Confusion at #2
-
Here's the truth.
There is no qb in this years draft worthy of a high first round pick. How many years can you count that the football talking heads have built up the playing level of a qb and they have turned out to be busts? Plenty. It's not a bad year to have the second pick overall but it's a bad year if you're reaching for a starting qb.
I'll admit the notion of a franchise qb tops everything from a good defense to building up the lines. But this isn't the year. Christian Ponder is a better qb than Wentz or Goff and he sucks.
-
Here's the truth.
There is no qb in this years draft worthy of a high first round pick. How many years can you count that the football talking heads have built up the playing level of a qb and they have turned out to be busts? Plenty. It's not a bad year to have the second pick overall but it's a bad year if you're reaching for a starting qb.
I'll admit the notion of a franchise qb tops everything from a good defense to building up the lines. But this isn't the year. Christian Ponder is a better qb than Wentz or Goff and he sucks.
"One said:
Christian Ponder is a better qb than Wentz or Goff and he sucks.
Functioning eyeballs disagree with this assessment.
-
Here's the truth.
There is no qb in this years draft worthy of a high first round pick. How many years can you count that the football talking heads have built up the playing level of a qb and they have turned out to be busts? Plenty. It's not a bad year to have the second pick overall but it's a bad year if you're reaching for a starting qb.
I'll admit the notion of a franchise qb tops everything from a good defense to building up the lines. But this isn't the year. Christian Ponder is a better qb than Wentz or Goff and he sucks.
One Post From the Truth said:
Here's the truth.
There is no qb in this years draft worthy of a high first round pick. How many years can you count that the football talking heads have built up the playing level of a qb and they have turned out to be busts? Plenty. It's not a bad year to have the second pick overall but it's a bad year if you're reaching for a starting qb.
I'll admit the notion of a franchise qb tops everything from a good defense to building up the lines. But this isn't the year. Christian Ponder is a better qb than Wentz or Goff and he sucks.
If that's the truth, I need me some Jack Nicholson reminding me I can't handle the truth.
Oh wait, you just implied Christy Ponder is better than Wentz and Goff. No Nicholson necessary...
I welcome the only Defensive Coordinator to earn a Superbowl Ring in New Orleans while understanding Revenge of the Nerds is a sequel. "Come get some!" -
"One said:
Christian Ponder is a better qb than Wentz or Goff and he sucks.
Functioning eyeballs disagree with this assessment.
Ya ok. Wait and see. Just don't get mad when the Browns draft a non qb at #2.Functioning eyeballs disagree with this assessment.
-
One Post From the Truth said:
Here's the truth.
There is no qb in this years draft worthy of a high first round pick. How many years can you count that the football talking heads have built up the playing level of a qb and they have turned out to be busts? Plenty. It's not a bad year to have the second pick overall but it's a bad year if you're reaching for a starting qb.
I'll admit the notion of a franchise qb tops everything from a good defense to building up the lines. But this isn't the year. Christian Ponder is a better qb than Wentz or Goff and he sucks.
If that's the truth, I need me some Jack Nicholson reminding me I can't handle the truth.
Oh wait, you just implied Christy Ponder is better than Wentz and Goff. No Nicholson necessary...
Ponder is a better NFL qb. Wentz and Goff have yet to take a snap. They are going to get killed.If that's the truth, I need me some Jack Nicholson reminding me I can't handle the truth.
Oh wait, you just implied Christy Ponder is better than Wentz and Goff. No Nicholson necessary...
-
Ya ok. Wait and see. Just don't get mad when the Browns draft a non qb at #2.Functioning eyeballs disagree with this assessment.
"One said:
Ya ok. Wait and see. Just don't get mad when the Browns draft a non qb at #2.
I won't be mad at all. But I know the two top QBs aren't Christian Ponder 2.0. If they take a top defensive player, I won't get my undies in a knot.
-
Oh, I see Wentz as a kid very well worth a high pick.
Yeah, Goff is the best pure passer... but it seems like
he doesn't have a life or something.
Seriously, google these two guys ,,, the difference is amazing.
What rookie qb IS ready to start, except for going to a
team that is already a playoff team or near to it?
Getting a more value-worthy qb later in the first round one hasn't worked diddley
for the Browns - it's the hardest position on the team to fill. And the competition
is on to get one. Outside of starting experience, I'm trying to figure out what
Wentz doesn't have to be another star qb in the NFL.
-
I'm not going to beat a dead horse. But I do offer a invitation.
Join me in the laughter at the Rams for giving the house up for a night on the town.
