Hoyer will start !
-
Oh that..
While he will start this season, he will not start THE season...
That ought to blow Stockman's mind...
By your own logic, why would Manziel start at all this season? If Hoyer starts Week 1, and is as good as you think he is, then why would Manziel become to the starter in the middle of the season?
HoyerHater said:
By your own logic, why would Manziel start at all this season? If Hoyer starts Week 1, and is as good as you think he is, then why would Manziel become to the starter in the middle of the season?
Injury.
We have a tendency to go through QB's - had quite a few changes last year, won't be surprised to see it this year (unfortunately).
how could anyone who calls themselves a Browns fan not realize we have gone through 3 or 4 QB's a season more often than not? seriously?
when i recently heard there were times when the Cowboys rolled w only Romo and only one or even NO other backups i was in complete disbelief. understanding this i can see how some of the Texas locale doesn't quite get why the Browns would try to insulate the position better than some other franchises apparently do.
HoyerHater said:
Because I'm telling you Hoyer isn't the guy?
That's funny because the real Coach and GM of the Browns already told you Hoyer wasn't the guy by drafting a QB in round 1. That was their clue to the rest of you that Hoyer, is a backup QB.
when did they say that? show me a link.
you certain it wasn't as insurance against Hoyer's knee injury combined with the value they got for Manziel at #22? Eric Mangini once said nowadays with injuries it's almost getting to be where one franchise QB on the team is not enough. he also said some philosophies around the league believe in taking a QB every single draft.
in any given moment all players on the roster are just an injury away from being on IR and out for the season. it could happen on any play on any day at any time.
yet, some want Manziel to start taking his lumps asap regardless if there is a better chance of winning for a few games or so starting Hoyer.
so what happens if they were to tank this season dedicating it a losing year for the sake of Manziel's growing pains to try to get him up to speed...and he doesn't GET up to speed?
or even if all looks good thru 2015 preseason then what if say...on the first series next year in the first game we lose him for the season to some crazy ass injury (!). what's the plan then after going all-in on one player? a billion dollar organization putting everything on the line, all the eggs in one basket, based simply on Johnny's potential durability??
in an ideal situation you should have at least two QBs on the roster that are at minimum solid starters. it's like CBs...you can never have too many (as long as you can afford them both). the key is having two that are cap friendly...like the two low cost options the Brown's currently have in their hot shot rookie 1st rd pick and their solid hometown vet in his prime who has the mind and the tools but conveniently does not have the experience to command a huge salary as of yet, for example.
HoyerHater said:
Once again, proving that being realistic about Hoyer makes you not knowledgeable, but instead a "Manziel lover".
Oh yeah and good call on saying nobody said Manziel wasn't drafted to be the starter, post #185
Looking real good TCPO. Good calls all around.
don't be dishonest and cherry-pick my post to try to make your point. although i did say what you quoted it was without context and semantics >> you know exactly what i meant, which is why you conveniently left the context out.
the point of my post was that JFF was not drafted to SIMPLY be the starter...he was drafted to be the future franchise QB of the Browns.
oh and btw Mr 209...go fuck yourself.
Okay, I admit I didn't see that. And I don't agree with sisky on that front.
The thing is, we're saying the same things. But you're so blinded by whatever it is you think you're trying to prove that you don't realize it.
actually Tim you may, just not out of context. here's post #185:
as long as we're speaking hypothetically and putting words in other's mouths, my version has this fantasy closer to something like this:
"We have a promising and competent looking vet QB in his prime...but he's just coming back from an injury. With a billion dollar organization, that is plain and simply not enough to go into a season with. At draft time, when we saw a guy who was rated high by many accounts slide to #22, at that value we felt it was worth taking a shot on him to help fill our needs. He's a high risk/high reward boom or bust kid with insane intangibles...but has a reckless--yet very effective vs college players--playing style.
Between the two, we feel we're going into this season with each of them off-setting the risks of the other. But you never know, we very well may draft a QB again next year...and to that end, it's fortunate that we have some extra ammo in the form of the 1st rd pick we got from the Bills."
>> that same pick they felt was more valuable and important to acquire "just in case" than draft ANY of the QB's at the top of the draft.
what you suggest by tossing the evaluating process and going "all-in" on Manziel is akin to gambling. the gambler approach can help you lose your franchise.
grinders take the long view and hedge their bets...and put themselves in advantageous positions to take down the gamblers at the right moment. taking this grifter attitude to the NFL has won superbowls.
they did not draft JFF to be the starter. they drafted Manziel for the exact same reason they acquired Thigpen, Young, Shaw, same reason the previous FO acquired Hoyer...FOR A CHANCE TO FIND THE CLEVELAND BROWNS FRANCHISE QB OF THE FUTURE!!
starting is temporary, and a band-aid won't get CLE a ring. reality is it's Franchise QB or bust.
fwiw Shaw had the fastest time of all QB's at the combine (4.62) and had the best touchdown to interception ratio in the NCAA. same as ur Johnny's "Lumbergh" i'd bet somewhere out there Connor Shaw has a version of his own Lumbergh as well. we regulars are not Lumbergh's for Hoyer. we are Browns fans, plain and simple. even the day Belicheat benched Bernie, never stopped being a Browns fan for a second my entire life. you will never understand this mentality. you are a grifter troll attempting to be guile using a poor Browns guise--a Manziel fan in fake Browns clothing. and had Manziel been drafted by another of the 31 other teams, you would be posing as a fan of theirs trolling their boards as i type this.
if you wanna crown em prematurely by all means have at it fanboy, crown em. if Manziel ever happens to become that guy ur trophy will still say nothing more than "you happened to guess right"
banjoBanjo said:
Watching HoyerHater crush skulls on this thread reminds me of that hypothetical about how many six year olds you could take-out at one time in a no-holds barred brawl.
