CBSSports reporting Gordon most likely gets 8 games
-
The problem is, the NFL doesn't care if they take a beating in the media. It will all be forgotten once the season starts.
The problem is, the NFL doesn't care if they take a beating in the media. It will all be forgotten once the season starts.
not really. i think you'll see womens groups doing some type of on camera protests. wearing pink shirts with some anti-NFL saying on them. i'll guarantee it.
don't fuck with a pissed off lady. you should know that by now.
-
Yeah... All those animal rights groups really made a dent... I'm sure the women's rights groups will do the same...
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
wait until they announce the irsay punishment. if gordon is gone for 8 games because of that test (weed) and irsay gets less with possession of coke and a suitcase of money (drug deal or money laundering) and ray rice only got 2 games for knocking out his ho, shit will go up like a bouncing betty.
let's see what happens to aldon smith friday because he has some serious charges against him.
wait until they announce the irsay punishment. if gordon is gone for 8 games because of that test (weed) and irsay gets less with possession of coke and a suitcase of money (drug deal or money laundering) and ray rice only got 2 games for knocking out his ho, shit will go up like a bouncing betty.
let's see what happens to aldon smith friday because he has some serious charges against him.
That was just his weekend party suitcase.
-
Yeah... All those animal rights groups really made a dent... I'm sure the women's rights groups will do the same...
Yeah... All those animal rights groups really made a dent... I'm sure the women's rights groups will do the same...
And they are still called The Redskins.
(in fact, didn't Dan Snyder just come out with some propaganda about that yesterday?)
-
Yeah... All those animal rights groups really made a dent... I'm sure the women's rights groups will do the same...
And they are still called The Redskins.
(in fact, didn't Dan Snyder just come out with some propaganda about that yesterday?)
Eight? If I'm Gordon, then I sue...
And they are still called The Redskins.
(in fact, didn't Dan Snyder just come out with some propaganda about that yesterday?)
That was fucking embarrassing...
-
Theyre just reporting what the Browns said they think he gets. I still think its thrown out and he gets 2-4 for the dui.
XxDaBuckeyexX said:
Theyre just reporting what the Browns said they think he gets. I still think its thrown out and he gets 2-4 for the dui.
tell me if i'm wrong but the league can't address the alleged ovi until he is proven guilty in a carolina court?
if that's the case then the quick solution is to delay the case until season end
the fuckin drama is wearing me out
-
The pos test is what the suspension will be about. The dui will be a seperate case, and he was .09, .01 over the limit, and when he did it again at the police station it was even lower.
-
XxDaBuckeyexX said:
Theyre just reporting what the Browns said they think he gets. I still think its thrown out and he gets 2-4 for the dui.
tell me if i'm wrong but the league can't address the alleged ovi until he is proven guilty in a carolina court?
if that's the case then the quick solution is to delay the case until season end
the fuckin drama is wearing me out
-
Yeah... All those animal rights groups really made a dent... I'm sure the women's rights groups will do the same...
Yeah... All those animal rights groups really made a dent... I'm sure the women's rights groups will do the same...
and you're a asshole if you don't think that follows vick to the end of his days...little boy.
btw WOODY, when's the last time dog fighting made the headline news? hmm? when's the last time a NFL player has been associated with dog fighting?
there's your big fucking dent.
-
XxDaBuckeyexX said:
Theyre just reporting what the Browns said they think he gets. I still think its thrown out and he gets 2-4 for the dui.
tell me if i'm wrong but the league can't address the alleged ovi until he is proven guilty in a carolina court?
if that's the case then the quick solution is to delay the case until season end
the fuckin drama is wearing me out
tell me if i'm wrong but the league can't address the alleged ovi until he is proven guilty in a carolina court?
What Roger is saying is that when there is:
- a pattern of behavior, e.g., Blackmon, he does not wait for the court decision.
- not a pattern of behavior, e.g., Irsay, Rice, he waits.
That's his story... and he's sticking with it.
So the question is, does he consider - weed, weed, cough syrup, 2nd hand weed, speeding (not my weed) DUI - a pattern???
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
roger the anarchist
-
tell me if i'm wrong but the league can't address the alleged ovi until he is proven guilty in a carolina court?
What Roger is saying is that when there is:
- a pattern of behavior, e.g., Blackmon, he does not wait for the court decision.
- not a pattern of behavior, e.g., Irsay, Rice, he waits.
That's his story... and he's sticking with it.
So the question is, does he consider - weed, weed, cough syrup, 2nd hand weed, speeding (not my weed) DUI - a pattern???
What Roger is saying is that when there is:
- a pattern of behavior, e.g., Blackmon, he does not wait for the court decision.
