Skip to content

Sashi is Destroying Browns Reporting in His Spare Time at the Spring Meeting

The Browns Board
86 21 3.3k
  • @gumby73 said:

    nobody's high or did I say anything about RG3 even starting at all. Draft Wentzoff at #2 & see where it goes at camp & the only drama I want to hear, is we have not named our starter due to competition. As for Duke, it's been 1 year. He's now seen what he can do to get better & if D. Henry is still their at #32 he will be tuff to pass up with Crow FA after next season, Crows vision & balance has got to go imo..

    So now you're back to Oakland and Jacksonville drafting a rookie QB and starting him on a shitty team.

    gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by gumby73
    #66

    @baconhound said:

    So now you're back to Oakland and Jacksonville drafting a rookie QB and starting him on a shitty team.

    Again, nothing ever changes. Make a opinion, including the words "compete" & people like yourself turn it into their own story to respond. Good luck arguing with yourself in your own opinions.. Get to end of camp & let's talk about this shitty team. in your opinion

  • C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
    #67

    Duke Johnson is....

    a terrific young talent. Anything else is just dumb.

  • @baconhound said:

    So now you're back to Oakland and Jacksonville drafting a rookie QB and starting him on a shitty team.

    Again, nothing ever changes. Make a opinion, including the words "compete" & people like yourself turn it into their own story to respond. Good luck arguing with yourself in your own opinions.. Get to end of camp & let's talk about this shitty team. in your opinion

    B BaconHound wrote on last edited by
    #68

    @gumby73 said:

    Again, nothing ever changes. Make a opinion, including the words "compete" & people like yourself turn it into their own story to respond. Good luck arguing with yourself in your own opinions.. Get to end of camp & let's talk about this shitty team. in your opinion

    Nothing to do with "competing" you draft Wentz or Goff and they win the job, see Oakland & Jacksonville. RGIII wins the job, or gets it handed to him to give the rookie time to adapt, and he's 1-5 and fans will be chanting for the rookie. How many times does this need to happen before history stops repeating itself.

  • Duke Johnson is....

    a terrific young talent. Anything else is just dumb.

    B BaconHound wrote on last edited by
    #69

    @calfoxwc said:

    Duke Johnson is....

    a terrific young talent. Anything else is just dumb.

    3.6 ypc and 2 TDs behind what PFF ranked as one of the best offensive lines in football, so yes a terrific young talent

  • C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
    #70

    meaningless stats. There is more to football that a simple stat....

    the Browns had no wr group to scare defenses, and

    just so "NO" to your dumb reply next time.

    Search Results
    Where was Duke Johnson in the second half of the Cleveland
    www.cleveland.com/.../where_was_duke_johnson_in_th...
    The Plain Dealer
    Nov 1, 2015 - Browns running back Duke Johnson fends off Arizona Cardinals free ... But the Browns did not target him in the second half with a pass as he ...
    Browns' Wilbert Montgomery can't explain Duke Johnson's ...
    www.cleveland.com/.../browns_wilbert_montgomery_c...
    The Plain Dealer
    Nov 18, 2015 - Browns' Wilbert Montgomery can't explain Duke Johnson's 2nd-halfdisappearing act ... But he's being used primarily as a receiver out of the backfield, and has more than ... It's not there for the running backs so that's different.
    What kind of role will Duke Johnson have in 2nd half of ...
    www.clevelandbrowns.com/...Duke-Johnson...2nd-hal...
    Cleveland Browns
    Nov 4, 2015 - Browns Mailbag: What kind of role will Duke Johnson have in 2nd half of season? ... Johnson had a minimal impact in Sunday's second half, and it was ... of the game, but there's no guarantee he'll do that against the Bengals.
  • @calfoxwc said:

    Duke Johnson is....

    a terrific young talent. Anything else is just dumb.

    3.6 ypc and 2 TDs behind what PFF ranked as one of the best offensive lines in football, so yes a terrific young talent

    Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by
    #71

    @baconhound said:

    3.6 ypc and 2 TDs behind what PFF ranked as one of the best offensive lines in football, so yes a terrific young talent

    Also 534 yards receiving, 8.8 YPC catching passes from one of the shittiest QB's in the league and voted AFC North Rookie of the year.

    It will be fun to see what he can do with a QB that will hopefully force defenses to play off the ball a bit and more than 6 carries per game.

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Well, they're picking after we are so your argument is invalid.

    That was a comment about drafting Gabbert & Bortles with 10 and 3. One isn't with the team and the other is 8-21.

    Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by
    #72

    @baconhound said:

    That was a comment about drafting Gabbert & Bortles with 10 and 3. One isn't with the team and the other is 8-21.

    And...they're still picking after us, so once again your point is invalid.

