Skip to content

Robiskie

The Browns Board
32 24 3.1k
  • D damajuki wrote on last edited by
    #1

    So far, so good.

    What we're seeing so far is a strong indication we will be run first, pass second.

    Robiskie is a young JJ. Love it.

  • So far, so good.

    What we're seeing so far is a strong indication we will be run first, pass second.

    Robiskie is a young JJ. Love it.

    H H Pac wrote on last edited by
    #2

    @damajuki said:

    What we're seeing so far is a strong indication we will be run first, pass second.

    And we're going to continue to not be able to stop the run, and not be able to put pressure on the passer.

  • So far, so good.

    What we're seeing so far is a strong indication we will be run first, pass second.

    Robiskie is a young JJ. Love it.

    B BigBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
    #3

    @damajuki said:

    So far, so good.

    What we're seeing so far is a strong indication we will be run first, pass second.

    Robiskie is a young JJ. Love it.

    This pick has me perplexed a little.... umm.. our defense STILL sucks?? And Robiskie?

    We feeling sorry for his dad's tenure here or something?

  • So far, so good.

    What we're seeing so far is a strong indication we will be run first, pass second.

    Robiskie is a young JJ. Love it.

    ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by
    #4

    @damajuki said:

    So far, so good.

    What we're seeing so far is a strong indication we will be run first, pass second.

    Robiskie is a young JJ. Love it.

    I agree Juki....I like the pick....a reliable receiver.

    A solid safe pick

  • So far, so good.

    What we're seeing so far is a strong indication we will be run first, pass second.

    Robiskie is a young JJ. Love it.

    DTBHD DTBH wrote on last edited by
    #5

    @damajuki said:

    Robiskie is a young JJ.

    No he isn't, he's a speedster. All Ohio State players are speedsters and heaven forbid you ever compare any of them to a slower player like JJ. Ye must be shunned.

  • N naptimeyeller wrote on last edited by
    #6

    We really need a lb bad, not sure wr should rank above lb.

  • We really need a lb bad, not sure wr should rank above lb.

    N NebBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
    #7

    @naptimeyeller said:

    We really need a lb bad, not sure wr should rank above lb.

    Who else is there besides BE?

  • We really need a lb bad, not sure wr should rank above lb.

    ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by
    #8

    @naptimeyeller said:

    We really need a lb bad, not sure wr should rank above lb.

    The coach is.

    We have a #2 receiver facing serious legal issues.

    Robiskie is a solid pick.

    Some of you guys need to get off what you think and think about everything......not to mention a guy like Rey wasn't taken right after we picked, so it not like someone jumped on our mistake.

    Lets see how it plays out in the next hour or so before we proclaim the sky is falling.

  • S Solon16 wrote on last edited by
    #9

    COULD HAVE GOT HIM AT 50....SICK SICK SICK.......horrible!

  • @naptimeyeller said:

    We really need a lb bad, not sure wr should rank above lb.

    The coach is.

    We have a #2 receiver facing serious legal issues.

    Robiskie is a solid pick.

    Some of you guys need to get off what you think and think about everything......not to mention a guy like Rey wasn't taken right after we picked, so it not like someone jumped on our mistake.

    Lets see how it plays out in the next hour or so before we proclaim the sky is falling.

    R RPrepublic wrote on last edited by
    #10

    @ballpeen said:

    The coach is.

    We have a #2 receiver facing serious legal issues.

    Robiskie is a solid pick.

    Some of you guys need to get off what you think and think about everything......not to mention a guy like Rey wasn't taken right after we picked, so it not like someone jumped on our mistake.

    Lets see how it plays out in the next hour or so before we proclaim the sky is falling.

    Agreed. There are so many needs on the team that really any good solid players in any position will help out a lot. I like what we've done so far. The trade of the number 5 was fantastic we picked up a second and 3 players and just moved down 12 spots. This is GREAT so far...

  • COULD HAVE GOT HIM AT 50....SICK SICK SICK.......horrible!

    ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by
    #11

    @solon16 said:

    COULD HAVE GOT HIM AT 50....SICK SICK SICK.......horrible!

    How do you know??? You don't is the correct answer.

  • next2nothingN next2nothing wrote on last edited by
    #12

    With the way the 1st round went I don't think any of us know who will or won't be there when we pick next.

  • P playerjdd wrote on last edited by
    #13

    I dont think Robiskie would have fallen to 50th. ReyRey would have been nice but Robiskie is a great reciver that is solid. The more i see people moving up the more i realize we got ripped just getting 6th rounders.

  • GipsG Gips wrote on last edited by
    #14

    Zombo said:

    Loving this draft so far. WR was our thinnest position.

    A+ so far...

    Don't forget the players we picked up from jets... Abrahams will start at safety.

    Zombo

    Im giving mankok a solid A the plus only comes if we pick up a couple potential LBs and a RB...๐Ÿ˜‰

  • G Greythan wrote on last edited by
    #15

    6 WR's picked in round one, right? Robiske wouldn't have slid to 50.

  • J JC wrote on last edited by
    #16

    No way Robo would have fallen to 50. If anything the bears would have taken him at 49, but I think he would have been scooped up before that. Solid pick. I am happy with the picks so far.

  • COULD HAVE GOT HIM AT 50....SICK SICK SICK.......horrible!

    N ndneighbor wrote on last edited by
    #17

    @solon16 said:

    COULD HAVE GOT HIM AT 50....SICK SICK SICK.......horrible!

    The ESPN tracker said he would be contributing immediately.

    Do you at least agree with that?

  • N ndneighbor wrote on last edited by
    #18

    This is where we find out.

  • plumcrazy73P plumcrazy73 wrote on last edited by
    #19

    don't understand this one, if we were going offense should have been RB but hey what do i know

  • SoCalBrownsFanS SoCalBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
    #20

    WTF, another WR. How about some defense Browns? How about a RB?