Camp Wentz- Starts here.
-
That is very true, I probably shouldn't have brought up my big board beliefs while talking about a big board.
"I have him as my one and I trust me the most." is what I was referring to. I have him one, too, but was discussing Mayock's rankings update.
-
That is very true, I probably shouldn't have brought up my big board beliefs while talking about a big board.
"I have him as my one and I trust me the most." is what I was referring to. I have him one, too, but was discussing Mayock's rankings update.
-
Guys who evaluate talent for a living thought Ryan Leaf and Jemarcus Russell were good ideas. If the Browns draft a QB @ 2, and he stinks, it would mean a bunch of 4-12 seasons. Good news is that's what we are used to.
-
Guys who evaluate talent for a living thought Ryan Leaf and Jemarcus Russell were good ideas. If the Browns draft a QB @ 2, and he stinks, it would mean a bunch of 4-12 seasons. Good news is that's what we are used to.
Well, guys who evaluate talent for a living weren't wrong. Both of those guys were talented. That's why guys who evaluate talent for a living aren't GM's, they're scouts.Guys who evaluate talent for a living thought Ryan Leaf and Jemarcus Russell were good ideas. If the Browns draft a QB @ 2, and he stinks, it would mean a bunch of 4-12 seasons. Good news is that's what we are used to.
But actual GM's do infinitely more than evaluate talent, and good ones likely noticed that both Russell and Leaf had issues outside of football that were legitimate red flags.
From what we've been presented as fans, neither of these guys present those same issues.
For the record, I was out on Russell. Not on Leaf, though...
...then again, I was only 9.
I'm awesome, and I fuck dolphins. Ghoolie 12/2/2012: I have absolutely no skills, training or pride -
Well, guys who evaluate talent for a living weren't wrong. Both of those guys were talented. That's why guys who evaluate talent for a living aren't GM's, they're scouts.Guys who evaluate talent for a living thought Ryan Leaf and Jemarcus Russell were good ideas. If the Browns draft a QB @ 2, and he stinks, it would mean a bunch of 4-12 seasons. Good news is that's what we are used to.
But actual GM's do infinitely more than evaluate talent, and good ones likely noticed that both Russell and Leaf had issues outside of football that were legitimate red flags.
From what we've been presented as fans, neither of these guys present those same issues.
For the record, I was out on Russell. Not on Leaf, though...
...then again, I was only 9.
Well, guys who evaluate talent for a living weren't wrong. Both of those guys were talented. That's why guys who evaluate talent for a living aren't GM's, they're scouts.
But actual GM's do infinitely more than evaluate talent, and good ones likely noticed that both Russell and Leaf had issues outside of football that were legitimate red flags.
From what we've been presented as fans, neither of these guys present those same issues.
For the record, I was out on Russell. Not on Leaf, though...
...then again, I was only 9.
We don't have a GM
-
Well, guys who evaluate talent for a living weren't wrong. Both of those guys were talented. That's why guys who evaluate talent for a living aren't GM's, they're scouts.
But actual GM's do infinitely more than evaluate talent, and good ones likely noticed that both Russell and Leaf had issues outside of football that were legitimate red flags.
From what we've been presented as fans, neither of these guys present those same issues.
For the record, I was out on Russell. Not on Leaf, though...
...then again, I was only 9.
We don't have a GM
We don't have a GM
Therein lies our problem.
-
Well, guys who evaluate talent for a living weren't wrong. Both of those guys were talented. That's why guys who evaluate talent for a living aren't GM's, they're scouts.Guys who evaluate talent for a living thought Ryan Leaf and Jemarcus Russell were good ideas. If the Browns draft a QB @ 2, and he stinks, it would mean a bunch of 4-12 seasons. Good news is that's what we are used to.
But actual GM's do infinitely more than evaluate talent, and good ones likely noticed that both Russell and Leaf had issues outside of football that were legitimate red flags.
From what we've been presented as fans, neither of these guys present those same issues.
For the record, I was out on Russell. Not on Leaf, though...
...then again, I was only 9.
...then again, I was only 9.
Excuses, excuses...
-
Saw him on Gruden's QB camp, and he came off as smart and affable.
Not sure if he would transition from North Dakota St. to putting the Browns on his back and helping them win a championship ... but he would be a more a likeable guy than Quinn, Weeds and Manzie, that's for sure.
He seems to have all the tools and the brain to pick up what he's missing.
Hue Jack got Flacco up and running in year one coming out of Delaware, so maybe he's the man for this job.
Zombo
-
Gruden says Wentz is most NFL ready QB he has met in "years"
-
Gruden says Wentz is most NFL ready QB he has met in "years"
Gruden says Wentz is most NFL ready QB he has met in "years"
... actual comment is "a couple years"...
... and then Jon said all he needs to do is "everything faster quicker".
-
-
-
Carson Wentz is absolutely everything I'd look for in a qb. And, every single qb that ever
comes out of college has to learn to do things faster/quicker. The league is faster/quicker.
But nobody is smarter than Wentz. And he LOVES the game. I can't imagine the Browns
not drafting him at #2.
-
..Unless Tunsil is available. Which he will be. Because Titans will now be taking Ramsey..
-
Carson Wentz is absolutely everything I'd look for in a qb. And, every single qb that ever
comes out of college has to learn to do things faster/quicker. The league is faster/quicker.
But nobody is smarter than Wentz. And he LOVES the game. I can't imagine the Browns
not drafting him at #2.
... every single qb that ever
True, but the "quick" gap is not the same for all players.
I get the Wentz attraction.... great kid, personable, big, only a tad goofy, big hands. But he is and will remain #2 on my QB board.
Should we call his name, I will not have to fight the fight I did with our last QB draftee... to keep my dinner down.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
... every single qb that ever
True, but the "quick" gap is not the same for all players.
I get the Wentz attraction.... great kid, personable, big, only a tad goofy, big hands. But he is and will remain #2 on my QB board.
Should we call his name, I will not have to fight the fight I did with our last QB draftee... to keep my dinner down.
-
-
"I think he's the most NFL-ready quarterback that we've had in the last couple of years." Gruden says
in the Wentz feature, which will air in April."
from a MKC article, Cleveland.com
Mayock compared him to Andrew Luck, saying:
"When I look at him, I see a kid that's as athletic or more athletic than Andrew Luck, He's bigger than
Andrew Luck. He's got arm strength comparable to Andrew Luck. He just doesn't have the experience
that Andrew Luck had..."
Greg Cosell of NFL Films:
"Hands down, Wentz was the best quarterback in these workouts." (in the combine)
Of course the Browns should, and will? draft Wentz at #2.
-
-
Don't know about that -- the #1 will be Ramsey to Titans. So, Tunsil will be available.
Yep, that would be risky business indeed.....................
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login