Leigh Bodden
-
Leigh Bodden WAS our best CB...then suddenly he was shipped off to an even WORSE hell-hole in Detroit. Now the Lions are cutting him.
The Lions played pretty much a Tampa Cover II last year...and that didn't fit with Bodden very well. Is it possible...with the Browns playing a bit more man-to-man and other coverages...that Bodden will be able to come back and regain his stature as one of the better young CB's in the league?
Even if he can't take over as a starter...wouldn't he be worth a look as depth?
He should come relatively cheap...and he is likely to know much of our defense (even with it getting a make over)...so to me he seems to be a likely pick up in the coming weeks.
-
Just because he WAS doesn't mean he was any good.
The last think I want to see is that guy covering someone man to man.
I would rather draft someone rather than look to the past for our future.
JMO
-
Leigh Bodden WAS our best CB...then suddenly he was shipped off to an even WORSE hell-hole in Detroit. Now the Lions are cutting him.
The Lions played pretty much a Tampa Cover II last year...and that didn't fit with Bodden very well. Is it possible...with the Browns playing a bit more man-to-man and other coverages...that Bodden will be able to come back and regain his stature as one of the better young CB's in the league?
Even if he can't take over as a starter...wouldn't he be worth a look as depth?
He should come relatively cheap...and he is likely to know much of our defense (even with it getting a make over)...so to me he seems to be a likely pick up in the coming weeks.
Leigh Bodden WAS our best CB...then suddenly he was shipped off to an even WORSE hell-hole in Detroit. Now the Lions are cutting him.
The Lions played pretty much a Tampa Cover II last year...and that didn't fit with Bodden very well. Is it possible...with the Browns playing a bit more man-to-man and other coverages...that Bodden will be able to come back and regain his stature as one of the better young CB's in the league?
Even if he can't take over as a starter...wouldn't he be worth a look as depth?
He should come relatively cheap...and he is likely to know much of our defense (even with it getting a make over)...so to me he seems to be a likely pick up in the coming weeks.
Problem is Mangini will be playing a lot of cover two zone defenses. He is not a man to man cover guy on defense.
Cleveland will play a base cover two zone with most pressure coming from the front 7.
BTW, Bodden was traded because he lost a step due to his many injuries and was tenitive in run support. He's, at best, a 4th corner now and Detriot doesn't want to pay a backup or dime back the kind of money he was making.
-
Totally agree, instead of worrying about the secondary; we should concern ourselves with putting QB's on their back. Tough to throw a pass from the ground.@danamal said:
We need beast linebackers and lineman who can pressure the qb.Our young secondary will continue to get better and we have more pressing needs and Bodden wasnt all that in the first place,I'd pass on him.
-
Depends what he would cost. I have no issue with it as long as the development of the Bmac and Wright continues, but there is no guarantee Holly will be healthy and resigned and he's got to be better than Cousin.
Bodden was a pretty solid player who played hurt for two straight years in a number one corner capacity (although he did play a lot of slot in 07). He also was good in run support for the most part.
Look, we're not going to draft every piece, so a guy like Bodden instantly gives the secondary depth that is so badly needed. We got torched by Ralph Brown in 06 and Cousin in 08, so bad that a marginal safety in Adams had to play the slot. Picking up a guy like Bodden would keep us from drafting someone like Jenkins and really concentrate on the front seven the way it should be.
I see nothing wrong with going after Bodden, not at all. We know what we're getting and also he should know his role if he were to sign here.
-
Leigh Bodden WAS our best CB...then suddenly he was shipped off to an even WORSE hell-hole in Detroit. Now the Lions are cutting him.
The Lions played pretty much a Tampa Cover II last year...and that didn't fit with Bodden very well. Is it possible...with the Browns playing a bit more man-to-man and other coverages...that Bodden will be able to come back and regain his stature as one of the better young CB's in the league?
Even if he can't take over as a starter...wouldn't he be worth a look as depth?
He should come relatively cheap...and he is likely to know much of our defense (even with it getting a make over)...so to me he seems to be a likely pick up in the coming weeks.
Problem is Mangini will be playing a lot of cover two zone defenses. He is not a man to man cover guy on defense.
Cleveland will play a base cover two zone with most pressure coming from the front 7.
BTW, Bodden was traded because he lost a step due to his many injuries and was tenitive in run support. He's, at best, a 4th corner now and Detriot doesn't want to pay a backup or dime back the kind of money he was making.
Problem is Mangini will be playing a lot of cover two zone defenses. He is not a man to man cover guy on defense.
