For My Fellow QB Naysayers... Gun to Head, Which One Do You Take?
-
First off, most scouts have 3 QBs in the top 15 players overall. The fact that they cant decide which one they like the best shouldnt scare you away from all of em. Gordon is a free agent after 2015 right? Carr is actually my least favorite of the 4 but if we drafted him Id support him. We took the 4th QB off the board in 2012 at what 24? Not exactly what im proposing at 4. Most scouts also had Weeden in the second round, not top 15.then y draft one of these Qbs at all. Sorry bub u draft a guy at 4 he better be the real deal and seeing how 100% of almost every single analysist can not agree on which one is better than the other really makes me gun shy of all of them. Hell the way I see it Carr is 1 combine, a couple of interviews, and a solid team workout from being projected better than all of them. Are u gonna jump on poetics bandwagon if this happens??? Watkins will still be projected as best wr in draft. And No Gordon and this years draft picks free agency period will be no where near each other. Isn't Gordon a free agent after 2014 anyways? Signing free agents aint as hard as it used to be anyways. Again this franchise should not be taken the 2nd or 3rd qb off the board at #4. That's the Retarded shit we did last year.
XxDaBuckeyexX said:
First off, most scouts have 3 QBs in the top 15 players overall. The fact that they cant decide which one they like the best shouldnt scare you away from all of em. Gordon is a free agent after 2015 right? Carr is actually my least favorite of the 4 but if we drafted him Id support him. We took the 4th QB off the board in 2012 at what 24? Not exactly what im proposing at 4. Most scouts also had Weeden in the second round, not top 15.
i haven't liked half the picks the browns have made since '99. the last 4 years have been atrocious, except for a heckert pick here or there. weeden and mccoy made me physically ill. but i support anyone that wears the brown orange and white.
hey let's pick up sams who just came out of the closet. at least we know he likes brown.
-
XxDaBuckeyexX said:
Almost every scout in America has 3 QBs in their top 20 players overall. How much better do they have to get?
First, since we are at 4 and 26, what does top 20 have to do with it? Most of "almost every scout" have only one QB in the top 4 players.
Then there's that other little problem... they can't seem to agree on which one is in the top 4. So it's not as much a matter of how much better "they have to get"; it's more a case of who is he?
Apparently the scouts are just like us...
I dont consider it a bad thing to have competition to be the top QB in the draft. Its close. Everyone has their own opinion. Hell if we go through this process and wait till the second round to snag Garappolo, I wouldnt mind, if they came out and said he was their #1 QB on their board. We have the ammo to get their #1 guy, and thats all I want. Wouldnt surprise me in the least if our front office screws the pick up, but at least theyre doing everything they can to try and get a QB in here. And Tour honestly, I could care less exactly where they have these guys ranked. I was using those rankings as a reference point. The only thing that matters is, who is the favorite QB? Where is he projected, and what's the latest pick we can use on him. In most scenarios, if the favorite is one of the top 3, none will be available at 26. Now, do we have to use 4 on him? Or, can we possibly move up from 26 to the teens and snag him? All questions that im glad I dont have to figure out.First, since we are at 4 and 26, what does top 20 have to do with it? Most of "almost every scout" have only one QB in the top 4 players.
Then there's that other little problem... they can't seem to agree on which one is in the top 4. So it's not as much a matter of how much better "they have to get"; it's more a case of who is he?
Apparently the scouts are just like us...
-
Xx that is a very good reason for concern. Scouts prognosticators pundits sports aficionados are all divided on which of these guys is the real deal. Seems like we'd have some sort of consensus...
WSS
-
Xx that is a very good reason for concern. Scouts prognosticators pundits sports aficionados are all divided on which of these guys is the real deal. Seems like we'd have some sort of consensus...
WSS
it would definitely make it easier. But hell we had scouts saying theyd take RGIII over Luck, and Leaf over Manning. Maybe theyre all the real deal, maybe theyre all busts....Xx that is a very good reason for concern. Scouts prognosticators pundits sports aficionados are all divided on which of these guys is the real deal. Seems like we'd have some sort of consensus...
WSS
-
Well RG 3 might have easily been a superstar had he not been hurt. Same with our possibly rose colored version of Brian Hoyer...
WSS
-
it would definitely make it easier. But hell we had scouts saying theyd take RGIII over Luck, and Leaf over Manning. Maybe theyre all the real deal, maybe theyre all busts....Xx that is a very good reason for concern. Scouts prognosticators pundits sports aficionados are all divided on which of these guys is the real deal. Seems like we'd have some sort of consensus...
WSS
XxDaBuckeyexX said:
it would definitely make it easier. But hell we had scouts saying theyd take RGIII over Luck, and Leaf over Manning. Maybe theyre all the real deal, maybe theyre all busts....
