Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. Westside Steve's Movie Reviews
  3. Gravity Review

Gravity Review

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Westside Steve's Movie Reviews
3 Posts 3 Posters 595 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
    • 39k Posts
    • 9k Reputation
    W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Gravity

    Warner Brothers

    PG 13 90 min

    Okay gang, spoiler alert ahead. Read on at your own peril. Actually what I should have said is go spend 9 bucks and sit through GRAVITY at your own peril but I digress...

    What we know coming in is that gravity has been a very highly advertised and highly touted science fiction extravaganza starring: to very marketable stars, George Clooney and Sandra Bullock. What we did not know from the trailers is that this film is similar, at least in concept, to a couple other films that I liked. If you remember Stephen King's CUJO and James Franco and 127 HOURS you remember, at least I do, wondering how they can make it entertaining film with basically only one setting. With CUJO it was the car being terrorized by the monsters rabid dog and 127 HOURS it was a crack in the mountainside where Franco was trapped. I liked both those movies and was surprised at the ingenuity involved to keep that one scene fresh.

    (Also while CUJO and 127 HOURS relied on flash back and side stories to leave the boredom here there is none of that, preferring to lumber from calamity to calamity.)

    Unfortunately that's not the case with GRAVITY. Here Bullock and Clooney are trapped in an ill-fated Space Station adventure. Bullock will wind up on her own in a desperate attempt to survive until she can make her way back to Earth.

    I have often pointed out that with even an average budget just about any film made has the capability of exhibiting some very impressive special effects. That means, unlike 2001 A SPACE ODDYSSEY I'm very really in all of fantastic CGI. Gravity starts out very impressively as the characters and props float about the cabin. This effect loses its lustre in about 5 minutes the surprise is over and it quickly becomes mundane. From then on it is simply a matter of Bullock going from chore to chore untangling the parachute, putting out fires, fixing different components etc. Unfortunately if you know the runtime of the film you quickly realize that these potentially deadly problems will be resolved. All this takes place as everything in the cabin is floating around quite annoyingly. Now while Bullock is certainly no Meryl Streep I don't blame her for this movies doldrums. She's just not given any material to work with. Clooney, on the other hand, is certainly capable but his part is pretty small; small enough, it seems, to have phoned it in which he seems to have done.

    So if you’re up for an hour and a half of pointless floating great.

    If not you’ll probably be bored to death. I was.

    Ps I just looked at some other reviews and I see I’m in the minority. They’re wrong. <G>

    D+

    WSS

    www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
      • 57k Posts
      • 4k Reputation
      The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Steve, as you know, I pretty much agree with you on this one. While the CGI is fantastic, the dialogue is purely pedestrian, that dialogue being mostly Sandra Bullock talking to herself. (which is actually better than the dialog when she is talking to Clooney).

      They also have her bipolar....half the time she plays as this tough resourceful well trained astronaut, and another half the time she is completely "damsel in distress" or as I call it "Ingenue in Space".

      Then the worst part is the old chestnut that every below average movie comes up with: the tired old "communications are cut off" ploy to try to make the situation more claustrophobic and isolated. Bogus.

      The real life counterpart to this film, Apollo 13 didn't cut off communications in order to be riveting.

      Oddly, I believe both movies had the same person being the "voice of Houston": Ed Harris.

      Cutting Ed out of the equation was a mistake in my mind.

      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • nickers nickersN Conversation Starter Dedicated Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
        • 14k Posts
        • 5k Reputation
        nickersN nickers wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Gravity needed the touch of a Martin Scorsese or Brian DePalma to really make it work.

        Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~
        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply

        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

        Register Login
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        Theme
        • System
        • Light
        • Dark
        The Browns Board Terms Privacy

        The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Forums
        • Recent
        • Popular
        • Users
        • Donate