Cleveland will play a base cover two zone with most pressure coming from the front 7.
god, i hate our defensive scheme. keeping both safeties high sucks because it lets the defense know where they're going to be and having the corners play the flat is, in our case, both a waste of our corner's man to man coverage skills and a stupid gamble looking to pick off short passes that will inevitably fail when we don't generate enough pressure.
it makes me sick that we're still playing the wrong version of the 3-4 and that we're compounding it by playing a stupid zone over it. corners can't use their speed if they're covering the flat. at least let them play a deep zone once in a while.
-
Problem is Mangini will be playing a lot of cover two zone defenses. He is not a man to man cover guy on defense.
Cleveland will play a base cover two zone with most pressure coming from the front 7.
god, i hate our defensive scheme. keeping both safeties high sucks because it lets the defense know where they're going to be and having the corners play the flat is, in our case, both a waste of our corner's man to man coverage skills and a stupid gamble looking to pick off short passes that will inevitably fail when we don't generate enough pressure.
it makes me sick that we're still playing the wrong version of the 3-4 and that we're compounding it by playing a stupid zone over it. corners can't use their speed if they're covering the flat. at least let them play a deep zone once in a while.
god, i hate our defensive scheme. keeping both safeties high sucks because it lets the defense know where they're going to be and having the corners play the flat is, in our case, both a waste of our corner's man to man coverage skills and a stupid gamble looking to pick off short passes that will inevitably fail when we don't generate enough pressure.
it makes me sick that we're still playing the wrong version of the 3-4 and that we're compounding it by playing a stupid zone over it. corners can't use their speed if they're covering the flat. at least let them play a deep zone once in a while.
Let me correct what I said, It's more of a zone like Pitts plays then a cover two. He believes in stopping the run and loves to play with a very active, athletic SS. You will see him play the SS in the box on 1st down a lot. He does play some man when he blitzes in 2nd and long or 3rd and long. You'll rarely see him blitz on first down unless they are in the red zone and then it would be a zone blitz.
Know, Ryan may ease him out of that bend but don't break zone defense, but don't look for a lot of man coverage.
-
god, i hate our defensive scheme. keeping both safeties high sucks because it lets the defense know where they're going to be and having the corners play the flat is, in our case, both a waste of our corner's man to man coverage skills and a stupid gamble looking to pick off short passes that will inevitably fail when we don't generate enough pressure.
it makes me sick that we're still playing the wrong version of the 3-4 and that we're compounding it by playing a stupid zone over it. corners can't use their speed if they're covering the flat. at least let them play a deep zone once in a while.
Let me correct what I said, It's more of a zone like Pitts plays then a cover two. He believes in stopping the run and loves to play with a very active, athletic SS. You will see him play the SS in the box on 1st down a lot. He does play some man when he blitzes in 2nd and long or 3rd and long. You'll rarely see him blitz on first down unless they are in the red zone and then it would be a zone blitz.
Know, Ryan may ease him out of that bend but don't break zone defense, but don't look for a lot of man coverage.
Let me correct what I said, It's more of a zone like Pitts plays then a cover two. He believes in stopping the run and loves to play with a very active, athletic SS. You will see him play the SS in the box on 1st down a lot. He does play some man when he blitzes in 2nd and long or 3rd and long. You'll rarely see him blitz on first down unless they are in the red zone and then it would be a zone blitz.
Know, Ryan may ease him out of that bend but don't break zone defense, but don't look for a lot of man coverage.
okay, cool. i think the basic scheme you're talking about goes like this: the SS comes down into the box and either plays a zone in the middle of the field or blitzes. the CBs and the FS either play 3 deep across the top or play two deep with one CB staying to either cover the flat on his side or to cover intermediate routes between the flat and the safeties, a bit deeper than the LBs play. depending on what the SS does, one to three of the LBs are available as blitzers and the others drop into zones in the middle of the field. the d-linemen all rush/occupy the o-line.
one idea to implement from the cover two, and something the steelers have done because of tomlin, is to have an ILB progressively drop to cover the middle of the field as the safeties split in two deep coverage. it's not an issue if we play three over the top, but the middle of the field is often wide open as the safeties split (larry fitzgerald scored his second TD in the SB on a play like this because the MLB didn't drop deep enough, something DQ won't have a problem with).
a good 3-4 is really cool because it combines the pressure that a 4-6 can bring with the unpredictability of the 3-4.
