Skip to content

***Official Browns Vs Broncos Game Day Thread***

The Browns Board
293 48 8.0k
  • @baconhound said:

    A good friend who is a huge Broncos fan admits they are beating the dregs right now.

    Oh...well that settles it. If your friend says so then it has to be true. They're still 6-0 and are in a shitty division, they're going to easily win the west and have a home game in the first round of the playoffs. The defense is legit and can carry them a long way, even with Manning playing poorly.

    B BaconHound wrote on last edited by

    @mark-o said:

    Oh...well that settles it. If your friend says so then it has to be true. They're still 6-0 and are in a shitty division, they're going to easily win the west and have a home game in the first round of the playoffs. The defense is legit and can carry them a long way, even with Manning playing poorly.

    They went like 27 drives without an offensive TD. They only score 1 offensive TD against a pourous Browns D missing two starting cornerbacks. Manning is a shotgun QB being asked to bootleg all the time. Their offensive line is the worst it's been on years. Manning looked like they lost in the postgame presser. I could go on and on.

  • DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by

    Bottom line, if fat ass Pettine had gone for 1 instead of 2, we would have 1, capish?

  • @mark-o said:

    Oh...well that settles it. If your friend says so then it has to be true. They're still 6-0 and are in a shitty division, they're going to easily win the west and have a home game in the first round of the playoffs. The defense is legit and can carry them a long way, even with Manning playing poorly.

    They went like 27 drives without an offensive TD. They only score 1 offensive TD against a pourous Browns D missing two starting cornerbacks. Manning is a shotgun QB being asked to bootleg all the time. Their offensive line is the worst it's been on years. Manning looked like they lost in the postgame presser. I could go on and on.

    Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by

    @baconhound said:

    They went like 27 drives without an offensive TD. They only score 1 offensive TD against a pourous Browns D missing two starting cornerbacks. Manning is a shotgun QB being asked to bootleg all the time. Their offensive line is the worst it's been on years. Manning looked like they lost in the postgame presser. I could go on and on.

    Go on and on all you want. They're 6-0 and in a shitty division. They will win the west and play a home playoff game. The defense will keep them in every game against every team except for possibly New England.

  • Bottom line, if fat ass Pettine had gone for 1 instead of 2, we would have 1, capish?

    Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Bottom line, if fat ass Pettine had gone for 1 instead of 2, we would have 1, capish?

    Thanks captain hindsight....

    According to you, if we played drunk Johnny, we would've won easily right? Kinda wish we would've...that pass rush would've killed him and all his faggot fanboys could go back to whereever they came from.

  • Bottom line, if fat ass Pettine had gone for 1 instead of 2, we would have 1, capish?

    OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Bottom line, if fat ass Pettine had gone for 1 instead of 2, we would have 1, capish?

    Denver would have went for 2 when they scored (seconds later). Maybe they would have gotten it or not?

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Bottom line, if fat ass Pettine had gone for 1 instead of 2, we would have 1, capish?

    Thanks captain hindsight....

    According to you, if we played drunk Johnny, we would've won easily right? Kinda wish we would've...that pass rush would've killed him and all his faggot fanboys could go back to whereever they came from.

    DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by

    @mark-o said:

    Thanks captain hindsight....

    According to you, if we played drunk Johnny, we would've won easily right? Kinda wish we would've...that pass rush would've killed him and all his faggot fanboys could go back to whereever they came from.

    Right, because McCown is so mobile, lol.

  • @mark-o said:

    Thanks captain hindsight....

    According to you, if we played drunk Johnny, we would've won easily right? Kinda wish we would've...that pass rush would've killed him and all his faggot fanboys could go back to whereever they came from.

    Right, because McCown is so mobile, lol.

    Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Right, because McCown is so mobile, lol.

    McCown is a pro. Drunk Johnny is a midget who can't see over the line.

  • Bottom line, if fat ass Pettine had gone for 1 instead of 2, we would have 1, capish?

    Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Bottom line, if fat ass Pettine had gone for 1 instead of 2, we would have 1, capish?

    Because the Broncos surely wouldn't have gone for 2 after their touchdown, right?

  • Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by

    Manziel would have thrown that fourth quarter INT better.

  • @baconhound said:

    17 on the defense, without one of their best players, and Denver is not even a top 5 NFL team.

