Skip to content

Our options?

The Browns Board
94 31 3.0k
  • Sorryto tell u guys but I don't believe anything is gonna change. Like I've said up untill the holy floater he was playing good enough to win. The offensive play calling was college double A at best. We did not run enough bottom line. For Christ sakes that play was on 1st down and the lions knew we were throwing. Don't like weeden fine I understand that but maybe they should be looking to run the rock a little more. The lions had there ears pinned back half way thru the 3rd and not once expected a run.

    Like i said weeden will be the starter next week. Heard it here first boys!!!

  • Sorryto tell u guys but I don't believe anything is gonna change. Like I've said up untill the holy floater he was playing good enough to win. The offensive play calling was college double A at best. We did not run enough bottom line. For Christ sakes that play was on 1st down and the lions knew we were throwing. Don't like weeden fine I understand that but maybe they should be looking to run the rock a little more. The lions had there ears pinned back half way thru the 3rd and not once expected a run.

    Like i said weeden will be the starter next week. Heard it here first boys!!!

    @cdl15 said:

    Sorryto tell u guys but I don't believe anything is gonna change. Like I've said up untill the holy floater he was playing good enough to win. The offensive play calling was college double A at best. We did not run enough bottom line. For Christ sakes that play was on 1st down and the lions knew we were throwing. Don't like weeden fine I understand that but maybe they should be looking to run the rock a little more. The lions had there ears pinned back half way thru the 3rd and not once expected a run.

    Like i said weeden will be the starter next week. Heard it here first boys!!!

    That's hardly a shocking prediction. Of course he will be the starter.

    Outside of the Benjamin run, we were still averaging around 5 YPC. Should have pounded the rock more, I agree. However, the Lions front 7 is as good as any in the league and I can see why we didn't.

    I'm so tired of halftime adjustments. We adjust ourselves out of the game more often than not. If it's not broke, don't fix it. Schwartz is hardly a mastermind, the defense did not change from what they've been doing in the second half all season long. We had five games of film on them, I could have told you that they would dial up the pressure once they get ahead and hope for mistakes.

    This game was lost by Weeden, but the playcalling sure didn't help anything. Without our DST generating a touchdown or two per game, we can expect to see more losses like this.

    Weeden is a detriment to the success of the team.

  • We didn't run enough? You think thats our problem.

  • We didn't run enough? You think thats our problem.

    @alkid3 said:

    We didn't run enough? You think thats our problem.

    I think our problem is Weeden,

    But, yes, we should have run more. McGahee was averaging nearly 4 YPC and he had the lowest average of any of our backs.

  • No run game and no QB.

  • of course we should have run more, we had over 100 yds in the 1st fucking half. I was at the game so I couldn't really tell what the big adjustment they made that apparently spooked Norv out of running more. But whatever. It wasn't "all" on Weeden...we had another couple crucial drops on balls that Weeden threw perfectly so fuck if I know.

  • I put allot on Weeden. no game management, plays in panic mode, seems the game moves too fast for him still, the play calling was not bad we had open players on the field, run game was suffecient, we are running the ball by committee, gordon with 126 yards, cameron was a non factor (open a few times) we had this game.

  • I put allot on Weeden. no game management, plays in panic mode, seems the game moves too fast for him still, the play calling was not bad we had open players on the field, run game was suffecient, we are running the ball by committee, gordon with 126 yards, cameron was a non factor (open a few times) we had this game.

    @lbc-mike said:

    I put allot on Weeden. no game management, plays in panic mode, seems the game moves too fast for him still, the play calling was not bad we had open players on the field, run game was suffecient, we are running the ball by committee, gordon with 126 yards, cameron was a non factor (open a few times) we had this game.

    yeah we did, we dominated them the 1st half.

  • If Weeden takes that sack, it's 2nd and long.

    Instead it was the game, how is it not his fault?

    Our defense was pillow-like, I must say. Detroit kept themselves out of the end zone in the 1st half, and they realized it was there for the taking in the 2nd.

    But we were in this game, and Weeden 'weeden'd' us out of it.

  • Offer the Giants one or both of our first round picks for Eli.

  • yeah so it will be a trade for richardson for manning?

  • Offer the Giants one or both of our first round picks for Eli.