  • @gumby73 said:

    Again, nothing ever changes. Make a opinion, including the words "compete" & people like yourself turn it into their own story to respond. Good luck arguing with yourself in your own opinions.. Get to end of camp & let's talk about this shitty team. in your opinion

    Nothing to do with "competing" you draft Wentz or Goff and they win the job, see Oakland & Jacksonville. RGIII wins the job, or gets it handed to him to give the rookie time to adapt, and he's 1-5 and fans will be chanting for the rookie. How many times does this need to happen before history stops repeating itself.

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
    #73

    @baconhound said:

    Nothing to do with "competing" you draft Wentz or Goff and they win the job, see Oakland & Jacksonville. RGIII wins the job, or gets it handed to him to give the rookie time to adapt, and he's 1-5 and fans will be chanting for the rookie. How many times does this need to happen before history stops repeating itself.

    You see that as a problem? I seem to remember Gary Danielson starting a few games for the Browns in 1985, got hurt, and then a guy by the name of Bernie Kosar took over. I'd sort of like that bit of history to repeat itself. 🙂

  • @baconhound said:

    3.6 ypc and 2 TDs behind what PFF ranked as one of the best offensive lines in football, so yes a terrific young talent

    Also 534 yards receiving, 8.8 YPC catching passes from one of the shittiest QB's in the league and voted AFC North Rookie of the year.

    It will be fun to see what he can do with a QB that will hopefully force defenses to play off the ball a bit and more than 6 carries per game.

    B BaconHound wrote on last edited by
    #74

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Also 534 yards receiving, 8.8 YPC catching passes from one of the shittiest QB's in the league and voted AFC North Rookie of the year.

    It will be fun to see what he can do with a QB that will hopefully force defenses to play off the ball a bit and more than 6 carries per game.

    Remember when Jordan Cameron was awesome too.

  • @baconhound said:

    That was a comment about drafting Gabbert & Bortles with 10 and 3. One isn't with the team and the other is 8-21.

    And...they're still picking after us, so once again your point is invalid.

    B BaconHound wrote on last edited by
    #75

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    And...they're still picking after us, so once again your point is invalid.

    So is your point that being the Jags is a good thing? Stockholm syndrome?

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    And...they're still picking after us, so once again your point is invalid.

    So is your point that being the Jags is a good thing? Stockholm syndrome?

    Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by
    #76

    @baconhound said:

    So is your point that being the Jags is a good thing? Stockholm syndrome?

    My point is that you can't logically shit talk an organization if they are performing better, regardless of how marginal the improvement is.

  • meaningless stats. There is more to football that a simple stat....

    the Browns had no wr group to scare defenses, and

    just so "NO" to your dumb reply next time.

    Search Results
    Where was Duke Johnson in the second half of the Cleveland
    www.cleveland.com/.../where_was_duke_johnson_in_th...
    The Plain Dealer
    Nov 1, 2015 - Browns running back Duke Johnson fends off Arizona Cardinals free ... But the Browns did not target him in the second half with a pass as he ...
    Browns' Wilbert Montgomery can't explain Duke Johnson's ...
    www.cleveland.com/.../browns_wilbert_montgomery_c...
    The Plain Dealer
    Nov 18, 2015 - Browns' Wilbert Montgomery can't explain Duke Johnson's 2nd-halfdisappearing act ... But he's being used primarily as a receiver out of the backfield, and has more than ... It's not there for the running backs so that's different.
    What kind of role will Duke Johnson have in 2nd half of ...
    www.clevelandbrowns.com/...Duke-Johnson...2nd-hal...
    Cleveland Browns
    Nov 4, 2015 - Browns Mailbag: What kind of role will Duke Johnson have in 2nd half of season? ... Johnson had a minimal impact in Sunday's second half, and it was ... of the game, but there's no guarantee he'll do that against the Bengals.
    B BaconHound wrote on last edited by
    #77

    @calfoxwc said:

    meaningless stats. There is more to football that a simple stat....

    the Browns had no wr group to scare defenses, and

    just so "NO" to your dumb reply next time.

    Search Results
    Where was Duke Johnson in the second half of the Cleveland
    www.cleveland.com/.../where_was_duke_johnson_in_th...
    The Plain Dealer
    Nov 1, 2015 - Browns running back Duke Johnson fends off Arizona Cardinals free ... But the Browns did not target him in the second half with a pass as he ...
    Browns' Wilbert Montgomery can't explain Duke Johnson's ...
    www.cleveland.com/.../browns_wilbert_montgomery_c...
    The Plain Dealer
    Nov 18, 2015 - Browns' Wilbert Montgomery can't explain Duke Johnson's 2nd-halfdisappearing act ... But he's being used primarily as a receiver out of the backfield, and has more than ... It's not there for the running backs so that's different.
    What kind of role will Duke Johnson have in 2nd half of ...
    www.clevelandbrowns.com/...Duke-Johnson...2nd-hal...
    Cleveland Browns
    Nov 4, 2015 - Browns Mailbag: What kind of role will Duke Johnson have in 2nd half of season? ... Johnson had a minimal impact in Sunday's second half, and it was ... of the game, but there's no guarantee he'll do that against the Bengals.

