Skip to content

Haloti Gnata traded to Detroit.

The Browns Board
21 12 867
  • We faced him 18 times, he was a 5 time All-Pro and a Super Bowl Champion ... and we never learned how to spell his name.

    Zombo

  • We faced him 18 times, he was a 5 time All-Pro and a Super Bowl Champion ... and we never learned how to spell his name.

    Zombo

    Zombo said:

    We faced him 18 times, he was a 5 time All-Pro and a Super champion ... and we never learned how to spell his name.

    Zombo

    Ngot all of us...

  • We faced him 18 times, he was a 5 time All-Pro and a Super Bowl Champion ... and we never learned how to spell his name.

    Zombo

    Zombo said:

    We faced him 18 times, he was a 5 time All-Pro and a Super champion ... and we never learned how to spell his name.

    Zombo

    K-nig-it-nat-a

  • Zombo said:

    We faced him 18 times, he was a 5 time All-Pro and a Super champion ... and we never learned how to spell his name.

    Zombo

    Ngot all of us...

    @tour2ma said:

    Ngot all of us...

    That's Haloti pun your using!

  • Zombo said:

    We faced him 18 times, he was a 5 time All-Pro and a Super champion ... and we never learned how to spell his name.

    Zombo

    K-nig-it-nat-a

    @the-gipper said:

    K-nig-it-nat-a

    Congrats. That's Fluid Samoan if I ever heard it.

  • @the-gipper said:

    K-nig-it-nat-a

    Congrats. That's Fluid Samoan if I ever heard it.

    @gumby73 said:

    Congrats. That's Fluid Samoan if I ever heard it.

    That is a combination of Olde English and Samoan. Courtesy Monty Python.

  • This one hurts, yes he is older, but he was had for nearly worthless picks. =(

  • This one hurts, yes he is older, but he was had for nearly worthless picks. =(

    cbbacker said:

    This one hurts, yes he is older, but he was had for nearly worthless picks. =(

    The Ravens weren't going to trade him in division in a million years as has already been pointed out by numerous people.

  • cbbacker said:

    This one hurts, yes he is older, but he was had for nearly worthless picks. =(

    The Ravens weren't going to trade him in division in a million years as has already been pointed out by numerous people.

    @mark-o said:

    The Ravens weren't going to trade him in division in a million years as has already been pointed out by numerous people.

    Pretty sure he is a lineman not a QB, and I think we toss a 3 at him, and they would have considered it. That rule only applies when you are talking about WR, RB, QB etc. Unless he is JJ Watt (which he isn't) I bet they would have considered us.

  • Well I'm not too worked up about this free agency shit but that's one player I'd have liked to have. Probably not so much if I had to give up picks but...

    WSS

  • @mark-o said:

    The Ravens weren't going to trade him in division in a million years as has already been pointed out by numerous people.

    Pretty sure he is a lineman not a QB, and I think we toss a 3 at him, and they would have considered it. That rule only applies when you are talking about WR, RB, QB etc. Unless he is JJ Watt (which he isn't) I bet they would have considered us.

    cbbacker said:

    Pretty sure he is a lineman not a QB, and I think we toss a 3 at him, and they would have considered it. That rule only applies when you are talking about WR, RB, QB etc. Unless he is JJ Watt (which he isn't) I bet they would have considered us.

    I doubt it.

    If he was a free agent, then yes we should have pursued him.

    Usually, you don't trade proven talent within the division.