Skip to content

0-7. When will the first win come?

The Browns Board
31 17 1.3k
  • I say when we make the first pick in the draft. Or we trade that pick for more picks that we will screw up

    How can anyone think anything different?

    It's been since 1999, and we have taken the #1 Qb

    Didn't work

    We have traded out of the top 3. Numerous times

    Didn't work

    We have taken Def in the top 3

    Didn't work

    GO TRIBE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • We can't be as bad as the 2008 lions.....

  • Next week, home against the Gino Smith led Jets.

  • Time to pick through the bones of that lot I guess, or another round of the good, the bad, and the erving.

    Bad:

    - QBs getting hit. This needs to stop. It's not all on the O-line as there were times yesterday when guys came around the edge unblocked, there were times when Kessler/Hogan held on trying to make something happen, presumably because there was no separation from the receivers, or trying to force a stoopid shovel pass ten yards when in FG position...

    - Those receivers. It's painfully obvious that we're lacking anything of note at the position when Pryor's not in the game. Hopefully Coleman picks up where he left off in his only two appearances of the year (173 yards and 2TDs), but even so, we can see we're going to need more from the rookies or Hawkins.

    - Missed tackles are unacceptable anywhere, ever. Jeremy Hill is not Shady McCoy. On top of that, it seemed after every time one of our defenders met the ball carrier, they got an extra 3-4 yards instead of being met in the hole and stopped.

    Ugly:

    - the D in general...specifically:

    - Cornerbacks. With no Joe Haden, we're left with a so-far-over-the-hill-he-can't-see-it-anymore Tramon Williams who can't keep pace with anyone; Disney presents Jamar Taylor ON ICE; and briean boddy-calhoun, an undrafted guy who was cut by the jags, joined us in September and looks like the least incompetent of the lot. Low bar. Side note: I'd be game for tradin' haden if we got anything substantial in return. The best ability is availability etc.

    - Safeties. When corners got beat, they weren't in a position to help. Maybe schematically, but the job of the high safety is to sweep up those things and ball hawk. Tracy Howard, a converted college corner in his first NFL start ever being asked to play safety, is not going to be up to the task. Sorry Tracy. They were often late to the tackle in run support too.

    - Run D. We all had (relatively) high hopes for the run game, having looked much 'stouter' with Shelton, Meder and Nassib up front. And, while there was some success stopping the run up the middle, they ran for 260 yards. 260. That's two games worth of bad run D in one. Or to put it another way, if we hold the Jets to no rushing yards, our average over the two games would still be ranked 30th. There's a lot of blame to go around, from OLBs not doing their job, tacklers giving up 5 yards after contact to turn what should be 3rd and 4 in to a first down, missed tackles, and maybe scheme, I don't know enough about that one though.

    The good! And there was at least some good yesterday.

    - The run game picked up again. Not excessively, but Crowell had 65 yards from 12 carries, which included once or twice slipping in the backfield. Kevin Hogan was running wild on the brothers at every opportunity which probably helped, but either way, we found a way to move the ball on the ground, to the tune of 180 yards.

    - Special teams wasn't a mess. Solid punting and coverage, no kicks missed, they did their job. I'm not sure how much credit they get for the two missed field goals but we can at least call the special teams battle a win for us this week.

    - Gary Barnidge had a nice game, making some clutch catches.

    - Hue Jackson had a plan on how to attack the bengals. Who saw Kevin Hogan running the read option as a possibility before it happened? It kept them off balance, gave Kessler time to speak with the coaches mid drive, and picked up some chunk yardage. We might be 0-7, but does anyone think Hue Jackson is a worse coach than Mike Pettine? Pat Shurmur?

    - Two sacks for Ogbah. Lovely. He's still struggling to get past tackles, but keeps playing and trying hard and if the coverage is decent, he ends up getting there.

    - Hey, nice strip John Greco. Can you play DL?

    Other things to be decided:

    - Spencer Drango got the start at left guard over Alvin Bailey and didn't seem to be horrendous. Shon Coleman got some time at right tackle with Pasztor struggling badly. So that's nice. Hopefully someone with more knowledge can tell us how they did.

    - Erving got injured. Normally injuries to first round draft picks and starters are considered bad, but Erv is a special case.

    - the body calhoun had some nice moments but some less nice moments. He kinda reminds me of Buster Skrine for some reason?

    - Hogan has a long windup it seems to me. Not a surprise to see tipped balls.

  • We can't be as bad as the 2008 lions.....

    @stillmotion said:

    We can't be as bad as the 2008 lions.....

    Don't put money on that one my friend. If we lose to the Jets, then I really believe it's 0-20. I can't seem to see any areas that are improving. Unless you count drawing a higher vacuum. 6 Qbs and counting after 7 games is not on the good side of record books but we own that too. My only real question to all the Kool aid drinkers would be.... Where is there improvement on the field? So far it's just been replace the old suck with new suck.

  • Next week, home against the Gino Smith led Jets.

    @gftchris said:

    Next week, home against the Gino Smith led Jets.

    Fitzgerald is back and Smith gets an MRI today on his injured knee.

    BTW Hoyer now out with a broken arm in Chicago.

    Edit: And the Giants are now 4-3 and only a game and 1/2 behind the boys, so I don't think so. They actually have a legit D. It's the Jets or nobody now.

  • Damn, missed that. Oh well, still think we get a win next week, Ryan Beardpatrick stepped in it good an proper when he said everyone had quit on him.

  • Damn, missed that. Oh well, still think we get a win next week, Ryan Beardpatrick stepped in it good an proper when he said everyone had quit on him.

    @gftchris said:

    Damn, missed that. Oh well, still think we get a win next week, Ryan Beardpatrick stepped in it good an proper when he said everyone had quit on him.

