Skip to content

Charlie Casserly says Browns offered a first round pick for Bradford

The Browns Board
69 20 3.4k
  • Two firsts for a qb in a meager qb draft?

    Not happenin. Bank on it.

    C Chicopee John wrote on last edited by Chicopee John
    #40

    @calfoxwc said:

    Two firsts for a qb in a meager qb draft?

    Not happenin. Bank on it.

    Not again, hopefully.

    The Browns "gave up" much more than 2 First Round Picks to draft Tim Couch (the best of a weak QB class).

    How did that work out?

    I hope that lesson has been learned, although I understand it is a different organization.

  • @tour2ma said:

    AKA... the sure thing...

    Problem is, as has been pointed out repeatedly, picks for sure thing QBs are not traded away...

    There has only ever been one "sure thing".

    The-Sure-Thing.jpg

    C Chicopee John wrote on last edited by
    #41

    @the-gipper said:

    There has only ever been one "sure thing".

    The-Sure-Thing.jpg

    In the real, awake world, Gip, somebody CAN actually fck up a wet dream.

  • @calfoxwc said:

    Two firsts for a qb in a meager qb draft?

    Not happenin. Bank on it.

    Not again, hopefully.

    The Browns "gave up" much more than 2 First Round Picks to draft Tim Couch (the best of a weak QB class).

    How did that work out?

    I hope that lesson has been learned, although I understand it is a different organization.

    Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by
    #42

    @chicopee-john said:

    Not again, hopefully.

    The Browns "gave up" much more than 2 First Round Picks to draft Tim Couch (the best of a weak QB class).

    How did that work out?

    I hope that lesson has been learned, although I understand it is a different organization.

    What did they give up to get Couch?

    Couch is still one of the highest rated QB prospects entering the NFL of the last 20 years. Put him on a team that doesn't suck absolute shit, and he's probably a top-10 QB and franchise-level guy.

  • @chicopee-john said:

    Not again, hopefully.

    The Browns "gave up" much more than 2 First Round Picks to draft Tim Couch (the best of a weak QB class).

    How did that work out?

    I hope that lesson has been learned, although I understand it is a different organization.

    What did they give up to get Couch?

    Couch is still one of the highest rated QB prospects entering the NFL of the last 20 years. Put him on a team that doesn't suck absolute shit, and he's probably a top-10 QB and franchise-level guy.

    C Chicopee John wrote on last edited by
    #43

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    What did they give up to get Couch?

    Couch is still one of the highest rated QB prospects entering the NFL of the last 20 years. Put him on a team that doesn't suck absolute shit, and he's probably a top-10 QB and franchise-level guy.

    If only "Ifs and But's" were candy and nuts, every day would be Christmas.

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    What did they give up to get Couch?

    Couch is still one of the highest rated QB prospects entering the NFL of the last 20 years. Put him on a team that doesn't suck absolute shit, and he's probably a top-10 QB and franchise-level guy.

    If only "Ifs and But's" were candy and nuts, every day would be Christmas.

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #44

    @chicopee-john said:

    If only "Ifs and But's" were candy and nuts, every day would be Christmas.

    More appropriate for a Bengals fan, I'd say...

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    What did they give up to get Couch?

    Couch is still one of the highest rated QB prospects entering the NFL of the last 20 years. Put him on a team that doesn't suck absolute shit, and he's probably a top-10 QB and franchise-level guy.

    If only "Ifs and But's" were candy and nuts, every day would be Christmas.

    Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by
    #45

    @chicopee-john said:

    If only "Ifs and But's" were candy and nuts, every day would be Christmas.

    Sure, but IF we're comparing first round QB busts, I hardly thing our re-inaugural QB fits the bill. Couch was as much of a bust as Clevfan4life is a Browns fan.

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    What did they give up to get Couch?

    Couch is still one of the highest rated QB prospects entering the NFL of the last 20 years. Put him on a team that doesn't suck absolute shit, and he's probably a top-10 QB and franchise-level guy.

    If only "Ifs and But's" were candy and nuts, every day would be Christmas.

    miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #46

    @chicopee-john said:

    If only "Ifs and But's" were candy and nuts, every day would be Christmas.

    so the browns are re-incarnated and they pick QB with their #1 pick. then a DE.

    no OL, a couple of rookie WR weapons, a whiff of any type or sense of any offensive scheme to get them through years of buidling a line on either side of the ball and couch sucks.

    GTFO. couch on the browns right now we'd be picking parker @19 and IN the playoffs.

