Skip to content

Columbus and the NFL...

The Browns Board
30 18 1.1k
  • Too close to Cincy and Cleveland

  • Could split the drive some... Is there a cleared site in Richfield? 🙂

  • Too close to Cle, Ind, Cin and Pit. Were surrounded.

  • Too close to Cincy and Cleveland

    @pumpkin-eater said:

    Too close to Cincy and Cleveland

    Two hours? How far do you think the giants and the jets are apart? Lol
  • San Antonio is just the hostage city these NFL teams use to make demands on their current city.

  • VesnaKociper said:

    Not a bad relocation site for The Browns. At some point, 4- 12 is going to get old.

    I'm pretty partial to the Reynoldsburg Roosters near E I-70 and I-270.

  • @pumpkin-eater said:

    Too close to Cincy and Cleveland

    Two hours? How far do you think the giants and the jets are apart? Lol

    @vagitron said:

    Two hours? How far do you think the giants and the jets are apart? Lol

    How many people are in the tri-state area compared to columbus cleveland and Cincinnati?

  • Our part of the country(NE) is pretty congested with teams.....cant believe the NFL would put another one this way....

    nfl-map-630x472.jpg

  • Too close to Cincy and Cleveland

    @pumpkin-eater said:

    Too close to Cincy and Cleveland

    Okay, what about this....

    In 10 or 20 years would the Bengals ever consider it?

    If the Browns didn't leave in 1995 but instead left in 2015 would they have gone to Columbus?

    It's only been in the last decade that Columbus, OH went from being a sleepy "Cowtown" to major growing metropolis. The Capital City has a huge population, big corporations headquarters, major university (very important), greater for young and middle-aged people. I mean it makes so much sense on paper anyway.

  • San Antonio is just the hostage city these NFL teams use to make demands on their current city.

    @wargograw said:

    San Antonio is just the hostage city these NFL teams use to make demands on their current city.

    Not anymore, San Antonio is moving to make this happen.

    http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/14572902/red-mccombs-trying-lure-oakland-raiders-san-antonio

  • VesnaKociper said:

    Not a bad relocation site for The Browns. At some point, 4- 12 is going to get old.

    Maybe they could change the colors to scarlet and grey and call themselves the ohio buckeyes to siphon off some of that winning tradition.

  • As long as JERRAH owns the Cowboys...... No team will ever start up in San Antonio

  • Cleveland got the rust belt tough thing going.

    Cincinnati got the crazy southern hilljack thing.......

    Columbus is like a big giant meal with no seasoning......any where usa.

  • well with the browns showing interest in columbus through a TC situation and the nfl not saying no it would seem likely something would happen in columbus. not saying a permanent nfl team being there but maybe a game or 2 being played there during the regular season by the browns and bengals. bring more revenue, nore 'on-the-fringe' fans and the nfl has a footprint there just like they do when they send teams to europe or mexico.

  • Columbus absorbed the entire county which is why there population is the largest. Louisville did the same thing in Kentucky.

  • well with the browns showing interest in columbus through a TC situation and the nfl not saying no it would seem likely something would happen in columbus. not saying a permanent nfl team being there but maybe a game or 2 being played there during the regular season by the browns and bengals. bring more revenue, nore 'on-the-fringe' fans and the nfl has a footprint there just like they do when they send teams to europe or mexico.

    @miktoxic said:

    well with the browns showing interest in columbus through a TC situation and the nfl not saying no it would seem likely something would happen in columbus. not saying a permanent nfl team being there but maybe a game or 2 being played there during the regular season by the browns and bengals. bring more revenue, nore 'on-the-fringe' fans and the nfl has a footprint there just like they do when they send teams to europe or mexico.

    Thats a fair point. Not sure the league would go for it otherwise you'll get teams doing the same thing all over the country.

    My thought is that Columbus is not on the radar right now....BUT, it will be when the population clicks over 1,000,000 in roughly a decade.

    Nobody legitimately saw cities like Jacksonville, Indianapolis, or even Seattle getting teams! However, these cities population, media size, and other factors were impossible for the NFL to ignore.

  • Also...

    You know "That State up North" ??

    Well Detroit is a sinking ship and there is nothing that says the Lions have to stay in the Motor City!

  • Also...

    You know "That State up North" ??

    Well Detroit is a sinking ship and there is nothing that says the Lions have to stay in the Motor City!

    @go-losers said:

    Also...

    You know "That State up North" ??

    Well Detroit is a sinking ship and there is nothing that says the Lions have to stay in the Motor City!

    yeah but any true fan of the nfl would hate to see a team move from their place in history. you've never had to deal with it. browns fans have and believe me you don't want to be in the crowd fighting for your team to stay in pittsburgh when roooney just decides to do a money grab and move to columbus or marietta or louisville cuz the city of pittsburgh won't give him what he wants.

    i can't believe there's not more of a huge cry-out for the fans in st. louis. i mean it seems like no one gives a shit. and then 2 other cities in cali thinking about moving and the fans just are like 'whatever'.

    you never know what you had until it's gone.

  • Poor St. Louis......it's terrible losing your team, but twice??....I doubt they ever get another chance....

  • Every year we could have our own Super Bowl between the Browns and Buckeyes!