Skip to content

CBSSports reporting Gordon most likely gets 8 games

The Browns Board
56 29 2.6k
  • miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #35

    i's live in ports-a-clinton. what's you mean about some taxes?

  • That depends on where you chose to live. It would seem that punishment should be equal in all the teams for the same infraction.

    Mr. Make-BelieveM Mr. Make-Believe wrote on last edited by
    #36

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    That depends on where you chose to live. It would seem that punishment should be equal in all the teams for the same infraction.

    In this particular instance, I happen to believe in the right of the corporation to discipline to the letter of the agreement between union and business. That doesn't mean however, that it's the way it always works... And it doesn't mean that it's always (as you said) fair.

  • miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #37

    boo.

  • @cuwoohio said:

    The problem is, the NFL doesn't care if they take a beating in the media. It will all be forgotten once the season starts.

    not really. i think you'll see womens groups doing some type of on camera protests. wearing pink shirts with some anti-NFL saying on them. i'll guarantee it.

    don't fuck with a pissed off lady. you should know that by now.

    The Cysko KidT The Cysko Kid wrote on last edited by
    #38

    @miktoxic said:

    not really. i think you'll see womens groups doing some type of on camera protests. wearing pink shirts with some anti-NFL saying on them. i'll guarantee it.

    don't fuck with a pissed off lady. you should know that by now.

    How well do you think it will go over when rice comes out in pink in October?

  • XxDaBuckeyexX said:

    The precedent has already been set that NFL teams are employers of the players who are employees. Employers must follow state employment guidelines.

    That would seem unfair to a player who played in a state with liberal laws, vs one with strict laws.

    DownSouthKCD DownSouthKC wrote on last edited by
    #39

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    That would seem unfair to a player who played in a state with liberal laws, vs one with strict laws.

    Not trying to be rude but that seems like a childish argument.

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    That would seem unfair to a player who played in a state with liberal laws, vs one with strict laws.

    Not trying to be rude but that seems like a childish argument.

    DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
    #40

    @downsouthkc said:

    Not trying to be rude but that seems like a childish argument.

    So you think that two players commit the same violation, one in CA, the other in GA. One gets suspended 8 games, the other none is fair? It should be a uniform punishment for everyone, hardly childish.

  • broganreynikB broganreynik wrote on last edited by
    #41

    Employers in states where weed is legal are still able to fire workers for smoking pot.

  • @downsouthkc said:

    Not trying to be rude but that seems like a childish argument.

    So you think that two players commit the same violation, one in CA, the other in GA. One gets suspended 8 games, the other none is fair? It should be a uniform punishment for everyone, hardly childish.

    DownSouthKCD DownSouthKC wrote on last edited by DownSouthKC
    #42

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    So you think that two players commit the same violation, one in CA, the other in GA. One gets suspended 8 games, the other none is fair? It should be a uniform punishment for everyone, hardly childish.

    What I am saying is stating "it's unfair for ..." is a childish, liberal, everything should be equal for every situation argument. It's like arguing that its not fair that Florida and Texas don't have state income taxes so players can make more money off the same salary in those states, theoretically, giving those teams a higher salary cap. I don't want to get too political on this forum.

    If a player is getting 8 games playing for Atlanta he isn't getting 0 playing for Oakland.

    its childish because it reminds me of an argument you would have had with your parents when you were a child. "that's not fair, daddy." "well, the world isn't fair, son."

  • Employers in states where weed is legal are still able to fire workers for smoking pot.

    DownSouthKCD DownSouthKC wrote on last edited by
    #43

    @broganreynik said:

    Employers in states where weed is legal are still able to fire workers for smoking pot.

    This.

    Thanks for clearing up some of what I was trying to say, lol.

  • DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
    #44

    I give up since you misread what I was trying to say to begin with.

  • Employers in states where weed is legal are still able to fire workers for smoking pot.

    DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
    #45

    @broganreynik said:

    Employers in states where weed is legal are still able to fire workers for smoking pot.

    Exactly.

  • L LondonBrown wrote on last edited by
    #46

    What is taking so long??!!

    Just tell us already

  • W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by Westside Steve
    #47

    given the facts of the case I say any suspension is a screwing.

    if he had failed both rounds with a high enough level that it was undoubtably smoking then a year would be fair.

    WSS

  • given the facts of the case I say any suspension is a screwing.

    if he had failed both rounds with a high enough level that it was undoubtably smoking then a year would be fair.

    WSS

    ComeonmanC Comeonman wrote on last edited by
    #48

    @westside-steve said:

    given the facts of the case I say any suspension is a screwing.

    if he had failed both rounds with a high enough level that it was undoubtably smoking then a year would be fair.

    WSS

    Except if Godell rules that it a pattern of behavior with his iron fist, like someone mentioned earlier. I would bet it all that this would be his basis for suspension
  • miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #49

    either way the NFL is going to look like shit AGAIN in some fans' eyes. goodell is going to have to build a bunker around his office.

  • Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #50

    diehard's a "liberal"?

  • miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #51

    until you step on his jordans.

  • T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #52

    He shoulda just beat up his girlfriend. Pot is 4 X's worse. Everybody knows that.

  • @westside-steve said:

    given the facts of the case I say any suspension is a screwing.

    if he had failed both rounds with a high enough level that it was undoubtably smoking then a year would be fair.

    WSS

    Except if Godell rules that it a pattern of behavior with his iron fist, like someone mentioned earlier. I would bet it all that this would be his basis for suspension
    W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
    #53

    @comeonman said:

    Except if Godell rules that it a pattern of behavior with his iron fist, like someone mentioned earlier. I would bet it all that this would be his basis for suspension

    Maybe but I wouldn't think it was a pattern of behavior if he was able to not smoke the stupid shit even while his homies were.

    WSS

  • @comeonman said:

    Except if Godell rules that it a pattern of behavior with his iron fist, like someone mentioned earlier. I would bet it all that this would be his basis for suspension

    Maybe but I wouldn't think it was a pattern of behavior if he was able to not smoke the stupid shit even while his homies were.

    WSS

    ComeonmanC Comeonman wrote on last edited by
    #54

    @westside-steve said:

    Maybe but I wouldn't think it was a pattern of behavior if he was able to not smoke the stupid shit even while his homies were.

    WSS

    True. But we are not Godell