LMAO is that really what you think is happening? LOL! he hasn't won one single debate here...he's just saying what you want to hear. not the same thing. oh, and btw go fuck yourself too.
I'll take the 200 posts I was right about over the one I was wrong about.
But you can hang onto that one, I know you need it. Might even want to print it out and get it framed.
you weren't wrong, i made that comment tongue-in-cheek. his black glove defense just blew the fuck up.
now if i can just get everyone to stop quoting this dick then i won't have to see any his posts at all anymore.
-
"Unlike the A&M crowd, Browns fans aren't in awe of college stats. Manziel looked good tonight -in preseason. So did Brandon Weeden last year. Baby steps guys".
Backpedaling and looking for excuses. And Weeden is not even close to touching Johnny. Try again.
Lord have mercy. Does Texas public education not teach reading comprehension. You guys are dumb as shit. No one ever compared Johnny to Weeden. They only said Weeden looked like a stud in preseason and he turned out to be shit."Unlike the A&M crowd, Browns fans aren't in awe of college stats. Manziel looked good tonight -in preseason. So did Brandon Weeden last year. Baby steps guys".
Backpedaling and looking for excuses. And Weeden is not even close to touching Johnny. Try again.
And what's with all this, you guys are back pedaling because if you don't don Johnny now, you can't claim on the internet that you thought he was great. Who the fuck cares?
You manzielites are such whiney ass holes who can even have a decent debate. I never met a crowd who are all so enamoured with a kid and that all have an IQ level just above Retarded. You all have the same traits. Its amazing.
-
The reason they are making the QB decision after the second game is so they get a good look not only at JM with and against the 1's , but Hoyer with the leaky 2 Oline against 2's.
Pettine says he wants a fair eval of both QB's and that does seem fair to both. Whichever one starts will be just fine-very comfortable with either which is a good position for a new coach to be in.
I am much more interested in seeing who they pick up off waivers for the OL 2's because the ones they have right now are not that good. I'm very happy with DL 2's.
Lines win football and D lines win Championships.
-
The reason they are making the QB decision after the second game is so they get a good look not only at JM with and against the 1's , but Hoyer with the leaky 2 Oline against 2's.
Pettine says he wants a fair eval of both QB's and that does seem fair to both. Whichever one starts will be just fine-very comfortable with either which is a good position for a new coach to be in.
I am much more interested in seeing who they pick up off waivers for the OL 2's because the ones they have right now are not that good. I'm very happy with DL 2's.
Lines win football and D lines win Championships.
Lines win football and D lines win Championships.
Sic 'em, Ghoolie, sic 'em...
Eric Mangini... said some philosophies around the league believe in taking a QB every single draft.
don't be dishonest and cherry-pick my post to try to make your point. although i did say what you quoted it was without context and semantics >> you know exactly what i meant, which is why you conveniently left the context out.
the point of my post was that JFF was not drafted to SIMPLY be the starter...he was drafted to be the future franchise QB of the Browns.
actually Tim you may, just not out of context. here's post #185:
you weren't wrong, i made that comment tongue-in-cheek. his black glove defense just blew the fuck up.
now if i can just get everyone to stop quoting this dick then i won't have to see any his posts at all anymore.
Guess I agree with the Mangenius since my QB philosophy is that you always need to be looking for your next one.
On cherry picking... I've come to the conclusion that is not what Stocky is doing. He's simply too far down the rabbit hole to take the real meaning.
On TCPO... was wondering what he thought he was wrong about... now I know... and, no, he was not (see above).
And I will take the no quote pledge. It will not be easy as there is so much to correct, but I will try. It will help that there are better uses of my time like going all Kreskin on a spoon. The odds of succeeding there are greater anyway...
-
The reason they are making the QB decision after the second game is so they get a good look not only at JM with and against the 1's , but Hoyer with the leaky 2 Oline against 2's.
Pettine says he wants a fair eval of both QB's and that does seem fair to both. Whichever one starts will be just fine-very comfortable with either which is a good position for a new coach to be in.
I am much more interested in seeing who they pick up off waivers for the OL 2's because the ones they have right now are not that good. I'm very happy with DL 2's.
Lines win football and D lines win Championships.
The reason they are making the QB decision after the second game is so they get a good look not only at JM with and against the 1's , but Hoyer with the leaky 2 Oline against 2's.
Pettine says he wants a fair eval of both QB's and that does seem fair to both. Whichever one starts will be just fine-very comfortable with either which is a good position for a new coach to be in.
I am much more interested in seeing who they pick up off waivers for the OL 2's because the ones they have right now are not that good. I'm very happy with DL 2's.
Lines win football and D lines win Championships.
It's closer than I thought it would be, regarding the quarterbacks. JF did impress me with much better arm strength than I expected.
You're right about o-line other than Gilkey, not much depth.
-
-
They have to give Manziel the starting nod against Washington on Monday.
I just want to see him with the 1's.
I think both QB's looked very crisp.
-
awww baby boo boo ma ma ma.
you wika wawa white now? baby bo boo?
lol.
a grown man typing baby talk has got to be the funniest shit ever, and no one does it better than walter.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login