Skip to content

***Official Browns Vs. 49ers Game Day Thread***

The Browns Board
76 27 3.6k
  • Where has this defense been all year long?

    B BaconHound wrote on last edited by
    #43

    @dawg08 said:

    Where has this defense been all year long?

    Same defense, 49ers stink

  • @dawg08 said:

    Where has this defense been all year long?

    Same defense, 49ers stink

    D dawg08 wrote on last edited by
    #44

    @baconhound said:

    Same defense, 49ers stink

    They put 26 pts up against the Bears. Next week should be interesting

  • @dawg08 said:

    Where has this defense been all year long?

    Same defense, 49ers stink

    dawg2fanD dawg2fan wrote on last edited by dawg2fan
    #45

    @baconhound said:

    Same defense, 49ers stink

    Couldn't agree more. And I agree that we don't have a QB issue. Honesty, I feel we would be ok if we had more weapons on offense. But tell that to Farmer. And on D, we just need another D Coordinator. O'Neil just plain sucks. Calling a good game today, but we wont finish the season with more than 3 wins.

  • @baconhound said:

    Same defense, 49ers stink

    They put 26 pts up against the Bears. Next week should be interesting

    B BaconHound wrote on last edited by BaconHound
    #46

    @dawg08 said:

    They put 26 pts up against the Bears. Next week should be interesting

    Bears stink as well and that was in overtime

  • @dawg08 said:

    They put 26 pts up against the Bears. Next week should be interesting

    Bears stink as well and that was in overtime

    dawg2fanD dawg2fan wrote on last edited by
    #47

    @baconhound said:

    Bears stink as well and that was in overtime

    And Chicago should have won it in regulation if they had made that FG.

  • Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by
    #48

    Makes you wonder what this year could have been...

  • Makes you wonder what this year could have been...

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by
    #49

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Makes you wonder what this year could have been...

    Probably about the same.

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Makes you wonder what this year could have been...

    Probably about the same.

    Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by
    #50

    @tiamat63 said:

    Probably about the same.

    Probably, except we'd have a 100% clear picture of what we had behind center - good or bad.

  • Opal312O Opal312 wrote on last edited by
    #51

    Seattle is playing lights out! All Imask is for the Browns to be competitive!

  • C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
    #52

    Looked to me like it's the first time the defense was playing

    uplifted and energized, and NOT confused with

    miscommunications.

    My guess is, Oneil and Pettine sat down with their defense

    and asked them how they could fix it.

    And, it was a great matchup across the board for the Browns.

    There were times when Manziel had all day to throw, and had no one to throw to.

    Would have been better to have gone to this game, ...but no, I went to the cincy debacle.

    These players played excited, and just looked like they were all on the same page.

    Odd, I didn't see..any duct tape on Oneil's mouth...

  • @bringbackbrownie2 said:

    Honestly that INT is more on Hartline than Johnny. If you wave frantically for the ball, you need to make a better effort going towards the ball to make the catch. Hartline assumed no one was near him and was backpedaling instead of meeting the ball in the air. It's not surprising to see Johnny that pissed after the play... All that said, Barnidge was open on the right side and even Benji was open for at least 7 yards after the scramble..

    Honestly that douchebag above would find something wrong with Manziel even if he went 50/50 with 10 TDs. There's no point in even talking about it.

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #53

    @jrb12711 said:

    Honestly that douchebag above would find something wrong with Manziel even if he went 50/50 with 10 TDs. There's no point in even talking about it.

    The truth is the truth regardless of the source.

    @bringbackbrownie2 said:

    Very true. crowell looks like a pro athlete today. I'll wait for verification from Tour, but I suspect Erving's replacement is much better at run blocking...

    I may actually grade this week, if I have time. My working theory is that we reverted to more of a power run scheme this week and it produced honest to God holes... near where they were supposed to be.

  • It's nice seeing the Browns run the ball.

    The 49ers are awful, but it's still nice to be dominating a team

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #54

    @typicalbrowns said:

    It's nice seeing the Browns run the ball.

    The 49ers are awful, but it's still nice to be dominating a team

    @calfoxwc said:

    Looked to me like it's the first time the defense was playing

    uplifted and energized, and NOT confused with

    miscommunications.

    I wish that was the case, cal, but no...

    I'm more in line with TB...

    SF stunk today and we refused to play down to their level.

  • B beare wrote on last edited by
    #55

    im not sure if he is the answer but fact is he played a great game today. Far as saying he did it against a bad team well remember we have lost to some bad teams.

