Hillary lying again
-
Claims Republicans are deliberately disenfranchising voters.
Liberals, blacks, eat up the shit she's dishing out. Ignorance is power. And the democrat party has the monopoly on it.
Has nothing to do with rampant voter fraud,...illegals and felons voting, democrat voters voting multiple times, registered democrats voting that are deceased.
Her sheer ugliness alone should shun people away from voting for her.
http://nypost.com/2015/06/05/clinton-accuses-gop-rivals-of-making-it-difficult-to-vote/
-
We have rampant voter fraud?
-
Not provable at all, if the dems and the grass fairies get their way.
But it is there.
-
Voter fraud is not as wide spread as some would think. However, in the areas it exists, it is rampant. The southern counties in WV have problems with it every election but it seems to only effect local elections.
-
What is this proof of residency that wisonsin is wanting voters to furnish at the polls? Is it just your drivers license? If so I don't understand liberals having a problem with people furnishing their drivers license to vote. If you have to start toting around a portfolio of work history and rent payment stubs than ok, I see their point.
-
What is this proof of residency that wisonsin is wanting voters to furnish at the polls? Is it just your drivers license? If so I don't understand liberals having a problem with people furnishing their drivers license to vote. If you have to start toting around a portfolio of work history and rent payment stubs than ok, I see their point.
What is this proof of residency that wisonsin is wanting voters to furnish at the polls? Is it just your drivers license? If so I don't understand liberals having a problem with people furnishing their drivers license to vote. If you have to start toting around a portfolio of work history and rent payment stubs than ok, I see their point.
The problem with showing a drivers license, is you have to PAY for that license. And according to the Constitution, no one should be forced to pay a tax to vote. I believe it's the 14th and 24th amendment
If you want to give everyone a state ID for free, then I'm all for voters showing ID, but if we have to pay for the ID then NO
-
What is this proof of residency that wisonsin is wanting voters to furnish at the polls? Is it just your drivers license? If so I don't understand liberals having a problem with people furnishing their drivers license to vote. If you have to start toting around a portfolio of work history and rent payment stubs than ok, I see their point.
The problem with showing a drivers license, is you have to PAY for that license. And according to the Constitution, no one should be forced to pay a tax to vote. I believe it's the 14th and 24th amendment
If you want to give everyone a state ID for free, then I'm all for voters showing ID, but if we have to pay for the ID then NO
The problem with showing a drivers license, is you have to PAY for that license. And according to the Constitution, no one should be forced to pay a tax to vote. I believe it's the 14th and 24th amendment
If you want to give everyone a state ID for free, then I'm all for voters showing ID, but if we have to pay for the ID then NO
I dunno. A drivers liscense or state ID is so fundamental, I mean you can't do "anything" in this country without something like that. So there's really no reason someone shouldn't have one. None at all unless they're not legal. In which case neither reps or dems should want them to vote. Do we really want to have a situation where a foreign country could "theoretically" fly in 10's of thousands of "tourists" in order to influence some local election?
-
The problem with showing a drivers license, is you have to PAY for that license. And according to the Constitution, no one should be forced to pay a tax to vote. I believe it's the 14th and 24th amendment
If you want to give everyone a state ID for free, then I'm all for voters showing ID, but if we have to pay for the ID then NO
I dunno. A drivers liscense or state ID is so fundamental, I mean you can't do "anything" in this country without something like that. So there's really no reason someone shouldn't have one. None at all unless they're not legal. In which case neither reps or dems should want them to vote. Do we really want to have a situation where a foreign country could "theoretically" fly in 10's of thousands of "tourists" in order to influence some local election?
I dunno. A drivers liscense or state ID is so fundamental, I mean you can't do "anything" in this country without something like that. So there's really no reason someone shouldn't have one. None at all unless they're not legal. In which case neither reps or dems should want them to vote. Do we really want to have a situation where a foreign country could "theoretically" fly in 10's of thousands of "tourists" in order to influence some local election?
You can vote without one. And that's one, if not the MOST, fundamental rights we have.
Making someone pay for something so they can vote is UNCONSTITUTIONAL
-
I dunno. A drivers liscense or state ID is so fundamental, I mean you can't do "anything" in this country without something like that. So there's really no reason someone shouldn't have one. None at all unless they're not legal. In which case neither reps or dems should want them to vote. Do we really want to have a situation where a foreign country could "theoretically" fly in 10's of thousands of "tourists" in order to influence some local election?
You can vote without one. And that's one, if not the MOST, fundamental rights we have.
Making someone pay for something so they can vote is UNCONSTITUTIONAL
You can vote without one. And that's one, if not the MOST, fundamental rights we have.
