Skip to content

TP has been realesed by the Chiefs

Locked The Browns Board
173 33 4.8k
  • LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by

    Can thus be broken up into chapters? Flugel would even say this thread is longwinded.

  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by The Gipper

    And here you go:

    Coach Les Miles, HC LSU....from Elyria, Oh. and Michigan Univ.

    Coach Gary Pinkel HC Missouri....from Akron, Ohio via Kent St. Univ.

    Coach Mark Stoops HC Kentucky....from Youngstown, Ohio via Iowa Univ.

    Coach Nick Saban HC Alabama...from WVA via Kent State, Ohio

    Kevin Sumlin HC Tex. A&M...from Ala. via Purdue Univ.

    Butch Jones HC Tenn. ....from Saugatuck, Mich. and Central Mich.

    Dan Mullen HC Miss. St. ....from Drexel Hill PA and Ursinus College PA

    Mark Richt HC Georgia....from Omaha Nebraska via Miami Univ

    Bret Bielema HC Ark.....from Illinois via Univ. of Iowa

    Urban Meyer former FLA HC....from Ashtabula, Oh. via Ohio State

    But I guess the SEC did have to have a few token southerners coach their teams:

    Spurrier is from Floridaand Univ. of Florida

    Freeze from Mississippi via Southern Miss. U.

    Muschamp from Ga. and the Univ. of Georgia

    Malzahn from Texas via Henderston St. Univ. (Ark.)

    Hell, the SEC has as many coaches from little ole Kent State and more from the MAC as it has from the entire SEC conference.

  • tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by tiamat63

    So what you're saying is, the Northern coaches have to show the southerners how to play ball? Gotchya'.

  • U Unsympathetic wrote on last edited by Unsympathetic

    SEC use of medical hardship/transfer/etc to end the career after 1,2 years isn't "some minute tool" - it's their entire philosophy, and fits right with their use of oversigning. It's the other side of the coin. It's part of the Southern culture of abusing people because they can - aka the cultural self-justification of slavery - it's not right, and that's why the big10 won't do it. Not shockingly, the big10's model was not even considered by the SEC.

    I hate the SEC and the South because of that culture, and I will always root for OSU to run up the score on every SEC team at every opportunity.

  • gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by

    Move to college forum?

  • @wargograw said:

    A. That's not clear nor is it accurate. We look good because we had the best bowl record almost a decade running and because we just won 7 straight crystal balls. Among other things.

    I don't know about the bowl thing.....but you had specific teams win those titles. One or two great teams doesn't not a good conference make. If that were the case then it could be argued that the Big Ten is the best conference because it now holds the title.

    B. It had more upperclassmen talent, yes. Totally granted. We'll see how they do next year. IMO the SEC is slowly moving toward much more of a college basketballish "rent a player" model. No redshirts, three years for everyone, if you haven't proved yourself within two years you transfer.

    But regardless, you mention our apparently lousy bowl record last year when we were only #2 in the bowl standings, as opposed to our usual #1. Oh, whatever will we do with such a failure.

    I don't think it was that good. Show us the record.

    W wargograw wrote on last edited by

    @the-gipper said:

    @wargograw said:

    A. That's not clear nor is it accurate. We look good because we had the best bowl record almost a decade running and because we just won 7 straight crystal balls. Among other things.

    I don't know about the bowl thing.....but you had specific teams win those titles. One or two great teams doesn't not a good conference make. If that were the case then it could be argued that the Big Ten is the best conference because it now holds the title.

    B. It had more upperclassmen talent, yes. Totally granted. We'll see how they do next year. IMO the SEC is slowly moving toward much more of a college basketballish "rent a player" model. No redshirts, three years for everyone, if you haven't proved yourself within two years you transfer.

    But regardless, you mention our apparently lousy bowl record last year when we were only #2 in the bowl standings, as opposed to our usual #1. Oh, whatever will we do with such a failure.

    I don't think it was that good. Show us the record.

    We were 7-5, PAC was 6-2.

