Draft Talk
-
I don't want any if the QBs playing college football right now. None of them are first round picks..yet. It could change. The Browns should trade the Eagles pick for Jimmy Garapolo.
I don't want any if the QBs playing college football right now. None of them are first round picks..yet. It could change. The Browns should trade the Eagles pick for Jimmy Garapolo.
Why would the Pats trade the heir apparent to their 39 year old QB? People here are delusional about the Pats trading away Garapolo.
-
I don't want any if the QBs playing college football right now. None of them are first round picks..yet. It could change. The Browns should trade the Eagles pick for Jimmy Garapolo.
Why would the Pats trade the heir apparent to their 39 year old QB? People here are delusional about the Pats trading away Garapolo.
People here are delusional about the Pats trading away Garapolo.
fixed...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
People here are delusional about the Pats trading away Garapolo.
fixed...
fixed...
Beat me to it. A year ago it was Ryan Mallet we should trade a first for. The year before that it was Foles. The year before that it was Mettenberger. A few year before that it was Flynn.
Crazy to think that Mallett, Mettenberger, Foles and Flynn are the top 4 QB's this year, isn't it? If only we'd have traded for them, we'd be set.
-
fixed...
Beat me to it. A year ago it was Ryan Mallet we should trade a first for. The year before that it was Foles. The year before that it was Mettenberger. A few year before that it was Flynn.
Crazy to think that Mallett, Mettenberger, Foles and Flynn are the top 4 QB's this year, isn't it? If only we'd have traded for them, we'd be set.
Beat me to it. A year ago it was Ryan Mallet we should trade a first for. The year before that it was Foles. The year before that it was Mettenberger. A few year before that it was Flynn.
Crazy to think that Mallett, Mettenberger, Foles and Flynn are the top 4 QB's this year, isn't it? If only we'd have traded for them, we'd be set.
On a positive note... no one is demanding we trade for DA this week. I guess his fan base found a 3-turnover, MNF start to be off-putting.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Beat me to it. A year ago it was Ryan Mallet we should trade a first for. The year before that it was Foles. The year before that it was Mettenberger. A few year before that it was Flynn.
Crazy to think that Mallett, Mettenberger, Foles and Flynn are the top 4 QB's this year, isn't it? If only we'd have traded for them, we'd be set.
On a positive note... no one is demanding we trade for DA this week. I guess his fan base found a 3-turnover, MNF start to be off-putting.
On a positive note... no one is demanding we trade for DA this week. I guess his fan base found a 3-turnover, MNF start to be off-putting.
Boy that was the easiest pick of hte weekend.. I knew DA had that soul crushing game changing interception in him. Just had to wait a bit for it but god it looked so familiar.
-
On a positive note... no one is demanding we trade for DA this week. I guess his fan base found a 3-turnover, MNF start to be off-putting.
Boy that was the easiest pick of hte weekend.. I knew DA had that soul crushing game changing interception in him. Just had to wait a bit for it but god it looked so familiar.
Boy that was the easiest pick of hte weekend.. I knew DA had that soul crushing game changing interception in him. Just had to wait a bit for it but god it looked so familiar.
I walked around work with an extra pep in my step.
My office is a block from the stadium and all week all I heard from my coworkers was "How could you let DA go, dude is a better QB than half of the starters in the league."
Needless to say...today was a quiet day.
-
But I expect OSUs QB to always be mentioned with the Heismen.
Miller and Garrett certainly deserved mentioned. Not so much Cardale.
Miller and Garrett certainly deserved mentioned. Not so much Cardale.
None of them deserved/s mention in the hesman discussion.
-
Miller and Garrett certainly deserved mentioned. Not so much Cardale.
None of them deserved/s mention in the hesman discussion.
None of them deserved/s mention in the hesman discussion.
Of course they do. Miller in fact was very high in the Heisman voting one year...finishing 5th in 2012 and 9th once.
Barrett will be very high this year....probably not win, but he is generally thought to be one of the top 3 candidates everywhere I have looked. And in 2014 he finished 5th.
Cardale, no. Not even a full time starter at any point.
So, finishing 5th is a "mention" for certain.
-
None of them deserved/s mention in the hesman discussion.
