Skip to content

The Browns Could Have A Good Season If...

The Browns Board
21 18 1.1k
  • Opal312O Opal312 wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Assuming Farmer does NOT trade our first round picks for ANOTHER quarterback, hear me out.

    If they were to draft Andrus Peat and Danny Shelton or Malcom Brown in the first round, then take a wide receiver in the second (Jaelen Strong, Devin Smith, if there still on the board. Then in the third a tight end. There should be a few good ones still available, Heuerman, OSU, Tyler Kroft, Rutgers. That leaves six picks to plug up holes and add depth where needed.

    No matter who starts at quarterback if we had an O-line like Dallas we could go to the power running game with Crowell and West.

    Let's face it; Tony Romo had all damn day to throw the ball. And Demarco Murray had the best year he will ever have.

    So now with Bowe, Hartline and Hawkins and a big tight end, I see the Browns beating the teams in our division.

    Even if they bring Johnny in until at least next year this is a far better solution than trading away all our pick for an unproven Mariota. McCown would still probably start anyway. This draft COULD SET THE Browns up for a decade of dominant defense and plenty of time to either develop Manziel or shoot for Cardale Jones next year.

    I'm not going to freak out if Farmer doesn't take a wide receiver at 12 because it looks like the best will be gone by then. If Kevin White or Parker are still there great. But Danny Shelton is too good to pass up.

  • WalterWhiteW WalterWhite wrote on last edited by
    #2

    Agreed. I'll take O-line, D front 7 all day in this draft.

    A star WR isn't going to help us in the long run

  • T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #3

    I think most here have been preaching that mantra, "Inside out!"

  • miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #4

    if the aliens come down from the skies and abduct the 13 opposing teams they are to face this year.

  • 7 7moses7 wrote on last edited by
    #5

    IF the dog didn't stop to take a shit he would have caught the rabbit

  • Agreed. I'll take O-line, D front 7 all day in this draft.

    A star WR isn't going to help us in the long run

    F FairHooker11 wrote on last edited by
    #6

    @walterwhite said:

    Agreed. I'll take O-line, D front 7 all day in this draft.

    A star WR isn't going to help us in the long run

    WTH - alot of us "old Browns fans" can recall the days - oh some 2000 posts or so of yours,

    decrying the fact that we had it all wrong - with you saying "screw the line(s), we need skilled position players"

    providing some lame reasons why the offense couldnt score points based on our teams lack of spectacular play,

    because we had no WR.

    maybe back then you were a Ghoolie disciple?

  • @walterwhite said:

    Agreed. I'll take O-line, D front 7 all day in this draft.

    A star WR isn't going to help us in the long run

    WTH - alot of us "old Browns fans" can recall the days - oh some 2000 posts or so of yours,

    decrying the fact that we had it all wrong - with you saying "screw the line(s), we need skilled position players"

    providing some lame reasons why the offense couldnt score points based on our teams lack of spectacular play,

    because we had no WR.

    maybe back then you were a Ghoolie disciple?

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #7

    @fairhooker11 said:

    WTH - alot of us "old Browns fans" can recall the days - oh some 2000 posts or so of yours...

  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #8

    It would not surprise me if the Browns take another RB in the mid rounds. Especially if the like of Tevin Coleman or Ameer Abdullah are available.

  • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
    #9

    So draft Devin Smith

    And Heuerman

    And Cardale next yea

    ... Ok

    Solidify the lines and grab a TE. Unless someone unexpectedly drops to 12

  • DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
    #10

    Hell freezes over.......

  • So draft Devin Smith

    And Heuerman

    And Cardale next yea

    ... Ok

    Solidify the lines and grab a TE. Unless someone unexpectedly drops to 12

    P Pumpkin Eater wrote on last edited by
    #11

    @mld-woody said:

    So draft Devin Smith

    And Heuerman

    And Cardale next yea

    ... Ok

    Solidify the lines and grab a TE. Unless someone unexpectedly drops to 12

    It's no worse than your michigan Devin Funchess faggotry.

  • C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
    #12

    well the year to take a WR was last year. It was top priority last year. Not this year. This year we have to take an OLB'er early cause we lost Sheard AND it's a really good draft year for hybrid type players.

  • @mld-woody said:

    So draft Devin Smith

    And Heuerman

    And Cardale next yea

    ... Ok

    Solidify the lines and grab a TE. Unless someone unexpectedly drops to 12

    It's no worse than your michigan Devin Funchess faggotry.

    MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by MLD Woody
    #13

    @pumpkin-eater said:

    It's no worse than your michigan Devin Funchess faggotry.

    Are you sure about that? I've said plenty of times I'm not even sure Funchess is a good fit here. I'm sorry I've talked about a prospect that can play two of our positions of need.

    But no, I'd say asking for multiple OSU draft picks, signing Tedd Ginn, then already declaring Cardale worth selling the farm for would be a little much.

    We all have our favorite teams, but lets be reasonable about it... but I can't say I've ever seen anything from you that would make me think you are capable of that.

    (oh, and for what its worth, the OP legitimately thinks the illuminati control our country)

  • well the year to take a WR was last year. It was top priority last year. Not this year. This year we have to take an OLB'er early cause we lost Sheard AND it's a really good draft year for hybrid type players.

    miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #14

    @clevfan4life said:

    well the year to take a WR was last year. It was top priority last year. Not this year. This year we have to take an OLB'er early cause we lost Sheard AND it's a really good draft year for hybrid type players.

    really? why is that? this draft is as deep as that in the WR class?

    because we signed dwayne bowe?

    no, i doubt we draft a WR in the first round (you never know), but to think farmer doesn't pick one somewhere along the line is insane.

    you must be talking about the browns' first pick. btw NT is more a position of need than OLB.

  • @mld-woody said:

    So draft Devin Smith

    And Heuerman

    And Cardale next yea

    ... Ok

    Solidify the lines and grab a TE. Unless someone unexpectedly drops to 12

    It's no worse than your michigan Devin Funchess faggotry.

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by tiamat63
    #15

    @pumpkin-eater said:

    It's no worse than your michigan Devin Funchess faggotry.

    I'm with Woody on this, he might be pro scUM and want Funchess - but he's cooled on that quite a bit. No reason to go over the top with name calling, man.

  • Browns149B Browns149 wrote on last edited by
    #16

    The Browns Could Have A Good Season If...

    The other 3 team in our division lose about 10 starters each

  • L larryfine wrote on last edited by
    #17

    WE could have just as good a season as the other three teams in our division. It depends on injuries and luck. If anyone on here don't believe this they can suck my smelly hairy balls!

  • miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #18

    i'd actually like funchess after all our other top priorities are taken care of.........

    too bad a receiver doesn't come with a 'good hands' guarantee.

  • W wargograw wrote on last edited by
    #19

    They do need to run the ball more. But I'm not sure about the Dallas comparison. They had a better QB, TE, WR1, WR2 (maybe not anymore with Bowe/Hartline), and RB than we do. And even the positions where we are strong (OL, Hawkins), they are better/comparable, respectively (Beasley in slot).

    We're a defensive team so that's probably not a realistic goal for us. They're pretty stacked in Dallas offensively.

  • gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by
    #20

    Build the Monster Defense. We can only score in the low 20's..