    During the streak, 4 different teams won natties. So no it's not all one team.

  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    Just to be fair, here are the origins of the Big Ten HCs:

    Urban Meyer HC Ohio St. ....born Ashtabula Oh, degrees at Cincinnati and Ohio St.

    Mark Dantonio HC Mich. St.....born El Paso Tx, degrees at South Carolina and Ohio U

    James Franklin HC Penn St....born Langhorne Pa, degree at Stroudsburg St.

    Pat Fitgerald HC Northwestern...born Chicago area degree at Northwestern

    Gary Anderson HC Wisconsin...born Salt Lake City, degree at Utah

    Mike Riley HC Nebraska....born in Idaho, degree at Alabama

    Jerry Kill HC Minnesota...born rural Kansas, degree at Southwestern Kansas

    Kirk Ferentz HC Iowa...born Royal Oak Mich, degree at Connecticut

    Jim Harbaugh HC Michigan...born Toledo, OH, degree at Michigan

    Randy Edsall HC Maryland...born in PA, degree at Syracuse

    Kevin Wilson HC Indiana...born in North Carolina, degree at North Carolina

    Kyle Flood HC Rutgers...born in Queens, degree at Iona

    Tim Beckman HC Illinois....born in Berea OH, degree at Findlay OH

    Darrell Hazell HC Purdue...born in New Jersey, degree at Muskingam College OH

  • @wargograw said:

    We average almost 80,000 people at every SEC game. Yes, we are "better fans." Get over it.

    The Top 5 schools in attendance in college football consists of 3 Big Ten Teams, 1 Big 12, and one SEC

    Yes, there is a difference. But Bama folks would still come away saying "we got a ranked win." Maybe you want to evaluate the records during that week and determine where exactly MSU deserved to be ranked? I mean since you're omniscient and all. I know that last year IIRC, there was only one team that made it to 7-0.

    Yes, by playing Southern Mississippi, UAB, So. Alabama,and UT Martin

    W wargograw wrote on last edited by

    @the-gipper said:

    @wargograw said:

    We average almost 80,000 people at every SEC game. Yes, we are "better fans." Get over it.

    The Top 5 schools in attendance in college football consists of 3 Big Ten Teams, 1 Big 12, and one SEC

    Yes, there is a difference. But Bama folks would still come away saying "we got a ranked win." Maybe you want to evaluate the records during that week and determine where exactly MSU deserved to be ranked? I mean since you're omniscient and all. I know that last year IIRC, there was only one team that made it to 7-0.

    Yes, by playing Southern Mississippi, UAB, So. Alabama,and UT Martin

    You can make the cutoff mark wherever you want. Who has more of the top 10? 15? 20? 25? Who has the highest average? I already said the Big 10 had three high quality, power programs. And after that, not much. Nebraska has the history and fan support but no longer has any local talent or national appeal.

    And yet very few other teams had the same record at that point, despite the fact that everyone plays weak comp early in the year.

  • @the-gipper said:

    @wargograw said:

    A. That's not clear nor is it accurate. We look good because we had the best bowl record almost a decade running and because we just won 7 straight crystal balls. Among other things.

    I don't know about the bowl thing.....but you had specific teams win those titles. One or two great teams doesn't not a good conference make. If that were the case then it could be argued that the Big Ten is the best conference because it now holds the title.

    B. It had more upperclassmen talent, yes. Totally granted. We'll see how they do next year. IMO the SEC is slowly moving toward much more of a college basketballish "rent a player" model. No redshirts, three years for everyone, if you haven't proved yourself within two years you transfer.

    But regardless, you mention our apparently lousy bowl record last year when we were only #2 in the bowl standings, as opposed to our usual #1. Oh, whatever will we do with such a failure.

    I don't think it was that good. Show us the record.

    We were 7-5, PAC was 6-2.

    During the streak, 4 different teams won natties. So no it's not all one team.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @wargograw said:

    We were 7-5, PAC was 6-2.

    During the streak, 4 different teams won natties. So no it's not all one team.