    Even the worst teams gain some yards. I admit he looks like a very good 3rd down option but a 200 carry guy he isn't

  • @baconhound said:

    So is your point that being the Jags is a good thing? Stockholm syndrome?

    My point is that you can't logically shit talk an organization if they are performing better, regardless of how marginal the improvement is.

    B BaconHound wrote on last edited by
    #78

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    My point is that you can't logically shit talk an organization if they are performing better, regardless of how marginal the improvement is.

    Nice, so at least we can give the Titans a big fuck you 😵 . Maybe with some great planning we can become the Texans.

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    My point is that you can't logically shit talk an organization if they are performing better, regardless of how marginal the improvement is.

    Nice, so at least we can give the Titans a big fuck you 😵 . Maybe with some great planning we can become the Texans.

    Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by
    #79

    @baconhound said:

    Nice, so at least we can give the Titans a big fuck you 😵 . Maybe with some great planning we can become the Texans.

    Gotta crawl before you can walk.

    It's few and far between that a team goes from garbage to glory and maintains.

  • @calfoxwc said:

    Duke Johnson is....

    a terrific young talent. Anything else is just dumb.

    3.6 ypc and 2 TDs behind what PFF ranked as one of the best offensive lines in football, so yes a terrific young talent

    W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
    #80

    @baconhound said:

    3.6 ypc and 2 TDs behind what PFF ranked as one of the best offensive lines in football, so yes a terrific young talent

    Dear PFF, I just bought a set of Maserati Pistons, a Porsche radiator and a Rolls-Royce head gasket and install them on my Subaru Outback. Now it doesn't run. What's wrong?

    WSS

  • @baconhound said:

    3.6 ypc and 2 TDs behind what PFF ranked as one of the best offensive lines in football, so yes a terrific young talent

    Dear PFF, I just bought a set of Maserati Pistons, a Porsche radiator and a Rolls-Royce head gasket and install them on my Subaru Outback. Now it doesn't run. What's wrong?

    WSS

    LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by
    #81

    @westside-steve said:

    Dear PFF, I just bought a set of Maserati Pistons, a Porsche radiator and a Rolls-Royce head gasket and install them on my Subaru Outback. Now it doesn't run. What's wrong?

    WSS

    "According to our algorithm, Michael Jordan was an o.k. pro."

  • @westside-steve said:

    Dear PFF, I just bought a set of Maserati Pistons, a Porsche radiator and a Rolls-Royce head gasket and install them on my Subaru Outback. Now it doesn't run. What's wrong?

    WSS

    "According to our algorithm, Michael Jordan was an o.k. pro."

    BrownsnMoparB BrownsnMopar wrote on last edited by
    #82

    @logicisforsquares said:

    "According to our algorithm, Michael Jordan was an o.k. pro."

    .....and we should draft Dan Marino!!!

  • @logicisforsquares said:

    "According to our algorithm, Michael Jordan was an o.k. pro."

    .....and we should draft Dan Marino!!!

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #83

    @brownsnmopar said:

    .....and we should draft Dan Marino!!!

    The Browns didn't have a first round pick in 1983. They traded it away for ??? who knows what. I think we still had Brian Sipe playing for us then....though he may have moved to the USFL by then. (where he went to work for Donald Trump). Otherwise they had Paul McDonald. Not sure why they thought they didn't need a QB. They drafted WR Ron Brown in the second round that year....who became a decent player....for the Rams. Then they took Reggie Camp.

    Anyone remember what they traded their 1983 1st round pick for? Magic beans?

  • @brownsnmopar said:

    .....and we should draft Dan Marino!!!

    The Browns didn't have a first round pick in 1983. They traded it away for ??? who knows what. I think we still had Brian Sipe playing for us then....though he may have moved to the USFL by then. (where he went to work for Donald Trump). Otherwise they had Paul McDonald. Not sure why they thought they didn't need a QB. They drafted WR Ron Brown in the second round that year....who became a decent player....for the Rams. Then they took Reggie Camp.

    Anyone remember what they traded their 1983 1st round pick for? Magic beans?

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #84

    @the-gipper said:

    Anyone remember what they traded their 1983 1st round pick for? Magic beans?

    Hardly magic anything... Tom Cousineau.

    Bills had the rights to him and we traded our 1983 1st for those rights.

    Bills used the pick to take Jim Kelly.

  • @the-gipper said:

    Anyone remember what they traded their 1983 1st round pick for? Magic beans?

    Hardly magic anything... Tom Cousineau.

    Bills had the rights to him and we traded our 1983 1st for those rights.

    Bills used the pick to take Jim Kelly.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #85

    @tour2ma said:

    Hardly magic anything... Tom Cousineau.

    Bills had the rights to him and we traded our 1983 1st for those rights.

    Bills used the pick to take Jim Kelly.

    Oh, yes, of course. (Insert here sound of hand smacking forehead) "We coulda had a V-8"