  • @chicopee-john said:

    Not again, hopefully.

    The Browns "gave up" much more than 2 First Round Picks to draft Tim Couch (the best of a weak QB class).

    How did that work out?

    I hope that lesson has been learned, although I understand it is a different organization.

    What did they give up to get Couch?

    Couch is still one of the highest rated QB prospects entering the NFL of the last 20 years. Put him on a team that doesn't suck absolute shit, and he's probably a top-10 QB and franchise-level guy.

    ErnieCamacho84E ErnieCamacho84 wrote on last edited by ErnieCamacho84
    #47

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    What did they give up to get Couch?

    Couch is still one of the highest rated QB prospects entering the NFL of the last 20 years. Put him on a team that doesn't suck absolute shit, and he's probably a top-10 QB and franchise-level guy.

    Dude was sacked 56 TIMES his rookie season. He had absolutely no protection. He was fucked from the get-go.

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    What did they give up to get Couch?

    Couch is still one of the highest rated QB prospects entering the NFL of the last 20 years. Put him on a team that doesn't suck absolute shit, and he's probably a top-10 QB and franchise-level guy.

    Dude was sacked 56 TIMES his rookie season. He had absolutely no protection. He was fucked from the get-go.

    C Chicopee John wrote on last edited by
    #48

    @erniecamacho84 said:

    Dude was sacked 56 TIMES his rookie season. He had absolutely no protection. He was fucked from the get-go.

    So..........................how did it work out?

  • @erniecamacho84 said:

    Dude was sacked 56 TIMES his rookie season. He had absolutely no protection. He was fucked from the get-go.

    So..........................how did it work out?

    miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by miktoxic
    #49

    @chicopee-john said:

    So..........................how did it work out?

    well it worked out that fans thinking that those 'awesome' #1 and 2's first round picks meant nothing because there was no 'team' to place them into.

    it's like the sammy watkins debate. you're going to pick a WR with the #4 overall pick when you don't even have a QB? GTFO.

    football, baseball and soccer are all field sports where most professionals know you build from the middle out. in baseball it's the catcher, the second baseman the center fielder then a pitcher. you don't just sign a pitcher without the other three. it's fucking common sense man. then you add the other components....short stop, 3rdbaseman etc etc

  • U Unsympathetic wrote on last edited by
    #50

    I'm just glad this thread has conclusively shown that OL before either QB or WR is the way to go.

    So, we're in agreement that we should go DT and OL in the first this year, yes? Good.

  • I'm just glad this thread has conclusively shown that OL before either QB or WR is the way to go.

    So, we're in agreement that we should go DT and OL in the first this year, yes? Good.

    Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by
    #51

    @unsympathetic said:

    I'm just glad this thread has conclusively shown that OL before either QB or WR is the way to go.

    So, we're in agreement that we should go DT and OL in the first this year, yes? Good.

    No. But nice try.

    With Mack, we had a top-five OL last year. We have two first round picks, a second round pick and a third round pick invested into this line. They are solid to great players at their individual positions. Adding a first round G won't put this offensive line over the edge, continuity will. We need depth and an offseason together. Nobody was complaining about the offensive line in Week 3 last year.

    As for defensive line: The Rams had four first round picks on their defensive line last year. How did they fare? The Bills had three first round picks on their defensive line last year. How did they fare?

    The Seahawks had one of, if not the best, defensive line last season... and they have two undrafted players, a third round pick and a first round pick.

    If the best overall run-stuffing DL is a first round prospect, then sure - let's go get him. Because that's what we need, a run-stuffer. But don't take a guy in the first just because a handful of people rate him as the best prospect. That's an idiot's way of drafting and you're not maximizing your spend.

    OL and DL are huge, you can't win with poor play at either position. However, a stellar DL/ OL and no QB isn't a recipe for success either. You've got to have both of them together.

    We have a solid to great corps of offensive linemen and a solid corps of defensive linemen. Get a run stuffing NT, play an entire season with the same offensive linemen in the same positions, and get an ILB who can sniff out a play and has the nuts to stop it at the mesh point and nobody will be complaining about our production from either line.

  • @erniecamacho84 said:

    The Browns could intentionally spark World War III, cause the deaths of 300,000,000 people, shoot my mother and rape my dog, and I would still be a fan. You're just a Steelers convert waiting to happen. Get the fuck out, bitch.

    It's funny that the only person that has "Cleveland fan" and "4 life" in their name is the one that's being a big ass whiny bitch.