-
I'm not going to beat a dead horse. But I do offer a invitation.
Join me in the laughter at the Rams for giving the house up for a night on the town.
One Post From the Truth said:
I'm not going to beat a dead horse. But I do offer a invitation.
Join me in the laughter at the Rams for giving the house up for a night on the town.
Oh that was a fucking stupid move for sure. You don't gamble with that many picks.
-
One Post From the Truth said:
Ponder is a better NFL qb. Wentz and Goff have yet to take a snap. They are going to get killed.
Aikman got killed as a rookie but it never meant Steve Walsh was a better QB like some silly Dallas fans insinuated at the time right? The key is to understand inevitable growing pains early like Jimmy Johnson did up against all his critics thinking he was out of his mind for preferring Aikman to Steve Walsh.3 SB rings later - how did Jimmy do with that?
Ponder is such a terrific NFL QB- Minnesota chose to upgrade him with the 4th QB selected in the 2014 draft. That doesn't strike me as projecting a better NFL future than the first and/or second QB in the 2016 draft. You've had some good posts since you arrived here but I can't join your logic on this.
-
One Post From the Truth said:
Ponder is a better NFL qb. Wentz and Goff have yet to take a snap. They are going to get killed.
Aikman got killed as a rookie but it never meant Steve Walsh was a better QB like some silly Dallas fans insinuated at the time right? The key is to understand inevitable growing pains early like Jimmy Johnson did up against all his critics thinking he was out of his mind for preferring Aikman to Steve Walsh.3 SB rings later - how did Jimmy do with that?
Ponder is such a terrific NFL QB- Minnesota chose to upgrade him with the 4th QB selected in the 2014 draft. That doesn't strike me as projecting a better NFL future than the first and/or second QB in the 2016 draft. You've had some good posts since you arrived here but I can't join your logic on this.
You caught me. I was trying to think of a qb that wasn't playing right now that's better than the two junkyard dogs. Ponder came to mind but a bad choice.Aikman got killed as a rookie but it never meant Steve Walsh was a better QB like some silly Dallas fans insinuated at the time right? The key is to understand inevitable growing pains early like Jimmy Johnson did up against all his critics thinking he was out of his mind for preferring Aikman to Steve Walsh.3 SB rings later - how did Jimmy do with that?
Ponder is such a terrific NFL QB- Minnesota chose to upgrade him with the 4th QB selected in the 2014 draft. That doesn't strike me as projecting a better NFL future than the first and/or second QB in the 2016 draft. You've had some good posts since you arrived here but I can't join your logic on this.
Nevertheless getting RG3 was a true sign of not getting a qb at 2. If we draft a qb at #2 he's going to start and I don't see it with RG3 on the roster.
-
I seriously don't want to sound self absorbed but can't refrain from telling the board how it is.
I said Tunsil wouldn't go #1. Also I said that if RG3 was signed the Browns won't draft a qb in the first round. But no one listened and I feel like the new kid in the movie "Waiting".
One Post From the Truth said:
I seriously don't want to sound self absorbed but can't refrain from telling the board how it is.
I said Tunsil wouldn't go #1. Also I said that if RG3 was signed the Browns won't draft a qb in the first round. But no one listened and I feel like the new kid in the movie "Waiting".
Hey, I listened.
We're all going a little crazy over this, mainly because we're starving for a winner. It doesn't mean one guy is right or one guy is wrong here...we're all Browns fans wanting this team to turn it around.
The only thing I get bent out of shape about is the "trading down" thing some fans are hung up on. It hasn't worked out for us in the past, and that doesn't mean it will work out or not work out now. I just wouldn't do it. The draft is supposed to be designed to help the weaker teams get better, not to trade away the possibility of getting better that a crappy season gives you.
Karlis Missed -
I wonder how many times a huge trade up has been worth it for
a team that paid a high price....
don't know, but I did find this.
-
You caught me. I was trying to think of a qb that wasn't playing right now that's better than the two junkyard dogs. Ponder came to mind but a bad choice.Aikman got killed as a rookie but it never meant Steve Walsh was a better QB like some silly Dallas fans insinuated at the time right? The key is to understand inevitable growing pains early like Jimmy Johnson did up against all his critics thinking he was out of his mind for preferring Aikman to Steve Walsh.3 SB rings later - how did Jimmy do with that?
Ponder is such a terrific NFL QB- Minnesota chose to upgrade him with the 4th QB selected in the 2014 draft. That doesn't strike me as projecting a better NFL future than the first and/or second QB in the 2016 draft. You've had some good posts since you arrived here but I can't join your logic on this.