    We? You mean they. The only we that you can count is your alma mater.....and I assume that is A&M. How did they do?

  • @the-gipper said:

    @wargograw said:

    We average almost 80,000 people at every SEC game. Yes, we are "better fans." Get over it.

    The Top 5 schools in attendance in college football consists of 3 Big Ten Teams, 1 Big 12, and one SEC

    Yes, there is a difference. But Bama folks would still come away saying "we got a ranked win." Maybe you want to evaluate the records during that week and determine where exactly MSU deserved to be ranked? I mean since you're omniscient and all. I know that last year IIRC, there was only one team that made it to 7-0.

    Yes, by playing Southern Mississippi, UAB, So. Alabama,and UT Martin

    You can make the cutoff mark wherever you want. Who has more of the top 10? 15? 20? 25? Who has the highest average? I already said the Big 10 had three high quality, power programs. And after that, not much. Nebraska has the history and fan support but no longer has any local talent or national appeal.

    And yet very few other teams had the same record at that point, despite the fact that everyone plays weak comp early in the year.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @wargograw said:

    You can make the cutoff mark wherever you want. Who has more of the top 10? 15? 20? 25? Who has the highest average? I already said the Big 10 had three high quality, power programs. And after that, not much. Nebraska has the history and fan support but no longer has any local talent or national appeal.

    And yet very few other teams had the same record at that point, despite the fact that everyone plays weak comp early in the year.

    But for a conference that claims superiority they suffer from diabetes more than any other. No one other of the power conferences piles on the creampuffs and cupcakes like the SEC.

  • W wargograw wrote on last edited by

    A&M won its bowl.

    The best coaches definitely come from up north. Too bad you guys can't keep them up there.

    But doesn't the majority of SEC coaches being northerners blow up the theory that we're fine with treating players poorly just like we're fine with having slaves and treating them poorly?

    The randomness, patheticness, inconsistency, and General "throw crap against the wall to see what sticks" tenor of the attacks on the SEC are hilarious. There is no coherent argument other than "well we won the last national championship."

  • gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by

    So...move to the college forum?

  • SEC use of medical hardship/transfer/etc to end the career after 1,2 years isn't "some minute tool" - it's their entire philosophy, and fits right with their use of oversigning. It's the other side of the coin. It's part of the Southern culture of abusing people because they can - aka the cultural self-justification of slavery - it's not right, and that's why the big10 won't do it. Not shockingly, the big10's model was not even considered by the SEC.

    I hate the SEC and the South because of that culture, and I will always root for OSU to run up the score on every SEC team at every opportunity.

    MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by

    @unsympathetic said:

    SEC use of medical hardship/transfer/etc to end the career after 1,2 years isn't "some minute tool" - it's their entire philosophy, and fits right with their use of oversigning. It's the other side of the coin. It's part of the Southern culture of abusing people because they can - aka the cultural self-justification of slavery - it's not right, and that's why the big10 won't do it. Not shockingly, the big10's model was not even considered by the SEC.

    I hate the SEC and the South because of that culture, and I will always root for OSU to run up the score on every SEC team at every opportunity.

    Holy shit.

    Oversigning tied to slavery.

    Creative.

  • A&M won its bowl.

    The best coaches definitely come from up north. Too bad you guys can't keep them up there.

    But doesn't the majority of SEC coaches being northerners blow up the theory that we're fine with treating players poorly just like we're fine with having slaves and treating them poorly?

    The randomness, patheticness, inconsistency, and General "throw crap against the wall to see what sticks" tenor of the attacks on the SEC are hilarious. There is no coherent argument other than "well we won the last national championship."

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @wargograw said:

    A&M won its bowl.

    The best coaches definitely come from up north. Too bad you guys can't keep them up there.

    Well, coaches are human and susceptible to all that under the table money that gets thrown around down there.

    But doesn't the majority of SEC coaches being northerners blow up the theory that we're fine with treating players poorly just like we're fine with having slaves and treating them poorly?

