Skip to content

***Official Browns Vs Broncos Game Day Thread***

The Browns Board
293 48 8.0k
  • Bottom line, if fat ass Pettine had gone for 1 instead of 2, we would have 1, capish?

    Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Bottom line, if fat ass Pettine had gone for 1 instead of 2, we would have 1, capish?

    Thanks captain hindsight....

    According to you, if we played drunk Johnny, we would've won easily right? Kinda wish we would've...that pass rush would've killed him and all his faggot fanboys could go back to whereever they came from.

  • Bottom line, if fat ass Pettine had gone for 1 instead of 2, we would have 1, capish?

    OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Bottom line, if fat ass Pettine had gone for 1 instead of 2, we would have 1, capish?

    Denver would have went for 2 when they scored (seconds later). Maybe they would have gotten it or not?

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Bottom line, if fat ass Pettine had gone for 1 instead of 2, we would have 1, capish?

    Thanks captain hindsight....

    According to you, if we played drunk Johnny, we would've won easily right? Kinda wish we would've...that pass rush would've killed him and all his faggot fanboys could go back to whereever they came from.

    DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by

    @mark-o said:

    Thanks captain hindsight....

    According to you, if we played drunk Johnny, we would've won easily right? Kinda wish we would've...that pass rush would've killed him and all his faggot fanboys could go back to whereever they came from.

    Right, because McCown is so mobile, lol.

  • @mark-o said:

    Thanks captain hindsight....

    According to you, if we played drunk Johnny, we would've won easily right? Kinda wish we would've...that pass rush would've killed him and all his faggot fanboys could go back to whereever they came from.

    Right, because McCown is so mobile, lol.

    Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Right, because McCown is so mobile, lol.

    McCown is a pro. Drunk Johnny is a midget who can't see over the line.

  • Bottom line, if fat ass Pettine had gone for 1 instead of 2, we would have 1, capish?

    Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Bottom line, if fat ass Pettine had gone for 1 instead of 2, we would have 1, capish?

    Because the Broncos surely wouldn't have gone for 2 after their touchdown, right?

  • Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by

    Manziel would have thrown that fourth quarter INT better.

  • @baconhound said:

    17 on the defense, without one of their best players, and Denver is not even a top 5 NFL team.

    Wins vs Tennessee & Baltimore

    Losses vs Oakland, San Diego & Denver

    Nothing has really changed

    6-0 puts them in the top 5. Yes they were without one of their best players on defense but the Browns were without 2 so every team has injuries.

    slimdawgS slimdawg wrote on last edited by

    @mark-o said:

    6-0 puts them in the top 5. Yes they were without one of their best players on defense but the Browns were without 2 so every team has injuries.

    Every single person in here would be shitting all over themselves if we were 6-0 regardless of how shitty the team looked getting there, hell id give the ol' left nut prolly. Its all about the W's when its all said and done and Denver is now 6-0. God i wish we were that bad.....

  • Have they sacked Manning today? Have we found a running back in Turbin?

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by hoorta

    @opal312 said:

    Have they sacked Manning today? Have we found a running back in Turbin?

    Better question is- did the Brown's defense even TOUCH Manning all game?

    @tour2ma said:

    Bad call on the 2-point try. Kicking the PAT at least shifts the 2-pt pressure to Denver.

    Based upon what I saw line, our interior OL simply did not keep pressure out of McC's face. But we shall see...

    Several serious breakdowns got McCown killed- especially the lost fumble.

    @mark-o said:

    Jesus....bunch of whiny pussies in here.

    I want to win these damn games- too bad if you just like artistic losses. I'm F***ing tired of these "close no cigar" games. We had it when Mingo intercepted that pass- then we put it in full reverse.

    @medicineman said:

    We held our own but imo we screwed the pooch when we had it at the 40 and go back 28 yards and punt. We had it. We fucking had it

    what I just said.

  • Bottom line, if fat ass Pettine had gone for 1 instead of 2, we would have 1, capish?

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by Tour2ma

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Bottom line, if fat ass Pettine had gone for 1 instead of 2, we would have 1, capish?

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Because the Broncos surely wouldn't have gone for 2 after their touchdown, right?