Of course they do. Miller in fact was very high in the Heisman voting one year...finishing 5th in 2012 and 9th once.
Barrett will be very high this year....probably not win, but he is generally thought to be one of the top 3 candidates everywhere I have looked. And in 2014 he finished 5th.
Cardale, no. Not even a full time starter at any point.
So, finishing 5th is a "mention" for certain.
Cardale, no. Not even a full time starter at any point.
Except for that whole BIG10-championship/college-playoff-run thing... yeah...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Cardale, no. Not even a full time starter at any point.
Except for that whole BIG10-championship/college-playoff-run thing... yeah...
Except for that whole BIG10-championship/college-playoff-run thing... yeah...
Does a three game stretch because of injury to the first choice count as "full time starter" now?
-
-
Mitch, Mitch, Mitch
-
made the number 10 defense in the nation look like bowling green all game they were talking about how Mitch was a better pro prospect than the "Deshauns" and Kaaya. his comparison was a Much Much more athletic Kirk Cousins but hey thats what the announcers were saying
-
Deshone Kizer just got benched for performance reasons
not a good game to do that especially with the browns scouts watching.Alright so because qb seems to be the focus. the stats for the top 6?
Luke Falk 28/48 261 0 TD 1 INT 47.2 rat
7 rush for -1
D. Watson 39/52 378 2 TD 1 INT 80.6 rat
13 rush for 38 yds and 1 TD
C. Kelly 18/39 253 1 TD 1 INT 52.5 rat
14 rush for 89 yds and 2 TD
B. Kaaya 16/31 224 0 TD 0 INT 27.9 rat
2 rush for -17
M. Trubisky 33/46 299 2 TD 0 INT 75.0 rat
13 rush for 47 yds
D. Kizer 14/26 154 0 TD 2 INT 43.7 rat
11 rush for 83 yds and 1 TD
1.Watson
2.Mitch
3.Kelly
4.Falk
5.Kaaya
6.Kizer
Btw Kaaya lacks in a lot of attributes but he has a great play action motion
-
I like Trubisky next year and Hornibrook the year after. Those are attributes I could work with.
-
Deshone Kizer just got benched for performance reasons
not a good game to do that especially with the browns scouts watching.Alright so because qb seems to be the focus. the stats for the top 6?
Luke Falk 28/48 261 0 TD 1 INT 47.2 rat
7 rush for -1
D. Watson 39/52 378 2 TD 1 INT 80.6 rat
13 rush for 38 yds and 1 TD
C. Kelly 18/39 253 1 TD 1 INT 52.5 rat
14 rush for 89 yds and 2 TD
B. Kaaya 16/31 224 0 TD 0 INT 27.9 rat
2 rush for -17
M. Trubisky 33/46 299 2 TD 0 INT 75.0 rat
13 rush for 47 yds
D. Kizer 14/26 154 0 TD 2 INT 43.7 rat
11 rush for 83 yds and 1 TD
1.Watson
2.Mitch
3.Kelly
4.Falk
5.Kaaya
6.Kizer
Btw Kaaya lacks in a lot of attributes but he has a great play action motion
Deshone Kizer just got benched for performance reasons
not a good game to do that especially with the browns scouts watching.Alright so because qb seems to be the focus. the stats for the top 6? Throwing falk in even though i only have 1 half
Luke Falk 17/29 137 0 TD 1 INT 56.25 rat
1 rush for -5
D. Watson 39/52 378 2 TD 1 INT 80.6 rat
13 rush for 38 yds and 1 TD
C. Kelly 18/39 253 1 TD 1 INT 52.5 rat
14 rush for 89 yds and 2 TD
B. Kaaya 16/31 224 0 TD 0 INT 27.9 rat
2 rush for -17
M. Trubisky 33/46 299 2 TD 0 INT 75.0 rat
13 rush for 47 yds
D. Kizer 14/26 154 0 TD 2 INT 43.7 rat
11 rush for 83 yds and 1 TD
1.Watson
2.Mitch
3.Kelly
4.Kaaya
5.Kizer
Falk incomplete i'm expecting him to do better than kaaya but not as good as Kelly. Btw Kaaya lacks in a lot of attributes but he has a great play action motion
Just more evidence to me that doing the usual jump up for an overrated QB would be so Brownsian with such a wealth of defensive talent in this draft class. I'm telling ya we got to load up this year with D or we will never be able to keep the performance pressure off a new QB. This class is so strong with edge rushers, safeties and interior DL. Just take 'em!