Nevertheless getting RG3 was a true sign of not getting a qb at 2. If we draft a qb at #2 he's going to start and I don't see it with RG3 on the roster.
One Post From the Truth said:
You caught me. I was trying to think of a qb that wasn't playing right now that's better than the two junkyard dogs. Ponder came to mind but a bad choice.
Nevertheless getting RG3 was a true sign of not getting a qb at 2. If we draft a qb at #2 he's going to start and I don't see it with RG3 on the roster.
You might be right on the RG3 thing; but the lingering question yet to be answered is can RG3 escape injury? He's got 2 brutal injuries in the NFL following 1 brutal injury in college. I'm thinking the RG3 idea, marks a good reason not to race a QB in before he's ready. It wouldn't suck if RG3 gave us a lot more though. If both of the first 2 QBs are seen by our front office and Hue as equitable talent projecting ahead - why not take a pick of the litter at a very important position?
I'm wondering if they don't see Goff and Wentz as equal - how much differently do they view their #2 from their #3 QB? If not much, we could still see a trade-down for more picks. If they see a big drop off from their #1 choice to any of the QBs thereafter, we could see a trade down.
I'm trying not to lose sight of the reality there is a rookie salary cap which could limit our overall draft volume some if we also plan on competing for rookie free agents. That said, it could also open us up to telling a team like Philly - we'll take Wisniewski and your first round pick and a couple other picks. We're not even close to spending enough money up to the recent cba standard so this could help that along some IMO. Philly is just 1 example. Denver can't possibly be planning on Mark Saycheese at QB so there's another team that has vets we can tap via trade plus a a few draft picks. They had a 3rd string edge rusher(Barrett) who we couldn't block last year after Ray got hurt. That would show up here as a massive upgrade to anyone we've been counting on recently.
As I said, earlier on in one of these threads - Dallas seems like a team in despair at QB. Add in Philly's situation and now we have 2 teams from the same division worrying about each other taking their guy potentially. Even better if we're the ones benefitting most of that. It's going to be fun to watch this play out especially if we keep an open mind to it.
-
The analytics thing says to me that there is no way that the Browns are going to rate need over value, and I just can't see them taking a QB at 2 that might not even be in the top 50 of all draft illegible players. In my mind, a QB at 2 has not been and is not now a possibility, especially once RG3 was signed.
I've been surprised before by this team that's for sure.......... The first 30min of the draft should be fun.
-
So, you want the Browns to draft the OT ? A lot more goes into it,
than "top 50 players" rankings.
It's far easier to be a top 50 player on defense. I think qb is the hardest jump
to the NFL to make, and that doesn't seem to be part of the criteria for these rankings.
Probably should compare these rankings like "top 50" against how they did a year or two
after being in the NFL.
-
So, you want the Browns to draft the OT ? A lot more goes into it,
than "top 50 players" rankings.
It's far easier to be a top 50 player on defense. I think qb is the hardest jump
to the NFL to make, and that doesn't seem to be part of the criteria for these rankings.
Probably should compare these rankings like "top 50" against how they did a year or two
after being in the NFL.
What do I want us to do?So, you want the Browns to draft the OT ? A lot more goes into it,
than "top 50 players" rankings.
It's far easier to be a top 50 player on defense. I think qb is the hardest jump
to the NFL to make, and that doesn't seem to be part of the criteria for these rankings.
Probably should compare these rankings like "top 50" against how they did a year or two
after being in the NFL.
Although I predict it does mean I'm right and it sure as heck doesn't mean I want it to happen. I hope I'm wrong.
If Goff is the guy then have the balls to get him. If RG3 put up with Cousins right behind him he can beat out Goff...this year. If Goff isn't the guy get Ramsey.
-
Tunsil is seen by most as the best player in the draft. Tennessee also has a huge need at LT. It made sense.
Tunsil is seen by most as the best player in the draft. Tennessee also has a huge need at LT. It made sense.
Not sure if I'd say most.
-
"One said:
Christian Ponder is a better qb than Wentz or Goff and he sucks.
Functioning eyeballs disagree with this assessment.
Functioning eyeballs disagree with this assessment.
Either that.....or it could be a correct assessment. (Goff being=to Christian Ponder that is)
-
Not sure if I'd say most.
Seemed true for a very long time. Just recently began to hear of "off-field concerns" with Tunsil and he began to fall. But up came Ramsey who plays a position that the Titans also need.
All that said, an offer like the Rams made is a "QB offer" and TN doesn't need one.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login