Skip to content

Schwartz, the #1 RT in the NFL

The Browns Board
54 23 1.4k
  • SO HOW COME WE CANT RUN FOR SHIT!!!!

    B bringbackbrownie2 wrote on last edited by
    #42

    @columbusking said:

    SO HOW COME WE CANT RUN FOR SHIT!!!!

    MAYBE CROWELL HAS NO VISION!! He certainly likes to stumble forward on every play.. Maybe Glenn Winston can provide a spark.
  • SO HOW COME WE CANT RUN FOR SHIT!!!!

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by
    #43

    @columbusking said:

    SO HOW COME WE CANT RUN FOR SHIT!!!!

    More to running the ball than just the Oline.

  • @columbusking said:

    SO HOW COME WE CANT RUN FOR SHIT!!!!

    MAYBE CROWELL HAS NO VISION!! He certainly likes to stumble forward on every play.. Maybe Glenn Winston can provide a spark.
    B BaconHound wrote on last edited by
    #44

    @bringbackbrownie2 said:

    MAYBE CROWELL HAS NO VISION!! He certainly likes to stumble forward on every play.. Maybe Glenn Winston can provide a spark.

    But Duke Johnson is the next Dickerson. A one legged man could've run behind the Cowboys line in the early 90s

  • miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #45

    i have always agreed with jimmy johnson's statement that you can find a RB anywhere. i believed he said i could turn the corner and find a rb.

    depends on what corner i presume. maybe 5th and madison instead of MLK and malcolm x blvd?

  • Not all is wrong with this team - or with the player development.

    PFF just today released their midseason All-Pro team.. and Schwartz is the #1 RT in all the land.

    FlugelF Flugel wrote on last edited by
    #46

    @unsympathetic said:

    Not all is wrong with this team - or with the player development.

    PFF just today released their midseason All-Pro team.. and Schwartz is the #1 RT in all the land.

    Good for Schwartz. Both he and Alex Mack played in Tedford's zone blocking schemes at Cal so it was nice to see him getting back in the same comfort zone that originally made him a 2nd round draft prospect. All the preparation he puts into earning the "Oracle" nickname from his teammates is paying off on the field.

    I'm still not a big fan of some of PFF's grading criteria;but I'll be happy to make this an exception my own stubborn rules.

  • SO HOW COME WE CANT RUN FOR SHIT!!!!

    FlugelF Flugel wrote on last edited by
    #47

    @columbusking said:

    SO HOW COME WE CANT RUN FOR SHIT!!!!

    When you scare nobody on the perimeter - you're way easier to outnumber at the point of attack. Teams are putting their #1 corner on Benjamin,jamming the TE and asking - what else do we need to defend? Since it's Duke Johnson (who only plays part time) they know when they can swarm our point of attack with more numbers than our line can block up front. And when it's a defense like Cincy who intercepted Ben Rapen 3 times and held Pitt to just 10 points - they don'teven need to outnumber us.

    In the last 3 games, we've only scored 3 points in the 2nd half so I wish our only problem beside a 32nd ranked defense was Johnny...

  • @columbusking said:

    SO HOW COME WE CANT RUN FOR SHIT!!!!

    When you scare nobody on the perimeter - you're way easier to outnumber at the point of attack. Teams are putting their #1 corner on Benjamin,jamming the TE and asking - what else do we need to defend? Since it's Duke Johnson (who only plays part time) they know when they can swarm our point of attack with more numbers than our line can block up front. And when it's a defense like Cincy who intercepted Ben Rapen 3 times and held Pitt to just 10 points - they don'teven need to outnumber us.

    In the last 3 games, we've only scored 3 points in the 2nd half so I wish our only problem beside a 32nd ranked defense was Johnny...

    MudflyM Mudfly wrote on last edited by
    #48

    @flugel said:

    In the last 3 games, we've only scored 3 points in the 2nd half so I wish our only problem beside a 32nd ranked defense was Johnny...

    And...lets be honest......5 straight 3 and outs to start the second half.....kinda puts that D in a bad spot, no?

    Last week...

    drive 1 = 2 min

    drive 2 = 56 sec

    drive 3 = 1 min 30 sec

    drive 4 = 20 sec

    drive 5 = 2 mi.....

    So, D got an average of 1 minute and 20 seconds between drives.....so, yeah, after holding early I can why they tailed off as the half progressed.......

    The O has gotta hold the ball for a minute and actually score for us to win....no matter what the D does....

  • @flugel said:

    In the last 3 games, we've only scored 3 points in the 2nd half so I wish our only problem beside a 32nd ranked defense was Johnny...

    And...lets be honest......5 straight 3 and outs to start the second half.....kinda puts that D in a bad spot, no?

    Last week...

    drive 1 = 2 min

    drive 2 = 56 sec

    drive 3 = 1 min 30 sec

    drive 4 = 20 sec

    drive 5 = 2 mi.....