    I don't think I was ever one that said that the SEC treated their players poorly....at least not while those players are there. I believe Woody's theory is that to the SEC players are a fungible commodity......discardable if they are perceived no longer useful. While I don't know if that is true, I guess it is plausible (and may happen at any number of other places). As to slavery, again, I never said they treated the players poorly....just that it was ironic that certain southerners want to use those grandsons of slaves as reason to pacify themselves over the loss of the Civil War. They probably treat the pretty well.

    The randomness, patheticness, inconsistency, and General "throw crap against the wall to see what sticks" tenor of the attacks on the SEC are hilarious. There is no coherent argument other than "well we won the last national championship."

    The SEC and its supporters open themselves up to attack by their ignorance, arrogance...and disreputable ways. You get what you pay for.

  • ColumbusKingC ColumbusKing wrote on last edited by

    Pryor officially is on the Bungles, but I see this thread has turned a corner.....

  • Pryor officially is on the Bungles, but I see this thread has turned a corner.....

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @columbusking said:

    Pryor officially is on the Bungles, but I see this thread has turned a corner.....

    The Bengals often do take the former Buckeyes that are the disjecta membra from other teams.

  • @wargograw said:

    A&M won its bowl.

    The best coaches definitely come from up north. Too bad you guys can't keep them up there.

    Well, coaches are human and susceptible to all that under the table money that gets thrown around down there.

    But doesn't the majority of SEC coaches being northerners blow up the theory that we're fine with treating players poorly just like we're fine with having slaves and treating them poorly?

    I don't think I was ever one that said that the SEC treated their players poorly....at least not while those players are there. I believe Woody's theory is that to the SEC players are a fungible commodity......discardable if they are perceived no longer useful. While I don't know if that is true, I guess it is plausible (and may happen at any number of other places). As to slavery, again, I never said they treated the players poorly....just that it was ironic that certain southerners want to use those grandsons of slaves as reason to pacify themselves over the loss of the Civil War. They probably treat the pretty well.

    The randomness, patheticness, inconsistency, and General "throw crap against the wall to see what sticks" tenor of the attacks on the SEC are hilarious. There is no coherent argument other than "well we won the last national championship."

    The SEC and its supporters open themselves up to attack by their ignorance, arrogance...and disreputable ways. You get what you pay for.

    W wargograw wrote on last edited by

    @the-gipper said:

    @wargograw said:

    A&M won its bowl.

    The best coaches definitely come from up north. Too bad you guys can't keep them up there.

    Well, coaches are human and susceptible to all that under the table money that gets thrown around down there.

    But doesn't the majority of SEC coaches being northerners blow up the theory that we're fine with treating players poorly just like we're fine with having slaves and treating them poorly?

    I don't think I was ever one that said that the SEC treated their players poorly....at least not while those players are there. I believe Woody's theory is that to the SEC players are a fungible commodity......discardable if they are perceived no longer useful. While I don't know if that is true, I guess it is plausible (and may happen at any number of other places). As to slavery, again, I never said they treated the players poorly....just that it was ironic that certain southerners want to use those grandsons of slaves as reason to pacify themselves over the loss of the Civil War. They probably treat the pretty well.

    The randomness, patheticness, inconsistency, and General "throw crap against the wall to see what sticks" tenor of the attacks on the SEC are hilarious. There is no coherent argument other than "well we won the last national championship."

    The SEC and its supporters open themselves up to attack by their ignorance, arrogance...and disreputable ways. You get what you pay for.

    It's not under the table. The SEC pays coaches very handsomely. That is on the record and "books," not off of them.

    Fine, I can't tie you to the slavery position stated a page or so ago. But whoever did take that position saw their theory blown up by seeing the birthplaces of SEC coaches.

    Yes they are commodities. They're on scholarship for the entertainment of the students and alumni, to present a "face" for the school, and to bring it prestige. If you can turn them into good people, great. But to me that's not the goal of the program. Just a difference of opinion. We can agree to disagree on the purpose of college football. But that doesn't mean other conferences are just as good on the field. They're just better at other things.

