Skip to content

With 5 days left...

The Browns Board
31 22 2.7k
  • trade?

  • where is todd boeckman?

    @coal11794 said:

    where is todd boeckman?

    um....WHAT?!?!?!?!

    And no trade. Thats dumb. Sorry.

  • @coal11794 said:

    where is todd boeckman?

    um....WHAT?!?!?!?!

    And no trade. Thats dumb. Sorry.

    @theclevelandsound said:

    um....WHAT?!?!?!?!

    And no trade. Thats dumb. Sorry.

    it's called a joke. google it.

  • Hard to pass on guys named Ziggy. 😎

    Still thinking...

  • Curry if he is there. Tyson Jackson if he isn't.

  • @theclevelandsound said:

    I know its alot of choices. But any one of these guys could go our way. Its a mystery folks. What would you do? I know what I would do.

    I think if Curry is there you have to take him. If he's not there you try and trade down, if that doesn't work, take Orakpo.

    AdaM said:

    I think if Curry is there you have to take him. If he's not there you try and trade down, if that doesn't work, take Orakpo.

    +1

  • I think that the draft board looks like this:

    1) Curry

    2) Orakpo

    3) Raji

    4) Crabtree

    I don't think they're at all interested in a QB.

  • We take curry if he is there if he isnt we take sanchez if he is still there and wheel and deal...😉

  • Rey Maualuga. Rex Ryan said he sees Rey as the next Ray Lewis, Rob Ryan our DC and Rex's brother, might see things the same way, eye to eye. I see us taking Rey and William Moore.

  • Matthews in my book. late 2nd round I would go after Robiskie

    A lot have picked Curry, I may be wrong but when you continually to drink to much and smoke dope you continue to walk through life in a black out and cant really make correct decisions.

    When it comes to curry & Lauranitus how well did they score in the wonderlic?

    Linebackers

    Clay Matthews: 27

    Brian Cushing: 23

    Rey Maualuga: 15 .... thats not very good, but its still higher than DA 😆

    We need smarter LB's not 3-5 year projects.

  • @letmedowns said:

    It seems like picking in the top 5 this year sucks.

    But I was thinking if we picked Raji and put him at nose and then put rogers at end with williams and with the recently signing of mosley (I believe) and shaun smith coming off the bench for depth. That's a pretty dominate DL.

    You could release R. Smith and pick up more cap room.

    I like Curry but we already have him in Dqwell Jackson.

    In the 2nd round get a pass rushing LB and a WR.

    AND DO NOT TRADE BRAYLON.....

    Why would you release Robaire Smith? If healthy (and they say he is) he is the second best LB we have. S. Smith couldn't carry his jock. As far a Curry, he isn't anything like Jackson. Jackson is playing WILB for a reason, he isn't very good at coverage. Curry is a complete LB, ranked the best player in the draft by almost everyone. Great against the run and drops into coverage very well. IMO he would be a super SILB and compliment Jackson real well. If you draft him as a OLB you better realize he isn't the pure pass rusher.

    And please forget Raji. We have a NT and a couple NTs trying to play DE. You have an all pro NT who isn't going anywhere and holes at OLB, SS and WR along with needs at RB and Center and you want to "REACH" for a guy at the position we are deapest at.

    BTW, Robaire Smith is costing you peanuts so you aren't gaining much cap room. You want cap room, get rid of Fraley and draft a Center in the 2nd round.

  • @letmedowns said:

    It seems like picking in the top 5 this year sucks.

    But I was thinking if we picked Raji and put him at nose and then put rogers at end with williams and with the recently signing of mosley (I believe) and shaun smith coming off the bench for depth. That's a pretty dominate DL.

    You could release R. Smith and pick up more cap room.

    I like Curry but we already have him in Dqwell Jackson.

    In the 2nd round get a pass rushing LB and a WR.

    AND DO NOT TRADE BRAYLON.....

    Why would you release Robaire Smith? If healthy (and they say he is) he is the second best LB we have. S. Smith couldn't carry his jock. As far a Curry, he isn't anything like Jackson. Jackson is playing WILB for a reason, he isn't very good at coverage. Curry is a complete LB, ranked the best player in the draft by almost everyone. Great against the run and drops into coverage very well. IMO he would be a super SILB and compliment Jackson real well. If you draft him as a OLB you better realize he isn't the pure pass rusher.