-
Let me correct what I said, It's more of a zone like Pitts plays then a cover two. He believes in stopping the run and loves to play with a very active, athletic SS. You will see him play the SS in the box on 1st down a lot. He does play some man when he blitzes in 2nd and long or 3rd and long. You'll rarely see him blitz on first down unless they are in the red zone and then it would be a zone blitz.
Know, Ryan may ease him out of that bend but don't break zone defense, but don't look for a lot of man coverage.
okay, cool. i think the basic scheme you're talking about goes like this: the SS comes down into the box and either plays a zone in the middle of the field or blitzes. the CBs and the FS either play 3 deep across the top or play two deep with one CB staying to either cover the flat on his side or to cover intermediate routes between the flat and the safeties, a bit deeper than the LBs play. depending on what the SS does, one to three of the LBs are available as blitzers and the others drop into zones in the middle of the field. the d-linemen all rush/occupy the o-line.
one idea to implement from the cover two, and something the steelers have done because of tomlin, is to have an ILB progressively drop to cover the middle of the field as the safeties split in two deep coverage. it's not an issue if we play three over the top, but the middle of the field is often wide open as the safeties split (larry fitzgerald scored his second TD in the SB on a play like this because the MLB didn't drop deep enough, something DQ won't have a problem with).
a good 3-4 is really cool because it combines the pressure that a 4-6 can bring with the unpredictability of the 3-4.
okay, cool. i think the basic scheme you're talking about goes like this: the SS comes down into the box and either plays a zone in the middle of the field or blitzes. the CBs and the FS either play 3 deep across the top or play two deep with one CB staying to either cover the flat on his side or to cover intermediate routes between the flat and the safeties, a bit deeper than the LBs play. depending on what the SS does, one to three of the LBs are available as blitzers and the others drop into zones in the middle of the field. the d-linemen all rush/occupy the o-line.
one idea to implement from the cover two, and something the steelers have done because of tomlin, is to have an ILB progressively drop to cover the middle of the field as the safeties split in two deep coverage. it's not an issue if we play three over the top, but the middle of the field is often wide open as the safeties split (larry fitzgerald scored his second TD in the SB on a play like this because the MLB didn't drop deep enough, something DQ won't have a problem with).
a good 3-4 is really cool because it combines the pressure that a 4-6 can bring with the unpredictability of the 3-4.
You're basically describing a disguised Tampa Two.
Bodden is a good player, he can fit in any system we run. I'm just saying if he is willing to not break the bank he is a viable solution.
-
okay, cool. i think the basic scheme you're talking about goes like this: the SS comes down into the box and either plays a zone in the middle of the field or blitzes. the CBs and the FS either play 3 deep across the top or play two deep with one CB staying to either cover the flat on his side or to cover intermediate routes between the flat and the safeties, a bit deeper than the LBs play. depending on what the SS does, one to three of the LBs are available as blitzers and the others drop into zones in the middle of the field. the d-linemen all rush/occupy the o-line.
one idea to implement from the cover two, and something the steelers have done because of tomlin, is to have an ILB progressively drop to cover the middle of the field as the safeties split in two deep coverage. it's not an issue if we play three over the top, but the middle of the field is often wide open as the safeties split (larry fitzgerald scored his second TD in the SB on a play like this because the MLB didn't drop deep enough, something DQ won't have a problem with).
a good 3-4 is really cool because it combines the pressure that a 4-6 can bring with the unpredictability of the 3-4.
You're basically describing a disguised Tampa Two.
Bodden is a good player, he can fit in any system we run. I'm just saying if he is willing to not break the bank he is a viable solution.
You're basically describing a disguised Tampa Two.
Bodden is a good player, he can fit in any system we run. I'm just saying if he is willing to not break the bank he is a viable solution.
He may not be the Bodden that started here but would be a decent backup or nickle back. He has definately lost a step and his injuries have caught up to him. I think the reason he got cut from the Lions was more about the size of his contract then his ability to still play at a respectable level.
I think it all depends on how much he wants. He could bring experience but I don't think he still has the ability due to injuries to be a starter.
-
Honestly...I was thinking of him more as our slot cover...not as a starting CB.
-
Honestly...I was thinking of him more as our slot cover...not as a starting CB.
Honestly...I was thinking of him more as our slot cover...not as a starting CB.
I thought that was a given.
-
Honestly...I was thinking of him more as our slot cover...not as a starting CB.
Honestly...I was thinking of him more as our slot cover...not as a starting CB.
That would be the only thing IMO......but I am not too concerned...we won't sign him.
