Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. What two players dont you want in rd 1?

What two players dont you want in rd 1?

The Browns Board
53 29 2.0k
  • Flyin JF Flyin J wrote on
    #17

    If we draft an offensive lineman at 8 or 32 ill flip out

  • The GipperT The Gipper

    For my honest answer, I don't want any of the OTs. I prefer that JT stay right where he is for the next 8 years or so....and for a ROT....we can get that later.

    Also, no DTs. Not if we are going to continue with the 3-4. If this team was to commit to a 4-3, then yes, perhaps. At NT we have Shelton. And he has to come of age and man that position. If we need another backup besides Meder, we can get one later.

    What DO I want us to consider in round 1?:

    DE....need edge rusher

    LBs both inside or out.....ditto

    WR or two. We have backups starting for us.

    Safety. Losses of Gipson/Whitner hurt. Need replacements

    darren15D darren15 wrote on
    #18

    @the-gipper said:

    For my honest answer, I don't want any of the OTs. I prefer that JT stay right where he is for the next 8 years or so....and for a ROT....we can get that later.

    Also, no DTs. Not if we are going to continue with the 3-4. If this team was to commit to a 4-3, then yes, perhaps. At NT we have Shelton. And he has to come of age and man that position. If we need another backup besides Meder, we can get one later.

    What DO I want us to consider in round 1?:

    DE....need edge rusher

    LBs both inside or out.....ditto

    WR or two. We have backups starting for us.

    Safety. Losses of Gipson/Whitner hurt. Need replacements

    With you Gip...that is why in our mock draft for Cleveland I went DE, OLB, WR

  • tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on
    #19

    Lynch and Ramsey.

  • Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on
    #20

    I knew you'd come around...

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
  • Mike HM Mike H wrote on
    #21

    Myles jack and Paxton lynch

  • W wargograw wrote on
    #22

    Buckner and...

    Well, really just Buckner.

    I hate Buckner.

    LogicIsForSquaresL 1 Reply
  • L LondonBrown wrote on
    #23

    At 8 Lynch and Elliott.

    I desperately hope we dont trade up late for Michael Thomas too, there are better receivers than him on day 3. He runs routes slowly too often, bust material for me.

  • DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on
    #24

    No fat ass OL.

    "You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
  • W wargograw

    Buckner and...

    Well, really just Buckner.

    I hate Buckner.

    LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on
    #25

    @wargograw said:

    Buckner and...

    Well, really just Buckner.

    I hate Buckner.

    I haven't watched any tape on the guy. PFF seems to have a giant chub for him.

    W 1 Reply
  • K KillerInstinct3 wrote on
    #26

    I think it's easy to say WR needs to be considered in an early pick. There's no way we go in this with Hartline as our 1.

    GO BROWNS!!!
  • K KillerInstinct3

    I think it's easy to say WR needs to be considered in an early pick. There's no way we go in this with Hartline as our 1.

    gftChrisG gftChris wrote on
    #27

    @killerinstinct3 said:

    I think it's easy to say WR needs to be considered in an early pick. There's no way we go in this with Hartline as our 1.

    I think be prepared for a continuation of the Ray Farmer approach to wide receivers.

    L Tour2maT The GipperT 3 Replies
  • LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares

    @wargograw said:

    Buckner and...

    Well, really just Buckner.

    I hate Buckner.

    I haven't watched any tape on the guy. PFF seems to have a giant chub for him.

    W wargograw wrote on
    #28

    @logicisforsquares said:

    I haven't watched any tape on the guy. PFF seems to have a giant chub for him.

    I know. Makes me doubt everything they do 😉

    I watched his taps and saw pretty much nothing elite about him at all.

  • gftChrisG gftChris

    @killerinstinct3 said:

    I think it's easy to say WR needs to be considered in an early pick. There's no way we go in this with Hartline as our 1.

    I think be prepared for a continuation of the Ray Farmer approach to wide receivers.

    L LondonBrown wrote on
    #29

    @gftchris said:

    I think be prepared for a continuation of the Ray Farmer approach to wide receivers.

    There is no way Hue allows that to continue, he'll have a big say on who we draft.

  • gftChrisG gftChris

    @killerinstinct3 said:

    I think it's easy to say WR needs to be considered in an early pick. There's no way we go in this with Hartline as our 1.

    I think be prepared for a continuation of the Ray Farmer approach to wide receivers.

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on
    #30

    @gftchris said:

    I think be prepared for a continuation of the Ray Farmer approach to wide receivers.

    I'd be shocked if we were still Farmer-rigid concerning WRs... especially ones that will actually attempt and execute downfield blocks.

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
  • gftChrisG gftChris wrote on
    #31

    What I mean is, I see us going for the traditional hard-to-get positions early on - QB, tackle, pass rusher. Those guys are pretty hard to find later on, unlike RB, WR, DT, G.

    L The GipperT 2 Replies
  • gftChrisG gftChris

    What I mean is, I see us going for the traditional hard-to-get positions early on - QB, tackle, pass rusher. Those guys are pretty hard to find later on, unlike RB, WR, DT, G.

    L LondonBrown wrote on
    #32

    @gftchris said:

    What I mean is, I see us going for the traditional hard-to-get positions early on - QB, tackle, pass rusher. Those guys are pretty hard to find later on, unlike RB, WR, DT, G.

    Tyler Boyd or Malcom Mitchell in the 3rd please

  • L LondonBrown

    @gftchris said:

    What I mean is, I see us going for the traditional hard-to-get positions early on - QB, tackle, pass rusher. Those guys are pretty hard to find later on, unlike RB, WR, DT, G.

    Tyler Boyd or Malcom Mitchell in the 3rd please

    gftChrisG gftChris wrote on
    #33

    @londonbrown said:

    Tyler Boyd or Malcom Mitchell in the 3rd please

    Or Sterling Shepherd, Charone Peake, or a bunch of other guys that can be had later on.

  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #34

    VesnaKociper said:

    Of course you jackoffs don't want Lynch. You didn't want Roethlisberger or Petersen either. God forbid the Browns pick a play maker. Let's draft more OL.

    Who the fuck are you talking to? I have more or less been on your side, saying Lynch may be the guy.

    (and from radio reports, Hue Jackson may also be on your side)

  • gftChrisG gftChris

    @killerinstinct3 said:

    I think it's easy to say WR needs to be considered in an early pick. There's no way we go in this with Hartline as our 1.

    I think be prepared for a continuation of the Ray Farmer approach to wide receivers.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #35

    @gftchris said:

    I think be prepared for a continuation of the Ray Farmer approach to wide receivers.

    I don't think so. I don't think one is in play at #8....but certainly if the Browns move down they could be....and clearly for #32 and #65 they would be.

  • gftChrisG gftChris

    What I mean is, I see us going for the traditional hard-to-get positions early on - QB, tackle, pass rusher. Those guys are pretty hard to find later on, unlike RB, WR, DT, G.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #36

    @gftchris said:

    What I mean is, I see us going for the traditional hard-to-get positions early on - QB, tackle, pass rusher. Those guys are pretty hard to find later on, unlike RB, WR, DT, G.

    sure.....but that is also because those positions are nearly just as much a need for the Browns.....and there appears to be more top flight talent available at those spots than at WR. That is why the WR spot may go 2d/3rd round, not anti-WR philosophy.

Log in to reply