    Wins vs Tennessee & Baltimore

    Losses vs Oakland, San Diego & Denver

    Nothing has really changed

    6-0 puts them in the top 5. Yes they were without one of their best players on defense but the Browns were without 2 so every team has injuries.

    slimdawgS slimdawg wrote on last edited by

    @mark-o said:

    6-0 puts them in the top 5. Yes they were without one of their best players on defense but the Browns were without 2 so every team has injuries.

    Every single person in here would be shitting all over themselves if we were 6-0 regardless of how shitty the team looked getting there, hell id give the ol' left nut prolly. Its all about the W's when its all said and done and Denver is now 6-0. God i wish we were that bad.....

  • Have they sacked Manning today? Have we found a running back in Turbin?

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by hoorta

    @opal312 said:

    Have they sacked Manning today? Have we found a running back in Turbin?

    Better question is- did the Brown's defense even TOUCH Manning all game?

    @tour2ma said:

    Bad call on the 2-point try. Kicking the PAT at least shifts the 2-pt pressure to Denver.

    Based upon what I saw line, our interior OL simply did not keep pressure out of McC's face. But we shall see...

    Several serious breakdowns got McCown killed- especially the lost fumble.

    @mark-o said:

    Jesus....bunch of whiny pussies in here.

    I want to win these damn games- too bad if you just like artistic losses. I'm F***ing tired of these "close no cigar" games. We had it when Mingo intercepted that pass- then we put it in full reverse.

    @medicineman said:

    We held our own but imo we screwed the pooch when we had it at the 40 and go back 28 yards and punt. We had it. We fucking had it

    what I just said.

  • Bottom line, if fat ass Pettine had gone for 1 instead of 2, we would have 1, capish?

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by Tour2ma

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Bottom line, if fat ass Pettine had gone for 1 instead of 2, we would have 1, capish?

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Because the Broncos surely wouldn't have gone for 2 after their touchdown, right?

    Thank you, TCPO, for taking the torch and carrying on...

    Carry on...

    @hoorta said:

    Better question is- did the Brown's defense even TOUCH Manning all game?

    Touch? Yes, Meder did. Impact? No.

    h,

    Was it as quiet at the game as it seemed during the broadcast? Saw a lot of shots of fans yelling late, but could still hear Manning over the crowd.

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Bottom line, if fat ass Pettine had gone for 1 instead of 2, we would have 1, capish?

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Because the Broncos surely wouldn't have gone for 2 after their touchdown, right?

    Thank you, TCPO, for taking the torch and carrying on...

    Carry on...

    @hoorta said:

    Better question is- did the Brown's defense even TOUCH Manning all game?

    Touch? Yes, Meder did. Impact? No.

    h,

    Was it as quiet at the game as it seemed during the broadcast? Saw a lot of shots of fans yelling late, but could still hear Manning over the crowd.

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by

    @tour2ma said:

    Thank you, TCPO, for taking the torch and carrying on...

    However, kicking the extra point and forcing the other team to execute a two point conversion seems much more appealing to me.

    I like the odds of asking the Donkeys to have to makes plays as opposed forcing a 2pt try when it was not needed.

  • Bad call on the 2-point try. Kicking the PAT at least shifts the 2-pt pressure to Denver.

    Based upon what I saw line, our interior OL simply did not keep pressure out of McC's face. But we shall see...

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by

    Exactly, tia...

    @tour2ma said:

    Bad call on the 2-point try. Kicking the PAT at least shifts the 2-pt pressure to Denver.

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Bottom line, if fat ass Pettine had gone for 1 instead of 2, we would have 1, capish?

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Because the Broncos surely wouldn't have gone for 2 after their touchdown, right?

    Thank you, TCPO, for taking the torch and carrying on...

    Carry on...

    @hoorta said:

    Better question is- did the Brown's defense even TOUCH Manning all game?

    Touch? Yes, Meder did. Impact? No.

    h,

    Was it as quiet at the game as it seemed during the broadcast? Saw a lot of shots of fans yelling late, but could still hear Manning over the crowd.

    DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by

    @tour2ma said:

    Thank you, TCPO, for taking the torch and carrying on...

    Carry on...