    Yep, but they did respond to him and he led them to the win yesterday.

  • Indeed, but I still can see us pulling out the W there.

    In related news, through game seven, we've had five road games, and only two home games (ravens and patriots). The second half of the season - basically every team is a tough game because we're that bad, but being at home for six out of nine should help a decent amount.

  • Chris, if primary edge rushers come around the edge unchecked...thats always on the o line. You just typo'd there right?

  • Indeed, but I still can see us pulling out the W there.

    In related news, through game seven, we've had five road games, and only two home games (ravens and patriots). The second half of the season - basically every team is a tough game because we're that bad, but being at home for six out of nine should help a decent amount.

    @gftchris said:

    Indeed, but I still can see us pulling out the W there.

    In related news, through game seven, we've had five road games, and only two home games (ravens and patriots). The second half of the season - basically every team is a tough game because we're that bad, but being at home for six out of nine should help a decent amount.

    I understand where you're coming from on this. And you should be right. With the World Series here this week and the team going nowhere for so many years now, locally, they are becoming an afterthought. There will be so many fans from opposing teams here that it may as well be a road game. It's been going that direction for some time now and not getting better. Say.. "Go Tribe" or "Go Cav's" out loud anywhere in NE Ohio and you will get a fist pump and a YA! Back at ya. Say "Go Browns" out loud.......crickets chirping and people snickering is the only thing you will hear back. And it's not about a SB either. We just want to be relevant again.
  • Chris, if primary edge rushers come around the edge unchecked...thats always on the o line. You just typo'd there right?

    @clevfan4life said:

    Chris, if primary edge rushers come around the edge unchecked...thats always on the o line. You just typo'd there right?

    Depends on the scheme? Might be relying on a tight end to block (seen it happen), might be looking for a quick out that doesn't give time for the rush to develop, which in turn was covered, could be looking for a running back to chip, could be a bunch of different things.

    Besides, it certainly wasn't always primary edge rushers coming through unchecked, but blitzers as well.

  • @clevfan4life said:

    Chris, if primary edge rushers come around the edge unchecked...thats always on the o line. You just typo'd there right?

    Depends on the scheme? Might be relying on a tight end to block (seen it happen), might be looking for a quick out that doesn't give time for the rush to develop, which in turn was covered, could be looking for a running back to chip, could be a bunch of different things.

    Besides, it certainly wasn't always primary edge rushers coming through unchecked, but blitzers as well.

    @gftchris said:

    Depends on the scheme? Might be relying on a tight end to block (seen it happen), might be looking for a quick out that doesn't give time for the rush to develop, which in turn was covered, could be looking for a running back to chip, could be a bunch of different things.

    Besides, it certainly wasn't always primary edge rushers coming through unchecked, but blitzers as well.

    Almost everytime primary rushers come unchecked u see a quick pass tonthe other side or an underneath route to a spilling out RB. Those are usually easy to see even if they get botched. I saw normal pocket protection that just plain missed stunting rushers. It happens to every o line i get that. But clearly indicative by our decades long rebolving door at qb more often than mot because of injury, the browns just have a generational inability to keep our QB's upright

  • Week 13 will feel like a win .....

  • @gftchris said:

    Depends on the scheme? Might be relying on a tight end to block (seen it happen), might be looking for a quick out that doesn't give time for the rush to develop, which in turn was covered, could be looking for a running back to chip, could be a bunch of different things.

    Besides, it certainly wasn't always primary edge rushers coming through unchecked, but blitzers as well.

    Almost everytime primary rushers come unchecked u see a quick pass tonthe other side or an underneath route to a spilling out RB. Those are usually easy to see even if they get botched. I saw normal pocket protection that just plain missed stunting rushers. It happens to every o line i get that. But clearly indicative by our decades long rebolving door at qb more often than mot because of injury, the browns just have a generational inability to keep our QB's upright

    @clevfan4life said:

    Almost everytime primary rushers come unchecked u see a quick pass tonthe other side or an underneath route to a spilling out RB. Those are usually easy to see even if they get botched. I saw normal pocket protection that just plain missed stunting rushers. It happens to every o line i get that. But clearly indicative by our decades long rebolving door at qb more often than mot because of injury, the browns just have a generational inability to keep our QB's upright

    If they're putting 8 men 'in the box' (I hate clichés), then the best OL in the world is going to leave someone unblocked. You need your TEs to pitch in, you need to not give their a chance to get home.

  • I still say the Browns win a couple before it's over. At Ratbirds, home vs NYJ or SD.

  • The home divisional games could be winnable. If this team improves just a little bit at each position - likely, with rookies - then the whole becomes a lot better.

  • @gftchris said:

    Depends on the scheme? Might be relying on a tight end to block (seen it happen), might be looking for a quick out that doesn't give time for the rush to develop, which in turn was covered, could be looking for a running back to chip, could be a bunch of different things.

    Besides, it certainly wasn't always primary edge rushers coming through unchecked, but blitzers as well.

    Almost everytime primary rushers come unchecked u see a quick pass tonthe other side or an underneath route to a spilling out RB. Those are usually easy to see even if they get botched. I saw normal pocket protection that just plain missed stunting rushers. It happens to every o line i get that. But clearly indicative by our decades long rebolving door at qb more often than mot because of injury, the browns just have a generational inability to keep our QB's upright

    @clevfan4life said:

    ...the browns just have a generational inability to keep our QB's upright

    Is your statement based on knock-downs? I ask because we are nowhere near on-pace for the sacked-by record...

  • As of now it looks like the JETS are the only team we can get a win against, but iam not calling it a sure win.

  • Which one is Zombo ?

    14721473_10153703271591653_7366114475366