I think Luck was a bigger consensus #1 than Manning over Leaf though. I think some on the Colts staff wanted to take Leaf over Manning.
Leaf is a guy that could have been good though. He signed that contract and basically said screw football. He just wanted to party and do drugs and be in the spot light. Another important thing to consider in player evaluations.
I think RG3 could still be a good player, but I would have never taken him over Luck. I thought Luck should have won the heisman too that year.
-
XxDaBuckeyexX said:
it would definitely make it easier. But hell we had scouts saying theyd take RGIII over Luck, and Leaf over Manning. Maybe theyre all the real deal, maybe theyre all busts....
I think Luck was a bigger consensus #1 than Manning over Leaf though. I think some on the Colts staff wanted to take Leaf over Manning.
Leaf is a guy that could have been good though. He signed that contract and basically said screw football. He just wanted to party and do drugs and be in the spot light. Another important thing to consider in player evaluations.
I think RG3 could still be a good player, but I would have never taken him over Luck. I thought Luck should have won the heisman too that year.
I think Luck was a bigger consensus #1 than Manning over Leaf though. I think some on the Colts staff wanted to take Leaf over Manning.
Leaf is a guy that could have been good though. He signed that contract and basically said screw football. He just wanted to party and do drugs and be in the spot light. Another important thing to consider in player evaluations.
I think RG3 could still be a good player, but I would have never taken him over Luck. I thought Luck should have won the heisman too that year.
Billl Polian denies that they were ever considering Leaf. Manning was always the guy per him.
-
I think Luck was a bigger consensus #1 than Manning over Leaf though. I think some on the Colts staff wanted to take Leaf over Manning.
Leaf is a guy that could have been good though. He signed that contract and basically said screw football. He just wanted to party and do drugs and be in the spot light. Another important thing to consider in player evaluations.
I think RG3 could still be a good player, but I would have never taken him over Luck. I thought Luck should have won the heisman too that year.
Billl Polian denies that they were ever considering Leaf. Manning was always the guy per him.
I heard an interview that Leaf didn't want to be in Indy, but Indy was doing their due-diligence and wanted to interview him because some of their scouts preferred him. Leaf skipped the interview.Billl Polian denies that they were ever considering Leaf. Manning was always the guy per him.
-
I heard an interview that Leaf didn't want to be in Indy, but Indy was doing their due-diligence and wanted to interview him because some of their scouts preferred him. Leaf skipped the interview.Billl Polian denies that they were ever considering Leaf. Manning was always the guy per him.
XxDaBuckeyexX said:
I heard an interview that Leaf didn't want to be in Indy, but Indy was doing their due-diligence and wanted to interview him because some of their scouts preferred him. Leaf skipped the interview.
Leigh Steinberg, Leaf's agent confirmed that they purposely ditched the Colts interview because he wanted to go to San Diego with the #2 pick.
Polian said that action simply confirmed what they thought about Leaf's immaturity and confirmed that Manning was the choice to make.
Did some Colt's scouts still like Leaf, perhaps. But I don't know about "preferred".
-
I think Luck was a bigger consensus #1 than Manning over Leaf though. I think some on the Colts staff wanted to take Leaf over Manning.
Leaf is a guy that could have been good though. He signed that contract and basically said screw football. He just wanted to party and do drugs and be in the spot light. Another important thing to consider in player evaluations.
I think RG3 could still be a good player, but I would have never taken him over Luck. I thought Luck should have won the heisman too that year.
Billl Polian denies that they were ever considering Leaf. Manning was always the guy per him.
Billl Polian denies that they were ever considering Leaf. Manning was always the guy per him.
And Irsay said they never considered RG3 due to concerns that he'd get hurt... Luck was their guy all the way.
Maybe we should ask Indy about this year's crop of QBs...
In return we can advise them on RBs...
XxDaBuckeyexX said:
All questions that im glad I dont have to figure out.
And I wish they'd ask me...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Thanks for the clarification.
Seemed to me more scouts/blog scouts were a bit more split on Leaf/Manning than Luck/RG3 though.
Hopefully Manziel doesn't turn into a Leaf type.
-
Billl Polian denies that they were ever considering Leaf. Manning was always the guy per him.
And Irsay said they never considered RG3 due to concerns that he'd get hurt... Luck was their guy all the way.
Maybe we should ask Indy about this year's crop of QBs...
In return we can advise them on RBs...
XxDaBuckeyexX said:
All questions that im glad I dont have to figure out.
And I wish they'd ask me...
And Irsay said they never considered RG3 due to concerns that he'd get hurt... Luck was their guy all the way.
Maybe we should ask Indy about this year's crop of QBs...
In return we can advise them on RBs...
I really dont think theyd trust us anymore lol.
And I wish they'd ask me...
At this point id trust u more than the stooges to get this right...so me too.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login