    Thank you, TCPO, for taking the torch and carrying on...

    Carry on...

    @hoorta said:

    Better question is- did the Brown's defense even TOUCH Manning all game?

    Touch? Yes, Meder did. Impact? No.

    h,

    Was it as quiet at the game as it seemed during the broadcast? Saw a lot of shots of fans yelling late, but could still hear Manning over the crowd.

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Bottom line, if fat ass Pettine had gone for 1 instead of 2, we would have 1, capish?

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Because the Broncos surely wouldn't have gone for 2 after their touchdown, right?

    Thank you, TCPO, for taking the torch and carrying on...

    Carry on...

    @hoorta said:

    Better question is- did the Brown's defense even TOUCH Manning all game?

    Touch? Yes, Meder did. Impact? No.

    h,

    Was it as quiet at the game as it seemed during the broadcast? Saw a lot of shots of fans yelling late, but could still hear Manning over the crowd.

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by

    @tour2ma said:

    Thank you, TCPO, for taking the torch and carrying on...

    However, kicking the extra point and forcing the other team to execute a two point conversion seems much more appealing to me.

    I like the odds of asking the Donkeys to have to makes plays as opposed forcing a 2pt try when it was not needed.

  • Bad call on the 2-point try. Kicking the PAT at least shifts the 2-pt pressure to Denver.

    Based upon what I saw line, our interior OL simply did not keep pressure out of McC's face. But we shall see...

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by

    Exactly, tia...

    @tour2ma said:

    Bad call on the 2-point try. Kicking the PAT at least shifts the 2-pt pressure to Denver.

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Bottom line, if fat ass Pettine had gone for 1 instead of 2, we would have 1, capish?

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Because the Broncos surely wouldn't have gone for 2 after their touchdown, right?

    Thank you, TCPO, for taking the torch and carrying on...

    Carry on...

    @hoorta said:

    Better question is- did the Brown's defense even TOUCH Manning all game?

    Touch? Yes, Meder did. Impact? No.

    h,

    Was it as quiet at the game as it seemed during the broadcast? Saw a lot of shots of fans yelling late, but could still hear Manning over the crowd.

    DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by

    @tour2ma said:

    Thank you, TCPO, for taking the torch and carrying on...

    Carry on...

    Touch? Yes, Meder did. Impact? No.

    h,

    Was it as quiet at the game as it seemed during the broadcast? Saw a lot of shots of fans yelling late, but could still hear Manning over the crowd.

    You've got to be a gay mother fucker.

  • @tour2ma said:

    Thank you, TCPO, for taking the torch and carrying on...

    Carry on...

    Touch? Yes, Meder did. Impact? No.

    h,

    Was it as quiet at the game as it seemed during the broadcast? Saw a lot of shots of fans yelling late, but could still hear Manning over the crowd.

    You've got to be a gay mother fucker.

    Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    You've got to be a gay mother fucker.

    thought you were leaving?

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Bottom line, if fat ass Pettine had gone for 1 instead of 2, we would have 1, capish?

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Because the Broncos surely wouldn't have gone for 2 after their touchdown, right?

    Thank you, TCPO, for taking the torch and carrying on...

    Carry on...

    @hoorta said:

    Better question is- did the Brown's defense even TOUCH Manning all game?

    Touch? Yes, Meder did. Impact? No.

    h,

    Was it as quiet at the game as it seemed during the broadcast? Saw a lot of shots of fans yelling late, but could still hear Manning over the crowd.

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by

    @tour2ma said:

    h,

    Was it as quiet at the game as it seemed during the broadcast? Saw a lot of shots of fans yelling late, but could still hear Manning over the crowd.

    Yeah- much less enthused opposed to the Titans game. There were a ton of Fairweather Front running Broncos\Manning lovers in attendance.

  • W Why wrote on last edited by

    Just got home from the game and for once I actually felt the Browns had as good a chance to win as lose . . . Which is a step in the right direction. But coaching is still killing us.

