What two players dont you want in rd 1?

gftChris

Lynch and a CB.

jcam222

The only thing that would make my head explode is an OT at 8. If we do they better have a high pick for this year lined up for JT in order to still get an impact playmaker.

MLD Woody

Wentz and Goff

oh hey! Go us!

Canton Mike

OT & OG.

Give me a PLAYMAKER!

Mike

Flyin J

If we draft an offensive lineman at 8 or 32 ill flip out

darren15

@the-gipper said:

For my honest answer, I don't want any of the OTs. I prefer that JT stay right where he is for the next 8 years or so....and for a ROT....we can get that later.

Also, no DTs. Not if we are going to continue with the 3-4. If this team was to commit to a 4-3, then yes, perhaps. At NT we have Shelton. And he has to come of age and man that position. If we need another backup besides Meder, we can get one later.

What DO I want us to consider in round 1?:

DE....need edge rusher

LBs both inside or out.....ditto

WR or two. We have backups starting for us.

Safety. Losses of Gipson/Whitner hurt. Need replacements

With you Gip...that is why in our mock draft for Cleveland I went DE, OLB, WR

tiamat63

Lynch and Ramsey.

Tour2ma

I knew you'd come around...

Mike H

Myles jack and Paxton lynch

wargograw

Buckner and...

Well, really just Buckner.

I hate Buckner.

LondonBrown

At 8 Lynch and Elliott.

I desperately hope we dont trade up late for Michael Thomas too, there are better receivers than him on day 3. He runs routes slowly too often, bust material for me.

DieHardBrownsFan

No fat ass OL.

LogicIsForSquares

@wargograw said:

Buckner and...

Well, really just Buckner.

I hate Buckner.

I haven't watched any tape on the guy. PFF seems to have a giant chub for him.

KillerInstinct3

I think it's easy to say WR needs to be considered in an early pick. There's no way we go in this with Hartline as our 1.

gftChris

@killerinstinct3 said:
I think it's easy to say WR needs to be considered in an early pick. There's no way we go in this with Hartline as our 1.

I think be prepared for a continuation of the Ray Farmer approach to wide receivers.

wargograw

@logicisforsquares said:
I haven't watched any tape on the guy. PFF seems to have a giant chub for him.

I know. Makes me doubt everything they do

I watched his taps and saw pretty much nothing elite about him at all.

LondonBrown

@gftchris said:
I think be prepared for a continuation of the Ray Farmer approach to wide receivers.

There is no way Hue allows that to continue, he'll have a big say on who we draft.

Tour2ma

@gftchris said:
I think be prepared for a continuation of the Ray Farmer approach to wide receivers.

I'd be shocked if we were still Farmer-rigid concerning WRs... especially ones that will actually attempt and execute downfield blocks.

gftChris

What I mean is, I see us going for the traditional hard-to-get positions early on - QB, tackle, pass rusher. Those guys are pretty hard to find later on, unlike RB, WR, DT, G.

LondonBrown

@gftchris said:
What I mean is, I see us going for the traditional hard-to-get positions early on - QB, tackle, pass rusher. Those guys are pretty hard to find later on, unlike RB, WR, DT, G.

Tyler Boyd or Malcom Mitchell in the 3rd please