This group if anything is going to look young...they aren't going to start bringing back players on their last leg.
-
we laready have our 3 CB's set in e wright, bmac, and daven. All Bodden would do is provide depth. I agree that we cant look from our past for the future
-
Honestly...I was thinking of him more as our slot cover...not as a starting CB.
Honestly...I was thinking of him more as our slot cover...not as a starting CB.
thats how detroit ended up useing him.
-
Leigh Bodden WAS our best CB...then suddenly he was shipped off to an even WORSE hell-hole in Detroit. Now the Lions are cutting him.
The Lions played pretty much a Tampa Cover II last year...and that didn't fit with Bodden very well. Is it possible...with the Browns playing a bit more man-to-man and other coverages...that Bodden will be able to come back and regain his stature as one of the better young CB's in the league?
Even if he can't take over as a starter...wouldn't he be worth a look as depth?
He should come relatively cheap...and he is likely to know much of our defense (even with it getting a make over)...so to me he seems to be a likely pick up in the coming weeks.
Leigh Bodden WAS our best CB...then suddenly he was shipped off to an even WORSE hell-hole in Detroit. Now the Lions are cutting him.
The Lions played pretty much a Tampa Cover II last year...and that didn't fit with Bodden very well. Is it possible...with the Browns playing a bit more man-to-man and other coverages...that Bodden will be able to come back and regain his stature as one of the better young CB's in the league?
Even if he can't take over as a starter...wouldn't he be worth a look as depth?
He should come relatively cheap...and he is likely to know much of our defense (even with it getting a make over)...so to me he seems to be a likely pick up in the coming weeks.
Bodden can play.............in a system dedicate to winning and using skill players wisely
Offense Wins.......Franchise QB's are the key.............Defense keeps you in the game.........Go Buckeyes -
I would bring him in if he was realistic on what he wants, if he wants more then is realistic then no thank you!
-
Leigh Bodden WAS our best CB...then suddenly he was shipped off to an even WORSE hell-hole in Detroit. Now the Lions are cutting him.
The Lions played pretty much a Tampa Cover II last year...and that didn't fit with Bodden very well. Is it possible...with the Browns playing a bit more man-to-man and other coverages...that Bodden will be able to come back and regain his stature as one of the better young CB's in the league?
Even if he can't take over as a starter...wouldn't he be worth a look as depth?
He should come relatively cheap...and he is likely to know much of our defense (even with it getting a make over)...so to me he seems to be a likely pick up in the coming weeks.
Bodden can play.............in a system dedicate to winning and using skill players wisely
Bodden can play.............in a system dedicate to winning and using skill players wisely
I disagree Rich.....I am 260 lbs and can cover as well as that guy.
Tell me the difference between getting punked by 4 yards like he would and getting punked by 20 yards like I would, other than I would do it for a lot less money?
Bodden isn't a good CB.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. -
Problem is Mangini will be playing a lot of cover two zone defenses. He is not a man to man cover guy on defense.
Cleveland will play a base cover two zone with most pressure coming from the front 7.
god, i hate our defensive scheme. keeping both safeties high sucks because it lets the defense know where they're going to be and having the corners play the flat is, in our case, both a waste of our corner's man to man coverage skills and a stupid gamble looking to pick off short passes that will inevitably fail when we don't generate enough pressure.
it makes me sick that we're still playing the wrong version of the 3-4 and that we're compounding it by playing a stupid zone over it. corners can't use their speed if they're covering the flat. at least let them play a deep zone once in a while.
god, i hate our defensive scheme. keeping both safeties high sucks because it lets the defense know where they're going to be and having the corners play the flat is, in our case, both a waste of our corner's man to man coverage skills and a stupid gamble looking to pick off short passes that will inevitably fail when we don't generate enough pressure.
it makes me sick that we're still playing the wrong version of the 3-4 and that we're compounding it by playing a stupid zone over it. corners can't use their speed if they're covering the flat. at least let them play a deep zone once in a while.
Better get used to seeing the same basic defense!
I think Mangini may have learned a lesson from last year though. You need those fast linebackers in his defense. Something that got exposed in the second half of the year in 2008 with the Jets.
This is why he'll pick Curry if he's there, and why he'll be going out of his way to shoring up the Linebacking spots.. I think he has to for this 3-4 to have a shot in hell at being successful
.jpg.a1a2b9a0c33008fdaf4097d8fe2cfd64.jpg "Riffer X"){kind=avatar}
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login