    So, D got an average of 1 minute and 20 seconds between drives.....so, yeah, after holding early I can why they tailed off as the half progressed.......

    The O has gotta hold the ball for a minute and actually score for us to win....no matter what the D does....

    FlugelF Flugel wrote on last edited by Flugel
    #49

    @mudfly said:

    And...lets be honest......5 straight 3 and outs to start the second half.....kinda puts that D in a bad spot, no?

    Last week...

    drive 1 = 2 min

    drive 2 = 56 sec

    drive 3 = 1 min 30 sec

    drive 4 = 20 sec

    drive 5 = 2 mi.....

    So, D got an average of 1 minute and 20 seconds between drives.....so, yeah, after holding early I can why they tailed off as the half progressed.......

    The O has gotta hold the ball for a minute and actually score for us to win....no matter what the D does....

    Couldn't have said it any better so I didn't. Great point Mud!

    The 3 drops by Hartline in half 2 vrs Arizona were all really significant. 1 week later, there were a lot of passes hitting hands of professionals that were dropped which would have moved the chains. Can you imagine if 1 guy dropped an Elway fastball vrs us - how much that changes history?

  • @bringbackbrownie2 said:

    MAYBE CROWELL HAS NO VISION!! He certainly likes to stumble forward on every play.. Maybe Glenn Winston can provide a spark.

    But Duke Johnson is the next Dickerson. A one legged man could've run behind the Cowboys line in the early 90s

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #50

    @baconhound said:

    But Duke Johnson is the next Dickerson. A one legged man could've run behind the Cowboys line in the early 90s

    Dickerson was never a Cowboy.

  • @baconhound said:

    But Duke Johnson is the next Dickerson. A one legged man could've run behind the Cowboys line in the early 90s

    Dickerson was never a Cowboy.

    T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #51

    @tour2ma said:

    Dickerson was never a Cowboy.

    Well he was playing for their scout team, SMU! 😁

  • @baconhound said:

    But Duke Johnson is the next Dickerson. A one legged man could've run behind the Cowboys line in the early 90s

    Dickerson was never a Cowboy.

    B BaconHound wrote on last edited by
    #52

    @tour2ma said:

    Dickerson was never a Cowboy.

    Two separate responses. The idea that we have a dominant O-Line and the reason we can't run the ball is RB deficiency is nonsense. All I've heard from coaches and fans alike is how awesome Duke Johnson is as if he is Dickerson already. My point with the Cowboys reference was that was the last real dominant O-Line and anyone could've run behind them. The Cowboys O-Line imposed their will on teams the Browns does not.

  • @tour2ma said:

    Dickerson was never a Cowboy.

    Two separate responses. The idea that we have a dominant O-Line and the reason we can't run the ball is RB deficiency is nonsense. All I've heard from coaches and fans alike is how awesome Duke Johnson is as if he is Dickerson already. My point with the Cowboys reference was that was the last real dominant O-Line and anyone could've run behind them. The Cowboys O-Line imposed their will on teams the Browns does not.

    miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #53

    @baconhound said:

    The Cowboys O-Line imposed their will on teams the Browns does not.

    wha WHA WHAT??

    yep. that's your whole dissection of what that analogy is about?

    both great OLines. how's the cowboy's run O doing? i don't know or really care but it's sure as hell not like it was last year with murray, well that's at least what a lot of people who know more about football than i do say.

    rbs are a dime a dozen but that dime in your pocket better be made of dylithium crystals or some shit CUZ we all know how bad sucky rbs do nothing but make an O one-dimensional.

    need a thoroughbred who's not playing for nick saban.

  • @baconhound said:

    The Cowboys O-Line imposed their will on teams the Browns does not.

    wha WHA WHAT??

    yep. that's your whole dissection of what that analogy is about?

    both great OLines. how's the cowboy's run O doing? i don't know or really care but it's sure as hell not like it was last year with murray, well that's at least what a lot of people who know more about football than i do say.

    rbs are a dime a dozen but that dime in your pocket better be made of dylithium crystals or some shit CUZ we all know how bad sucky rbs do nothing but make an O one-dimensional.

    need a thoroughbred who's not playing for nick saban.

    B BaconHound wrote on last edited by
    #54

    @miktoxic said:

    wha WHA WHAT??

    yep. that's your whole dissection of what that analogy is about?

    both great OLines. how's the cowboy's run O doing? i don't know or really care but it's sure as hell not like it was last year with murray, well that's at least what a lot of people who know more about football than i do say.

    rbs are a dime a dozen but that dime in your pocket better be made of dylithium crystals or some shit CUZ we all know how bad sucky rbs do nothing but make an O one-dimensional.

    need a thoroughbred who's not playing for nick saban.

    Talking about the Cowboys circa 94