    @mark-o said:

    Offer the Giants one or both of our first round picks for Eli.

    I'd do it if I were both teams.

  • I'd look for anything out there as a pick up who could be better than Weeden (which is nearly anyone).

    Matt Cassell in Minnesota

    Matt Flynn

    Tim Tebow

    Matt Leinart

    David Carr

    @mark-o said:

    I'd look for anything out there as a pick up who could be better than Weeden (which is nearly anyone).

    Matt Cassell in Minnesota

    Matt Flynn

    Tim Tebow

    Matt Leinart

    David Carr

    This list makes me throw up in my mouth a little! Look Weeden no doubt helped us lose the game. There is no doubt he is not the long term answer at QB. There is no doubt he lacks field vision and he thinks to slow. There is no doubt your list is ridiculous. If you expect anyone to believe any QB on that list will make a difference you need to quit drinking earlier in the day. Your post later about Eli is equally laughable.

  • Which part is laughable....You don't think the Giants would at least consider it? Why wouldn't we consider it?

    Everyone on that list is better right now today than Brandon Weetarded..

  • @mark-o said:

    I'd look for anything out there as a pick up who could be better than Weeden (which is nearly anyone).

    Matt Cassell in Minnesota

    Matt Flynn

    Tim Tebow

    Matt Leinart

    David Carr

    This list makes me throw up in my mouth a little! Look Weeden no doubt helped us lose the game. There is no doubt he is not the long term answer at QB. There is no doubt he lacks field vision and he thinks to slow. There is no doubt your list is ridiculous. If you expect anyone to believe any QB on that list will make a difference you need to quit drinking earlier in the day. Your post later about Eli is equally laughable.

    @jcam222 said:

    This list makes me throw up in my mouth a little! Look Weeden no doubt helped us lose the game. There is no doubt he is not the long term answer at QB. There is no doubt he lacks field vision and he thinks to slow. There is no doubt your list is ridiculous. If you expect anyone to believe any QB on that list will make a difference you need to quit drinking earlier in the day. Your post later about Eli is equally laughable.

    ^1000%

    ok people you're still pissed we lost but don't grab your pitch forks and torches just yet.

    leading all 5 games at the half and then coming out and losing half of those, is not on brandon weeden.

  • Yeah..those 6 yards he led us to in the 3rd quarter was awe inspiring.

    Funny how the play calling and the o-line looked so much better with a different QB.

  • Which part is laughable....You don't think the Giants would at least consider it? Why wouldn't we consider it?

    Everyone on that list is better right now today than Brandon Weetarded..

    @mark-o said:

    Which part is laughable....You don't think the Giants would at least consider it? Why wouldn't we consider it?

    Everyone on that list is better right now today than Brandon Weetarded..

    The QB's on your first list are all proven losers. Not one of them is capable of being a solid NFL starter now. You can include Weeden in that list, I will give you that. There is however no reason to trade a turd for a different turd. They will both float and stink!

    Regarding Eli and giving up two first rounders HELL NO. If he was playing well and dominating MAYBE. There is no way you gamble two first rounders on him at this point not knowing why he is playing so poorly.

    I am not saying bringing in another QB is a bad idea. I am saying your list doesn't have that guy in it.

  • I'd offer them one of our first rounders for Eli and I would probably give them both for a guy with 2 super bowl rings and a sieve for an offensive line this season.

  • I'd offer them one of our first rounders for Eli and I would probably give them both for a guy with 2 super bowl rings and a sieve for an offensive line this season.

    @mark-o said:

    I'd offer them one of our first rounders for Eli and I would probably give them both for a guy with 2 super bowl rings and a sieve for an offensive line this season.

    I can agree as far as offering our lowest 1st round pick. I have to admit I would pull that trigger fast.

  • Offer the Giants one or both of our first round picks for Eli.

    @mark-o said:

    Offer the Giants one or both of our first round picks for Eli.

    No way, no fucking way in hell we should bring in another pocket squatter unless it's the older Manning. Young Eli gets "murdered" here in Cleveland. His brother the onsite OC makes it work cause he knows who's gonna get close to him or blitz him before they do...he's a fucking Jedi i'm not joking, not even slightly. The dude is Yoda with his shit. Eli, he has to have the right situation to win...which is not here in Cleveland.