  • @the-gipper said:

    @wargograw said:

    A&M won its bowl.

    The best coaches definitely come from up north. Too bad you guys can't keep them up there.

    Well, coaches are human and susceptible to all that under the table money that gets thrown around down there.

    But doesn't the majority of SEC coaches being northerners blow up the theory that we're fine with treating players poorly just like we're fine with having slaves and treating them poorly?

    I don't think I was ever one that said that the SEC treated their players poorly....at least not while those players are there. I believe Woody's theory is that to the SEC players are a fungible commodity......discardable if they are perceived no longer useful. While I don't know if that is true, I guess it is plausible (and may happen at any number of other places). As to slavery, again, I never said they treated the players poorly....just that it was ironic that certain southerners want to use those grandsons of slaves as reason to pacify themselves over the loss of the Civil War. They probably treat the pretty well.

    The randomness, patheticness, inconsistency, and General "throw crap against the wall to see what sticks" tenor of the attacks on the SEC are hilarious. There is no coherent argument other than "well we won the last national championship."

    The SEC and its supporters open themselves up to attack by their ignorance, arrogance...and disreputable ways. You get what you pay for.

    It's not under the table. The SEC pays coaches very handsomely. That is on the record and "books," not off of them.

    Fine, I can't tie you to the slavery position stated a page or so ago. But whoever did take that position saw their theory blown up by seeing the birthplaces of SEC coaches.

    Yes they are commodities. They're on scholarship for the entertainment of the students and alumni, to present a "face" for the school, and to bring it prestige. If you can turn them into good people, great. But to me that's not the goal of the program. Just a difference of opinion. We can agree to disagree on the purpose of college football. But that doesn't mean other conferences are just as good on the field. They're just better at other things.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by The Gipper

    @wargograw said:

    It's not under the table. The SEC pays coaches very handsomely. That is on the record and "books," not off of them.

    OK, right, the coaches are paid above the table, the players below.

    Fine, I can't tie you to the slavery position stated a page or so ago. But whoever did take that position saw their theory blown up by seeing the birthplaces of SEC coaches.

    I AM the one that said that some southern douchebags think that having good SEC football teams somehow makes up for losing the Civil War. And I said that it is the sons of those former slaves.....the institution that the South fought so hard to protect and retain...that is "winning" that battle for you.

    But I never equated those players current situation to slavery. No, they are all getting paid like good employees/independent contractors/capitalists.

    Yes they are commodities. They're on scholarship for the entertainment of the students and alumni, to present a "face" for the school, and to bring it prestige. If you can turn them into good people, great. But to me that's not the goal of the program. Just a difference of opinion. We can agree to disagree on the purpose of college football. But that doesn't mean other conferences are just as good on the field. They're just better at other things.

    Well, players may be commodities at other schools/conferences. Its just that the SEC is most blatant about it.

    But, here is a FYI for you....sort of changing the topic. As I told you before my daughter goes to Trinity there in SA. My sister in law lives there and while she was in HS we visited the in-laws and my daughter loved the area and like the school...so she chose to go there. Well, another branch of the in-laws family also lives in that area and a couple of their boys go to TAMU. Apparently they faced the music and knew they could not get into Trinity. Well, when my daughter got accepted and enrolled in Trinity apparently there was a fair amount of jealousy and resentment over it because of the feeling that they would not be qualified. Some of their thinking was that my daughter was never good enough to get in or make it there. Well, she got in, and is making it. (though I will say her grades need to be better). The worst of the bunch may actually be her own aunt...my wife's sister. She has a serious vanity streak and hates for it to be perceived that someone is getting by better than her. What should have been an occasion of pride for her became a reason for her to be resentful.

  • W wargograw wrote on last edited by

    I know what you said about slavery (and disagree). I was referring to whoever said we treat our players badly because we treat people badly in general, just like "we" treated the slaves.

  • P Pumpkin Eater wrote on last edited by

    I'm going to go get some popcorn