    And please forget Raji. We have a NT and a couple NTs trying to play DE. You have an all pro NT who isn't going anywhere and holes at OLB, SS and WR along with needs at RB and Center and you want to "REACH" for a guy at the position we are deapest at.

    BTW, Robaire Smith is costing you peanuts so you aren't gaining much cap room. You want cap room, get rid of Fraley and draft a Center in the 2nd round.

    @ytownbrownsbacker said:

    Why would you release Robaire Smith? If healthy (and they say he is) he is the second best LB we have. S. Smith couldn't carry his jock. As far a Curry, he isn't anything like Jackson. Jackson is playing WILB for a reason, he isn't very good at coverage. Curry is a complete LB, ranked the best player in the draft by almost everyone. Great against the run and drops into coverage very well. IMO he would be a super SILB and compliment Jackson real well. If you draft him as a OLB you better realize he isn't the pure pass rusher.

    And please forget Raji. We have a NT and a couple NTs trying to play DE. You have an all pro NT who isn't going anywhere and holes at OLB, SS and WR along with needs at RB and Center and you want to "REACH" for a guy at the position we are deapest at.

    BTW, Robaire Smith is costing you peanuts so you aren't gaining much cap room. You want cap room, get rid of Fraley and draft a Center in the 2nd round.

    Curry played against weak competition last year.Also I don't think curry is as good in coverage as you think but is a great athlete.

    I like the signing of barton to play inside with dqwell so we are going to need a pass rushing LB.

    If we had Raji, we would always have a solid DL on the field which is critical in the 3-4. Rogers is a beast but takes to many plays off. How many sacks did we have last year? We need pressure up front on passing situations.

    Curry will probably be gone anyways.

  • If Braylon is traded before the Browns pick it's Crabtree, if BE is still here then Curry.

  • Rey Maualuga. Rex Ryan said he sees Rey as the next Ray Lewis, Rob Ryan our DC and Rex's brother, might see things the same way, eye to eye. I see us taking Rey and William Moore.

    @playgroundlegend said:

    Rex Ryan said he sees Rey as the next Ray Lewis

    It's too bad he never said that.

    Here's how I see it:

    • 1. Aaron Curry

    2. Brian Orakpo

    3. Michael Crabtree

    4. Jason Smith

  • AdaM said:

    I think if Curry is there you have to take him. If he's not there you try and trade down, if that doesn't work, take Orakpo.

    +1

  • Since it says who I would pick, I didn't hit any of those as no OTs are listed.

    A stud RT would help this team more than anything IMO.

    Control the ball on the ground, and be able to do so in either direction.

    We can't do that right now and that is why we can't score points.

  • Definately trade BE

    Definately stay away from Crabtree

    Definately get anything for DA(expect biggest surprise on this move)

    Definately go offense on top 2 picks

    Defense the rest of the way

    Obviously we should accept offers you just can't turn down(multiple picks, players)

    Wasn't that easy!

  • Definately trade BE

    Definately stay away from Crabtree

    Definately get anything for DA(expect biggest surprise on this move)

    Definately go offense on top 2 picks

    Defense the rest of the way

    Obviously we should accept offers you just can't turn down(multiple picks, players)

    Wasn't that easy!

    @hammertime said:

    Definately go offense on top 2 picks

    our defense was atrocious last year and you want us to go offense with our first two picks? i don't know about that. i think that would create a lot more problems than offer solutions.

  • yay! For the first time on this board I have created a hot topic! 🙂

  • @hammertime said:

    Definately go offense on top 2 picks

    our defense was atrocious last year and you want us to go offense with our first two picks? i don't know about that. i think that would create a lot more problems than offer solutions.

    @clevelandfanforlife said:

    our defense was atrocious last year and you want us to go offense with our first two picks? i don't know about that. i think that would create a lot more problems than offer solutions.

    I'm expecting another top pick.

    Remember our offense didn't score for quite some time last year, forget the excuses its still the NFL and scoring is always the key to winning.

    4 picks in the top 2 rounds asking for offense with the top 2 is not a reach.