    Touch? Yes, Meder did. Impact? No.

    h,

    Was it as quiet at the game as it seemed during the broadcast? Saw a lot of shots of fans yelling late, but could still hear Manning over the crowd.

    You've got to be a gay mother fucker.

  • @tour2ma said:

    Thank you, TCPO, for taking the torch and carrying on...

    Carry on...

    Touch? Yes, Meder did. Impact? No.

    h,

    Was it as quiet at the game as it seemed during the broadcast? Saw a lot of shots of fans yelling late, but could still hear Manning over the crowd.

    You've got to be a gay mother fucker.

    Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    You've got to be a gay mother fucker.

    thought you were leaving?

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Bottom line, if fat ass Pettine had gone for 1 instead of 2, we would have 1, capish?

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Because the Broncos surely wouldn't have gone for 2 after their touchdown, right?

    Thank you, TCPO, for taking the torch and carrying on...

    Carry on...

    @hoorta said:

    Better question is- did the Brown's defense even TOUCH Manning all game?

    Touch? Yes, Meder did. Impact? No.

    h,

    Was it as quiet at the game as it seemed during the broadcast? Saw a lot of shots of fans yelling late, but could still hear Manning over the crowd.

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by

    @tour2ma said:

    h,

    Was it as quiet at the game as it seemed during the broadcast? Saw a lot of shots of fans yelling late, but could still hear Manning over the crowd.

    Yeah- much less enthused opposed to the Titans game. There were a ton of Fairweather Front running Broncos\Manning lovers in attendance.

  • W Why wrote on last edited by

    Just got home from the game and for once I actually felt the Browns had as good a chance to win as lose . . . Which is a step in the right direction. But coaching is still killing us.

    Beyond the decision to go for 2, which I questioned, but at least could see the reasoning, the overtime period was amateur hour. Our D couldn't get up to the line or get off the field in time (because we have to switch our lineman every play), it was on coaching to call the time out and get that shit corrected. The fact we didn't have a chance to kick the game winning field goal after intercepting on their 39 lays completely at the feet of the coaching staff. Why on god's green earth do you call the most risky running play in the book on first down in that situation. I know we have a rookie kicker, but you run up the middle a couple times and hopefully gain 6 yards and you at least have a shot. Pettine having no faith in his players unless they are grizzled veterans is costing this team.

  • tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by

    Re: Our defense. That over call O'Neil likes to give. We need to more work on holding the backside contain and filling the B gap. Might have been game speed and I missed it, but it felt like several times Mingo, Kirksey just didn't fill and after Manning would audible to the weakside, Denver would make it a solid gain.

  • W Why

    Just got home from the game and for once I actually felt the Browns had as good a chance to win as lose . . . Which is a step in the right direction. But coaching is still killing us.

    Beyond the decision to go for 2, which I questioned, but at least could see the reasoning, the overtime period was amateur hour. Our D couldn't get up to the line or get off the field in time (because we have to switch our lineman every play), it was on coaching to call the time out and get that shit corrected. The fact we didn't have a chance to kick the game winning field goal after intercepting on their 39 lays completely at the feet of the coaching staff. Why on god's green earth do you call the most risky running play in the book on first down in that situation. I know we have a rookie kicker, but you run up the middle a couple times and hopefully gain 6 yards and you at least have a shot. Pettine having no faith in his players unless they are grizzled veterans is costing this team.

    B browns52 wrote on last edited by

    @why said:

    Just got home from the game and for once I actually felt the Browns had as good a chance to win as lose . . . Which is a step in the right direction. But coaching is still killing us.

    Beyond the decision to go for 2, which I questioned, but at least could see the reasoning, the overtime period was amateur hour. Our D couldn't get up to the line or get off the field in time (because we have to switch our lineman every play), it was on coaching to call the time out and get that shit corrected. The fact we didn't have a chance to kick the game winning field goal after intercepting on their 39 lays completely at the feet of the coaching staff. Why on god's green earth do you call the most risky running play in the book on first down in that situation. I know we have a rookie kicker, but you run up the middle a couple times and hopefully gain 6 yards and you at least have a shot. Pettine having no faith in his players unless they are grizzled veterans is costing this team.

    i have not read every post but my first post was why the f did we run turbin to the outside...that was the play that cost us the game at that point..whoever called itneeds to get their ass kicked......jeez....