    Beyond the decision to go for 2, which I questioned, but at least could see the reasoning, the overtime period was amateur hour. Our D couldn't get up to the line or get off the field in time (because we have to switch our lineman every play), it was on coaching to call the time out and get that shit corrected. The fact we didn't have a chance to kick the game winning field goal after intercepting on their 39 lays completely at the feet of the coaching staff. Why on god's green earth do you call the most risky running play in the book on first down in that situation. I know we have a rookie kicker, but you run up the middle a couple times and hopefully gain 6 yards and you at least have a shot. Pettine having no faith in his players unless they are grizzled veterans is costing this team.

  • tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by

    Re: Our defense. That over call O'Neil likes to give. We need to more work on holding the backside contain and filling the B gap. Might have been game speed and I missed it, but it felt like several times Mingo, Kirksey just didn't fill and after Manning would audible to the weakside, Denver would make it a solid gain.

  • W Why

    Just got home from the game and for once I actually felt the Browns had as good a chance to win as lose . . . Which is a step in the right direction. But coaching is still killing us.

    Beyond the decision to go for 2, which I questioned, but at least could see the reasoning, the overtime period was amateur hour. Our D couldn't get up to the line or get off the field in time (because we have to switch our lineman every play), it was on coaching to call the time out and get that shit corrected. The fact we didn't have a chance to kick the game winning field goal after intercepting on their 39 lays completely at the feet of the coaching staff. Why on god's green earth do you call the most risky running play in the book on first down in that situation. I know we have a rookie kicker, but you run up the middle a couple times and hopefully gain 6 yards and you at least have a shot. Pettine having no faith in his players unless they are grizzled veterans is costing this team.

    B browns52 wrote on last edited by

    @why said:

    Just got home from the game and for once I actually felt the Browns had as good a chance to win as lose . . . Which is a step in the right direction. But coaching is still killing us.

    Beyond the decision to go for 2, which I questioned, but at least could see the reasoning, the overtime period was amateur hour. Our D couldn't get up to the line or get off the field in time (because we have to switch our lineman every play), it was on coaching to call the time out and get that shit corrected. The fact we didn't have a chance to kick the game winning field goal after intercepting on their 39 lays completely at the feet of the coaching staff. Why on god's green earth do you call the most risky running play in the book on first down in that situation. I know we have a rookie kicker, but you run up the middle a couple times and hopefully gain 6 yards and you at least have a shot. Pettine having no faith in his players unless they are grizzled veterans is costing this team.

    i have not read every post but my first post was why the f did we run turbin to the outside...that was the play that cost us the game at that point..whoever called itneeds to get their ass kicked......jeez....

  • @baconhound said:

    We're not?

    We dropped 23 on the best defense in the league and took an undefeated team to overtime.

    We're not what we were before.

    B browns52 wrote on last edited by

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    We dropped 23 on the best defense in the league and took an undefeated team to overtime.

    We're not what we were before.

    me thinks we have been 2-4 before...many times as a matter of fact...don't care who we play...good teams mediocre teams etc...nothing has changed..bad play calling, horrible ol play...no pass rush.. another 100 plus rusher ..really...so what if haden was out...he is having a shitty yr anyway...i have seen his ass get kicked more often than not this yr...and what did gibson do prior to his injury.....makes an int then fumbles it right back to the jets on the same play...yeah great...got news for ya...if ware would have played we would have got crushed the way our ol played today...we......still......suck......it's all about the w's and the l's...

  • Fire Pettine and Farmer. JFF would have won this game, bank it.

    B browns52 wrote on last edited by

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Fire Pettine and Farmer. JFF would have won this game, bank

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Fire Pettine and Farmer. JFF would have won this game, bank it.

    a heheheheeee. a heheheeeeeee...
  • OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by

    A lot of what ifs, missed opportunities and mistakes are the reason we are 2-4 right now and not 5-1. Even the Jets game I have to wonder if the outcome would have been different had McCown not gone out of the game in the first quarter? In the Oakland game we started playing with some urgency in the second half and made a good comeback that fell short. Why didn't we have the sense of urgency the whole game? Against the Chargers we put enough points on the board to win but defense cost us that game. In today's game I put more of the blame on the offense. The defense played well enough for us to win but the offense could not come through when needed. You cannot waste an opportunity in OT of an interception and getting the ball at the opponents 40 and have to punt. You can't do it. The other team will say thank you very much and make you pay for missing the golden opportunity which Manning did.