-
Deshone Kizer just got benched for performance reasons
not a good game to do that especially with the browns scouts watching.Alright so because qb seems to be the focus. the stats for the top 6? Throwing falk in even though i only have 1 half
Luke Falk 17/29 137 0 TD 1 INT 56.25 rat
1 rush for -5
D. Watson 39/52 378 2 TD 1 INT 80.6 rat
13 rush for 38 yds and 1 TD
C. Kelly 18/39 253 1 TD 1 INT 52.5 rat
14 rush for 89 yds and 2 TD
B. Kaaya 16/31 224 0 TD 0 INT 27.9 rat
2 rush for -17
M. Trubisky 33/46 299 2 TD 0 INT 75.0 rat
13 rush for 47 yds
D. Kizer 14/26 154 0 TD 2 INT 43.7 rat
11 rush for 83 yds and 1 TD
1.Watson
2.Mitch
3.Kelly
4.Kaaya
5.Kizer
Falk incomplete i'm expecting him to do better than kaaya but not as good as Kelly. Btw Kaaya lacks in a lot of attributes but he has a great play action motion
Just more evidence to me that doing the usual jump up for an overrated QB would be so Brownsian with such a wealth of defensive talent in this draft class. I'm telling ya we got to load up this year with D or we will never be able to keep the performance pressure off a new QB. This class is so strong with edge rushers, safeties and interior DL. Just take 'em!
Just more evidence to me that doing the usual jump up for an overrated QB would be so Brownsian with such a wealth of defensive talent in this draft class. I'm telling ya we got to load up this year with D or we will never be able to keep the performance pressure off a new QB. This class is so strong with edge rushers, safeties and interior DL. Just take 'em!
Evidence tells me you can do both.
That you don't have to "jump" to grab a QB prospect.
That if there is true "depth" on the D-side, there will be quality D players available through the first two days of the draft.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Well if trubisky can keep this play up throughout the rest of the season we may end up taking him 1a and going CB on 1b followed by C on 2a which would be acceptable if he even declares but it ahould be noted that at mitch's current pace he will end this year with more passing attempts than wentz had
-
Deshone Kizer just got benched for performance reasons
not a good game to do that especially with the browns scouts watching.Alright so because qb seems to be the focus. the stats for the top 6? Throwing falk in even though i only have 1 half
Luke Falk 17/29 137 0 TD 1 INT 56.25 rat
1 rush for -5
D. Watson 39/52 378 2 TD 1 INT 80.6 rat
13 rush for 38 yds and 1 TD
C. Kelly 18/39 253 1 TD 1 INT 52.5 rat
14 rush for 89 yds and 2 TD
B. Kaaya 16/31 224 0 TD 0 INT 27.9 rat
2 rush for -17
M. Trubisky 33/46 299 2 TD 0 INT 75.0 rat
13 rush for 47 yds
D. Kizer 14/26 154 0 TD 2 INT 43.7 rat
11 rush for 83 yds and 1 TD
1.Watson
2.Mitch
3.Kelly
4.Kaaya
5.Kizer
Falk incomplete i'm expecting him to do better than kaaya but not as good as Kelly. Btw Kaaya lacks in a lot of attributes but he has a great play action motion
Just more evidence to me that doing the usual jump up for an overrated QB would be so Brownsian with such a wealth of defensive talent in this draft class. I'm telling ya we got to load up this year with D or we will never be able to keep the performance pressure off a new QB. This class is so strong with edge rushers, safeties and interior DL. Just take 'em!
Just more evidence to me that doing the usual jump up for an overrated QB would be so Brownsian with such a wealth of defensive talent in this draft class. I'm telling ya we got to load up this year with D or we will never be able to keep the performance pressure off a new QB. This class is so strong with edge rushers, safeties and interior DL. Just take 'em!
I agree completely. Go with Kessler for another season unless he totally shits the bed the rest of the way but he's look decent enough in what we've seen so far this year that you could go with him and build a defense. Follow the Vikings plan. The offense is an afterthought and they're 5-0
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login