury that everybody loved last year and now i guess he's just a piece of garbage that we toss into the streets.
stay classy cleveland.
if manziel or bortles falls to us a 4 or 5 or wherever we are picking at fine, get the guy. i just don't understand all the hoopla when we got a guy returning from injury that everybody loved last year and now i guess he's just a piece of garbage that we toss into the streets.
I completely agree. I wouldn't trade up to get anyone.
-
@mike-h said:
Remember when you all told me I was crazy for not wanting him?
All??? While I favored other options at #4 (led by a trade down), I'll admit that early there was a period when I was also "open to" TR at #4. The quote below is from one of my later posts on his possible selection...
I have no idea who Rufio is... no idea of his credentials. I was looking for anything to rebut all the crap (PoG was) citing and up he popped in a Google. But he laid out logical, rational, unemotional case against drafting TR that rang true for me.
(The Rufalo article: http://www.dawgsbyna...not-draft-trent )
When we traded up to take TR, I went ballastic. We could have made the same mistake at #4...
-
-
-
earlier in a thread of 66 pages?
wow, you got too much time on your hands.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login