    More like Clevfanuntilimaketheswitchtopittsburgh

    ClevelandFanForLifeC ClevelandFanForLife wrote on last edited by ClevelandFanForLife
    #52

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    It's funny that the only person that has "Cleveland fan" and "4 life" in their name is the one that's being a big ass whiny bitch.

    More like Clevfanuntilimaketheswitchtopittsburgh

    Ahem... I believe you forgot the original...
  • @unsympathetic said:

    I'm just glad this thread has conclusively shown that OL before either QB or WR is the way to go.

    So, we're in agreement that we should go DT and OL in the first this year, yes? Good.

    No. But nice try.

    With Mack, we had a top-five OL last year. We have two first round picks, a second round pick and a third round pick invested into this line. They are solid to great players at their individual positions. Adding a first round G won't put this offensive line over the edge, continuity will. We need depth and an offseason together. Nobody was complaining about the offensive line in Week 3 last year.

    As for defensive line: The Rams had four first round picks on their defensive line last year. How did they fare? The Bills had three first round picks on their defensive line last year. How did they fare?

    The Seahawks had one of, if not the best, defensive line last season... and they have two undrafted players, a third round pick and a first round pick.

    If the best overall run-stuffing DL is a first round prospect, then sure - let's go get him. Because that's what we need, a run-stuffer. But don't take a guy in the first just because a handful of people rate him as the best prospect. That's an idiot's way of drafting and you're not maximizing your spend.

    OL and DL are huge, you can't win with poor play at either position. However, a stellar DL/ OL and no QB isn't a recipe for success either. You've got to have both of them together.

    We have a solid to great corps of offensive linemen and a solid corps of defensive linemen. Get a run stuffing NT, play an entire season with the same offensive linemen in the same positions, and get an ILB who can sniff out a play and has the nuts to stop it at the mesh point and nobody will be complaining about our production from either line.

    miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by miktoxic
    #53

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    We have a solid to great corps of offensive linemen and a solid corps of defensive linemen. Get a run stuffing NT, play an entire season with the same offensive linemen in the same positions, and get an ILB who can sniff out a play and has the nuts to stop it at the mesh point and nobody will be complaining about our production from either line.

    agreed BUT now that the browns have seen what can happen when one of the 'corp' goes down to injury then i'd think they'd like to bolster both lines with either first day starters or depth to balance that issue.

    so an OL with one of the 2 picks in the first round would be a solid move IMO.

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    It's funny that the only person that has "Cleveland fan" and "4 life" in their name is the one that's being a big ass whiny bitch.

    More like Clevfanuntilimaketheswitchtopittsburgh

    Ahem... I believe you forgot the original...
    Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by
    #54

    @clevelandfanforlife said:

    Ahem... I believe you forgot the original...

    Oh man. My apologies.

  • WalterWhiteW WalterWhite wrote on last edited by WalterWhite
    #55

    If The Browns give up a 1st round pick for an injury prone QB with a huge contract that's never put up good numbers then the Honeymoon with Ray Farmer needs to come to an end.

  • If The Browns give up a 1st round pick for an injury prone QB with a huge contract that's never put up good numbers then the Honeymoon with Ray Farmer needs to come to an end.

    miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #56

    @walterwhite said:

    If The Browns give up a 1st round pick for an injury prone QB with a huge contract that's never put up good numbers then the Honeymoon with Ray Farmer needs to come to an end.

    shut up.

    we already know you suck at making picks so................

    who's injury prone btw?

  • Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #57

    Walter is talking about Bradford.

  • @chicopee-john said:

    If only "Ifs and But's" were candy and nuts, every day would be Christmas.

    Sure, but IF we're comparing first round QB busts, I hardly thing our re-inaugural QB fits the bill. Couch was as much of a bust as Clevfan4life is a Browns fan.

    C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
    #58

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Sure, but IF we're comparing first round QB busts, I hardly thing our re-inaugural QB fits the bill. Couch was as much of a bust as Clevfan4life is a Browns fan.

    check that shit cause that guy ain't me.

  • W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by Westside Steve
    #59

    Well while you are making up ridiculous scenarios... Apparently the league doesn't want JaMarcus Winston 😉 to come to the draft. Sounds like a red flag to me meaning his character must be in question nationwide. Yes? No? If that's true there's a better chance he drops than Mariota.

    Of course that rumor was from WKNR and the bleacher Report so...

    (just mentioning it not trying to piss off The Winston lovers)

    WSS