Skip to content

Enough drama let's go shopping.

The Browns Board
23 14 1.3k
  • C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
    #8

    The no FA makes sense. You bring in FA's when you're trying to fill in a few pieces. We bring in a high priced FA right now what's he gonna do except languish? we might only win one game next year, and that's ssaying something seeing as our schedule looks soft.

  • and considering Jimmy also said no building through free agency.....so, plan on only low bar signings....

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
    #9

    @mudfly said:

    and considering Jimmy also said no building through free agency.....so, plan on only low bar signings....

    YA, Johnny knows a few guys he's met in bars that could help us. 😁

  • Opal312O Opal312 wrote on last edited by
    #10

    Would anyone be interested in Brock Osweiler? His contract is up at the end of the season. If we could get Osweiler we could use the rest of our picks for Bosa, Elliot, Wide receivers etc

  • Would anyone be interested in Brock Osweiler? His contract is up at the end of the season. If we could get Osweiler we could use the rest of our picks for Bosa, Elliot, Wide receivers etc

    T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
    #11

    @opal312 said:

    Would anyone be interested in Brock Osweiler? His contract is up at the end of the season. If we could get Osweiler we could use the rest of our picks for Bosa, Elliot, Wide receivers etc

    Yep, I've posted that elsewhere. But it will be hard to get him away from Elway/Kubiak.

  • Would anyone be interested in Brock Osweiler? His contract is up at the end of the season. If we could get Osweiler we could use the rest of our picks for Bosa, Elliot, Wide receivers etc

    Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by
    #12

    @opal312 said:

    Would anyone be interested in Brock Osweiler? His contract is up at the end of the season. If we could get Osweiler we could use the rest of our picks for Bosa, Elliot, Wide receivers etc

    Interested? Sure...but I don't think there's any way he leaves Denver. He's been sitting behind Manning for like 3 years and he's played well enough in his starts this year for them to keep him around knowing Manning is over done at this point.

  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #13

  • Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #14

    Why is nothing ever interpreted middling? Everything is not one extreme of the other...

    "Not opening up the checkbook" in FA and "building thru the draft" do not mean "no FA's".

    They mean FA signings will be strategic... and with DePodesta on-board we may well do a lot of FA bargain hunting.

    However, splash signings like JPP or Irvin will be rare to non-existent... at least initially. Someday we will hopefully need a final piece, but that's a ways off... even if all goes well.

  • Why is nothing ever interpreted middling? Everything is not one extreme of the other...

    "Not opening up the checkbook" in FA and "building thru the draft" do not mean "no FA's".

    They mean FA signings will be strategic... and with DePodesta on-board we may well do a lot of FA bargain hunting.

    However, splash signings like JPP or Irvin will be rare to non-existent... at least initially. Someday we will hopefully need a final piece, but that's a ways off... even if all goes well.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #15

    @tour2ma said:

    Why is nothing ever interpreted middling? Everything is not one extreme of the other...

    "Not opening up the checkbook" in FA and "building thru the draft" do not mean "no FA's".

    They mean FA signings will be strategic... and with DePodesta on-board we may well do a lot of FA bargain hunting.

    However, splash signings like JPP or Irvin will be rare to non-existent... at least initially. Someday we will hopefully need a final piece, but that's a ways off... even if all goes well.

    Excellent point my dear Watson.

  • @tour2ma said:

    Why is nothing ever interpreted middling? Everything is not one extreme of the other...

    "Not opening up the checkbook" in FA and "building thru the draft" do not mean "no FA's".

    They mean FA signings will be strategic... and with DePodesta on-board we may well do a lot of FA bargain hunting.

    However, splash signings like JPP or Irvin will be rare to non-existent... at least initially. Someday we will hopefully need a final piece, but that's a ways off... even if all goes well.

    Excellent point my dear Watson.

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #16

    @the-gipper said:

    Excellent point my dear Watson.

    Are you waiting for me to call you "Holmes"? 😉

  • @the-gipper said:

    Excellent point my dear Watson.

    Are you waiting for me to call you "Holmes"? 😉

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #17

    @tour2ma said:

    Are you waiting for me to call you "Holmes"? 😉

    Oliver Wendell Holmes perhaps. I just thought calling you Watson seemed natural after saying "excellent point".

  • @tour2ma said:

    Are you waiting for me to call you "Holmes"? 😉

    Oliver Wendell Holmes perhaps. I just thought calling you Watson seemed natural after saying "excellent point".

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #18

    @the-gipper said:

    Oliver Wendell Holmes perhaps.

    lol... your lawyer is showing... 🙂

  • Would anyone be interested in Brock Osweiler? His contract is up at the end of the season. If we could get Osweiler we could use the rest of our picks for Bosa, Elliot, Wide receivers etc

    dawg2fanD dawg2fan wrote on last edited by dawg2fan
    #19

    @opal312 said:

    Would anyone be interested in Brock Osweiler? His contract is up at the end of the season. If we could get Osweiler we could use the rest of our picks for Bosa, Elliot, Wide receivers etc

    I've seen drafts picks where Bosa is the number 2 pick overall and Elliot is the number 15 overall. So I guess what I'm saying is picking Elliot is not very likely.

  • jiggins7919J jiggins7919 wrote on last edited by
    #20

    I have low expectations regarding free agency. I think we'll take a shot at a few "mid grade" people, but we're not going to go all out for any of the big tag names. Not our style, and probably not very smart. The names the poster suggested are pretty interesting, and worth considering. Pass rushers are always at a premium, and if we can get one for a decent price, it'd be huge.

  • Would anyone be interested in Brock Osweiler? His contract is up at the end of the season. If we could get Osweiler we could use the rest of our picks for Bosa, Elliot, Wide receivers etc

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #21

    @opal312 said:

    Would anyone be interested in Brock Osweiler?

    No...

    @jiggins7919 said:

    I have low expectations regarding free agency. I think we'll take a shot at a few "mid grade" people...

    Mid-grade FA's ought to be right in analytics' wheelhouse.

  • Would anyone be interested in Brock Osweiler? His contract is up at the end of the season. If we could get Osweiler we could use the rest of our picks for Bosa, Elliot, Wide receivers etc

    dawg2fanD dawg2fan wrote on last edited by
    #22

    @opal312 said:

    Would anyone be interested in Brock Osweiler? His contract is up at the end of the season. If we could get Osweiler we could use the rest of our picks for Bosa, Elliot, Wide receivers etc

    The other reason I wouldn't want him is the weapons he has around him. He has all of the pieces and still can't win the big games. If he came to Cleveland, he wouldn't have half the weapons. I'd stick with McCown and whoever we draft.

  • @opal312 said:

    Would anyone be interested in Brock Osweiler? His contract is up at the end of the season. If we could get Osweiler we could use the rest of our picks for Bosa, Elliot, Wide receivers etc

    The other reason I wouldn't want him is the weapons he has around him. He has all of the pieces and still can't win the big games. If he came to Cleveland, he wouldn't have half the weapons. I'd stick with McCown and whoever we draft.

    W wargograw wrote on last edited by
    #23

    @dawg2fan said:

    The other reason I wouldn't want him is the weapons he has around him. He has all of the pieces and still can't win the big games. If he came to Cleveland, he wouldn't have half the weapons. I'd stick with McCown and whoever we draft.

    I don't know. The running game and OL were pretty bad.