Making someone pay for something so they can vote is UNCONSTITUTIONAL
I do see your point but being able to vote without any ID whatsoever? In this day and age? Back then someone would have had to go on a sea voyage to get in here and vote illegally. Now not so much right?
-
You can vote without one. And that's one, if not the MOST, fundamental rights we have.
Making someone pay for something so they can vote is UNCONSTITUTIONAL
I do see your point but being able to vote without any ID whatsoever? In this day and age? Back then someone would have had to go on a sea voyage to get in here and vote illegally. Now not so much right?
I do see your point but being able to vote without any ID whatsoever? In this day and age? Back then someone would have had to go on a sea voyage to get in here and vote illegally. Now not so much right?
I do agree an ID should be required to vote, but that ID should cost nothing.
If you have to pay for it, then you CAN NOT be required to have one.
-
And if you think the states are going to give up that money from ID's, you are crazy
-
I believe in photo voter ID to vote but also that should be made available free of charge to those who don't have one. If they lose it or misplace it however it then should be their responsibility to replace it.
-
Turnout is typically around 55% before we start about talking about voter ID we should worry about voter participation.
-
Turnout is typically around 55% before we start about talking about voter ID we should worry about voter participation.
Turnout is typically around 55% before we start about talking about voter ID we should worry about voter participation.
The less idiots that participate, the happier I am.
WSS
-
Turnout is typically around 55% before we start about talking about voter ID we should worry about voter participation.
The less idiots that participate, the happier I am.
WSS
The less idiots that participate, the happier I am.
WSS
I would agree but unfortunately those that vote don't take a common sense test. The same people that supported "Trickle Down Economics" believe in the benevolence of corporate America and capitalism.
-
The less idiots that participate, the happier I am.
WSS
I would agree but unfortunately those that vote don't take a common sense test. The same people that supported "Trickle Down Economics" believe in the benevolence of corporate America and capitalism.
I would agree but unfortunately those that vote don't take a common sense test. The same people that supported "Trickle Down Economics" believe in the benevolence of corporate America and capitalism.
Well then getting more stupid people to vote is well, stupid.
A good common sense question to ask would be is why a voter ID is important. If they cant answer they are too stupid to vote..
-
I would agree but unfortunately those that vote don't take a common sense test. The same people that supported "Trickle Down Economics" believe in the benevolence of corporate America and capitalism.
Well then getting more stupid people to vote is well, stupid.
A good common sense question to ask would be is why a voter ID is important. If they cant answer they are too stupid to vote..
Stuart said:
Well then getting more stupid people to vote is well, stupid.
A good common sense question to ask would be is why a voter ID is important. If they cant answer they are too stupid to vote..
It IS important,
but it should also be FREE of a tax,
atleast according to our CONSTITUTION
"And they don't really know even what they're talkin' about And I can't imagine what empty heads can achieve." -
The less idiots that participate, the happier I am.
WSS
I would agree but unfortunately those that vote don't take a common sense test. The same people that supported "Trickle Down Economics" believe in the benevolence of corporate America and capitalism.
I would agree but unfortunately those that vote don't take a common sense test. The same people that supported "Trickle Down Economics" believe in the benevolence of corporate America and capitalism.
But I consider myself reasonably well informed and I have no problem with trickle down economics. I believe a rising tide floats all boats.
WSS
-
I would agree but unfortunately those that vote don't take a common sense test. The same people that supported "Trickle Down Economics" believe in the benevolence of corporate America and capitalism.
But I consider myself reasonably well informed and I have no problem with trickle down economics. I believe a rising tide floats all boats.
WSS
But I consider myself reasonably well informed and I have no problem with trickle down economics. I believe a rising tide floats all boats.
WSS
I believe you have to have lived under Jimmy Carter to appreciate Ronald Reagan. Reagan inherited a mess from Carter and his supply side economics (trickle down to the critics) worked better than anyone could even have imagined. It created huge job growth and prosperity and I believe as well that a rising tide raises all boats and we saw it happen with Reagan.
Obama inherited a mess in 08 but has he made this country any better in over 6 years? His policies have only made things worse. His stimulus was billions of dollars spent with little to show for it. The national debt has increased to over 18 trillion dollars. We have a community organizer for a president and his lack of experience has shown. Reagan was not just a hollywood actor when he was elected but he had already been governor of California for 2 terms.
-
Stuart said:
Well then getting more stupid people to vote is well, stupid.
A good common sense question to ask would be is why a voter ID is important. If they cant answer they are too stupid to vote..
It IS important,
but it should also be FREE of a tax,
atleast according to our CONSTITUTION
It IS important,
but it should also be FREE of a tax,
atleast according to our CONSTITUTION
This is why we are fucked up.
Having a voter ID is now considered a tax?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login