Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. mock 2.0

mock 2.0

The Browns Board
48 11 2.8k

  • Looking fairly realistic. Not sure Jacksonville wouldn't take Sanchez, instead of Crabtree, though Crabtree would be real value, could see Jacksonville being able to trade down to Denver, WA or NYJets if Sanchez is there at their pick

    S 1 Reply

  • I just don't think gerrard was problem...the jags lost 3 lineman last year and was the crux of the problem....they just gave him a big contract....just dont buy the hype ....smokescreen to me...I did this with no trades.

  • Yeah, TFY Draft is reporting that they've received a guarantee from one of their sources that the Steelers won't be taking Mack at #32.

    Also, I don't think Seattle's going to take a tackle, especially if Jason Smith's off the board. Walter makes some good points here, and the Seahawks' GM seemed to corroborate those points at a recent presser. I think they'll take Crabtree; I'm assuming their much publicized interest in Sanchez isn't totally sincere.

    S 1 Reply

  • put up your mock aloy... I have to compete with someone...Jason J aint around!!! Also...I'm and have been going back and fourth with KC and Seattle picks...

  • Not done yet, but I should have it ready by tomorrow.

    We should start up the mock draft competition we had last year. IIRC, both you and Heck kicked my ass.

  • fair warning...I've been doing this 26 years...I love draft day. I mean really do....been watching gavel to gavel since its been on TV

    Hardest in years

  • D DieselPusher

    Looking fairly realistic. Not sure Jacksonville wouldn't take Sanchez, instead of Crabtree, though Crabtree would be real value, could see Jacksonville being able to trade down to Denver, WA or NYJets if Sanchez is there at their pick

    @dieselpusher said:

    Looking fairly realistic. Not sure Jacksonville wouldn't take Sanchez, instead of Crabtree, though Crabtree would be real value, could see Jacksonville being able to trade down to Denver, WA or NYJets if Sanchez is there at their pick

    FAIRLY...PUT YOURS UP! BRING IT. What's up Jimbo???

  • I like the mock draft but i think its wishfull thinking curry will fall to us....kc drafted glen dorsey last year and they run a 3-4 there not going to take raji in my opinion but i could be wrong

  • Dorsey is out of position as NT in 3-4...would be a better end. he should be a 4-3 DT but Pioli's track record is DL DL DL... Curry is a good selection here and so is eugene Monroe......I've been going back and forth for weeks on this.

  • S Solon16

    Dorsey is out of position as NT in 3-4...would be a better end. he should be a 4-3 DT but Pioli's track record is DL DL DL... Curry is a good selection here and so is eugene Monroe......I've been going back and forth for weeks on this.

    @solon16 said:

    Dorsey is out of position as NT in 3-4...would be a better end. he should be a 4-3 DT but Pioli's track record is DL DL DL

    Tank Tyler is going to be playing NT for them. That's what he did in college. Dorsey will be an end.

    Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote! - "Ben Franklin"
  • Oldcrow1945O Oldcrow1945

    @solon16 said:

    Dorsey is out of position as NT in 3-4...would be a better end. he should be a 4-3 DT but Pioli's track record is DL DL DL

    Tank Tyler is going to be playing NT for them. That's what he did in college. Dorsey will be an end.

    @oldcrow1945 said:

    Tank Tyler is going to be playing NT for them. That's what he did in college. Dorsey will be an end.

    Put up your mock!

  • S Solon16

    @oldcrow1945 said:

    Tank Tyler is going to be playing NT for them. That's what he did in college. Dorsey will be an end.

    Put up your mock!

    @solon16 said:

    Put up your mock!

    I put up my Brown's mock....I could do the entire thing later tonight or tomorrow though.

    I'm telling ya Solon...the chiefs aren't taking Raji. It's been all over the web that Tyler is moving back to his natural postition. He played it at N.C. State.

    Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote! - "Ben Franklin"

  • thanks but NC state plays a 4-3...Tyler 4-3 DT.

  • S Solon16

    thanks but NC state plays a 4-3...Tyler 4-3 DT.

    @solon16 said:

    thanks but NC state plays a 4-3...Tyler 4-3 DT.

    Now they do...Not under Chuck Amato.

    Tom O'Brian switched back to the 4-3

    Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote! - "Ben Franklin"

  • He came out the same year as Williams and , lawson ...right?

  • S Solon16

    He came out the same year as Williams and , lawson ...right?

    @solon16 said:

    He came out the same year as Williams and , lawson ...right?

    O'Brian was hired in December of 2006...His first season at N.C. State was in 2007. Tyler's first year in the NFL.

    Tyler's entire college career was under Amato in the 3-4 defense.

    Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote! - "Ben Franklin"

  • explain to me then why the starting D-line in 2005 was Williams, McCargo, Tyler and Manny Lawson? google it...4-3

  • S Solon16

    explain to me then why the starting D-line in 2005 was Williams, McCargo, Tyler and Manny Lawson? google it...4-3

    @solon16 said:

    explain to me then why the starting D-line in 2005 was Williams, McCargo, Tyler and Manny Lawson? google it...4-3

    I think they played the 4-3 McCargo's senior year and went back to Amato's 3-4 Tyler's last year.

    Edit: I just talked to a friend of mine. He said Lawson was strictly a LB and then switched to a hybrid OLB-DE in Amato's defense. But that Tyler normally lined up over either guard gap as a NT.

    Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote! - "Ben Franklin"

  • 4~3

    Oldcrow1945O 1 Reply
  • ? Guest

    Yeah, TFY Draft is reporting that they've received a guarantee from one of their sources that the Steelers won't be taking Mack at #32.

    Also, I don't think Seattle's going to take a tackle, especially if Jason Smith's off the board. Walter makes some good points here, and the Seahawks' GM seemed to corroborate those points at a recent presser. I think they'll take Crabtree; I'm assuming their much publicized interest in Sanchez isn't totally sincere.

    Aloysius said:

    Yeah, TFY Draft is reporting that they've received a guarantee from one of their sources that the Steelers won't be taking Mack at #32.

    Also, I don't think Seattle's going to take a tackle, especially if Jason Smith's off the board. Walter makes some good points here, and the Seahawks' GM seemed to corroborate those points at a recent presser. I think they'll take Crabtree; I'm assuming their much publicized interest in Sanchez isn't totally sincere.

    perhaps....Sarkesian was Sanchez's old coach...he might go to Seattle....crabtree/macklin/curry probably go here...don't they need a returner???

Log in to reply