- not a pattern of behavior, e.g., Irsay, Rice, he waits.
That's his story... and he's sticking with it.
So the question is, does he consider - weed, weed, cough syrup, 2nd hand weed, speeding (not my weed) DUI - a pattern???
the problem with Irsay is it's certainly not the first time he was doing it, just the first time he got caught.The smart thing for Goodell to do IMHO would be to just drop the iffy drug charge (which could be challenged in court)- and suspend Gordon for two games under the personal conduct policy- which can't be.
-
-
tell me if i'm wrong but the league can't address the alleged ovi until he is proven guilty in a carolina court?
What Roger is saying is that when there is:
- a pattern of behavior, e.g., Blackmon, he does not wait for the court decision.
- not a pattern of behavior, e.g., Irsay, Rice, he waits.
That's his story... and he's sticking with it.
So the question is, does he consider - weed, weed, cough syrup, 2nd hand weed, speeding (not my weed) DUI - a pattern???
What Roger is saying is that when there is:
- a pattern of behavior, e.g., Blackmon, he does not wait for the court decision.
- not a pattern of behavior, e.g., Irsay, Rice, he waits.
That's his story... and he's sticking with it.
So the question is, does he consider - weed, weed, cough syrup, 2nd hand weed, speeding (not my weed) DUI - a pattern???
Since this isn't a court of law, but an administrative penalty governed by contract with the players union, do they have to follow the law of a state to give an admin punishment? I wouldn't think so.
"You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970. -
What Roger is saying is that when there is:
- a pattern of behavior, e.g., Blackmon, he does not wait for the court decision.
- not a pattern of behavior, e.g., Irsay, Rice, he waits.
That's his story... and he's sticking with it.
So the question is, does he consider - weed, weed, cough syrup, 2nd hand weed, speeding (not my weed) DUI - a pattern???
Since this isn't a court of law, but an administrative penalty governed by contract with the players union, do they have to follow the law of a state to give an admin punishment? I wouldn't think so.
Since this isn't a court of law, but an administrative penalty governed by contract with the players union, do they have to follow the law of a state to give an admin punishment? I wouldn't think so.
I suspect not, because then you'd have different rules for different players in the league (ie, all the smokey joe's would go to Denver)
-
-
The precedent has already been set that NFL teams are employers of the players who are employees. Employers must follow state employment guidelines.
XxDaBuckeyexX said:
The precedent has already been set that NFL teams are employers of the players who are employees. Employers must follow state employment guidelines.
That would seem unfair to a player who played in a state with liberal laws, vs one with strict laws.
"You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970. -
XxDaBuckeyexX said:
The precedent has already been set that NFL teams are employers of the players who are employees. Employers must follow state employment guidelines.
That would seem unfair to a player who played in a state with liberal laws, vs one with strict laws.
That would seem unfair to a player who played in a state with liberal laws, vs one with strict laws.
My point exactly. Also, I'm not sure if the state/federal thing applies here to league rules, where a positive drug test is grounds for suspension - I'm not sure if there's such a stipulation in state law?
-
What Roger is saying is that when there is:
- a pattern of behavior, e.g., Blackmon, he does not wait for the court decision.
- not a pattern of behavior, e.g., Irsay, Rice, he waits.
That's his story... and he's sticking with it.
So the question is, does he consider - weed, weed, cough syrup, 2nd hand weed, speeding (not my weed) DUI - a pattern???
Since this isn't a court of law, but an administrative penalty governed by contract with the players union, do they have to follow the law of a state to give an admin punishment? I wouldn't think so.
Since this isn't a court of law, but an administrative penalty governed by contract with the players union, do they have to follow the law of a state to give an admin punishment? I wouldn't think so.
That was the entire crux of the Star Caps litigation with the one Saint and the 2 Vikings. They were in court for 2 seasons before things were resolved. It all hinged on Minnesota state law in regards to how drug tests are administered. The players essentially won that lawsuit.
-
Since this isn't a court of law, but an administrative penalty governed by contract with the players union, do they have to follow the law of a state to give an admin punishment? I wouldn't think so.
That was the entire crux of the Star Caps litigation with the one Saint and the 2 Vikings. They were in court for 2 seasons before things were resolved. It all hinged on Minnesota state law in regards to how drug tests are administered. The players essentially won that lawsuit.
That was the entire crux of the Star Caps litigation with the one Saint and the 2 Vikings. They were in court for 2 seasons before things were resolved. It all hinged on Minnesota state law in regards to how drug tests are administered. The players essentially won that lawsuit.
Can that happen in Josh's case?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login