Skip to content

Indianapolis's Luck Runs Out

The Browns Board
25 12 1.6k
  • miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #2

    indy trying to climb back in it.

    kc just lost one of their pro bowl corners. that will not help.

    alex smith should thank jim harbaugh with a big fat kiss for letting him get out of SF. can i say resurrection?

  • OsirisO Osiris wrote on last edited by
    #3

    Yep I might be eating my words tonight.

  • Yep I might be eating my words tonight.

    miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by miktoxic
    #4

    @osiris said:

    Yep I might be eating my words tonight.

    you're not the only one.

    i heard (actually i know) they go down nicely though with a tall gin and tonic w/lime. takes the bitterness away.

  • Erie DawgE Erie Dawg wrote on last edited by
    #5

    i think the team that has the ball last wins this one..

  • OsirisO Osiris wrote on last edited by
    #6

    On the plus side, if the Chiefs do win, that headline will be even more awesome.

  • miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #7

    OMG!

  • R ReginaBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
    #8

    Damn it! Chiefs had some Browns luck with all the key injuries. Moving down the draft board 🙁

  • OsirisO Osiris wrote on last edited by
    #9

    I suspect my premature posting of this headline, combined with the curse of being a Browns fan, resulted in karmic diarrhea of the Chiefs losing this game. The Browns are proof that Murphy's Law is real! (Slams head into wall)

  • LBC mikeL LBC mike wrote on last edited by
    #10

    good game though. sucks about us dropping in the draft.

  • C cuwoohio wrote on last edited by
    #11

    How can a team owned by the those steaming pile of cow dung Ersays be so lucky.

  • LBC mikeL LBC mike wrote on last edited by
    #12

    you have to tweet a lot I guess

  • tml1138T tml1138 wrote on last edited by
    #13

    What pick # would Browns have if Indy lost? 22? Maybe it's for the best.

  • ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by
    #14

    At this point it doesn't really matter where Indy"s pick ends up. The players in that range are all about the same.

  • At this point it doesn't really matter where Indy"s pick ends up. The players in that range are all about the same.

    Browns149B Browns149 wrote on last edited by
    #15

    @ballpeen said:

    At this point it doesn't really matter where Indy"s pick ends up. The players in that range are all about the same.

    Sounds about right

  • miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #16

    yeah it's right around the range of picking your franchise QB (weeden/browns @22) or a 15 year starting OL (decastro/piitspuke@24) or an impact LB (hightower/pats@25) in 2012.

    scouting and a good FO makes all the difference in the world.

  • yeah it's right around the range of picking your franchise QB (weeden/browns @22) or a 15 year starting OL (decastro/piitspuke@24) or an impact LB (hightower/pats@25) in 2012.

    scouting and a good FO makes all the difference in the world.

    Browns149B Browns149 wrote on last edited by
    #17

    @miktoxic said:

    yeah it's right around the range of picking your franchise QB (weeden/browns @22) or a 15 year starting OL (decastro/piitspuke@24) or an impact LB (hightower/pats@25) in 2012.

    scouting and a good FO makes all the difference in the world.

    I'm not sold we have the guys to get the job done

  • W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by Westside Steve
    #18

    Keeping in mind that while it is fun for the fans 2 hate on Campbell and Weeden that we had Little and Bess , two very substandard receivers, no running game and a week offensive line.

    Move Mitchell Schwartz to guard add a blue chip receiver and a stud linebacker and tackle to the mix and I think the whole equation changes.

    WSS

  • Keeping in mind that while it is fun for the fans 2 hate on Campbell and Weeden that we had Little and Bess , two very substandard receivers, no running game and a week offensive line.

    Move Mitchell Schwartz to guard add a blue chip receiver and a stud linebacker and tackle to the mix and I think the whole equation changes.

    WSS

    Browns149B Browns149 wrote on last edited by
    #19

    @westside-steve said:

    Keeping in mind that while it is fun for the fans 2 hate on Campbell and Weeden that we had Little and Bess , two very substandard receivers, no running game and a week offensive line.

    WSS

    Hoyer had the same crap to deal with

  • @westside-steve said:

    Keeping in mind that while it is fun for the fans 2 hate on Campbell and Weeden that we had Little and Bess , two very substandard receivers, no running game and a week offensive line.

    WSS

    Hoyer had the same crap to deal with

    W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by Westside Steve
    #20

    @browns149 said:

    Hoyer had the same crap to deal with

    And he had two, not 3, good games. Remember Brandon Weeden got us out of the hole after he went down and Jason Campbell had a couple of really outstanding outings. Yes I hope Brian Hoyer is the next Brian Sipe and not the next Kelly Holcomb.

    still I believe that by building a powerful team we can get a lot better results no matter who the quarterback is. There's not one guy out there I feel can carry the team the way an Elway Brady or Manning can.

    WSS

    WSS

  • Keeping in mind that while it is fun for the fans 2 hate on Campbell and Weeden that we had Little and Bess , two very substandard receivers, no running game and a week offensive line.

    Move Mitchell Schwartz to guard add a blue chip receiver and a stud linebacker and tackle to the mix and I think the whole equation changes.

    WSS

    miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #21

    @westside-steve said:

    Keeping in mind that while it is fun for the fans 2 hate on Campbell and Weeden that we had Little and Bess , two very substandard receivers, no running game and a week offensive line.

    Move Mitchell Schwartz to guard add a blue chip receiver and a stud linebacker and tackle to the mix and I think the whole equation changes.

    WSS

    i don't disagree. but reading your posts i know you still have some love for weeden, so i'll keep this as nice as possible......

    he can't read defenses and is awful in the pocket. i would have sent HIM on his way right after the stoolers game.

    i actually think campbell is a better QB than what was shown because i think he was playing with dinged up ribs.

    weeden has/had all the tools from the neck down. it's his stoopidity and lack of being able to throw anything but a fastball that made hoyer look like a pro-bowler in comparison.