  • @jrb12711 said:

    Honestly that douchebag above would find something wrong with Manziel even if he went 50/50 with 10 TDs. There's no point in even talking about it.

    The truth is the truth regardless of the source.

    @bringbackbrownie2 said:

    Very true. crowell looks like a pro athlete today. I'll wait for verification from Tour, but I suspect Erving's replacement is much better at run blocking...

    I may actually grade this week, if I have time. My working theory is that we reverted to more of a power run scheme this week and it produced honest to God holes... near where they were supposed to be.

    T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by TexasAg1969
    #56

    @tour2ma said:

    The truth is the truth regardless of the source.

    I may actually grade this week, if I have time. My working theory is that we reverted to more of a power run scheme this week and it produced honest to God holes... near where they were supposed to be.

    LOL! I had a chance to see the tape when I got home late yesterday. My first thought was, "Tour's got to grade this!" 😁

    They looked far more coordinated than I have seen them this whole year. The same can be said for the whole defense. I don't care that SF is not great, I saw fire, enthusiasm and people giving everything they had to take their part of the responsibility in this full team effort.

  • Canton DawgC Canton Dawg wrote on last edited by
    #57

    49ers weigh in on Browns surprise performance. . .

    "They were able to do whatever they wanted to do on us". - Ahmad Brooks

    http://m.cantonrep.com/article/20151214/SPORTS/151219720

  • 49ers weigh in on Browns surprise performance. . .

    "They were able to do whatever they wanted to do on us". - Ahmad Brooks

    http://m.cantonrep.com/article/20151214/SPORTS/151219720

    MudflyM Mudfly wrote on last edited by
    #58

    @canton-dawg said:

    49ers weigh in on Browns surprise performance. . .

    "They were able to do whatever they wanted to do on us". - Ahmad Brooks

    http://m.cantonrep.com/article/20151214/SPORTS/151219720

    Nice....thats a plus 1 for our coaching staff....😉

  • @canton-dawg said:

    49ers weigh in on Browns surprise performance. . .

    "They were able to do whatever they wanted to do on us". - Ahmad Brooks

    http://m.cantonrep.com/article/20151214/SPORTS/151219720

    Nice....thats a plus 1 for our coaching staff....😉

    T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #59

    @mudfly said:

    Nice....thats a plus 1 for our coaching staff.... 😉

    Yep, lot of praise for the OL as well. And this particular comment about JM gave me deja vu because I said it last year here, "He's dangerous throwing downfield when the receivers do a good job getting open when he starts to scramble." I had said on here that as receivers get used to him extending plays they will begin to find ways to get open. A prime example was the cooperation between JM and Barnidge on a right side scramble when Barnidge got behind the defender and JM pointed for him to continue going longer as he threw him open even more. That is the same chemistry he developed with Evans and bodes well for both in the future. I think he has it with Benjamin as well.

    I still agree the first option is to go through all the progressions first and take off when nothing develops. But it's good to see when receivers and QB are on the same scramble page as well when it becomes the last resort. Now if he can just learn to throw it away when that fails as well. Then you have a complete dual threat QB.

  • Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #60

    Same chemistry Hoyer developed... 😛

    I thought JM had shown "throw it away" progress this year until SF. But lesson reinforced... no harm move along... if ESPN will let us.

    I swear the lead "game highlight" in every CLE/SF replay package was that play... usually followed by a scramble run... usually followed by the TD to Barn. One thing did precede the INT, however... "the autograph".

  • @jrb12711 said:

    Honestly that douchebag above would find something wrong with Manziel even if he went 50/50 with 10 TDs. There's no point in even talking about it.

    The truth is the truth regardless of the source.

    @bringbackbrownie2 said:

    Very true. crowell looks like a pro athlete today. I'll wait for verification from Tour, but I suspect Erving's replacement is much better at run blocking...

    I may actually grade this week, if I have time. My working theory is that we reverted to more of a power run scheme this week and it produced honest to God holes... near where they were supposed to be.

    Canton DawgC Canton Dawg wrote on last edited by
    #61

    @tour2ma said:

    My working theory is that we reverted to more of a power run scheme this week and it produced honest to God holes... near where they were supposed to be.

    That's what these old bloodshot eyes saw as well.

  • @tour2ma said:

    My working theory is that we reverted to more of a power run scheme this week and it produced honest to God holes... near where they were supposed to be.

    That's what these old bloodshot eyes saw as well.

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #62

    @canton-dawg said:

    That's what these old bloodshot eyes saw as well.

    Now the question is: was the shift SF, game-plan specific or driven by a change in 1 of 5 players?

    We'll see Sunday, but I've a feeling it's the former.